CINXE.COM

Philosophy of science - Wikipedia

<!DOCTYPE html> <html class="client-nojs skin-theme-clientpref-day mf-expand-sections-clientpref-0 mf-font-size-clientpref-small mw-mf-amc-clientpref-0" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>Philosophy of science - Wikipedia</title> <script>(function(){var className="client-js skin-theme-clientpref-day mf-expand-sections-clientpref-0 mf-font-size-clientpref-small mw-mf-amc-clientpref-0";var cookie=document.cookie.match(/(?:^|; )enwikimwclientpreferences=([^;]+)/);if(cookie){cookie[1].split('%2C').forEach(function(pref){className=className.replace(new RegExp('(^| )'+pref.replace(/-clientpref-\w+$|[^\w-]+/g,'')+'-clientpref-\\w+( |$)'),'$1'+pref+'$2');});}document.documentElement.className=className;}());RLCONF={"wgBreakFrames":false,"wgSeparatorTransformTable":["",""],"wgDigitTransformTable":["",""],"wgDefaultDateFormat":"dmy","wgMonthNames":["","January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"],"wgRequestId":"afa27122-8ea4-48c9-9cc1-fdae40b5eca0","wgCanonicalNamespace":"","wgCanonicalSpecialPageName":false,"wgNamespaceNumber":0,"wgPageName":"Philosophy_of_science","wgTitle":"Philosophy of science","wgCurRevisionId":1254841328,"wgRevisionId":1254841328, "wgArticleId":37010,"wgIsArticle":true,"wgIsRedirect":false,"wgAction":"view","wgUserName":null,"wgUserGroups":["*"],"wgPageViewLanguage":"en","wgPageContentLanguage":"en","wgPageContentModel":"wikitext","wgRelevantPageName":"Philosophy_of_science","wgRelevantArticleId":37010,"wgIsProbablyEditable":true,"wgRelevantPageIsProbablyEditable":true,"wgRestrictionEdit":[],"wgRestrictionMove":[],"wgNoticeProject":"wikipedia","wgCiteReferencePreviewsActive":false,"wgFlaggedRevsParams":{"tags":{"status":{"levels":1}}},"wgMediaViewerOnClick":true,"wgMediaViewerEnabledByDefault":true,"wgPopupsFlags":0,"wgVisualEditor":{"pageLanguageCode":"en","pageLanguageDir":"ltr","pageVariantFallbacks":"en"},"wgMFMode":"stable","wgMFAmc":false,"wgMFAmcOutreachActive":false,"wgMFAmcOutreachUserEligible":false,"wgMFLazyLoadImages":true,"wgMFEditNoticesFeatureConflict":false,"wgMFDisplayWikibaseDescriptions":{"search":true,"watchlist":true,"tagline":false,"nearby":true},"wgMFIsSupportedEditRequest":true, "wgMFScriptPath":"","wgWMESchemaEditAttemptStepOversample":false,"wgWMEPageLength":100000,"wgRelatedArticlesCompat":[],"wgCentralAuthMobileDomain":true,"wgEditSubmitButtonLabelPublish":true,"wgSectionTranslationMissingLanguages":[{"lang":"ace","autonym":"Acèh","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ady","autonym":"адыгабзэ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"alt","autonym":"алтай тил","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ami","autonym":"Pangcah","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"an","autonym":"aragonés","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ang","autonym":"Ænglisc","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ann","autonym":"Obolo","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"anp","autonym":"अंगिका","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ary","autonym":"الدارجة","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"arz","autonym":"مصرى","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"av","autonym":"авар","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"avk","autonym":"Kotava","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"awa","autonym":"अवधी","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ay","autonym":"Aymar aru","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"azb","autonym":"تۆرکجه","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"ba", "autonym":"башҡортса","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ban","autonym":"Basa Bali","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bar","autonym":"Boarisch","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bbc","autonym":"Batak Toba","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bcl","autonym":"Bikol Central","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bdr","autonym":"Bajau Sama","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"be","autonym":"беларуская","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bew","autonym":"Betawi","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bho","autonym":"भोजपुरी","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bi","autonym":"Bislama","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bjn","autonym":"Banjar","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"blk","autonym":"ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bm","autonym":"bamanankan","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bo","autonym":"བོད་ཡིག","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bpy","autonym":"বিষ্ণুপ্রিয়া মণিপুরী","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"br","autonym":"brezhoneg","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"bs","autonym":"bosanski","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"btm","autonym":"Batak Mandailing","dir":"ltr"},{"lang": "bug","autonym":"Basa Ugi","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"cdo","autonym":"閩東語 / Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ce","autonym":"нохчийн","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ceb","autonym":"Cebuano","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ch","autonym":"Chamoru","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"chr","autonym":"ᏣᎳᎩ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"co","autonym":"corsu","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"cr","autonym":"Nēhiyawēwin / ᓀᐦᐃᔭᐍᐏᐣ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"crh","autonym":"qırımtatarca","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"cu","autonym":"словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"cy","autonym":"Cymraeg","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"dag","autonym":"dagbanli","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"dga","autonym":"Dagaare","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"din","autonym":"Thuɔŋjäŋ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"diq","autonym":"Zazaki","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"dsb","autonym":"dolnoserbski","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"dtp","autonym":"Kadazandusun","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"dv","autonym":"ދިވެހިބަސް","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"dz","autonym": "ཇོང་ཁ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ee","autonym":"eʋegbe","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"eml","autonym":"emiliàn e rumagnòl","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"fat","autonym":"mfantse","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ff","autonym":"Fulfulde","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"fj","autonym":"Na Vosa Vakaviti","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"fo","autonym":"føroyskt","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"fon","autonym":"fɔ̀ngbè","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"frp","autonym":"arpetan","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"frr","autonym":"Nordfriisk","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"fur","autonym":"furlan","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"fy","autonym":"Frysk","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"gag","autonym":"Gagauz","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"gan","autonym":"贛語","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"glk","autonym":"گیلکی","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"gn","autonym":"Avañe'ẽ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"gom","autonym":"गोंयची कोंकणी / Gõychi Konknni","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"gor","autonym":"Bahasa Hulontalo","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"gpe","autonym":"Ghanaian Pidgin","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"gu","autonym": "ગુજરાતી","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"guc","autonym":"wayuunaiki","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"gur","autonym":"farefare","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"guw","autonym":"gungbe","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"gv","autonym":"Gaelg","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ha","autonym":"Hausa","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"hak","autonym":"客家語 / Hak-kâ-ngî","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"haw","autonym":"Hawaiʻi","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"hif","autonym":"Fiji Hindi","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"hr","autonym":"hrvatski","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"hsb","autonym":"hornjoserbsce","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ht","autonym":"Kreyòl ayisyen","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"hyw","autonym":"Արեւմտահայերէն","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ia","autonym":"interlingua","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"iba","autonym":"Jaku Iban","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ie","autonym":"Interlingue","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ig","autonym":"Igbo","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"igl","autonym":"Igala","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ilo","autonym":"Ilokano","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"iu","autonym":"ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᑦ / inuktitut","dir": "ltr"},{"lang":"jv","autonym":"Jawa","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ka","autonym":"ქართული","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kaa","autonym":"Qaraqalpaqsha","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kab","autonym":"Taqbaylit","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kbd","autonym":"адыгэбзэ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kbp","autonym":"Kabɩyɛ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kcg","autonym":"Tyap","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kg","autonym":"Kongo","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kge","autonym":"Kumoring","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ki","autonym":"Gĩkũyũ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kl","autonym":"kalaallisut","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"km","autonym":"ភាសាខ្មែរ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kn","autonym":"ಕನ್ನಡ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"koi","autonym":"перем коми","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"krc","autonym":"къарачай-малкъар","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ku","autonym":"kurdî","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kus","autonym":"Kʋsaal","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kv","autonym":"коми","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"kw","autonym":"kernowek","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ky", "autonym":"кыргызча","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"lad","autonym":"Ladino","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"lb","autonym":"Lëtzebuergesch","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"lez","autonym":"лезги","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"lg","autonym":"Luganda","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"li","autonym":"Limburgs","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"lij","autonym":"Ligure","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"lmo","autonym":"lombard","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ln","autonym":"lingála","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"lo","autonym":"ລາວ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ltg","autonym":"latgaļu","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mad","autonym":"Madhurâ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mai","autonym":"मैथिली","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"map-bms","autonym":"Basa Banyumasan","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mdf","autonym":"мокшень","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mg","autonym":"Malagasy","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mhr","autonym":"олык марий","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mi","autonym":"Māori","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"min","autonym":"Minangkabau","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ml","autonym":"മലയാളം","dir":"ltr"},{ "lang":"mn","autonym":"монгол","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mni","autonym":"ꯃꯤꯇꯩ ꯂꯣꯟ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mnw","autonym":"ဘာသာမန်","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mos","autonym":"moore","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mr","autonym":"मराठी","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mrj","autonym":"кырык мары","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mt","autonym":"Malti","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mwl","autonym":"Mirandés","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"my","autonym":"မြန်မာဘာသာ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"myv","autonym":"эрзянь","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"mzn","autonym":"مازِرونی","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"nah","autonym":"Nāhuatl","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"nan","autonym":"閩南語 / Bân-lâm-gú","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"nap","autonym":"Napulitano","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"nb","autonym":"norsk bokmål","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"nds","autonym":"Plattdüütsch","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"nds-nl","autonym":"Nedersaksies","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ne","autonym":"नेपाली","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"new", "autonym":"नेपाल भाषा","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"nia","autonym":"Li Niha","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"nqo","autonym":"ߒߞߏ","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"nr","autonym":"isiNdebele seSewula","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"nso","autonym":"Sesotho sa Leboa","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ny","autonym":"Chi-Chewa","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"oc","autonym":"occitan","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"om","autonym":"Oromoo","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"or","autonym":"ଓଡ଼ିଆ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"os","autonym":"ирон","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"pag","autonym":"Pangasinan","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"pam","autonym":"Kapampangan","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"pap","autonym":"Papiamentu","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"pcd","autonym":"Picard","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"pcm","autonym":"Naijá","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"pdc","autonym":"Deitsch","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"pms","autonym":"Piemontèis","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"pnb","autonym":"پنجابی","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"pwn","autonym":"pinayuanan","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"qu","autonym":"Runa Simi","dir":"ltr"},{"lang": "rm","autonym":"rumantsch","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"rn","autonym":"ikirundi","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"rsk","autonym":"руски","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"rue","autonym":"русиньскый","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"rup","autonym":"armãneashti","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"rw","autonym":"Ikinyarwanda","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"sa","autonym":"संस्कृतम्","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"sah","autonym":"саха тыла","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"sat","autonym":"ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"sc","autonym":"sardu","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"scn","autonym":"sicilianu","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"sco","autonym":"Scots","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"se","autonym":"davvisámegiella","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"sg","autonym":"Sängö","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"sgs","autonym":"žemaitėška","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"shi","autonym":"Taclḥit","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"shn","autonym":"ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"skr","autonym":"سرائیکی","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"sl","autonym":"slovenščina","dir":"ltr"},{ "lang":"sm","autonym":"Gagana Samoa","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"smn","autonym":"anarâškielâ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"sn","autonym":"chiShona","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"so","autonym":"Soomaaliga","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"srn","autonym":"Sranantongo","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ss","autonym":"SiSwati","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"st","autonym":"Sesotho","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"stq","autonym":"Seeltersk","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"sw","autonym":"Kiswahili","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"szl","autonym":"ślůnski","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tay","autonym":"Tayal","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tcy","autonym":"ತುಳು","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tdd","autonym":"ᥖᥭᥰ ᥖᥬᥲ ᥑᥨᥒᥰ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"te","autonym":"తెలుగు","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tet","autonym":"tetun","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tg","autonym":"тоҷикӣ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"th","autonym":"ไทย","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ti","autonym":"ትግርኛ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tk","autonym":"Türkmençe","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tly","autonym":"tolışi","dir" :"ltr"},{"lang":"tn","autonym":"Setswana","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"to","autonym":"lea faka-Tonga","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tpi","autonym":"Tok Pisin","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"trv","autonym":"Seediq","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ts","autonym":"Xitsonga","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tt","autonym":"татарча / tatarça","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tum","autonym":"chiTumbuka","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tw","autonym":"Twi","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ty","autonym":"reo tahiti","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"tyv","autonym":"тыва дыл","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"udm","autonym":"удмурт","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ur","autonym":"اردو","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"uz","autonym":"oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"ve","autonym":"Tshivenda","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"vec","autonym":"vèneto","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"vep","autonym":"vepsän kel’","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"vls","autonym":"West-Vlams","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"vo","autonym":"Volapük","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"vro","autonym":"võro","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"wa","autonym":"walon", "dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"war","autonym":"Winaray","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"wo","autonym":"Wolof","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"xal","autonym":"хальмг","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"xh","autonym":"isiXhosa","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"xmf","autonym":"მარგალური","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"yi","autonym":"ייִדיש","dir":"rtl"},{"lang":"yo","autonym":"Yorùbá","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"yue","autonym":"粵語","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"za","autonym":"Vahcuengh","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"zgh","autonym":"ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ ⵜⴰⵏⴰⵡⴰⵢⵜ","dir":"ltr"},{"lang":"zu","autonym":"isiZulu","dir":"ltr"}],"wgSectionTranslationTargetLanguages":["ace","ady","alt","am","ami","an","ang","ann","anp","ar","ary","arz","as","ast","av","avk","awa","ay","az","azb","ba","ban","bar","bbc","bcl","bdr","be","bew","bg","bho","bi","bjn","blk","bm","bn","bo","bpy","br","bs","btm","bug","ca","cdo","ce","ceb","ch","chr","ckb","co","cr","crh","cs","cu","cy","da","dag","de","dga","din","diq","dsb","dtp","dv","dz","ee", "el","eml","eo","es","et","eu","fa","fat","ff","fi","fj","fo","fon","fr","frp","frr","fur","fy","gag","gan","gcr","gl","glk","gn","gom","gor","gpe","gu","guc","gur","guw","gv","ha","hak","haw","he","hi","hif","hr","hsb","ht","hu","hy","hyw","ia","iba","ie","ig","igl","ilo","io","is","it","iu","ja","jam","jv","ka","kaa","kab","kbd","kbp","kcg","kg","kge","ki","kk","kl","km","kn","ko","koi","krc","ks","ku","kus","kv","kw","ky","lad","lb","lez","lg","li","lij","lld","lmo","ln","lo","lt","ltg","lv","mad","mai","map-bms","mdf","mg","mhr","mi","min","mk","ml","mn","mni","mnw","mos","mr","mrj","ms","mt","mwl","my","myv","mzn","nah","nan","nap","nb","nds","nds-nl","ne","new","nia","nl","nn","nqo","nr","nso","ny","oc","om","or","os","pa","pag","pam","pap","pcd","pcm","pdc","pl","pms","pnb","ps","pt","pwn","qu","rm","rn","ro","rsk","rue","rup","rw","sa","sah","sat","sc","scn","sco","sd","se","sg","sgs","sh","shi","shn","si","sk","skr","sl","sm","smn","sn","so","sq","sr","srn","ss","st","stq", "su","sv","sw","szl","ta","tay","tcy","tdd","te","tet","tg","th","ti","tk","tl","tly","tn","to","tpi","tr","trv","ts","tt","tum","tw","ty","tyv","udm","ur","uz","ve","vec","vep","vi","vls","vo","vro","wa","war","wo","wuu","xal","xh","xmf","yi","yo","yue","za","zgh","zh","zu"],"isLanguageSearcherCXEntrypointEnabled":true,"mintEntrypointLanguages":["ace","ast","azb","bcl","bjn","bh","crh","ff","fon","ig","is","ki","ks","lmo","min","sat","ss","tn","vec"],"wgWikibaseItemId":"Q59115","wgCheckUserClientHintsHeadersJsApi":["brands","architecture","bitness","fullVersionList","mobile","model","platform","platformVersion"],"GEHomepageSuggestedEditsEnableTopics":true,"wgGETopicsMatchModeEnabled":false,"wgGEStructuredTaskRejectionReasonTextInputEnabled":false,"wgGELevelingUpEnabledForUser":false,"wgMinervaPermissions":{"watchable":true,"watch":false},"wgMinervaFeatures":{"beta":false,"donate":true,"mobileOptionsLink":true,"categories":false,"pageIssues":true,"talkAtTop":true,"historyInPageActions" :false,"overflowSubmenu":false,"tabsOnSpecials":true,"personalMenu":false,"mainMenuExpanded":false,"echo":true,"nightMode":true},"wgMinervaDownloadNamespaces":[0]};RLSTATE={"ext.globalCssJs.user.styles":"ready","site.styles":"ready","user.styles":"ready","ext.globalCssJs.user":"ready","user":"ready","user.options":"loading","ext.cite.styles":"ready","skins.minerva.styles":"ready","skins.minerva.content.styles.images":"ready","mediawiki.hlist":"ready","skins.minerva.codex.styles":"ready","skins.minerva.icons":"ready","skins.minerva.amc.styles":"ready","ext.wikimediamessages.styles":"ready","mobile.init.styles":"ready","ext.relatedArticles.styles":"ready","wikibase.client.init":"ready","ext.wikimediaBadges":"ready"};RLPAGEMODULES=["ext.cite.ux-enhancements","mediawiki.page.media","ext.scribunto.logs","site","mediawiki.page.ready","skins.minerva.scripts","ext.centralNotice.geoIP","ext.centralNotice.startUp","ext.gadget.switcher","ext.urlShortener.toolbar", "ext.centralauth.centralautologin","ext.popups","mobile.init","ext.echo.centralauth","ext.relatedArticles.readMore.bootstrap","ext.eventLogging","ext.wikimediaEvents","ext.navigationTiming","ext.cx.eventlogging.campaigns","ext.cx.entrypoints.mffrequentlanguages","ext.cx.entrypoints.languagesearcher.init","mw.externalguidance.init","ext.checkUser.clientHints","ext.growthExperiments.SuggestedEditSession","wikibase.sidebar.tracking"];</script> <script>(RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.loader.impl(function(){return["user.options@12s5i",function($,jQuery,require,module){mw.user.tokens.set({"patrolToken":"+\\","watchToken":"+\\","csrfToken":"+\\"}); }];});});</script> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/w/load.php?lang=en&amp;modules=ext.cite.styles%7Cext.relatedArticles.styles%7Cext.wikimediaBadges%7Cext.wikimediamessages.styles%7Cmediawiki.hlist%7Cmobile.init.styles%7Cskins.minerva.amc.styles%7Cskins.minerva.codex.styles%7Cskins.minerva.content.styles.images%7Cskins.minerva.icons%2Cstyles%7Cwikibase.client.init&amp;only=styles&amp;skin=minerva"> <script async="" src="/w/load.php?lang=en&amp;modules=startup&amp;only=scripts&amp;raw=1&amp;skin=minerva"></script> <meta name="ResourceLoaderDynamicStyles" content=""> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/w/load.php?lang=en&amp;modules=site.styles&amp;only=styles&amp;skin=minerva"> <meta name="generator" content="MediaWiki 1.44.0-wmf.4"> <meta name="referrer" content="origin"> <meta name="referrer" content="origin-when-cross-origin"> <meta name="robots" content="max-image-preview:standard"> <meta name="format-detection" content="telephone=no"> <meta name="theme-color" content="#eaecf0"> <meta property="og:image" content="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Bertini_fresco_of_Galileo_Galilei_and_Doge_of_Venice.jpg"> <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200"> <meta property="og:image:height" content="1303"> <meta property="og:image" content="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Bertini_fresco_of_Galileo_Galilei_and_Doge_of_Venice.jpg"> <meta property="og:image:width" content="800"> <meta property="og:image:height" content="868"> <meta property="og:image" content="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e7/Bertini_fresco_of_Galileo_Galilei_and_Doge_of_Venice.jpg/640px-Bertini_fresco_of_Galileo_Galilei_and_Doge_of_Venice.jpg"> <meta property="og:image:width" content="640"> <meta property="og:image:height" content="695"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes, minimum-scale=0.25, maximum-scale=5.0"> <meta property="og:title" content="Philosophy of science - Wikipedia"> <meta property="og:type" content="website"> <link rel="preconnect" href="//upload.wikimedia.org"> <link rel="manifest" href="/w/api.php?action=webapp-manifest"> <link rel="alternate" type="application/x-wiki" title="Edit this page" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit"> <link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="/static/apple-touch/wikipedia.png"> <link rel="icon" href="/static/favicon/wikipedia.ico"> <link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="/w/rest.php/v1/search" title="Wikipedia (en)"> <link rel="EditURI" type="application/rsd+xml" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=rsd"> <link rel="canonical" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_science"> <link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en"> <link rel="dns-prefetch" href="//meta.wikimedia.org" /> <link rel="dns-prefetch" href="//login.wikimedia.org"> </head> <body class="mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject mw-editable page-Philosophy_of_science rootpage-Philosophy_of_science stable issues-group-B skin-minerva action-view skin--responsive mw-mf-amc-disabled mw-mf"><div id="mw-mf-viewport"> <div id="mw-mf-page-center"> <a class="mw-mf-page-center__mask" href="#"></a> <header class="header-container header-chrome"> <div class="minerva-header"> <nav class="navigation-drawer toggle-list view-border-box"> <input type="checkbox" id="main-menu-input" class="toggle-list__checkbox" role="button" aria-haspopup="true" aria-expanded="false" aria-labelledby="mw-mf-main-menu-button"> <label role="button" for="main-menu-input" id="mw-mf-main-menu-button" aria-hidden="true" data-event-name="ui.mainmenu" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet toggle-list__toggle"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--menu"></span> <span></span> </label> <div id="mw-mf-page-left" class="menu view-border-box"> <ul id="p-navigation" class="toggle-list__list"> <li class="toggle-list-item "> <a class="toggle-list-item__anchor menu__item--home" href="/wiki/Main_Page" data-mw="interface"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--home"></span> <span class="toggle-list-item__label">Home</span> </a> </li> <li class="toggle-list-item "> <a class="toggle-list-item__anchor menu__item--random" href="/wiki/Special:Random" data-mw="interface"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--die"></span> <span class="toggle-list-item__label">Random</span> </a> </li> <li class="toggle-list-item skin-minerva-list-item-jsonly"> <a class="toggle-list-item__anchor menu__item--nearby" href="/wiki/Special:Nearby" data-event-name="menu.nearby" data-mw="interface"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--mapPin"></span> <span class="toggle-list-item__label">Nearby</span> </a> </li> </ul> <ul id="p-personal" class="toggle-list__list"> <li class="toggle-list-item "> <a class="toggle-list-item__anchor menu__item--login" href="/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&amp;returnto=Philosophy+of+science" data-event-name="menu.login" data-mw="interface"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--logIn"></span> <span class="toggle-list-item__label">Log in</span> </a> </li> </ul> <ul id="pt-preferences" class="toggle-list__list"> <li class="toggle-list-item skin-minerva-list-item-jsonly"> <a class="toggle-list-item__anchor menu__item--settings" href="/w/index.php?title=Special:MobileOptions&amp;returnto=Philosophy+of+science" data-event-name="menu.settings" data-mw="interface"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--settings"></span> <span class="toggle-list-item__label">Settings</span> </a> </li> </ul> <ul id="p-donation" class="toggle-list__list"> <li class="toggle-list-item "> <a class="toggle-list-item__anchor menu__item--donate" href="https://donate.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FundraiserRedirector?utm_source=donate&amp;utm_medium=sidebar&amp;utm_campaign=C13_en.wikipedia.org&amp;uselang=en&amp;utm_key=minerva" data-event-name="menu.donate" data-mw="interface"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--heart"></span> <span class="toggle-list-item__label">Donate</span> </a> </li> </ul> <ul class="hlist"> <li class="toggle-list-item "> <a class="toggle-list-item__anchor menu__item--about" href="/wiki/Wikipedia:About" data-mw="interface"> <span class="toggle-list-item__label">About Wikipedia</span> </a> </li> <li class="toggle-list-item "> <a class="toggle-list-item__anchor menu__item--disclaimers" href="/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer" data-mw="interface"> <span class="toggle-list-item__label">Disclaimers</span> </a> </li> </ul> </div> <label class="main-menu-mask" for="main-menu-input"></label> </nav> <div class="branding-box"> <a href="/wiki/Main_Page"> <span><img src="/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en.svg" alt="Wikipedia" width="120" height="18" style="width: 7.5em; height: 1.125em;"/> </span> </a> </div> <form action="/w/index.php" method="get" class="minerva-search-form"> <div class="search-box"> <input type="hidden" name="title" value="Special:Search"/> <input class="search skin-minerva-search-trigger" id="searchInput" type="search" name="search" placeholder="Search Wikipedia" aria-label="Search Wikipedia" autocapitalize="sentences" title="Search Wikipedia [f]" accesskey="f"> <span class="search-box-icon-overlay"><span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--search"></span> </span> </div> <button id="searchIcon" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet skin-minerva-search-trigger"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--search"></span> <span>Search</span> </button> </form> <nav class="minerva-user-navigation" aria-label="User navigation"> </nav> </div> </header> <main id="content" class="mw-body"> <div class="banner-container"> <div id="siteNotice"></div> </div> <div class="pre-content heading-holder"> <div class="page-heading"> <h1 id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading mw-first-heading"><span class="mw-page-title-main">Philosophy of science</span></h1> <div class="tagline"></div> </div> <ul id="p-associated-pages" class="minerva__tab-container"> <li class="minerva__tab selected"> <a class="minerva__tab-text" href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_science" rel="" data-event-name="tabs.subject">Article</a> </li> <li class="minerva__tab "> <a class="minerva__tab-text" href="/wiki/Talk:Philosophy_of_science" rel="discussion" data-event-name="tabs.talk">Talk</a> </li> </ul> <nav class="page-actions-menu"> <ul id="p-views" class="page-actions-menu__list"> <li id="language-selector" class="page-actions-menu__list-item"> <a role="button" href="#p-lang" data-mw="interface" data-event-name="menu.languages" title="Language" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet language-selector"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--language"></span> <span>Language</span> </a> </li> <li id="page-actions-watch" class="page-actions-menu__list-item"> <a role="button" id="ca-watch" href="/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&amp;returnto=Philosophy+of+science" data-event-name="menu.watch" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet menu__item--page-actions-watch"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--star"></span> <span>Watch</span> </a> </li> <li id="page-actions-edit" class="page-actions-menu__list-item"> <a role="button" id="ca-edit" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit" data-event-name="menu.edit" data-mw="interface" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet edit-page menu__item--page-actions-edit"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>Edit</span> </a> </li> </ul> </nav> <!-- version 1.0.2 (change every time you update a partial) --> <div id="mw-content-subtitle"></div> </div> <div id="bodyContent" class="content"> <div id="mw-content-text" class="mw-body-content"><script>function mfTempOpenSection(id){var block=document.getElementById("mf-section-"+id);block.className+=" open-block";block.previousSibling.className+=" open-block";}</script><div class="mw-content-ltr mw-parser-output" lang="en" dir="ltr"><section class="mf-section-0" id="mf-section-0"><p class="mw-empty-elt"> </p> <style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1236090951">.mw-parser-output .hatnote{font-style:italic}.mw-parser-output div.hatnote{padding-left:1.6em;margin-bottom:0.5em}.mw-parser-output .hatnote i{font-style:normal}.mw-parser-output .hatnote+link+.hatnote{margin-top:-0.5em}@media print{body.ns-0 .mw-parser-output .hatnote{display:none!important}}</style><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">This article is about the branch of philosophy. For the journal, see <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_Science_(journal)" title="Philosophy of Science (journal)"><i>Philosophy of Science</i> (journal)</a>.</div> <style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1129693374">.mw-parser-output .hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul{margin:0;padding:0}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt,.mw-parser-output .hlist li{margin:0;display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ul{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist .mw-empty-li{display:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dt::after{content:": "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li::after{content:" · ";font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li:last-child::after{content:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:first-child::before{content:" (";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:last-child::after{content:")";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol{counter-reset:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li{counter-increment:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li::before{content:" "counter(listitem)"\a0 "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li ol>li:first-child::before{content:" ("counter(listitem)"\a0 "}</style><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1126788409">.mw-parser-output .plainlist ol,.mw-parser-output .plainlist ul{line-height:inherit;list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.mw-parser-output .plainlist ol li,.mw-parser-output .plainlist ul li{margin-bottom:0}</style><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1246091330">.mw-parser-output .sidebar{width:22em;float:right;clear:right;margin:0.5em 0 1em 1em;background:var(--background-color-neutral-subtle,#f8f9fa);border:1px solid var(--border-color-base,#a2a9b1);padding:0.2em;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%;border-collapse:collapse;display:table}body.skin-minerva .mw-parser-output .sidebar{display:table!important;float:right!important;margin:0.5em 0 1em 1em!important}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-subgroup{width:100%;margin:0;border-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-left{float:left;clear:left;margin:0.5em 1em 1em 0}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-none{float:none;clear:both;margin:0.5em 1em 1em 0}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-outer-title{padding:0 0.4em 0.2em;font-size:125%;line-height:1.2em;font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-top-image{padding:0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-top-caption,.mw-parser-output .sidebar-pretitle-with-top-image,.mw-parser-output .sidebar-caption{padding:0.2em 0.4em 0;line-height:1.2em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-pretitle{padding:0.4em 0.4em 0;line-height:1.2em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-title,.mw-parser-output .sidebar-title-with-pretitle{padding:0.2em 0.8em;font-size:145%;line-height:1.2em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-title-with-pretitle{padding:0.1em 0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-image{padding:0.2em 0.4em 0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-heading{padding:0.1em 0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-content{padding:0 0.5em 0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-content-with-subgroup{padding:0.1em 0.4em 0.2em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-above,.mw-parser-output .sidebar-below{padding:0.3em 0.8em;font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-collapse .sidebar-above,.mw-parser-output .sidebar-collapse .sidebar-below{border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-bottom:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-navbar{text-align:right;font-size:115%;padding:0 0.4em 0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-list-title{padding:0 0.4em;text-align:left;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6em;font-size:105%}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-list-title-c{padding:0 0.4em;text-align:center;margin:0 3.3em}@media(max-width:640px){body.mediawiki .mw-parser-output .sidebar{width:100%!important;clear:both;float:none!important;margin-left:0!important;margin-right:0!important}}body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .sidebar a>img{max-width:none!important}@media screen{html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-list-title,html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-title-with-pretitle{background:transparent!important}html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-title-with-pretitle a{color:var(--color-progressive)!important}}@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-list-title,html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-title-with-pretitle{background:transparent!important}html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-title-with-pretitle a{color:var(--color-progressive)!important}}@media print{body.ns-0 .mw-parser-output .sidebar{display:none!important}}</style><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1234152309">.mw-parser-output .philosophy-sidebar{max-width:22em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-phi-pre{padding-top:0.8em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-phi-title{font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:0em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-phi-title a{color:black}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-phi-img{padding:0.8em 0.8em 1em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-phi-above{padding:0.5em 1.5em 0.5em;display:block;background-color:#efefef}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-phi button{padding:0 0.2em}</style><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1246091330"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1129693374"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1246091330"> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1129693374"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1246091330"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1129693374"> <p class="mw-empty-elt"> </p><p><b>Philosophy of science</b> is the branch of <a href="/wiki/Philosophy" title="Philosophy">philosophy</a> concerned with the foundations, <a href="/wiki/Methodology" title="Methodology">methods</a>, and implications of <a href="/wiki/Science" title="Science">science</a>. Amongst its central questions are <a href="/wiki/Demarcation_problem" title="Demarcation problem">the difference between science and non-science</a>, the <a href="/wiki/Reliabilism" title="Reliabilism">reliability</a> of scientific theories, and the ultimate purpose and meaning of science as a human endeavour. Philosophy of science focuses on <a href="/wiki/Metaphysics" title="Metaphysics">metaphysical</a>, <a href="/wiki/Epistemology" title="Epistemology">epistemic</a> and <a href="/wiki/Semantics" title="Semantics">semantic</a> aspects of scientific practice, and overlaps with <a href="/wiki/Metaphysics" title="Metaphysics">metaphysics</a>, <a href="/wiki/Ontology" title="Ontology">ontology</a>, <a href="/wiki/Logic" title="Logic">logic</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Epistemology" title="Epistemology">epistemology</a>, for example, when it explores the relationship between science and the concept of <a href="/wiki/Truth" title="Truth">truth</a>. Philosophy of science is both a theoretical and <a href="/wiki/Empirical_research" title="Empirical research">empirical discipline</a>, relying on philosophical theorising as well as <a href="/wiki/Metatheory" title="Metatheory">meta-studies</a> of scientific practice. Ethical issues such as <a href="/wiki/Bioethics" title="Bioethics">bioethics</a> and <a href="/wiki/Scientific_misconduct" title="Scientific misconduct">scientific misconduct</a> are often considered <a href="/wiki/Ethics" title="Ethics">ethics</a> or <a href="/wiki/Science_studies" title="Science studies">science studies</a> rather than the philosophy of science. </p><p>Many of the central problems concerned with the philosophy of science lack contemporary consensus, including whether science can infer <a href="/wiki/Scientific_realism" title="Scientific realism">truth about unobservable entities</a> and <a href="/wiki/Problem_of_induction" title="Problem of induction">whether inductive reasoning can be justified</a> as yielding definite scientific knowledge. Philosophers of science also consider philosophical problems within particular sciences (such as <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_biology" title="Philosophy of biology">biology</a>, <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_physics" title="Philosophy of physics">physics</a> and social sciences such as <a href="/wiki/Economics" title="Economics">economics</a> and <a href="/wiki/Psychology" title="Psychology">psychology</a>). Some philosophers of science also use contemporary results in science to reach conclusions about <a href="/wiki/Metaphilosophy" title="Metaphilosophy">philosophy itself</a>. </p><p>While philosophical thought pertaining to science dates back at least to the time of <a href="/wiki/Aristotle" title="Aristotle">Aristotle</a>, the general philosophy of science emerged as a distinct discipline only in the 20th century following the <a href="/wiki/Logical_positivist" class="mw-redirect" title="Logical positivist">logical positivist</a> movement, which aimed to formulate criteria for ensuring all philosophical statements' meaningfulness and objectively assessing them. <a href="/wiki/Karl_Popper" title="Karl Popper">Karl Popper</a> criticized logical positivism and helped establish a modern set of standards for <a href="/wiki/Scientific_method" title="Scientific method">scientific methodology</a>. <a href="/wiki/Thomas_Kuhn" title="Thomas Kuhn">Thomas Kuhn</a>'s 1962 book <i><a href="/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions" title="The Structure of Scientific Revolutions">The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</a></i> was also formative, challenging the view of <a href="/wiki/Scientific_progress" class="mw-redirect" title="Scientific progress">scientific progress</a> as the steady, cumulative acquisition of knowledge based on a fixed method of systematic experimentation and instead arguing that any progress is relative to a "<a href="/wiki/Paradigm" title="Paradigm">paradigm</a>", the set of questions, concepts, and practices that define a scientific discipline in a particular historical period.<sup id="cite_ref-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-1"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>1<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>Subsequently, the <a href="/wiki/Coherentism" title="Coherentism">coherentist</a> approach to science, in which a theory is validated if it makes sense of observations as part of a coherent whole, became prominent due to <a href="/wiki/Willard_Van_Orman_Quine" title="Willard Van Orman Quine">W. V. Quine</a> and others. Some thinkers such as <a href="/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould" title="Stephen Jay Gould">Stephen Jay Gould</a> seek to ground science in <a href="/wiki/Axiomatic" class="mw-redirect" title="Axiomatic">axiomatic</a> assumptions, such as the <a href="/wiki/Uniformity_of_nature" class="mw-redirect" title="Uniformity of nature">uniformity of nature</a>. A vocal minority of philosophers, and <a href="/wiki/Paul_Feyerabend" title="Paul Feyerabend">Paul Feyerabend</a> in particular, argue against the existence of the "<a href="/wiki/Scientific_method" title="Scientific method">scientific method</a>", so all approaches to science should be allowed, including explicitly <a href="/wiki/Supernatural" title="Supernatural">supernatural</a> ones.<sup id="cite_ref-contra_2-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-contra-2"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>2<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Another approach to thinking about science involves studying how <a href="/wiki/Constructivist_epistemology" class="mw-redirect" title="Constructivist epistemology">knowledge is created</a> from a <a href="/wiki/Sociology" title="Sociology">sociological</a> perspective, an approach represented by scholars like <a href="/wiki/David_Bloor" title="David Bloor">David Bloor</a> and <a href="/wiki/S._Barry_Barnes" title="S. Barry Barnes">Barry Barnes</a>. Finally, a tradition in <a href="/wiki/Continental_philosophy" title="Continental philosophy">continental philosophy</a> approaches science from the perspective of a rigorous analysis of human experience. </p><p>Philosophies of the particular sciences range from questions about the nature of <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_space_and_time" title="Philosophy of space and time">time</a> raised by Einstein's <a href="/wiki/General_relativity" title="General relativity">general relativity</a>, to the implications of <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_and_economics" title="Philosophy and economics">economics</a> for <a href="/wiki/Public_policy" title="Public policy">public policy</a>. A central theme is whether the terms of one scientific theory can be intra- or intertheoretically <a href="/wiki/Reductionism" title="Reductionism">reduced</a> to the terms of another. Can chemistry be reduced to physics, or can sociology be reduced to individual <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_psychology" title="Philosophy of psychology">psychology</a>? The general questions of philosophy of science also arise with greater specificity in some particular sciences. For instance, the question of the validity of scientific reasoning is seen in a different guise in the <a href="/wiki/Foundations_of_statistics" title="Foundations of statistics">foundations of statistics</a>. The question of what counts as science and what should be excluded arises as a life-or-death matter in the <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_medicine" title="Philosophy of medicine">philosophy of medicine</a>. Additionally, the philosophies of biology, psychology, and the <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_social_science" title="Philosophy of social science">social sciences</a> explore whether the scientific studies of <a href="/wiki/Human_nature" title="Human nature">human nature</a> can achieve objectivity or are inevitably shaped by <a href="/wiki/Value_(personal_and_cultural)" class="mw-redirect" title="Value (personal and cultural)">values</a> and by social relations. </p> <div id="toc" class="toc" role="navigation" aria-labelledby="mw-toc-heading"><input type="checkbox" role="button" id="toctogglecheckbox" class="toctogglecheckbox" style="display:none"><div class="toctitle" lang="en" dir="ltr"><h2 id="mw-toc-heading">Contents</h2><span class="toctogglespan"><label class="toctogglelabel" for="toctogglecheckbox"></label></span></div> <ul> <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-1"><a href="#Introduction"><span class="tocnumber">1</span> <span class="toctext">Introduction</span></a> <ul> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-2"><a href="#Defining_science"><span class="tocnumber">1.1</span> <span class="toctext">Defining science</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-3"><a href="#Scientific_explanation"><span class="tocnumber">1.2</span> <span class="toctext">Scientific explanation</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-4"><a href="#Justifying_science"><span class="tocnumber">1.3</span> <span class="toctext">Justifying science</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-5"><a href="#Observation_inseparable_from_theory"><span class="tocnumber">1.4</span> <span class="toctext">Observation inseparable from theory</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-6"><a href="#The_purpose_of_science"><span class="tocnumber">1.5</span> <span class="toctext">The purpose of science</span></a> <ul> <li class="toclevel-3 tocsection-7"><a href="#Real_patterns"><span class="tocnumber">1.5.1</span> <span class="toctext">Real patterns</span></a></li> </ul> </li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-8"><a href="#Values_and_science"><span class="tocnumber">1.6</span> <span class="toctext">Values and science</span></a></li> </ul> </li> <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-9"><a href="#History"><span class="tocnumber">2</span> <span class="toctext">History</span></a> <ul> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-10"><a href="#Pre-modern"><span class="tocnumber">2.1</span> <span class="toctext">Pre-modern</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-11"><a href="#Modern"><span class="tocnumber">2.2</span> <span class="toctext">Modern</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-12"><a href="#Logical_positivism"><span class="tocnumber">2.3</span> <span class="toctext">Logical positivism</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-13"><a href="#Thomas_Kuhn"><span class="tocnumber">2.4</span> <span class="toctext">Thomas Kuhn</span></a></li> </ul> </li> <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-14"><a href="#Current_approaches"><span class="tocnumber">3</span> <span class="toctext">Current approaches</span></a> <ul> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-15"><a href="#Naturalism's_axiomatic_assumptions"><span class="tocnumber">3.1</span> <span class="toctext">Naturalism's axiomatic assumptions</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-16"><a href="#Coherentism"><span class="tocnumber">3.2</span> <span class="toctext">Coherentism</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-17"><a href="#Anything_goes_methodology"><span class="tocnumber">3.3</span> <span class="toctext">Anything goes methodology</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-18"><a href="#Sociology_of_scientific_knowledge_methodology"><span class="tocnumber">3.4</span> <span class="toctext">Sociology of scientific knowledge methodology</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-19"><a href="#Continental_philosophy"><span class="tocnumber">3.5</span> <span class="toctext">Continental philosophy</span></a></li> </ul> </li> <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-20"><a href="#Other_topics"><span class="tocnumber">4</span> <span class="toctext">Other topics</span></a> <ul> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-21"><a href="#Reductionism"><span class="tocnumber">4.1</span> <span class="toctext">Reductionism</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-22"><a href="#Social_accountability"><span class="tocnumber">4.2</span> <span class="toctext">Social accountability</span></a></li> </ul> </li> <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-23"><a href="#Philosophy_of_particular_sciences"><span class="tocnumber">5</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of particular sciences</span></a> <ul> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-24"><a href="#Philosophy_of_statistics"><span class="tocnumber">5.1</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of statistics</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-25"><a href="#Philosophy_of_mathematics"><span class="tocnumber">5.2</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of mathematics</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-26"><a href="#Philosophy_of_physics"><span class="tocnumber">5.3</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of physics</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-27"><a href="#Philosophy_of_chemistry"><span class="tocnumber">5.4</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of chemistry</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-28"><a href="#Philosophy_of_astronomy"><span class="tocnumber">5.5</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of astronomy</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-29"><a href="#Philosophy_of_Earth_sciences"><span class="tocnumber">5.6</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of Earth sciences</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-30"><a href="#Philosophy_of_biology"><span class="tocnumber">5.7</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of biology</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-31"><a href="#Philosophy_of_medicine"><span class="tocnumber">5.8</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of medicine</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-32"><a href="#Philosophy_of_psychiatry"><span class="tocnumber">5.9</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of psychiatry</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-33"><a href="#Philosophy_of_psychology"><span class="tocnumber">5.10</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of psychology</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-34"><a href="#Philosophy_of_social_science"><span class="tocnumber">5.11</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of social science</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-35"><a href="#Philosophy_of_technology"><span class="tocnumber">5.12</span> <span class="toctext">Philosophy of technology</span></a></li> </ul> </li> <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-36"><a href="#See_also"><span class="tocnumber">6</span> <span class="toctext">See also</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-37"><a href="#References"><span class="tocnumber">7</span> <span class="toctext">References</span></a> <ul> <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-38"><a href="#Sources"><span class="tocnumber">7.1</span> <span class="toctext">Sources</span></a></li> </ul> </li> <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-39"><a href="#Further_reading"><span class="tocnumber">8</span> <span class="toctext">Further reading</span></a></li> <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-40"><a href="#External_links"><span class="tocnumber">9</span> <span class="toctext">External links</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </section><div class="mw-heading mw-heading2 section-heading" onclick="mfTempOpenSection(1)"><span class="indicator mf-icon mf-icon-expand mf-icon--small"></span><h2 id="Introduction">Introduction</h2><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=1" title="Edit section: Introduction" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div><section class="mf-section-1 collapsible-block" id="mf-section-1"> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Defining_science">Defining science</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=2" title="Edit section: Defining science" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Demarcation_problem" title="Demarcation problem">Demarcation problem</a></div> <figure class="mw-default-size" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Allan_Ramsay_-_David_Hume,_1711_-_1776._Historian_and_philosopher_-_PG_3521_-_National_Galleries_of_Scotland.jpg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/ba/Allan_Ramsay_-_David_Hume%2C_1711_-_1776._Historian_and_philosopher_-_PG_3521_-_National_Galleries_of_Scotland.jpg/170px-Allan_Ramsay_-_David_Hume%2C_1711_-_1776._Historian_and_philosopher_-_PG_3521_-_National_Galleries_of_Scotland.jpg" decoding="async" width="170" height="208" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="5776" data-file-height="7080"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 170px;height: 208px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/ba/Allan_Ramsay_-_David_Hume%2C_1711_-_1776._Historian_and_philosopher_-_PG_3521_-_National_Galleries_of_Scotland.jpg/170px-Allan_Ramsay_-_David_Hume%2C_1711_-_1776._Historian_and_philosopher_-_PG_3521_-_National_Galleries_of_Scotland.jpg" data-width="170" data-height="208" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/ba/Allan_Ramsay_-_David_Hume%2C_1711_-_1776._Historian_and_philosopher_-_PG_3521_-_National_Galleries_of_Scotland.jpg/255px-Allan_Ramsay_-_David_Hume%2C_1711_-_1776._Historian_and_philosopher_-_PG_3521_-_National_Galleries_of_Scotland.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/ba/Allan_Ramsay_-_David_Hume%2C_1711_-_1776._Historian_and_philosopher_-_PG_3521_-_National_Galleries_of_Scotland.jpg/340px-Allan_Ramsay_-_David_Hume%2C_1711_-_1776._Historian_and_philosopher_-_PG_3521_-_National_Galleries_of_Scotland.jpg 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption>In formulating 'the problem of induction', David Hume devised one of the most pervasive puzzles in the philosophy of science. </figcaption></figure> <figure class="mw-default-size" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Karl_Popper.jpg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/43/Karl_Popper.jpg/170px-Karl_Popper.jpg" decoding="async" width="170" height="218" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="600" data-file-height="769"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 170px;height: 218px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/43/Karl_Popper.jpg/170px-Karl_Popper.jpg" data-width="170" data-height="218" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/43/Karl_Popper.jpg/255px-Karl_Popper.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/43/Karl_Popper.jpg/340px-Karl_Popper.jpg 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption>Karl Popper in the 1980s. Popper is credited with formulating 'the demarcation problem', which considers the question of how we distinguish between science and pseudoscience. </figcaption></figure> <p>Distinguishing between science and <a href="/wiki/Non-science" title="Non-science">non-science</a> is referred to as the demarcation problem. For example, should <a href="/wiki/Psychoanalysis" title="Psychoanalysis">psychoanalysis</a>, <a href="/wiki/Creation_science" title="Creation science">creation science</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Historical_materialism" title="Historical materialism">historical materialism</a> be considered pseudosciences? <a href="/wiki/Karl_Popper" title="Karl Popper">Karl Popper</a> called this the central question in the philosophy of science.<sup id="cite_ref-Thornton2006_3-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Thornton2006-3"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>3<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> However, no unified account of the problem has won acceptance among philosophers, and some regard the problem as unsolvable or uninteresting.<sup id="cite_ref-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-4"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>4<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Laudan1983_5-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Laudan1983-5"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>5<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Martin_Gardner" title="Martin Gardner">Martin Gardner</a> has argued for the use of a <a href="/wiki/Potter_Stewart_standard" class="mw-redirect" title="Potter Stewart standard">Potter Stewart standard</a> ("I know it when I see it") for recognizing pseudoscience.<sup id="cite_ref-6" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-6"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>6<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>Early attempts by the <a href="/wiki/Logical_positivists" class="mw-redirect" title="Logical positivists">logical positivists</a> grounded science in observation while non-science was non-observational and hence meaningless.<sup id="cite_ref-Uebel2006_7-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Uebel2006-7"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Popper argued that the central property of science is <a href="/wiki/Falsifiability" title="Falsifiability">falsifiability</a>. That is, every genuinely scientific claim is capable of being proven false, at least in principle.<sup id="cite_ref-Popper1959_8-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Popper1959-8"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>8<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>An area of study or speculation that masquerades as science in an attempt to claim a legitimacy that it would not otherwise be able to achieve is referred to as <a href="/wiki/Pseudoscience" title="Pseudoscience">pseudoscience</a>, <a href="/wiki/Fringe_science" title="Fringe science">fringe science</a>, or <a href="/wiki/Junk_science" title="Junk science">junk science</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-9" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-9"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>9<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-10" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-10"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>10<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-11" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-11"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>11<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-12" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-12"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>12<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-13" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-13"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>13<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-14" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-14"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>14<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-15" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-15"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>15<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Physicist <a href="/wiki/Richard_Feynman" title="Richard Feynman">Richard Feynman</a> coined the term "<a href="/wiki/Cargo_cult_science" class="mw-redirect" title="Cargo cult science">cargo cult science</a>" for cases in which researchers believe they are doing science because their activities have the outward appearance of it but actually lack the "kind of utter honesty" that allows their results to be rigorously evaluated.<sup id="cite_ref-cargocultscience_16-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-cargocultscience-16"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>16<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Scientific_explanation">Scientific explanation</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=3" title="Edit section: Scientific explanation" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Scientific_explanation" class="mw-redirect" title="Scientific explanation">Scientific explanation</a></div> <p>A closely related question is what counts as a good scientific explanation. In addition to providing predictions about future events, society often takes scientific theories to provide <a href="/wiki/Explanation" title="Explanation">explanations</a> for events that occur regularly or have already occurred. Philosophers have investigated the criteria by which a scientific theory can be said to have successfully explained a phenomenon, as well as what it means to say a scientific theory has <a href="/wiki/Explanatory_power" title="Explanatory power">explanatory power</a>. </p><p>One early and influential account of scientific explanation is the <a href="/wiki/Deductive-nomological" class="mw-redirect" title="Deductive-nomological">deductive-nomological</a> model. It says that a successful scientific explanation must deduce the occurrence of the phenomena in question from a <a href="/wiki/Scientific_law" title="Scientific law">scientific law</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-Hempel1948_17-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Hempel1948-17"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>17<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> This view has been subjected to substantial criticism, resulting in several widely acknowledged counterexamples to the theory.<sup id="cite_ref-Salmon1992_18-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Salmon1992-18"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>18<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> It is especially challenging to characterize what is meant by an explanation when the thing to be explained cannot be deduced from any law because it is a matter of chance, or otherwise cannot be perfectly predicted from what is known. <a href="/wiki/Wesley_C._Salmon" title="Wesley C. Salmon">Wesley Salmon</a> developed a model in which a good scientific explanation must be statistically relevant to the outcome to be explained.<sup id="cite_ref-Salmon1971_19-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Salmon1971-19"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>19<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Woodward2003_20-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Woodward2003-20"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>20<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Others have argued that the key to a good explanation is unifying disparate phenomena or providing a causal mechanism.<sup id="cite_ref-Woodward2003_20-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Woodward2003-20"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>20<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Justifying_science">Justifying science</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=4" title="Edit section: Justifying science" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Problem_of_induction" title="Problem of induction">Problem of induction</a></div> <p>Although it is often taken for granted, it is not at all clear how one can infer the validity of a general statement from a number of specific instances or infer the truth of a theory from a series of successful tests.<sup id="cite_ref-StanInduction_21-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StanInduction-21"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>21<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> For example, a chicken observes that each morning the farmer comes and gives it food, for hundreds of days in a row. The chicken may therefore use <a href="/wiki/Inductive_reasoning" title="Inductive reasoning">inductive reasoning</a> to infer that the farmer will bring food <i>every</i> morning. However, one morning, the farmer comes and kills the chicken. How is scientific reasoning more trustworthy than the chicken's reasoning? </p><p>One approach is to acknowledge that induction cannot achieve certainty, but observing more instances of a general statement can at least make the general statement more <a href="/wiki/Probability" title="Probability">probable</a>. So the chicken would be right to conclude from all those mornings that it is likely the farmer will come with food again the next morning, even if it cannot be certain. However, there remain difficult questions about the process of interpreting any given evidence into a probability that the general statement is true. One way out of these particular difficulties is to declare that all beliefs about scientific theories are <a href="/wiki/Bayesian_probability" title="Bayesian probability">subjective</a>, or personal, and correct reasoning is merely about how evidence should change one's subjective beliefs over time.<sup id="cite_ref-StanInduction_21-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StanInduction-21"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>21<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>Some argue that what scientists do is not inductive reasoning at all but rather <a href="/wiki/Abductive_reasoning" title="Abductive reasoning">abductive reasoning</a>, or inference to the best explanation. In this account, science is not about generalizing specific instances but rather about hypothesizing explanations for what is observed. As discussed in the previous section, it is not always clear what is meant by the "best explanation". <a href="/wiki/Ockham%27s_razor" class="mw-redirect" title="Ockham's razor">Ockham's razor</a>, which counsels choosing the <a href="/wiki/Simplicity" title="Simplicity">simplest</a> available explanation, thus plays an important role in some versions of this approach. To return to the example of the chicken, would it be simpler to suppose that the farmer cares about it and will continue taking care of it indefinitely or that the farmer is fattening it up for slaughter? Philosophers have tried to make this <a href="/wiki/Heuristic" title="Heuristic">heuristic</a> principle more precise regarding theoretical <a href="/wiki/Occam%27s_razor" title="Occam's razor">parsimony</a> or other measures. Yet, although various measures of simplicity have been brought forward as potential candidates, it is generally accepted that there is no such thing as a theory-independent measure of simplicity. In other words, there appear to be as many different measures of simplicity as there are theories themselves, and the task of choosing between measures of simplicity appears to be every bit as problematic as the job of choosing between theories.<sup id="cite_ref-StanSimple_22-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StanSimple-22"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>22<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Nicholas_Maxwell" title="Nicholas Maxwell">Nicholas Maxwell</a> has argued for some decades that unity rather than simplicity is the key non-empirical factor in influencing the choice of theory in science, persistent preference for unified theories in effect committing science to the acceptance of a metaphysical thesis concerning unity in nature. In order to improve this problematic thesis, it needs to be represented in the form of a hierarchy of theses, each thesis becoming more insubstantial as one goes up the hierarchy.<sup id="cite_ref-23" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-23"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>23<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Observation_inseparable_from_theory">Observation inseparable from theory</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=5" title="Edit section: Observation inseparable from theory" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <figure class="mw-halign-right" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Einstein_cross.jpg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img alt="Five balls of light are arranged in a cross shape." src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c8/Einstein_cross.jpg/263px-Einstein_cross.jpg" decoding="async" width="263" height="254" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="1915" data-file-height="1849"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 263px;height: 254px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c8/Einstein_cross.jpg/263px-Einstein_cross.jpg" data-alt="Five balls of light are arranged in a cross shape." data-width="263" data-height="254" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c8/Einstein_cross.jpg/395px-Einstein_cross.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c8/Einstein_cross.jpg/526px-Einstein_cross.jpg 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption>Seen through a telescope, the <a href="/wiki/Einstein_cross" class="mw-redirect" title="Einstein cross">Einstein cross</a> seems to provide evidence for five different objects, but this observation is theory-laden. If we assume the theory of <a href="/wiki/General_relativity" title="General relativity">general relativity</a>, the image only provides evidence for two objects.</figcaption></figure> <p>When making observations, scientists look through telescopes, study images on electronic screens, record meter readings, and so on. Generally, on a basic level, they can agree on what they see, e.g., the thermometer shows 37.9 degrees C. But, if these scientists have different ideas about the theories that have been developed to explain these basic observations, they may disagree about what they are observing. For example, before <a href="/wiki/Albert_Einstein" title="Albert Einstein">Albert Einstein</a>'s <a href="/wiki/General_relativity" title="General relativity">general theory of relativity</a>, observers would have likely interpreted an image of the <a href="/wiki/Einstein_cross" class="mw-redirect" title="Einstein cross">Einstein cross</a> as five different objects in space. In light of that theory, however, astronomers will tell you that there are actually only two objects, one in the center and <a href="/wiki/Gravitational_lens" title="Gravitational lens">four different images</a> of a second object around the sides. Alternatively, if other scientists suspect that something is wrong with the telescope and only one object is actually being observed, they are operating under yet another theory. Observations that cannot be separated from theoretical interpretation are said to be <a href="/wiki/Theory-laden" class="mw-redirect" title="Theory-laden">theory-laden</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-StanTheoryObs_24-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StanTheoryObs-24"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>24<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>All observation involves both <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_perception" title="Philosophy of perception">perception</a> and <a href="/wiki/Cognitive_process" class="mw-redirect" title="Cognitive process">cognition</a>. That is, one does not make an observation passively, but rather is actively engaged in distinguishing the phenomenon being observed from surrounding sensory data. Therefore, observations are affected by one's underlying understanding of the way in which the world functions, and that understanding may influence what is perceived, noticed, or deemed worthy of consideration. In this sense, it can be argued that all observation is theory-laden.<sup id="cite_ref-StanTheoryObs_24-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StanTheoryObs-24"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>24<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="The_purpose_of_science">The purpose of science</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=6" title="Edit section: The purpose of science" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">See also: <a href="/wiki/Scientific_realism" title="Scientific realism">Scientific realism</a> and <a href="/wiki/Instrumentalism" title="Instrumentalism">Instrumentalism</a></div> <p>Should science aim to determine ultimate truth, or are there questions that science <a href="/wiki/Empirical_limits_in_science" class="mw-redirect" title="Empirical limits in science">cannot answer</a>? <i>Scientific realists</i> claim that science aims at truth and that one ought to regard <a href="/wiki/Scientific_theories" class="mw-redirect" title="Scientific theories">scientific theories</a> as true, approximately true, or likely true. Conversely, <i>scientific anti-realists</i> argue that science does not aim (or at least does not succeed) at truth, especially truth about <a href="/wiki/Unobservable" title="Unobservable">unobservables</a> like electrons or other universes.<sup id="cite_ref-Levin1984_25-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Levin1984-25"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>25<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Instrumentalism" title="Instrumentalism">Instrumentalists</a> argue that scientific theories should only be evaluated on whether they are useful. In their view, whether theories are true or not is beside the point, because the purpose of science is to make predictions and enable effective technology. </p><p>Realists often point to the success of recent scientific theories as evidence for the truth (or near truth) of current theories.<sup id="cite_ref-Boyd2002_26-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Boyd2002-26"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>26<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-27" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-27"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>27<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Antirealists point to either the many false theories in the <a href="/wiki/History_of_science" title="History of science">history of science</a>,<sup id="cite_ref-Stanford2006_28-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Stanford2006-28"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>28<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Laudan1981_29-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Laudan1981-29"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>29<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> epistemic morals,<sup id="cite_ref-vanFraassen1980_30-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-vanFraassen1980-30"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>30<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> the success of false <a href="/wiki/Scientific_modelling" title="Scientific modelling">modeling</a> assumptions,<sup id="cite_ref-Winsberg2006_31-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Winsberg2006-31"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>31<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> or widely termed <a href="/wiki/Postmodern" class="mw-redirect" title="Postmodern">postmodern</a> criticisms of objectivity as evidence against scientific realism.<sup id="cite_ref-Boyd2002_26-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Boyd2002-26"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>26<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Antirealists attempt to explain the success of scientific theories without reference to truth.<sup id="cite_ref-Stanford2000_32-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Stanford2000-32"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>32<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Some antirealists claim that scientific theories aim at being accurate only about observable objects and argue that their success is primarily judged by that criterion.<sup id="cite_ref-vanFraassen1980_30-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-vanFraassen1980-30"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>30<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading4"><h4 id="Real_patterns">Real patterns</h4><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=7" title="Edit section: Real patterns" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <p>The notion of <a href="/wiki/Real_patterns" class="mw-redirect" title="Real patterns">real patterns</a> has been propounded, notably by philosopher <a href="/wiki/Daniel_Dennett" title="Daniel Dennett">Daniel C. Dennett</a>, as an intermediate position between strong realism and <a href="/wiki/Eliminative_materialism" title="Eliminative materialism">eliminative materialism</a>. This concept delves into the investigation of patterns observed in scientific phenomena to ascertain whether they signify underlying truths or are mere constructs of human interpretation. Dennett provides a unique ontological account concerning real patterns, examining the extent to which these recognized patterns have predictive utility and allow for efficient compression of information.<sup id="cite_ref-33" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-33"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>33<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>The discourse on real patterns extends beyond philosophical circles, finding relevance in various scientific domains. For example, in biology, inquiries into real patterns seek to elucidate the nature of biological explanations, exploring how recognized patterns contribute to a comprehensive understanding of biological phenomena.<sup id="cite_ref-34" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-34"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>34<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Similarly, in chemistry, debates around the reality of chemical bonds as real patterns continue.<sup id="cite_ref-35" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-35"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>35<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>Evaluation of real patterns also holds significance in broader scientific inquiries. Researchers, like Tyler Millhouse, propose criteria for evaluating the realness of a pattern, particularly in the context of universal patterns and the human propensity to perceive patterns, even where there might be none.<sup id="cite_ref-36" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-36"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>36<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> This evaluation is pivotal in advancing research in diverse fields, from climate change to machine learning, where recognition and validation of real patterns in scientific models play a crucial role.<sup id="cite_ref-37" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-37"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>37<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Values_and_science">Values and science</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=8" title="Edit section: Values and science" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <p>Values intersect with science in different ways. There are epistemic values that mainly guide the scientific research. The scientific enterprise is embedded in particular culture and values through individual practitioners. Values emerge from science, both as product and process and can be distributed among several cultures in the society. When it comes to the justification of science in the sense of general public participation by single practitioners, science plays the role of a mediator between evaluating the standards and policies of society and its participating individuals, wherefore science indeed falls victim to vandalism and sabotage adapting the means to the end.<sup id="cite_ref-38" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-38"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>38<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <figure class="mw-default-size" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Thomas-kuhn-portrait.png" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ad/Thomas-kuhn-portrait.png/170px-Thomas-kuhn-portrait.png" decoding="async" width="170" height="210" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="600" data-file-height="740"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 170px;height: 210px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ad/Thomas-kuhn-portrait.png/170px-Thomas-kuhn-portrait.png" data-width="170" data-height="210" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ad/Thomas-kuhn-portrait.png/255px-Thomas-kuhn-portrait.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ad/Thomas-kuhn-portrait.png/340px-Thomas-kuhn-portrait.png 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption>Thomas Kuhn is credited with coining the term '<a href="/wiki/Paradigm_shift" title="Paradigm shift">paradigm shift</a>' to describe the creation and evolution of scientific theories.</figcaption></figure> <p>If it is unclear what counts as science, how the process of confirming theories works, and what the purpose of science is, there is considerable scope for values and other social influences to shape science. Indeed, <a href="/wiki/Value_(personal_and_cultural)" class="mw-redirect" title="Value (personal and cultural)">values</a> can play a role ranging from determining which research gets funded to influencing which theories achieve scientific consensus.<sup id="cite_ref-StanSocial_39-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StanSocial-39"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>39<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> For example, in the 19th century, cultural values held by scientists about race shaped research on <a href="/wiki/Evolution" title="Evolution">evolution</a>, and values concerning <a href="/wiki/Social_class" title="Social class">social class</a> influenced debates on <a href="/wiki/Phrenology" title="Phrenology">phrenology</a> (considered scientific at the time).<sup id="cite_ref-40" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-40"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>40<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Feminist_epistemology" title="Feminist epistemology">Feminist philosophers of science</a>, sociologists of science, and others explore how social values affect science. </p> </section><div class="mw-heading mw-heading2 section-heading" onclick="mfTempOpenSection(2)"><span class="indicator mf-icon mf-icon-expand mf-icon--small"></span><h2 id="History">History</h2><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=9" title="Edit section: History" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div><section class="mf-section-2 collapsible-block" id="mf-section-2"> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">See also: <a href="/wiki/History_of_scientific_method" title="History of scientific method">History of scientific method</a>, <a href="/wiki/History_of_science" title="History of science">History of science</a>, and <a href="/wiki/History_of_philosophy" title="History of philosophy">History of philosophy</a></div> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Pre-modern">Pre-modern</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=10" title="Edit section: Pre-modern" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <p>The origins of philosophy of science trace back to <a href="/wiki/Plato" title="Plato">Plato</a> and <a href="/wiki/Aristotle" title="Aristotle">Aristotle</a>,<sup id="cite_ref-41" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-41"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>41<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> who distinguished the forms of approximate and exact reasoning, set out the threefold scheme of <a href="/wiki/Abductive_reasoning" title="Abductive reasoning">abductive</a>, <a href="/wiki/Deductive_reasoning" title="Deductive reasoning">deductive</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Inductive_reasoning" title="Inductive reasoning">inductive</a> inference, and also analyzed reasoning by <a href="/wiki/Analogy" title="Analogy">analogy</a>. The eleventh century Arab polymath <a href="/wiki/Ibn_al-Haytham" title="Ibn al-Haytham">Ibn al-Haytham</a> (known in Latin as <a href="/wiki/Alhazen" class="mw-redirect" title="Alhazen">Alhazen</a>) conducted his research in optics by way of controlled experimental testing and applied <a href="/wiki/Geometry" title="Geometry">geometry</a>, especially in his investigations into the images resulting from the <a href="/wiki/Catoptrics" title="Catoptrics">reflection</a> and <a href="/wiki/Dioptrics" title="Dioptrics">refraction</a> of light. <a href="/wiki/Roger_Bacon" title="Roger Bacon">Roger Bacon</a> (1214–1294), an English thinker and experimenter heavily influenced by al-Haytham, is recognized by many to be the father of modern scientific method.<sup id="cite_ref-42" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-42"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>42<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> His view that mathematics was essential to a correct understanding of natural philosophy is considered to have been 400 years ahead of its time.<sup id="cite_ref-First_Scientist,_Clegg_43-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-First_Scientist,_Clegg-43"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>43<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Modern">Modern</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=11" title="Edit section: Modern" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <figure typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Francis_Bacon_statue,_Gray%27s_Inn.jpg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e6/Francis_Bacon_statue%2C_Gray%27s_Inn.jpg/262px-Francis_Bacon_statue%2C_Gray%27s_Inn.jpg" decoding="async" width="262" height="350" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="480" data-file-height="640"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 262px;height: 350px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e6/Francis_Bacon_statue%2C_Gray%27s_Inn.jpg/262px-Francis_Bacon_statue%2C_Gray%27s_Inn.jpg" data-width="262" data-height="350" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e6/Francis_Bacon_statue%2C_Gray%27s_Inn.jpg/394px-Francis_Bacon_statue%2C_Gray%27s_Inn.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e6/Francis_Bacon_statue%2C_Gray%27s_Inn.jpg 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption>Francis Bacon's statue at <a href="/wiki/Gray%27s_Inn" title="Gray's Inn">Gray's Inn</a>, South Square, London</figcaption></figure> <figure class="mw-default-size mw-halign-left" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Hierarchy_of_the_Sciences_-_diagram.svg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/87/Hierarchy_of_the_Sciences_-_diagram.svg/220px-Hierarchy_of_the_Sciences_-_diagram.svg.png" decoding="async" width="220" height="124" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="512" data-file-height="288"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 220px;height: 124px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/87/Hierarchy_of_the_Sciences_-_diagram.svg/220px-Hierarchy_of_the_Sciences_-_diagram.svg.png" data-width="220" data-height="124" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/87/Hierarchy_of_the_Sciences_-_diagram.svg/330px-Hierarchy_of_the_Sciences_-_diagram.svg.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/87/Hierarchy_of_the_Sciences_-_diagram.svg/440px-Hierarchy_of_the_Sciences_-_diagram.svg.png 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption>Theory of Science by Auguste Comte</figcaption></figure> <p><a href="/wiki/Francis_Bacon" title="Francis Bacon">Francis Bacon</a> (no direct relation to <a href="/wiki/Roger_Bacon" title="Roger Bacon">Roger Bacon</a>, who lived 300 years earlier) was a seminal figure in philosophy of science at the time of the <a href="/wiki/Scientific_revolution" class="mw-redirect" title="Scientific revolution">Scientific Revolution</a>. In his work <i><a href="/wiki/Novum_Organum" title="Novum Organum">Novum Organum</a></i> (1620)—an allusion to Aristotle's <i><a href="/wiki/Organon" title="Organon">Organon</a></i>—Bacon outlined a new <a href="/wiki/System_of_logic" class="mw-redirect" title="System of logic">system of logic</a> to improve upon the old philosophical process of <a href="/wiki/Syllogism" title="Syllogism">syllogism</a>. Bacon's method relied on experimental <i>histories</i> to eliminate alternative theories.<sup id="cite_ref-44" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-44"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>44<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> In 1637, <a href="/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Descartes" title="René Descartes">René Descartes</a> established a new framework for grounding scientific knowledge in his treatise, <i><a href="/wiki/Discourse_on_Method" class="mw-redirect" title="Discourse on Method">Discourse on Method</a></i>, advocating the central role of <a href="/wiki/Rationalism" title="Rationalism">reason</a> as opposed to sensory experience. By contrast, in 1713, the 2nd edition of <a href="/wiki/Isaac_Newton" title="Isaac Newton">Isaac Newton</a>'s <i><a href="/wiki/Philosophiae_Naturalis_Principia_Mathematica" class="mw-redirect" title="Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica">Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica</a></i> argued that "... hypotheses ... have no place in experimental philosophy. In this philosophy[,] propositions are deduced from the phenomena and rendered general by induction."<sup id="cite_ref-www.paricenter.com_mullin02_45-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-www.paricenter.com_mullin02-45"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>45<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> This passage influenced a "later generation of philosophically-inclined readers to pronounce a ban on causal hypotheses in natural philosophy".<sup id="cite_ref-www.paricenter.com_mullin02_45-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-www.paricenter.com_mullin02-45"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>45<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> In particular, later in the 18th century, <a href="/wiki/David_Hume" title="David Hume">David Hume</a> would famously articulate <a href="/wiki/Skepticism" title="Skepticism">skepticism</a> about the ability of science to determine <a href="/wiki/Causality" title="Causality">causality</a> and gave a definitive formulation of the <a href="/wiki/Problem_of_induction" title="Problem of induction">problem of induction</a>, though both theses would be contested by the end of the 18th century by Immanuel Kant in his <a href="/wiki/Critique_of_Pure_Reason" title="Critique of Pure Reason">Critique of Pure Reason</a> and <a href="/wiki/Metaphysical_Foundations_of_Natural_Science" title="Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science">Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science</a>. In 19th century <a href="/wiki/Auguste_Comte" title="Auguste Comte">Auguste Comte</a> made a major contribution to the theory of science. The 19th century writings of <a href="/wiki/John_Stuart_Mill" title="John Stuart Mill">John Stuart Mill</a> are also considered important in the formation of current conceptions of the scientific method, as well as anticipating later accounts of scientific explanation.<sup id="cite_ref-mill_46-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-mill-46"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>46<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Logical_positivism">Logical positivism</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=12" title="Edit section: Logical positivism" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Logical_positivism" title="Logical positivism">Logical positivism</a></div> <p><a href="/wiki/Instrumentalism" title="Instrumentalism">Instrumentalism</a> became popular among physicists around the turn of the 20th century, after which logical positivism defined the field for several decades. Logical positivism accepts only testable statements as meaningful, rejects metaphysical interpretations, and embraces <a href="/wiki/Verificationism" title="Verificationism">verificationism</a> (a set of <a href="/wiki/Epistemology" title="Epistemology">theories of knowledge</a> that combines <a href="/wiki/Logicism" title="Logicism">logicism</a>, <a href="/wiki/Empiricism" title="Empiricism">empiricism</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Linguistics" title="Linguistics">linguistics</a> to ground philosophy on a basis consistent with examples from the <a href="/wiki/Empirical_sciences" class="mw-redirect" title="Empirical sciences">empirical sciences</a>). Seeking to overhaul all of philosophy and convert it to a new <i>scientific philosophy</i>,<sup id="cite_ref-Friedman-pxiv_47-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Friedman-pxiv-47"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>47<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> the <a href="/wiki/Berlin_Circle_(philosophy)" class="mw-redirect" title="Berlin Circle (philosophy)">Berlin Circle</a> and the <a href="/wiki/Vienna_Circle" title="Vienna Circle">Vienna Circle</a> propounded logical positivism in the late 1920s. </p><p>Interpreting <a href="/wiki/Ludwig_Wittgenstein" title="Ludwig Wittgenstein">Ludwig Wittgenstein</a>'s early <a href="/wiki/Tractatus_Logico-Philosophicus" title="Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus">philosophy of language</a>, logical positivists identified a verifiability principle or criterion of cognitive meaningfulness. From <a href="/wiki/Bertrand_Russell" title="Bertrand Russell">Bertrand Russell</a>'s logicism they sought reduction of mathematics to logic. They also embraced Russell's <a href="/wiki/Logical_atomism" title="Logical atomism">logical atomism</a>, <a href="/wiki/Ernst_Mach" title="Ernst Mach">Ernst Mach</a>'s <a href="/wiki/Phenomenalism" title="Phenomenalism">phenomenalism</a>—whereby the mind knows only actual or potential sensory experience, which is the content of all sciences, whether physics or psychology—and <a href="/wiki/Percy_Bridgman" class="mw-redirect" title="Percy Bridgman">Percy Bridgman</a>'s <a href="/wiki/Operationalism" class="mw-redirect" title="Operationalism">operationalism</a>. Thereby, only the <i>verifiable</i> was scientific and <i>cognitively meaningful</i>, whereas the unverifiable was unscientific, cognitively meaningless "pseudostatements"—metaphysical, emotive, or such—not worthy of further review by philosophers, who were newly tasked to organize knowledge rather than develop new knowledge. </p><p>Logical positivism is commonly portrayed as taking the extreme position that scientific language should never refer to anything unobservable—even the seemingly core notions of causality, mechanism, and principles—but that is an exaggeration. Talk of such unobservables could be allowed as metaphorical—direct observations viewed in the abstract—or at worst metaphysical or emotional. <i>Theoretical laws</i> would be reduced to <i>empirical laws</i>, while <i>theoretical terms</i> would garner meaning from <i>observational terms</i> via <i>correspondence rules</i>. Mathematics in physics would reduce to <a href="/wiki/Symbolic_logic" class="mw-redirect" title="Symbolic logic">symbolic logic</a> via logicism, while <a href="/wiki/Rational_reconstruction" title="Rational reconstruction">rational reconstruction</a> would convert <a href="/wiki/Natural_language" title="Natural language">ordinary language</a> into standardized equivalents, all networked and united by a <a href="/wiki/Logical_syntax" class="mw-redirect" title="Logical syntax">logical syntax</a>. A scientific theory would be stated with its method of verification, whereby a <a href="/wiki/Logical_calculus" class="mw-redirect" title="Logical calculus">logical calculus</a> or <a href="/wiki/Operationalism" class="mw-redirect" title="Operationalism">empirical operation</a> could verify its falsity or truth. </p><p>In the late 1930s, logical positivists fled Germany and Austria for Britain and America. By then, many had replaced Mach's phenomenalism with <a href="/wiki/Otto_Neurath" title="Otto Neurath">Otto Neurath</a>'s <a href="/wiki/Physicalism" title="Physicalism">physicalism</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Rudolf_Carnap" title="Rudolf Carnap">Rudolf Carnap</a> had sought to replace <i>verification</i> with simply <i>confirmation</i>. With <a href="/wiki/World_War_II" title="World War II">World War II</a>'s close in 1945, logical positivism became milder, <i>logical empiricism</i>, led largely by <a href="/wiki/Carl_Gustav_Hempel" title="Carl Gustav Hempel">Carl Hempel</a>, in America, who expounded the <a href="/wiki/Covering_law_model" class="mw-redirect" title="Covering law model">covering law model</a> of scientific explanation as a way of identifying the logical form of explanations without any reference to the suspect notion of "causation". The logical positivist movement became a major underpinning of <a href="/wiki/Analytic_philosophy" title="Analytic philosophy">analytic philosophy</a>,<sup id="cite_ref-autogenerated1_48-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-autogenerated1-48"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>48<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> and dominated <a href="/wiki/Anglosphere" title="Anglosphere">Anglosphere</a> philosophy, including philosophy of science, while influencing sciences, into the 1960s. Yet the movement failed to resolve its central problems,<sup id="cite_ref-Smith1986_49-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Smith1986-49"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>49<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Bunge1996_50-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Bunge1996-50"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>50<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-51" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-51"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>51<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> and its doctrines were increasingly assaulted. Nevertheless, it brought about the establishment of philosophy of science as a distinct subdiscipline of philosophy, with Carl Hempel playing a key role.<sup id="cite_ref-Friedman-pxii_52-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Friedman-pxii-52"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>52<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <figure typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Epicycle_and_deferent.svg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fb/Epicycle_and_deferent.svg/261px-Epicycle_and_deferent.svg.png" decoding="async" width="261" height="233" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="560" data-file-height="500"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 261px;height: 233px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fb/Epicycle_and_deferent.svg/261px-Epicycle_and_deferent.svg.png" data-width="261" data-height="233" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fb/Epicycle_and_deferent.svg/392px-Epicycle_and_deferent.svg.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fb/Epicycle_and_deferent.svg/522px-Epicycle_and_deferent.svg.png 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption>For <a href="/wiki/Thomas_Kuhn" title="Thomas Kuhn">Kuhn</a>, the addition of <a href="/wiki/Deferent_and_epicycle" title="Deferent and epicycle">epicycles</a> in Ptolemaic astronomy was "normal science" within a paradigm, whereas the <a href="/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions#Copernican_Revolution" title="The Structure of Scientific Revolutions">Copernican revolution</a> was a paradigm shift.</figcaption></figure> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Thomas_Kuhn">Thomas Kuhn</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=13" title="Edit section: Thomas Kuhn" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions" title="The Structure of Scientific Revolutions">The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</a></div> <p>In the 1962 book <i><a href="/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions" title="The Structure of Scientific Revolutions">The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</a></i>, <a href="/wiki/Thomas_Kuhn" title="Thomas Kuhn">Thomas Kuhn</a> argued that the process of observation and evaluation takes place within a paradigm, a <a href="/wiki/Logically_consistent" class="mw-redirect" title="Logically consistent">logically consistent</a> "portrait" of the world that is consistent with observations made from its framing. A paradigm also encompasses the set of questions and practices that define a scientific discipline. He characterized <i>normal science</i> as the process of observation and "puzzle solving" which takes place within a paradigm, whereas <i>revolutionary science</i> occurs when one paradigm overtakes another in a <a href="/wiki/Paradigm_shift" title="Paradigm shift">paradigm shift</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-53" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-53"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>53<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>Kuhn denied that it is ever possible to isolate the hypothesis being tested from the influence of the theory in which the observations are grounded, and he argued that it is not possible to evaluate competing paradigms independently. More than one logically consistent construct can paint a usable likeness of the world, but there is no common ground from which to pit two against each other, theory against theory. Each paradigm has its own distinct questions, aims, and interpretations. Neither provides a standard by which the other can be judged, so there is no clear way to measure <a href="/wiki/Scientific_progress" class="mw-redirect" title="Scientific progress">scientific progress</a> across paradigms. </p><p>For Kuhn, the choice of paradigm was sustained by rational processes, but not ultimately determined by them. The choice between paradigms involves setting two or more "portraits" against the world and deciding which likeness is most promising. For Kuhn, acceptance or rejection of a paradigm is a social process as much as a logical process. Kuhn's position, however, is not one of <a href="/wiki/Relativism" title="Relativism">relativism</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-KuhnP206_54-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-KuhnP206-54"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>54<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> According to Kuhn, a paradigm shift occurs when a significant number of observational anomalies arise in the old paradigm and a new paradigm makes sense of them. That is, the choice of a new paradigm is based on observations, even though those observations are made against the background of the old paradigm. </p> </section><div class="mw-heading mw-heading2 section-heading" onclick="mfTempOpenSection(3)"><span class="indicator mf-icon mf-icon-expand mf-icon--small"></span><h2 id="Current_approaches">Current approaches</h2><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=14" title="Edit section: Current approaches" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div><section class="mf-section-3 collapsible-block" id="mf-section-3"> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Naturalism's_axiomatic_assumptions"><span id="Naturalism.27s_axiomatic_assumptions"></span>Naturalism's axiomatic assumptions</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=15" title="Edit section: Naturalism's axiomatic assumptions" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable relarticle mainarticle selfreference noprint">This section is <a href="/wiki/Help:Transclusion" title="Help:Transclusion">transcluded</a> from <a href="/wiki/Naturalism_(philosophy)#Providing_assumptions_required_for_science" title="Naturalism (philosophy)">Naturalism (philosophy)#Providing assumptions required for science</a>. <span class="plainlinks" style="font-style: normal; font-size:85%;">(<a class="external text" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naturalism_(philosophy)&amp;action=edit#Providing_assumptions_required_for_science">edit</a> | <a class="external text" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naturalism_(philosophy)&amp;action=history#Providing_assumptions_required_for_science">history</a>)</span></div> <p>According to Robert Priddy, all scientific study inescapably builds on at least some essential assumptions that cannot be tested by scientific processes;<sup id="cite_ref-Priddy_1998_55-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Priddy_1998-55"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>55<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> that is, that scientists must start with some assumptions as to the ultimate analysis of the facts with which it deals. These assumptions would then be justified partly by their adherence to the types of occurrence of which we are directly conscious, and partly by their success in representing the observed facts with a certain generality, devoid of <i>ad hoc</i> suppositions."<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEWhitehead1997135_56-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEWhitehead1997135-56"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>56<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Thomas_Kuhn" title="Thomas Kuhn">Kuhn</a> also claims that all science is based on assumptions about the character of the universe, rather than merely on empirical facts. These assumptions – a paradigm – comprise a collection of beliefs, values and techniques that are held by a given scientific community, which legitimize their systems and set the limitations to their investigation.<sup id="cite_ref-57" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-57"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>57<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> For naturalists, nature is the only reality, the "correct" paradigm, and there is no such thing as <i>supernatural</i>, i.e. anything above, beyond, or outside of nature. The scientific method is to be used to investigate all reality, including the human spirit.<sup id="cite_ref-58" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-58"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>58<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>Some claim that naturalism is the implicit philosophy of working scientists, and that the following basic assumptions are needed to justify the scientific method:<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii_59-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii-59"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>59<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <ol><li><i>That there is an objective reality shared by all rational observers</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii_59-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii-59"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>59<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091–2_60-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932-60"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>60<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><br>"The basis for rationality is acceptance of an external objective reality."<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEDurak2008_61-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEDurak2008-61"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>61<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> "Objective reality is clearly an essential thing if we are to develop a meaningful perspective of the world. Nevertheless its very existence is assumed."<sup id="cite_ref-62" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-62"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>62<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> "Our belief that objective reality exist is an assumption that it arises from a real world outside of ourselves. As infants we made this assumption unconsciously. People are happy to make this assumption that adds meaning to our sensations and feelings, than live with <a href="/wiki/Solipsism" title="Solipsism">solipsism</a>."<sup id="cite_ref-63" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-63"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>63<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> "Without this assumption, there would be only the thoughts and images in our own mind (which would be the only existing mind) and there would be no need of science, or anything else."<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTESobottka200511_64-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTESobottka200511-64"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>64<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup class="noprint Inline-Template" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources" title="Wikipedia:Verifiability"><span title="The material near this tag may rely on a self-published source. (May 2023)">self-published source?</span></a></i>]</sup></li> <li><i>That this objective reality is governed by natural laws</i>;<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii_59-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii-59"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>59<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091–2_60-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932-60"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>60<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> <br>"Science, at least today, assumes that the universe obeys knowable principles that don't depend on time or place, nor on subjective parameters such as what we think, know or how we behave."<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEDurak2008_61-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEDurak2008-61"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>61<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Hugh Gauch argues that science presupposes that "the physical world is orderly and comprehensible."<sup id="cite_ref-65" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-65"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>65<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></li> <li><i>That reality can be discovered by means of systematic observation and experimentation.</i><sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii_59-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii-59"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>59<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091–2_60-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932-60"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>60<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><br>Stanley Sobottka said: "The assumption of external reality is necessary for science to function and to flourish. For the most part, science is the discovering and explaining of the external world."<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTESobottka200511_64-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTESobottka200511-64"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>64<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup class="noprint Inline-Template" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources" title="Wikipedia:Verifiability"><span title="The material near this tag may rely on a self-published source. (May 2023)">self-published source?</span></a></i>]</sup> "Science attempts to produce knowledge that is as universal and objective as possible within the realm of human understanding."<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEDurak2008_61-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEDurak2008-61"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>61<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></li> <li><i>That Nature has uniformity of laws and most if not all things in nature must have at least a natural cause.</i><sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091–2_60-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932-60"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>60<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><br>Biologist <a href="/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould" title="Stephen Jay Gould">Stephen Jay Gould</a> referred to these two closely related propositions as the constancy of nature's laws and the operation of known processes.<sup id="cite_ref-66" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-66"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>66<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Simpson agrees that the axiom of uniformity of law, an unprovable postulate, is necessary in order for scientists to extrapolate inductive inference into the unobservable past in order to meaningfully study it.<sup id="cite_ref-67" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-67"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>67<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> "The assumption of spatial and temporal invariance of natural laws is by no means unique to geology since it amounts to a warrant for inductive inference which, as Bacon showed nearly four hundred years ago, is the basic mode of reasoning in empirical science. Without assuming this spatial and temporal invariance, we have no basis for extrapolating from the known to the unknown and, therefore, no way of reaching general conclusions from a finite number of observations. (Since the assumption is itself vindicated by induction, it can in no way "prove" the validity of induction — an endeavor virtually abandoned after Hume demonstrated its futility two centuries ago)."<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEGould1965223–228_68-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEGould1965223%E2%80%93228-68"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>68<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Gould also notes that natural processes such as Lyell's "uniformity of process" are an assumption: "As such, it is another <i>a priori</i> assumption shared by all scientists and not a statement about the empirical world."<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEGould198411_69-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEGould198411-69"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>69<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> According to R. Hooykaas: "The principle of uniformity is not a law, not a rule established after comparison of facts, but a principle, preceding the observation of facts ... It is the logical principle of parsimony of causes and of economy of scientific notions. By explaining past changes by analogy with present phenomena, a limit is set to conjecture, for there is only one way in which two things are equal, but there are an infinity of ways in which they could be supposed different."<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHooykaas196338_70-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEHooykaas196338-70"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>70<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></li> <li><i>That experimental procedures will be done satisfactorily without any deliberate or unintentional mistakes that will influence the results</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091–2_60-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932-60"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>60<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></li> <li><i>That experimenters won't be significantly biased by their presumptions.</i><sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091–2_60-5" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932-60"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>60<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></li> <li><i>That random sampling is representative of the entire population.</i><sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091–2_60-6" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932-60"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>60<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><br>A simple random sample (SRS) is the most basic probabilistic option used for creating a sample from a population. The benefit of SRS is that the investigator is guaranteed to choose a sample that represents the population that ensures statistically valid conclusions.<sup id="cite_ref-71" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-71"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>71<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></li></ol> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Coherentism">Coherentism</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=16" title="Edit section: Coherentism" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Coherentism" title="Coherentism">Coherentism</a></div> <figure class="mw-default-size" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:JeremiahHorrocks.jpg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/JeremiahHorrocks.jpg/220px-JeremiahHorrocks.jpg" decoding="async" width="220" height="156" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="400" data-file-height="284"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 220px;height: 156px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/JeremiahHorrocks.jpg/220px-JeremiahHorrocks.jpg" data-width="220" data-height="156" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/JeremiahHorrocks.jpg/330px-JeremiahHorrocks.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/JeremiahHorrocks.jpg 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption><a href="/wiki/Jeremiah_Horrocks" title="Jeremiah Horrocks">Jeremiah Horrocks</a> makes the first observation of the transit of Venus in 1639, as imagined by the artist <a href="/wiki/William_Richard_Lavender" title="William Richard Lavender">W. R. Lavender</a> in 1903.</figcaption></figure> <p>In contrast to the view that science rests on foundational assumptions, coherentism asserts that statements are justified by being a part of a coherent system. Or, rather, individual statements cannot be validated on their own: only coherent systems can be justified.<sup id="cite_ref-72" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-72"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>72<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> A prediction of a <a href="/wiki/Transit_of_Venus" title="Transit of Venus">transit of Venus</a> is justified by its being coherent with broader beliefs about celestial mechanics and earlier observations. As explained above, observation is a cognitive act. That is, it relies on a pre-existing understanding, a systematic set of beliefs. An observation of a transit of Venus requires a huge range of auxiliary beliefs, such as those that describe the <a href="/wiki/Optics" title="Optics">optics</a> of telescopes, the <a href="/wiki/Mechanics" title="Mechanics">mechanics</a> of the telescope mount, and an understanding of <a href="/wiki/Celestial_mechanics" title="Celestial mechanics">celestial mechanics</a>. If the prediction fails and a transit is not observed, that is likely to occasion an adjustment in the system, a change in some auxiliary assumption, rather than a rejection of the theoretical system.<sup class="noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed" title="Wikipedia:Citation needed"><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources. (December 2017)">citation needed</span></a></i>]</sup> </p><p>In fact, according to the <a href="/wiki/Duhem%E2%80%93Quine_thesis" title="Duhem–Quine thesis">Duhem–Quine thesis</a>, after <a href="/wiki/Pierre_Duhem" title="Pierre Duhem">Pierre Duhem</a> and <a href="/wiki/Willard_Van_Orman_Quine" title="Willard Van Orman Quine">W.V. Quine</a>, it is impossible to test a theory in isolation.<sup id="cite_ref-Harding1976_73-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Harding1976-73"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>73<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> One must always add auxiliary hypotheses in order to make testable predictions. For example, to test <a href="/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gravitation" title="Newton's law of universal gravitation">Newton's Law of Gravitation</a> in the solar system, one needs information about the masses and positions of the Sun and all the planets. Famously, the failure to predict the orbit of <a href="/wiki/Uranus" title="Uranus">Uranus</a> in the 19th century led not to the rejection of Newton's Law but rather to the rejection of the hypothesis that the solar system comprises only seven planets. The investigations that followed led to the discovery of an eighth planet, <a href="/wiki/Neptune" title="Neptune">Neptune</a>. If a test fails, something is wrong. But there is a problem in figuring out what that something is: a missing planet, badly calibrated test equipment, an unsuspected curvature of space, or something else.<sup class="noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed" title="Wikipedia:Citation needed"><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources. (January 2018)">citation needed</span></a></i>]</sup> </p><p>One consequence of the Duhem–Quine thesis is that one can make any theory compatible with any empirical observation by the addition of a sufficient number of suitable <i>ad hoc</i> hypotheses. <a href="/wiki/Karl_Popper" title="Karl Popper">Karl Popper</a> accepted this thesis, leading him to reject <a href="/wiki/Falsifiability#Naive_falsificationism" title="Falsifiability">naïve falsification</a>. Instead, he favored a "survival of the fittest" view in which the most falsifiable scientific theories are to be preferred.<sup id="cite_ref-Popper_2005ch3-4_74-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Popper_2005ch3-4-74"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>74<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Anything_goes_methodology">Anything goes methodology</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=17" title="Edit section: Anything goes methodology" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <figure class="mw-default-size mw-halign-right" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Paul_Feyerabend_Berkeley.jpg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/Paul_Feyerabend_Berkeley.jpg/220px-Paul_Feyerabend_Berkeley.jpg" decoding="async" width="220" height="224" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="609" data-file-height="621"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 220px;height: 224px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/Paul_Feyerabend_Berkeley.jpg/220px-Paul_Feyerabend_Berkeley.jpg" data-width="220" data-height="224" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/Paul_Feyerabend_Berkeley.jpg/330px-Paul_Feyerabend_Berkeley.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/Paul_Feyerabend_Berkeley.jpg/440px-Paul_Feyerabend_Berkeley.jpg 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption><a href="/wiki/Paul_Karl_Feyerabend" class="mw-redirect" title="Paul Karl Feyerabend">Paul Karl Feyerabend</a></figcaption></figure> <p><a href="/wiki/Paul_Feyerabend" title="Paul Feyerabend">Paul Feyerabend</a> (1924–1994) argued that no description of scientific method could possibly be broad enough to include all the approaches and methods used by scientists, and that there are no useful and exception-free <a href="/wiki/Methodology" title="Methodology">methodological rules</a> governing the progress of science. He argued that "the only principle that does not inhibit progress is: <i>anything goes</i>".<sup id="cite_ref-contra_2-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-contra-2"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>2<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>Feyerabend said that science started as a liberating movement, but that over time it had become increasingly dogmatic and rigid and had some oppressive features, and thus had become increasingly an <a href="/wiki/Ideology" title="Ideology">ideology</a>. Because of this, he said it was impossible to come up with an unambiguous way to distinguish science from <a href="/wiki/Religion" title="Religion">religion</a>, <a href="/wiki/Magic_(paranormal)" class="mw-redirect" title="Magic (paranormal)">magic</a>, or <a href="/wiki/Mythology" class="mw-redirect" title="Mythology">mythology</a>. He saw the exclusive dominance of science as a means of directing society as <a href="/wiki/Authoritarian" class="mw-redirect" title="Authoritarian">authoritarian</a> and ungrounded.<sup id="cite_ref-contra_2-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-contra-2"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>2<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Promulgation of this epistemological anarchism earned Feyerabend the title of "the worst enemy of science" from his detractors.<sup id="cite_ref-sep_75-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-sep-75"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>75<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Sociology_of_scientific_knowledge_methodology">Sociology of scientific knowledge methodology</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=18" title="Edit section: Sociology of scientific knowledge methodology" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Sociology_of_scientific_knowledge" title="Sociology of scientific knowledge">Sociology of scientific knowledge</a></div> <p>According to Kuhn, science is an inherently communal activity which can only be done as part of a community.<sup id="cite_ref-KuhnPostParadigm_76-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-KuhnPostParadigm-76"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>76<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> For him, the fundamental difference between science and other disciplines is the way in which the communities function. Others, especially Feyerabend and some post-modernist thinkers, have argued that there is insufficient difference between social practices in science and other disciplines to maintain this distinction. For them, social factors play an important and direct role in scientific method, but they do not serve to differentiate science from other disciplines. On this account, science is socially constructed, though this does not necessarily imply the more radical notion that reality itself is a <a href="/wiki/Social_constructionism" title="Social constructionism">social construct</a>. </p><p><a href="/wiki/Michel_Foucault" title="Michel Foucault">Michel Foucault</a> sought to analyze and uncover how disciplines within the social sciences developed and adopted the methodologies used by their practitioners. In works like <i><a href="/wiki/The_Archaeology_of_Knowledge" title="The Archaeology of Knowledge">The Archaeology of Knowledge</a></i>, he used the term <i>human sciences</i>. The human sciences do not comprise mainstream academic disciplines; they are rather an interdisciplinary space for the reflection on <i>man</i> who is the subject of more mainstream scientific knowledge, taken now as an object, sitting between these more conventional areas, and of course associating with disciplines such as <a href="/wiki/Anthropology" title="Anthropology">anthropology</a>, <a href="/wiki/Psychology" title="Psychology">psychology</a>, <a href="/wiki/Sociology" title="Sociology">sociology</a>, and even <a href="/wiki/History" title="History">history</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-77" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-77"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>77<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Rejecting the <a href="/wiki/Scientific_realism" title="Scientific realism">realist</a> view of scientific inquiry, Foucault argued throughout his work that scientific discourse is not simply an objective study of phenomena, as both <a href="/wiki/Natural_science" title="Natural science">natural</a> and <a href="/wiki/Social_science" title="Social science">social scientists</a> like to believe, but is rather the product of systems of power relations struggling to construct scientific disciplines and knowledge within given societies.<sup id="cite_ref-78" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-78"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>78<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> With the advances of scientific disciplines, such as psychology and anthropology, the need to separate, categorize, normalize and institutionalize populations into constructed social identities became a staple of the sciences. Constructions of what were considered "normal" and "abnormal" stigmatized and ostracized groups of people, like the mentally ill and sexual and gender minorities.<sup id="cite_ref-79" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-79"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>79<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>However, some (such as Quine) do maintain that scientific reality is a social construct: </p> <blockquote><p> Physical objects are conceptually imported into the situation as convenient intermediaries not by definition in terms of experience, but simply as irreducible posits comparable, epistemologically, to the gods of Homer ... For my part I do, qua lay physicist, believe in physical objects and not in Homer's gods; and I consider it a scientific error to believe otherwise. But in point of epistemological footing, the physical objects and the gods differ only in degree and not in kind. Both sorts of entities enter our conceptions only as <i>cultural posits</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-80" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-80"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>80<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></p></blockquote> <p>The public backlash of scientists against such views, particularly in the 1990s, became known as the <a href="/wiki/Science_wars" title="Science wars">science wars</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-81" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-81"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>81<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>A major development in recent decades has been the study of the formation, structure, and evolution of scientific communities by sociologists and anthropologists – including <a href="/wiki/David_Bloor" title="David Bloor">David Bloor</a>, <a href="/wiki/Harry_Collins" title="Harry Collins">Harry Collins</a>, <a href="/wiki/Bruno_Latour" title="Bruno Latour">Bruno Latour</a>, <a href="/wiki/Ian_Hacking" title="Ian Hacking">Ian Hacking</a> and <a href="/wiki/Anselm_Strauss" title="Anselm Strauss">Anselm Strauss</a>. Concepts and methods (such as rational choice, social choice or game theory) from <a href="/wiki/Economics_of_scientific_knowledge" title="Economics of scientific knowledge">economics have also been applied</a><sup class="noprint Inline-Template" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Unsupported_attributions" title="Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch"><span title="The material near this tag may use weasel words or too-vague attribution. (October 2017)">by whom?</span></a></i>]</sup> for understanding the efficiency of scientific communities in the production of knowledge. This interdisciplinary field has come to be known as <a href="/wiki/Science_and_technology_studies" title="Science and technology studies">science and technology studies</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-82" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-82"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>82<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Here the approach to the philosophy of science is to study how scientific communities actually operate. </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Continental_philosophy">Continental philosophy</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=19" title="Edit section: Continental philosophy" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <p>Philosophers in the <a href="/wiki/Continental_philosophy" title="Continental philosophy">continental philosophical tradition</a> are not traditionally categorized<sup class="noprint Inline-Template" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Unsupported_attributions" title="Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch"><span title="The material near this tag may use weasel words or too-vague attribution. (March 2019)">by whom?</span></a></i>]</sup> as philosophers of science. However, they have much to say about science, some of which has anticipated themes in the analytical tradition. For example, in <a href="/wiki/On_the_Genealogy_of_Morality" title="On the Genealogy of Morality"><i>The Genealogy of Morals</i></a> (1887) <a href="/wiki/Friedrich_Nietzsche" title="Friedrich Nietzsche">Friedrich Nietzsche</a> advanced the thesis that the motive for the search for truth in sciences is a kind of ascetic ideal.<sup id="cite_ref-83" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-83"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>83<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>In general, continental philosophy views science from a <a href="/wiki/World_history_(field)" title="World history (field)">world-historical</a> perspective. Philosophers such as <a href="/wiki/Pierre_Duhem" title="Pierre Duhem">Pierre Duhem</a> (1861–1916) and <a href="/wiki/Gaston_Bachelard" title="Gaston Bachelard">Gaston Bachelard</a> (1884–1962) wrote their works with this world-historical approach to science, predating Kuhn's 1962 work by a generation or more. All of these approaches involve a historical and sociological turn to science, with a priority on lived experience (a kind of Husserlian <a href="/wiki/Lifeworld" title="Lifeworld">"life-world"</a>), rather than a progress-based or anti-historical approach as emphasised in the analytic tradition. One can trace this continental strand of thought through the <a href="/wiki/Phenomenology_(philosophy)" title="Phenomenology (philosophy)">phenomenology</a> of <a href="/wiki/Edmund_Husserl" title="Edmund Husserl">Edmund Husserl</a> (1859–1938), the late works of <a href="/wiki/Maurice_Merleau-Ponty" title="Maurice Merleau-Ponty">Merleau-Ponty</a> (<i>Nature: Course Notes from the Collège de France</i>, 1956–1960), and the <a href="/wiki/Hermeneutics" title="Hermeneutics">hermeneutics</a> of <a href="/wiki/Martin_Heidegger" title="Martin Heidegger">Martin Heidegger</a> (1889–1976).<sup id="cite_ref-Gutting_84-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Gutting-84"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>84<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>The largest effect on the continental tradition with respect to science came from Martin Heidegger's critique of the <a href="/wiki/Present-at-hand" class="mw-redirect" title="Present-at-hand">theoretical attitude</a> in general, which of course includes the scientific attitude.<sup id="cite_ref-Wheeler2015_85-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Wheeler2015-85"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>85<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> For this reason, the continental tradition has remained much more skeptical of the importance of science in <a href="/wiki/Human_life_(disambiguation)" class="mw-redirect mw-disambig" title="Human life (disambiguation)">human life</a> and in philosophical inquiry. Nonetheless, there have been a number of important works: especially those of a Kuhnian precursor, <a href="/wiki/Alexandre_Koyr%C3%A9" title="Alexandre Koyré">Alexandre Koyré</a> (1892–1964). Another important development was that of <a href="/wiki/Michel_Foucault" title="Michel Foucault">Michel Foucault</a>'s analysis of historical and scientific thought in <i><a href="/wiki/The_Order_of_Things" title="The Order of Things">The Order of Things</a></i> (1966) and his study of power and corruption within the "science" of <a href="/wiki/Insanity" title="Insanity">madness</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-86" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-86"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>86<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Post-Heideggerian authors contributing to continental philosophy of science in the second half of the 20th century include <a href="/wiki/J%C3%BCrgen_Habermas" title="Jürgen Habermas">Jürgen Habermas</a> (e.g., <i>Truth and Justification</i>, 1998), <a href="/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_von_Weizs%C3%A4cker" title="Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker">Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker</a> (<i>The Unity of Nature</i>, 1980; <a href="/wiki/German_language" title="German language">German</a>: <i lang="de">Die Einheit der Natur</i> (1971)), and <a href="/wiki/Wolfgang_Stegm%C3%BCller" title="Wolfgang Stegmüller">Wolfgang Stegmüller</a> (<i>Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie</i>, 1973–1986). </p> <div style="clear:both;" class=""></div> </section><div class="mw-heading mw-heading2 section-heading" onclick="mfTempOpenSection(4)"><span class="indicator mf-icon mf-icon-expand mf-icon--small"></span><h2 id="Other_topics">Other topics</h2><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=20" title="Edit section: Other topics" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div><section class="mf-section-4 collapsible-block" id="mf-section-4"> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Reductionism">Reductionism</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=21" title="Edit section: Reductionism" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <p><a href="/wiki/Analysis" title="Analysis">Analysis</a> involves breaking an observation or theory down into simpler concepts in order to understand it. <a href="/wiki/Reductionism" title="Reductionism">Reductionism</a> can refer to one of several philosophical positions related to this approach. One type of reductionism suggests that phenomena are amenable to scientific explanation at lower levels of analysis and inquiry. Perhaps a historical event might be explained in sociological and psychological terms, which in turn might be described in terms of human physiology, which in turn might be described in terms of chemistry and physics.<sup id="cite_ref-StanUnity_87-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StanUnity-87"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>87<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Daniel_Dennett" title="Daniel Dennett">Daniel Dennett</a> distinguishes legitimate reductionism from what he calls <i><a href="/wiki/Greedy_reductionism" title="Greedy reductionism">greedy reductionism</a>,</i> which denies real complexities and leaps too quickly to sweeping generalizations.<sup id="cite_ref-88" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-88"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>88<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Social_accountability">Social accountability</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=22" title="Edit section: Social accountability" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">See also: <a href="/wiki/The_Mismeasure_of_Man" title="The Mismeasure of Man">The Mismeasure of Man</a></div> <p>A broad issue affecting the neutrality of science concerns the areas which science chooses to explore—that is, what part of the world and of humankind are studied by science. <a href="/wiki/Philip_Kitcher" title="Philip Kitcher">Philip Kitcher</a> in his <i>Science, Truth, and Democracy</i><sup id="cite_ref-89" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-89"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>89<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> argues that scientific studies that attempt to show one segment of the population as being less intelligent, less successful, or emotionally backward compared to others have a political feedback effect which further excludes such groups from access to science. Thus such studies undermine the broad consensus required for good science by excluding certain people, and so proving themselves in the end to be unscientific. </p> </section><div class="mw-heading mw-heading2 section-heading" onclick="mfTempOpenSection(5)"><span class="indicator mf-icon mf-icon-expand mf-icon--small"></span><h2 id="Philosophy_of_particular_sciences">Philosophy of particular sciences</h2><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=23" title="Edit section: Philosophy of particular sciences" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div><section class="mf-section-5 collapsible-block" id="mf-section-5"> <style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1244412712">.mw-parser-output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 32px}.mw-parser-output .templatequotecite{line-height:1.5em;text-align:left;margin-top:0}@media(min-width:500px){.mw-parser-output .templatequotecite{padding-left:1.6em}}</style><blockquote class="templatequote"><p>There is no such thing as philosophy-free science; there is only science whose philosophical baggage is taken on board without examination.<sup id="cite_ref-90" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-90"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>90<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></p><div class="templatequotecite">— <cite>Daniel Dennett, <i><a href="/wiki/Darwin%27s_Dangerous_Idea" title="Darwin's Dangerous Idea">Darwin's Dangerous Idea</a></i>, 1995</cite></div></blockquote> <p>In addition to addressing the general questions regarding science and induction, many philosophers of science are occupied by investigating foundational problems in particular sciences. They also examine the implications of particular sciences for broader philosophical questions. The late 20th and early 21st century has seen a rise in the number of practitioners of philosophy of a particular science.<sup id="cite_ref-StanPhilNeuro_91-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StanPhilNeuro-91"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>91<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_statistics">Philosophy of statistics</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=24" title="Edit section: Philosophy of statistics" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_statistics" title="Philosophy of statistics">Philosophy of statistics</a></div> <p>The problem of induction discussed above is seen in another form in debates over the <a href="/wiki/Foundations_of_statistics" title="Foundations of statistics">foundations of statistics</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-92" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-92"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>92<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> The standard approach to <a href="/wiki/Statistical_hypothesis_testing" class="mw-redirect" title="Statistical hypothesis testing">statistical hypothesis testing</a> avoids claims about whether evidence supports a hypothesis or makes it more probable. Instead, the typical test yields a <a href="/wiki/P-value" title="P-value">p-value</a>, which is the probability of the <i>evidence</i> being such as it is, under the assumption that the <a href="/wiki/Null_hypothesis" title="Null hypothesis">null hypothesis</a> is true. If the <i>p</i>-value is too high, the hypothesis is rejected, in a way analogous to falsification. In contrast, <a href="/wiki/Bayesian_inference" title="Bayesian inference">Bayesian inference</a> seeks to assign probabilities to hypotheses. Related topics in philosophy of statistics include <a href="/wiki/Probability_interpretations" title="Probability interpretations">probability interpretations</a>, <a href="/wiki/Overfitting" title="Overfitting">overfitting</a>, and the difference between <a href="/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation" title="Correlation does not imply causation">correlation and causation</a>. </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_mathematics">Philosophy of mathematics</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=25" title="Edit section: Philosophy of mathematics" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_mathematics" title="Philosophy of mathematics">Philosophy of mathematics</a></div> <p>Philosophy of mathematics is concerned with the philosophical foundations and implications of <a href="/wiki/Mathematics" title="Mathematics">mathematics</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-93" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-93"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>93<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> The central questions are whether <a href="/wiki/Number" title="Number">numbers</a>, <a href="/wiki/Triangle" title="Triangle">triangles</a>, and other mathematical entities exist independently of the human <a href="/wiki/Mind" title="Mind">mind</a> and what is the nature of mathematical <a href="/wiki/Proposition" title="Proposition">propositions</a>. Is asking whether "1 + 1 = 2" is true fundamentally different from asking whether a ball is red? Was <a href="/wiki/Calculus" title="Calculus">calculus</a> invented or discovered? A related question is whether learning mathematics requires <a href="/wiki/A_priori_and_a_posteriori" title="A priori and a posteriori">experience or reason alone</a>. What does it mean to prove a mathematical <a href="/wiki/Theorem" title="Theorem">theorem</a> and how does one know whether a <a href="/wiki/Mathematical_proof" title="Mathematical proof">mathematical proof</a> is correct? Philosophers of mathematics also aim to clarify the relationships between mathematics and <a href="/wiki/Logic" title="Logic">logic</a>, human capabilities such as <a href="/wiki/Intuition_(psychology)" class="mw-redirect" title="Intuition (psychology)">intuition</a>, and the <a href="/wiki/Material_universe" class="mw-redirect" title="Material universe">material universe</a>. </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_physics">Philosophy of physics</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=26" title="Edit section: Philosophy of physics" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_physics" title="Philosophy of physics">Philosophy of physics</a></div> <p>Philosophy of physics is the study of the fundamental, <a href="/wiki/Philosophy" title="Philosophy">philosophical</a> questions underlying modern <a href="/wiki/Physics" title="Physics">physics</a>, the study of <a href="/wiki/Matter" title="Matter">matter</a> and <a href="/wiki/Energy" title="Energy">energy</a> and how they interact. The main questions concern the nature of <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_space_and_time" title="Philosophy of space and time">space and time</a>, <a href="/wiki/Atom" title="Atom">atoms</a> and <a href="/wiki/Atomism" title="Atomism">atomism</a>. Also included are the predictions of <a href="/wiki/Physical_cosmology" title="Physical cosmology">cosmology</a>, the <a href="/wiki/Interpretation_of_quantum_mechanics" class="mw-redirect" title="Interpretation of quantum mechanics">interpretation of quantum mechanics</a>, the foundations of <a href="/wiki/Statistical_mechanics" title="Statistical mechanics">statistical mechanics</a>, <a href="/wiki/Causality_(physics)" title="Causality (physics)">causality</a>, <a href="/wiki/Determinism" title="Determinism">determinism</a>, and the nature of <a href="/wiki/Physical_law" class="mw-redirect" title="Physical law">physical laws</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-94" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-94"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>94<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Classically, several of these questions were studied as part of <a href="/wiki/Metaphysics" title="Metaphysics">metaphysics</a> (for example, those about causality, determinism, and space and time). </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_chemistry">Philosophy of chemistry</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=27" title="Edit section: Philosophy of chemistry" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_chemistry" title="Philosophy of chemistry">Philosophy of chemistry</a></div> <p>Philosophy of chemistry is the philosophical study of the <a href="/wiki/Methodology" title="Methodology">methodology</a> and content of the science of <a href="/wiki/Chemistry" title="Chemistry">chemistry</a>. It is explored by philosophers, chemists, and philosopher-chemist teams. It includes research on general philosophy of science issues as applied to chemistry. For example, can all chemical phenomena be explained by <a href="/wiki/Quantum_mechanics" title="Quantum mechanics">quantum mechanics</a> or is it not possible to reduce chemistry to physics? For another example, chemists have discussed the philosophy of <a class="mw-selflink-fragment" href="#Confirmation_of_theories">how theories are confirmed</a> in the context of confirming <a href="/wiki/Reaction_mechanism" title="Reaction mechanism">reaction mechanisms</a>. Determining reaction mechanisms is difficult because they cannot be observed directly. Chemists can use a number of indirect measures as evidence to rule out certain mechanisms, but they are often unsure if the remaining mechanism is correct because there are many other possible mechanisms that they have not tested or even thought of.<sup id="cite_ref-WeisbergEtal2011_95-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-WeisbergEtal2011-95"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>95<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Philosophers have also sought to clarify the meaning of chemical concepts which do not refer to specific physical entities, such as <a href="/wiki/Chemical_bonds" class="mw-redirect" title="Chemical bonds">chemical bonds</a>. </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_astronomy">Philosophy of astronomy</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=28" title="Edit section: Philosophy of astronomy" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <p>The philosophy of astronomy seeks to understand and analyze the methodologies and technologies used by experts in the discipline, focusing on how observations made about <a href="/wiki/Space" title="Space">space</a> and <a href="/wiki/Astrophysics" title="Astrophysics">astrophysical phenomena</a> can be studied. Given that astronomers rely and use theories and formulas from other scientific disciplines, such as chemistry and physics, the pursuit of understanding how knowledge can be obtained about the cosmos, as well as the relation in which our planet and <a href="/wiki/Solar_System" title="Solar System">Solar System</a> have within our personal views of our place in the universe, philosophical insights into how facts about space can be scientifically analyzed and configure with other established knowledge is a main point of inquiry. </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_Earth_sciences">Philosophy of Earth sciences</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=29" title="Edit section: Philosophy of Earth sciences" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <p>The philosophy of Earth science is concerned with how humans obtain and verify knowledge of the workings of the Earth system, including the <a href="/wiki/Atmosphere" title="Atmosphere">atmosphere</a>, <a href="/wiki/Hydrosphere" title="Hydrosphere">hydrosphere</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Geosphere" title="Geosphere">geosphere</a> (solid earth). Earth scientists' ways of knowing and habits of mind share important commonalities with other sciences, but also have distinctive attributes that emerge from the complex, heterogeneous, unique, long-lived, and non-manipulatable nature of the Earth system. </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_biology">Philosophy of biology</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=30" title="Edit section: Philosophy of biology" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_biology" title="Philosophy of biology">Philosophy of biology</a></div> <figure class="mw-default-size mw-halign-right" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:P1160335_peter_godfrey-smith_reading.jpg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/P1160335_peter_godfrey-smith_reading.jpg/170px-P1160335_peter_godfrey-smith_reading.jpg" decoding="async" width="170" height="229" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="2832" data-file-height="3822"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 170px;height: 229px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/P1160335_peter_godfrey-smith_reading.jpg/170px-P1160335_peter_godfrey-smith_reading.jpg" data-width="170" data-height="229" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/P1160335_peter_godfrey-smith_reading.jpg/255px-P1160335_peter_godfrey-smith_reading.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/P1160335_peter_godfrey-smith_reading.jpg/340px-P1160335_peter_godfrey-smith_reading.jpg 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption>Peter Godfrey-Smith was awarded the <a href="/wiki/Lakatos_Award" title="Lakatos Award">Lakatos Award</a><sup id="cite_ref-96" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-96"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>96<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> for his 2009 book <i>Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection</i>, which discusses the philosophical foundations of the theory of <a href="/wiki/Evolution" title="Evolution">evolution</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-Gewertz2007_97-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Gewertz2007-97"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>97<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-98" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-98"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>98<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></figcaption></figure> <p>Philosophy of biology deals with <a href="/wiki/Epistemology" title="Epistemology">epistemological</a>, <a href="/wiki/Metaphysics" title="Metaphysics">metaphysical</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Ethics" title="Ethics">ethical</a> issues in the <a href="/wiki/Biology" title="Biology">biological</a> and <a href="/wiki/Medical_research" title="Medical research">biomedical</a> sciences. Although philosophers of science and philosophers generally have long been interested in biology (e.g., <a href="/wiki/Aristotle" title="Aristotle">Aristotle</a>, <a href="/wiki/Descartes" class="mw-redirect" title="Descartes">Descartes</a>, <a href="/wiki/Gottfried_Wilhelm_Leibniz" title="Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz">Leibniz</a> and even <a href="/wiki/Immanuel_Kant" title="Immanuel Kant">Kant</a>), philosophy of biology only emerged as an independent field of philosophy in the 1960s and 1970s.<sup id="cite_ref-99" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-99"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>99<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Philosophers of science began to pay increasing attention to developments in biology, from the rise of the <a href="/wiki/Modern_synthesis_(20th_century)" title="Modern synthesis (20th century)">modern synthesis</a> in the 1930s and 1940s to the discovery of the structure of <a href="/wiki/Deoxyribonucleic_acid" class="mw-redirect" title="Deoxyribonucleic acid">deoxyribonucleic acid</a> (DNA) in 1953 to more recent advances in <a href="/wiki/Genetic_engineering" title="Genetic engineering">genetic engineering</a>. Other key ideas such as the <a href="/wiki/Reduction_(philosophy)" class="mw-redirect" title="Reduction (philosophy)">reduction</a> of all life processes to <a href="/wiki/Biochemical" class="mw-redirect" title="Biochemical">biochemical</a> reactions as well as the incorporation of <a href="/wiki/Psychology" title="Psychology">psychology</a> into a broader <a href="/wiki/Neuroscience" title="Neuroscience">neuroscience</a> are also addressed. Research in current philosophy of biology includes investigation of the foundations of evolutionary theory (such as <a href="/wiki/Peter_Godfrey-Smith" title="Peter Godfrey-Smith">Peter Godfrey-Smith</a>'s work),<sup id="cite_ref-100" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-100"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>100<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> and the role of viruses as persistent symbionts in host genomes. As a consequence, the evolution of genetic content order is seen as the result of competent genome editors <sup class="noprint Inline-Template" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_clarify" title="Wikipedia:Please clarify"><span title="The text near this tag needs further explanation. (June 2020)">further explanation needed</span></a></i>]</sup> in contrast to former narratives in which error replication events (mutations) dominated. </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_medicine">Philosophy of medicine</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=31" title="Edit section: Philosophy of medicine" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_medicine" title="Philosophy of medicine">Philosophy of medicine</a></div> <figure class="mw-default-size mw-halign-left" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Papyrus_text;_fragment_of_Hippocratic_oath._Wellcome_L0034090.jpg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Papyrus_text%3B_fragment_of_Hippocratic_oath._Wellcome_L0034090.jpg/170px-Papyrus_text%3B_fragment_of_Hippocratic_oath._Wellcome_L0034090.jpg" decoding="async" width="170" height="357" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="1826" data-file-height="3831"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 170px;height: 357px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Papyrus_text%3B_fragment_of_Hippocratic_oath._Wellcome_L0034090.jpg/170px-Papyrus_text%3B_fragment_of_Hippocratic_oath._Wellcome_L0034090.jpg" data-width="170" data-height="357" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Papyrus_text%3B_fragment_of_Hippocratic_oath._Wellcome_L0034090.jpg/255px-Papyrus_text%3B_fragment_of_Hippocratic_oath._Wellcome_L0034090.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Papyrus_text%3B_fragment_of_Hippocratic_oath._Wellcome_L0034090.jpg/340px-Papyrus_text%3B_fragment_of_Hippocratic_oath._Wellcome_L0034090.jpg 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption>A fragment of the <a href="/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath" title="Hippocratic Oath">Hippocratic Oath</a> from <a href="/wiki/Oxyrhynchus_Papyri" title="Oxyrhynchus Papyri">the third century</a></figcaption></figure> <p>Beyond <a href="/wiki/Medical_ethics" title="Medical ethics">medical ethics</a> and <a href="/wiki/Bioethics" title="Bioethics">bioethics</a>, the philosophy of medicine is a branch of philosophy that includes the <a href="/wiki/Epistemology" title="Epistemology">epistemology</a> and <a href="/wiki/Ontology" title="Ontology">ontology</a>/<a href="/wiki/Metaphysics" title="Metaphysics">metaphysics</a> of medicine. Within the epistemology of medicine, <a href="/wiki/Evidence-based_medicine" title="Evidence-based medicine">evidence-based medicine</a> (EBM) (or evidence-based practice (EBP)) has attracted attention, most notably the roles of randomisation,<sup id="cite_ref-Papineau_1994_101-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Papineau_1994-101"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>101<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Worrall_2002_102-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Worrall_2002-102"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>102<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Worrall_2007_103-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Worrall_2007-103"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>103<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Blind_experiment" class="mw-redirect" title="Blind experiment">blinding</a> and <a href="/wiki/Placebo" title="Placebo">placebo</a> controls. Related to these areas of investigation, ontologies of specific interest to the philosophy of medicine include <a href="/wiki/Cartesian_dualism" class="mw-redirect" title="Cartesian dualism">Cartesian dualism</a>, the monogenetic conception of disease<sup id="cite_ref-Lee_2012_104-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Lee_2012-104"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>104<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> and the conceptualization of 'placebos' and 'placebo effects'.<sup id="cite_ref-Grünbaum_1981_105-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Gr%C3%BCnbaum_1981-105"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>105<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Gøtzsche_1994_106-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-G%C3%B8tzsche_1994-106"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>106<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Nunn_2009_107-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Nunn_2009-107"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>107<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Turner_2012_108-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Turner_2012-108"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>108<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> There is also a growing interest in the metaphysics of medicine,<sup id="cite_ref-Worrall_2011_109-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Worrall_2011-109"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>109<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> particularly the idea of causation. Philosophers of medicine might not only be interested in how medical knowledge is generated, but also in the nature of such phenomena. Causation is of interest because the purpose of much medical research is to establish causal relationships, e.g. what causes disease, or what causes people to get better.<sup id="cite_ref-Cartwright_2009_110-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Cartwright_2009-110"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>110<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_psychiatry">Philosophy of psychiatry</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=32" title="Edit section: Philosophy of psychiatry" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_psychiatry" title="Philosophy of psychiatry">Philosophy of psychiatry</a></div> <p>Philosophy of psychiatry explores philosophical questions relating to <a href="/wiki/Psychiatry" title="Psychiatry">psychiatry</a> and <a href="/wiki/Mental_illness" class="mw-redirect" title="Mental illness">mental illness</a>. The philosopher of science and medicine Dominic Murphy identifies three areas of exploration in the philosophy of psychiatry. The first concerns the examination of psychiatry as a science, using the tools of the philosophy of science more broadly. The second entails the examination of the concepts employed in discussion of mental illness, including the experience of mental illness, and the normative questions it raises. The third area concerns the links and discontinuities between the <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_mind" title="Philosophy of mind">philosophy of mind</a> and <a href="/wiki/Psychopathology" title="Psychopathology">psychopathology</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-111" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-111"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>111<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_psychology">Philosophy of psychology</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=33" title="Edit section: Philosophy of psychology" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_psychology" title="Philosophy of psychology">Philosophy of psychology</a></div> <figure class="mw-default-size" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Wundt-research-group.jpg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/Wundt-research-group.jpg/220px-Wundt-research-group.jpg" decoding="async" width="220" height="159" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="552" data-file-height="400"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 220px;height: 159px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/Wundt-research-group.jpg/220px-Wundt-research-group.jpg" data-width="220" data-height="159" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/Wundt-research-group.jpg/330px-Wundt-research-group.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/Wundt-research-group.jpg/440px-Wundt-research-group.jpg 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a><figcaption><a href="/wiki/Wilhelm_Wundt" title="Wilhelm Wundt">Wilhelm Wundt</a> (seated) with colleagues in his psychological laboratory, the first of its kind</figcaption></figure> <p>Philosophy of psychology refers to issues at the theoretical foundations of modern <a href="/wiki/Psychology" title="Psychology">psychology</a>. Some of these issues are epistemological concerns about the methodology of psychological investigation. For example, is the best method for studying psychology to focus only on the response of <a href="/wiki/Behaviorism" title="Behaviorism">behavior</a> to external stimuli or should psychologists focus on <a href="/wiki/Mentalism_(psychology)" title="Mentalism (psychology)">mental perception and thought processes</a>?<sup id="cite_ref-Routpsych_112-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Routpsych-112"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>112<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> If the latter, an important question is how the internal experiences of others can be measured. Self-reports of feelings and beliefs may not be reliable because, even in cases in which there is no apparent incentive for subjects to intentionally deceive in their answers, self-deception or selective memory may affect their responses. Then even in the case of accurate self-reports, how can responses be compared across individuals? Even if two individuals respond with the same answer on a <a href="/wiki/Likert_scale" title="Likert scale">Likert scale</a>, they may be experiencing very different things. </p><p>Other issues in philosophy of psychology are philosophical questions about the nature of mind, brain, and cognition, and are perhaps more commonly thought of as part of <a href="/wiki/Cognitive_science" title="Cognitive science">cognitive science</a>, or <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_mind" title="Philosophy of mind">philosophy of mind</a>. For example, are humans <a href="/wiki/Rationality" title="Rationality">rational</a> creatures?<sup id="cite_ref-Routpsych_112-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Routpsych-112"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>112<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Is there any sense in which they have <a href="/wiki/Free_will" title="Free will">free will</a>, and how does that relate to the experience of making choices? Philosophy of psychology also closely monitors contemporary work conducted in <a href="/wiki/Cognitive_neuroscience" title="Cognitive neuroscience">cognitive neuroscience</a>, <a href="/wiki/Psycholinguistics" title="Psycholinguistics">psycholinguistics</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Artificial_intelligence" title="Artificial intelligence">artificial intelligence</a>, questioning what they can and cannot explain in psychology. </p><p>Philosophy of psychology is a relatively young field, because psychology only became a discipline of its own in the late 1800s. In particular, <a href="/wiki/Neurophilosophy" title="Neurophilosophy">neurophilosophy</a> has just recently become its own field with the works of <a href="/wiki/Paul_Churchland" title="Paul Churchland">Paul Churchland</a> and <a href="/wiki/Patricia_Churchland" title="Patricia Churchland">Patricia Churchland</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-StanPhilNeuro_91-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StanPhilNeuro-91"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>91<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Philosophy of mind, by contrast, has been a well-established discipline since before psychology was a field of study at all. It is concerned with questions about the very nature of mind, the qualities of experience, and particular issues like the debate between <a href="/wiki/Mind-body_dualism" class="mw-redirect" title="Mind-body dualism">dualism</a> and <a href="/wiki/Monism" title="Monism">monism</a>. </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_social_science">Philosophy of social science</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=34" title="Edit section: Philosophy of social science" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_social_science" title="Philosophy of social science">Philosophy of social science</a></div> <p>The philosophy of social science is the study of the logic and method of the <a href="/wiki/Social_sciences" class="mw-redirect" title="Social sciences">social sciences</a>, such as <a href="/wiki/Sociology" title="Sociology">sociology</a> and <a href="/wiki/Cultural_anthropology" title="Cultural anthropology">cultural anthropology</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-113" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-113"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>113<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Philosophers of social science are concerned with the differences and similarities between the social and the <a href="/wiki/Natural_science" title="Natural science">natural sciences</a>, causal relationships between social phenomena, the possible existence of social laws, and the <a href="/wiki/Ontology" title="Ontology">ontological</a> significance of <a href="/wiki/Structure_and_agency" title="Structure and agency">structure and agency</a>. </p><p>The French philosopher, <a href="/wiki/Auguste_Comte" title="Auguste Comte">Auguste Comte</a> (1798–1857), established the epistemological perspective of <a href="/wiki/Positivism" title="Positivism">positivism</a> in <i>The Course in Positivist Philosophy</i>, a series of texts published between 1830 and 1842. The first three volumes of the <i>Course</i> dealt chiefly with the <a href="/wiki/Natural_sciences" class="mw-redirect" title="Natural sciences">natural sciences</a> already in existence (<a href="/wiki/Geoscience" class="mw-redirect" title="Geoscience">geoscience</a>, <a href="/wiki/Astronomy" title="Astronomy">astronomy</a>, <a href="/wiki/Physics" title="Physics">physics</a>, <a href="/wiki/Chemistry" title="Chemistry">chemistry</a>, <a href="/wiki/Biology" title="Biology">biology</a>), whereas the latter two emphasised the inevitable coming of <a href="/wiki/Social_science" title="Social science">social science</a>: "<i><a href="/wiki/Sociology" title="Sociology">sociologie</a></i>".<sup id="cite_ref-114" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-114"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>114<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> For Comte, the natural sciences had to necessarily arrive first, before humanity could adequately channel its efforts into the most challenging and complex "Queen science" of human society itself. Comte offers an evolutionary system proposing that society undergoes three phases in its quest for the truth according to a general '<a href="/wiki/Law_of_three_stages" title="Law of three stages">law of three stages</a>'. These are (1) the <i>theological</i>, (2) the <i>metaphysical</i>, and (3) the <i>positive</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-115" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-115"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>115<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>Comte's positivism established the initial philosophical foundations for formal sociology and <a href="/wiki/Social_research" title="Social research">social research</a>. <a href="/wiki/Durkheim" class="mw-redirect" title="Durkheim">Durkheim</a>, <a href="/wiki/Marx" class="mw-redirect" title="Marx">Marx</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Max_Weber" title="Max Weber">Weber</a> are more typically cited as the fathers of contemporary social science. In <a href="/wiki/Psychology" title="Psychology">psychology</a>, a positivistic approach has historically been favoured in <a href="/wiki/Behaviourism" class="mw-redirect" title="Behaviourism">behaviourism</a>. Positivism has also been espoused by '<a href="/wiki/Technocracy_(bureaucratic)" class="mw-redirect" title="Technocracy (bureaucratic)">technocrats</a>' who believe in the inevitability of <a href="/wiki/Social_progress" class="mw-redirect" title="Social progress">social progress</a> through science and technology.<sup id="cite_ref-116" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-116"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>116<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p><p>The positivist perspective has been associated with '<a href="/wiki/Scientism" title="Scientism">scientism</a>'; the view that the methods of the natural sciences may be applied to all areas of investigation, be it philosophical, social scientific, or otherwise. Among most social scientists and historians, orthodox positivism has long since lost popular support. Today, practitioners of both social and physical sciences instead take into account the distorting effect of observer <a href="/wiki/Bias" title="Bias">bias</a> and structural limitations. This scepticism has been facilitated by a general weakening of deductivist accounts of science by philosophers such as <a href="/wiki/Thomas_Kuhn" title="Thomas Kuhn">Thomas Kuhn</a>, and new philosophical movements such as <a href="/wiki/Critical_realism_(philosophy_of_the_social_sciences)" title="Critical realism (philosophy of the social sciences)">critical realism</a> and <a href="/wiki/Neopragmatism" title="Neopragmatism">neopragmatism</a>. The philosopher-sociologist <a href="/wiki/J%C3%BCrgen_Habermas" title="Jürgen Habermas">Jürgen Habermas</a> has critiqued pure <a href="/wiki/Instrumental_rationality" class="mw-redirect" title="Instrumental rationality">instrumental rationality</a> as meaning that scientific-thinking becomes something akin to <a href="/wiki/Ideology" title="Ideology">ideology</a> itself.<sup id="cite_ref-117" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-117"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>117<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Philosophy_of_technology">Philosophy of technology</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=35" title="Edit section: Philosophy of technology" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236090951"><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_technology" title="Philosophy of technology">Philosophy of technology</a></div> <p>The philosophy of technology is a sub-field of <a href="/wiki/Philosophy" title="Philosophy">philosophy</a> that studies the nature of <a href="/wiki/Technology" title="Technology">technology</a>. Specific research topics include study of the role of tacit and explicit knowledge in creating and using technology, the nature of functions in technological artifacts, the role of values in design, and ethics related to technology. Technology and engineering can both involve the application of scientific knowledge. The <a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_engineering" title="Philosophy of engineering">philosophy of engineering</a> is an emerging sub-field of the broader philosophy of technology. </p> </section><div class="mw-heading mw-heading2 section-heading" onclick="mfTempOpenSection(6)"><span class="indicator mf-icon mf-icon-expand mf-icon--small"></span><h2 id="See_also">See also</h2><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=36" title="Edit section: See also" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div><section class="mf-section-6 collapsible-block" id="mf-section-6"> <style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1239009302">.mw-parser-output .portalbox{padding:0;margin:0.5em 0;display:table;box-sizing:border-box;max-width:175px;list-style:none}.mw-parser-output .portalborder{border:1px solid var(--border-color-base,#a2a9b1);padding:0.1em;background:var(--background-color-neutral-subtle,#f8f9fa)}.mw-parser-output .portalbox-entry{display:table-row;font-size:85%;line-height:110%;height:1.9em;font-style:italic;font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .portalbox-image{display:table-cell;padding:0.2em;vertical-align:middle;text-align:center}.mw-parser-output .portalbox-link{display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle}@media(min-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .portalleft{clear:left;float:left;margin:0.5em 1em 0.5em 0}.mw-parser-output .portalright{clear:right;float:right;margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em}}</style><ul role="navigation" aria-label="Portals" class="noprint portalbox portalborder portalright"> <li class="portalbox-entry"><span class="portalbox-image"><span class="noviewer" typeof="mw:File"><span><noscript><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Socrates.png/18px-Socrates.png" decoding="async" width="18" height="28" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="326" data-file-height="500"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 18px;height: 28px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Socrates.png/18px-Socrates.png" data-alt="" data-width="18" data-height="28" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Socrates.png/27px-Socrates.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Socrates.png/36px-Socrates.png 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></span></span></span><span class="portalbox-link"><a href="/wiki/Portal:Philosophy" title="Portal:Philosophy">Philosophy portal</a></span></li><li class="portalbox-entry"><span class="portalbox-image"><span class="noviewer" typeof="mw:File"><a href="/wiki/File:Nuvola_apps_kalzium.svg" class="mw-file-description"><noscript><img alt="icon" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/Nuvola_apps_kalzium.svg/28px-Nuvola_apps_kalzium.svg.png" decoding="async" width="28" height="28" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="128" data-file-height="128"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 28px;height: 28px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/Nuvola_apps_kalzium.svg/28px-Nuvola_apps_kalzium.svg.png" data-alt="icon" data-width="28" data-height="28" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/Nuvola_apps_kalzium.svg/42px-Nuvola_apps_kalzium.svg.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/Nuvola_apps_kalzium.svg/56px-Nuvola_apps_kalzium.svg.png 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></a></span></span><span class="portalbox-link"><a href="/wiki/Portal:Science" title="Portal:Science">Science portal</a></span></li></ul> <style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1184024115">.mw-parser-output .div-col{margin-top:0.3em;column-width:30em}.mw-parser-output .div-col-small{font-size:90%}.mw-parser-output .div-col-rules{column-rule:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .div-col dl,.mw-parser-output .div-col ol,.mw-parser-output .div-col ul{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .div-col li,.mw-parser-output .div-col dd{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}</style><div class="div-col" style="column-width: 18em;"> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Criticism_of_science" title="Criticism of science">Criticism of science</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/History_and_philosophy_of_science" title="History and philosophy of science">History and philosophy of science</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/List_of_philosophers_of_science" title="List of philosophers of science">List of philosophers of science</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Metaphysical_naturalism" title="Metaphysical naturalism">Metaphysical naturalism</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Metascience" title="Metascience">Metascience</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Objectivity_(philosophy)" class="mw-redirect" title="Objectivity (philosophy)">Objectivity (philosophy)</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Philosophy_of_engineering" title="Philosophy of engineering">Philosophy of engineering</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Science_policy" title="Science policy">Science policy</a></li></ul> </div> </section><div class="mw-heading mw-heading2 section-heading" onclick="mfTempOpenSection(7)"><span class="indicator mf-icon mf-icon-expand mf-icon--small"></span><h2 id="References">References</h2><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=37" title="Edit section: References" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div><section class="mf-section-7 collapsible-block" id="mf-section-7"> <style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1239543626">.mw-parser-output .reflist{margin-bottom:0.5em;list-style-type:decimal}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .reflist{font-size:90%}}.mw-parser-output .reflist .references{font-size:100%;margin-bottom:0;list-style-type:inherit}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-2{column-width:30em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-3{column-width:25em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns{margin-top:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns ol{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-alpha{list-style-type:upper-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-roman{list-style-type:upper-roman}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-alpha{list-style-type:lower-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-greek{list-style-type:lower-greek}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-roman{list-style-type:lower-roman}</style><div class="reflist reflist-columns references-column-width" style="column-width: 24em;"> <ol class="references"> <li id="cite_note-1"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-1">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1238218222">.mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit;word-wrap:break-word}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"\"""\"""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation:target{background-color:rgba(0,127,255,0.133)}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-free.id-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Lock-green.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited.id-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration.id-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription.id-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg")right 0.1em center/12px no-repeat}body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-free a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background-size:contain;padding:0 1em 0 0}.mw-parser-output .cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:none;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;color:var(--color-error,#d33)}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{color:var(--color-error,#d33)}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#085;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right{padding-right:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .citation .mw-selflink{font-weight:inherit}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{color:#18911f}}@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{color:#18911f}}</style><cite class="citation encyclopaedia cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150417031348/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/324460/Thomas-S-Kuhn">"Thomas S. Kuhn"</a>. <i><a href="/wiki/Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica" title="Encyclopædia Britannica">Encyclopædia Britannica</a></i>. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/324460/Thomas-S-Kuhn">the original</a> on 2015-04-17. <q>Instead, he argued that the paradigm determines the kinds of experiments scientists perform, the types of questions they ask, and the problems they consider important.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Thomas+S.+Kuhn&amp;rft.btitle=Encyclop%C3%A6dia+Britannica&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.britannica.com%2FEBchecked%2Ftopic%2F324460%2FThomas-S-Kuhn&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-contra-2"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-contra_2-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-contra_2-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-contra_2-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFFeyerabend1993" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Paul_Feyerabend" title="Paul Feyerabend">Feyerabend, Paul</a> (1993) [1974]. <span class="id-lock-registration" title="Free registration required"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/againstmethod0000feye"><i>Against Method</i></a></span> (3rd ed.). London; New York: <a href="/wiki/Verso_Books" title="Verso Books">Verso</a>. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/086091481X" title="Special:BookSources/086091481X"><bdi>086091481X</bdi></a>. <a href="/wiki/OCLC_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="OCLC (identifier)">OCLC</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://search.worldcat.org/oclc/29026104">29026104</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Against+Method&amp;rft.place=London%3B+New+York&amp;rft.edition=3rd&amp;rft.pub=Verso&amp;rft.date=1993&amp;rft_id=info%3Aoclcnum%2F29026104&amp;rft.isbn=086091481X&amp;rft.aulast=Feyerabend&amp;rft.aufirst=Paul&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdetails%2Fagainstmethod0000feye&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Thornton2006-3"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Thornton2006_3-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFThornton2006" class="citation web cs1">Thornton, Stephen (2006). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/">"Karl Popper"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20070627013103/http://plato.stanford.edu//entries///popper/">Archived</a> from the original on 2007-06-27<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2007-12-01</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Karl+Popper&amp;rft.date=2006&amp;rft.aulast=Thornton&amp;rft.aufirst=Stephen&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fpopper%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-4"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-4">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite class="citation encyclopaedia cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150905091332/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/#NonSciPosSci">"Science and Pseudo-science"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. 2008. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/#NonSciPosSci">the original</a> on 2015-09-05.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Science+and+Pseudo-science&amp;rft.btitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.date=2008&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fpseudo-science%2F%23NonSciPosSci&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Laudan1983-5"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Laudan1983_5-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFLaudan1983" class="citation book cs1">Laudan, Larry (1983). "The Demise of the Demarcation Problem". In Grünbaum, Adolf; Cohen, Robert Sonné; Laudan, Larry (eds.). <i>Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum</i>. Springer. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-90-277-1533-3" title="Special:BookSources/978-90-277-1533-3"><bdi>978-90-277-1533-3</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=The+Demise+of+the+Demarcation+Problem&amp;rft.btitle=Physics%2C+Philosophy%2C+and+Psychoanalysis%3A+Essays+in+Honor+of+Adolf+Gr%C3%BCnbaum&amp;rft.pub=Springer&amp;rft.date=1983&amp;rft.isbn=978-90-277-1533-3&amp;rft.aulast=Laudan&amp;rft.aufirst=Larry&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-6"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-6">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFGordin2012" class="citation book cs1">Gordin, Michael D. (2012). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=SqOPw9Yq-MEC&amp;q=pseudoscience+potter+stewart&amp;pg=PA13"><i>The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe</i></a>. University of Chicago Press. pp. 12–13. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-226-30442-7" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-226-30442-7"><bdi>978-0-226-30442-7</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+Pseudoscience+Wars%3A+Immanuel+Velikovsky+and+the+Birth+of+the+Modern+Fringe&amp;rft.pages=12-13&amp;rft.pub=University+of+Chicago+Press&amp;rft.date=2012&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-226-30442-7&amp;rft.aulast=Gordin&amp;rft.aufirst=Michael+D.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DSqOPw9Yq-MEC%26q%3Dpseudoscience%2Bpotter%2Bstewart%26pg%3DPA13&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Uebel2006-7"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Uebel2006_7-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFUebel2006" class="citation web cs1">Uebel, Thomas (2006). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/vienna-circle/">"Vienna Circle"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20070626224948/http://plato.stanford.edu//entries///vienna-circle/">Archived</a> from the original on 2007-06-26<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2007-12-01</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Vienna+Circle&amp;rft.date=2006&amp;rft.aulast=Uebel&amp;rft.aufirst=Thomas&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fvienna-circle%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Popper1959-8"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Popper1959_8-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFPopper2004" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Karl_Popper" title="Karl Popper">Popper, Karl</a> (2004). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=Yq6xeupNStMC&amp;q=the+logic+of+scientific+discovery"><i>The logic of scientific discovery</i></a> (reprint ed.). London &amp; New York: Routledge Classics. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-415-27844-7" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-415-27844-7"><bdi>978-0-415-27844-7</bdi></a>First published 1959 by Hutchinson &amp; Co.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+logic+of+scientific+discovery&amp;rft.place=London+%26+New+York&amp;rft.edition=reprint&amp;rft.pub=Routledge+Classics&amp;rft.date=2004&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-415-27844-7&amp;rft.aulast=Popper&amp;rft.aufirst=Karl&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DYq6xeupNStMC%26q%3Dthe%2Blogic%2Bof%2Bscientific%2Bdiscovery&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span><span class="cs1-maint citation-comment"><code class="cs1-code">{{<a href="/wiki/Template:Cite_book" title="Template:Cite book">cite book</a>}}</code>: CS1 maint: postscript (<a href="/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_postscript" title="Category:CS1 maint: postscript">link</a>)</span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-9"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-9">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite class="citation encyclopaedia cs1">"Pseudoscientific – pretending to be scientific, falsely represented as being scientific". <i>Oxford American Dictionary</i>. <a href="/wiki/Oxford_English_Dictionary" title="Oxford English Dictionary">Oxford English Dictionary</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Pseudoscientific+%E2%80%93+pretending+to+be+scientific%2C+falsely+represented+as+being+scientific&amp;rft.btitle=Oxford+American+Dictionary&amp;rft.pub=Oxford+English+Dictionary&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-10"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-10">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFHansson1996" class="citation journal cs1">Hansson, Sven Ove (1996). "Defining Pseudoscience". <i>Philosophia Naturalis</i>. <b>33</b>: 169–176.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Philosophia+Naturalis&amp;rft.atitle=Defining+Pseudoscience&amp;rft.volume=33&amp;rft.pages=169-176&amp;rft.date=1996&amp;rft.aulast=Hansson&amp;rft.aufirst=Sven+Ove&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span>, as cited in <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite class="citation encyclopaedia cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150905091332/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/#NonSciPosSci">"Science and Pseudo-science"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. 2008. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/#NonSciPosSci">the original</a> on 2015-09-05.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Science+and+Pseudo-science&amp;rft.btitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.date=2008&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fpseudo-science%2F%23NonSciPosSci&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span>. The Stanford article states: "Many writers on pseudoscience have emphasized that pseudoscience is non-science posing as science. The foremost modern classic on the subject (Gardner 1957) bears the title <a href="/wiki/Fads_and_Fallacies_in_the_Name_of_Science" title="Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science">Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science</a>. According to Brian Baigrie (1988, 438), "[w]hat is objectionable about these beliefs is that they masquerade as genuinely scientific ones." These and many other authors assume that to be pseudoscientific, an activity or a teaching has to satisfy the following two criteria (Hansson 1996): (1) it is not scientific, and (2) its major proponents try to create the impression that it is scientific".</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-11"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-11">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFHewittSuchockiHewitt2003" class="citation book cs1">Hewitt, Paul G.; Suchocki, John; Hewitt, Leslie A. (2003). <i>Conceptual Physical Science</i> (3rd ed.). Addison Wesley. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-321-05173-4" title="Special:BookSources/0-321-05173-4"><bdi>0-321-05173-4</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Conceptual+Physical+Science&amp;rft.edition=3rd&amp;rft.pub=Addison+Wesley&amp;rft.date=2003&amp;rft.isbn=0-321-05173-4&amp;rft.aulast=Hewitt&amp;rft.aufirst=Paul+G.&amp;rft.au=Suchocki%2C+John&amp;rft.au=Hewitt%2C+Leslie+A.&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-12"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-12">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFBennett2003" class="citation book cs1">Bennett, Jeffrey O. (2003). <i>The Cosmic Perspective</i> (3rd ed.). Addison Wesley. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-8053-8738-2" title="Special:BookSources/0-8053-8738-2"><bdi>0-8053-8738-2</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+Cosmic+Perspective&amp;rft.edition=3rd&amp;rft.pub=Addison+Wesley&amp;rft.date=2003&amp;rft.isbn=0-8053-8738-2&amp;rft.aulast=Bennett&amp;rft.aufirst=Jeffrey+O.&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-13"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-13">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Gauch HG Jr. <i>Scientific Method in Practice</i> (2003).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-14"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-14">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">A 2006 <a href="/wiki/National_Science_Foundation" title="National Science Foundation">National Science Foundation</a> report on Science and engineering indicators quoted <a href="/wiki/Michael_Shermer" title="Michael Shermer">Michael Shermer</a>'s (1997) definition of pseudoscience: '"claims presented so that they appear [to be] scientific even though they lack supporting evidence and plausibility"(p. 33). In contrast, science is "a set of methods designed to describe and interpret observed and inferred phenomena, past or present, and aimed at building a testable body of knowledge open to rejection or confirmation" (p. 17)'. <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFShermer1997" class="citation book cs1">Shermer, Michael (1997). <i>Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time</i>. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-7167-3090-3" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-7167-3090-3"><bdi>978-0-7167-3090-3</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Why+People+Believe+Weird+Things%3A+Pseudoscience%2C+Superstition%2C+and+Other+Confusions+of+Our+Time&amp;rft.place=New+York&amp;rft.pub=W.H.+Freeman+and+Company&amp;rft.date=1997&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-7167-3090-3&amp;rft.aulast=Shermer&amp;rft.aufirst=Michael&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span> as cited by <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFNational_Science_FoundationDivision_of_Science_Resources_Statistics2006" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/National_Science_Foundation" title="National Science Foundation">National Science Foundation</a>; Division of Science Resources Statistics (2006). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/c7/c7s2.htm">"Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding"</a>. <i>Science and engineering indicators 2006</i>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Science+and+Technology%3A+Public+Attitudes+and+Understanding&amp;rft.btitle=Science+and+engineering+indicators+2006&amp;rft.date=2006&amp;rft.au=National+Science+Foundation&amp;rft.au=Division+of+Science+Resources+Statistics&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nsf.gov%2Fstatistics%2Fseind06%2Fc7%2Fc7s2.htm&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-15"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-15">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">"A pretended or spurious science; a collection of related beliefs about the world mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method or as having the status that scientific truths now have," from the <i><a href="/wiki/Oxford_English_Dictionary" title="Oxford English Dictionary">Oxford English Dictionary</a></i>, second edition 1989.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-cargocultscience-16"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-cargocultscience_16-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFFeynman" class="citation web cs1"><a href="/wiki/Richard_Feynman" title="Richard Feynman">Feynman, Richard</a>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20131201231202/http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.pdf">"Cargo Cult Science"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.pdf">the original</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> on 2013-12-01<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2015-10-25</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Cargo+Cult+Science&amp;rft.aulast=Feynman&amp;rft.aufirst=Richard&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fcalteches.library.caltech.edu%2F51%2F2%2FCargoCult.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Hempel1948-17"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Hempel1948_17-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFHempelOppenheim1948" class="citation journal cs1"><a href="/wiki/Carl_Hempel" class="mw-redirect" title="Carl Hempel">Hempel, Carl G.</a>; Oppenheim, Paul (1948). "Studies in the Logic of Explanation". <i>Philosophy of Science</i>. <b>15</b> (2): 135–175. <a href="/wiki/CiteSeerX_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="CiteSeerX (identifier)">CiteSeerX</a> <span class="id-lock-free" title="Freely accessible"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.294.3693">10.1.1.294.3693</a></span>. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1086%2F286983">10.1086/286983</a>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16924146">16924146</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Philosophy+of+Science&amp;rft.atitle=Studies+in+the+Logic+of+Explanation&amp;rft.volume=15&amp;rft.issue=2&amp;rft.pages=135-175&amp;rft.date=1948&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fsummary%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.294.3693%23id-name%3DCiteSeerX&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A16924146%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1086%2F286983&amp;rft.aulast=Hempel&amp;rft.aufirst=Carl+G.&amp;rft.au=Oppenheim%2C+Paul&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Salmon1992-18"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Salmon1992_18-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFSalmonEarmanGlymourLenno1992" class="citation book cs1">Salmon, Merrilee; Earman, John; Glymour, Clark; Lenno, James G.; Machamer, Peter; McGuire, J.E.; Norton, John D.; Salmon, Wesley C.; Schaffner, Kenneth F. (1992). <i>Introduction to the Philosophy of Science</i>. Prentice-Hall. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-13-663345-7" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-13-663345-7"><bdi>978-0-13-663345-7</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Introduction+to+the+Philosophy+of+Science&amp;rft.pub=Prentice-Hall&amp;rft.date=1992&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-13-663345-7&amp;rft.aulast=Salmon&amp;rft.aufirst=Merrilee&amp;rft.au=Earman%2C+John&amp;rft.au=Glymour%2C+Clark&amp;rft.au=Lenno%2C+James+G.&amp;rft.au=Machamer%2C+Peter&amp;rft.au=McGuire%2C+J.E.&amp;rft.au=Norton%2C+John+D.&amp;rft.au=Salmon%2C+Wesley+C.&amp;rft.au=Schaffner%2C+Kenneth+F.&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Salmon1971-19"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Salmon1971_19-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFSalmon1971" class="citation book cs1">Salmon, Wesley (1971). <span class="id-lock-registration" title="Free registration required"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/statisticalexpla0000unse"><i>Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance</i></a></span>. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780822974116" title="Special:BookSources/9780822974116"><bdi>9780822974116</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Statistical+Explanation+and+Statistical+Relevance&amp;rft.place=Pittsburgh&amp;rft.pub=University+of+Pittsburgh+Press&amp;rft.date=1971&amp;rft.isbn=9780822974116&amp;rft.aulast=Salmon&amp;rft.aufirst=Wesley&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdetails%2Fstatisticalexpla0000unse&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Woodward2003-20"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Woodward2003_20-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Woodward2003_20-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFWoodward2003" class="citation web cs1"><a href="/wiki/James_Woodward_(philosopher)" title="James Woodward (philosopher)">Woodward, James</a> (2003). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-explanation/">"Scientific Explanation"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20070706080422/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-explanation/">Archived</a> from the original on 2007-07-06<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2007-12-07</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Scientific+Explanation&amp;rft.date=2003&amp;rft.aulast=Woodward&amp;rft.aufirst=James&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fscientific-explanation%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-StanInduction-21"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-StanInduction_21-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-StanInduction_21-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFVickers2013" class="citation web cs1">Vickers, John (2013). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/">"The Problem of Induction"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20140407014814/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/">Archived</a> from the original on 2014-04-07<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2014-02-25</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=The+Problem+of+Induction&amp;rft.date=2013&amp;rft.aulast=Vickers&amp;rft.aufirst=John&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Finduction-problem%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-StanSimple-22"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-StanSimple_22-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFBaker2013" class="citation web cs1">Baker, Alan (2013). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/">"Simplicity"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20140326180129/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/">Archived</a> from the original on 2014-03-26<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2014-02-25</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Simplicity&amp;rft.date=2013&amp;rft.aulast=Baker&amp;rft.aufirst=Alan&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fsimplicity%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-23"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-23">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="/wiki/Nicholas_Maxwell" title="Nicholas Maxwell">Nicholas Maxwell</a> (1998) <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-comprehensibility-of-the-universe-9780199261550?lang=en&amp;cc=gb">The Comprehensibility of the Universe</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180227214410/https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-comprehensibility-of-the-universe-9780199261550?lang=en&amp;cc=gb">Archived</a> 2018-02-27 at the <a href="/wiki/Wayback_Machine" title="Wayback Machine">Wayback Machine</a> Clarendon Press; (2017) <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.paragonhouse.com/xcart/Understanding-Scientific-Progress-Aim-Oriented-Empiricism.html">Understanding Scientific Progress: Aim-Oriented Empiricism</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180220210819/http://www.paragonhouse.com/xcart/Understanding-Scientific-Progress-Aim-Oriented-Empiricism.html">Archived</a> 2018-02-20 at the <a href="/wiki/Wayback_Machine" title="Wayback Machine">Wayback Machine</a>, Paragon House, St. Paul</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-StanTheoryObs-24"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-StanTheoryObs_24-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-StanTheoryObs_24-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFBogen2013" class="citation web cs1">Bogen, Jim (2013). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/science-theory-observation/">"Theory and Observation in Science"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20140227105420/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/science-theory-observation/">Archived</a> from the original on 2014-02-27<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2014-02-25</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Theory+and+Observation+in+Science&amp;rft.date=2013&amp;rft.aulast=Bogen&amp;rft.aufirst=Jim&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fscience-theory-observation%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Levin1984-25"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Levin1984_25-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFLevin1984" class="citation book cs1">Levin, Michael (1984). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/scientificrealis0000unse/page/124">"What Kind of Explanation is Truth?"</a>. In Jarrett Leplin (ed.). <i>Scientific Realism</i>. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/scientificrealis0000unse/page/124">124–1139</a>. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-520-05155-3" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-520-05155-3"><bdi>978-0-520-05155-3</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=What+Kind+of+Explanation+is+Truth%3F&amp;rft.btitle=Scientific+Realism&amp;rft.place=Berkeley&amp;rft.pages=124-1139&amp;rft.pub=University+of+California+Press&amp;rft.date=1984&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-520-05155-3&amp;rft.aulast=Levin&amp;rft.aufirst=Michael&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdetails%2Fscientificrealis0000unse%2Fpage%2F124&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Boyd2002-26"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Boyd2002_26-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Boyd2002_26-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFBoyd2002" class="citation web cs1">Boyd, Richard (2002). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/">"Scientific Realism"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20070706080354/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/">Archived</a> from the original on 2007-07-06<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2007-12-01</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Scientific+Realism&amp;rft.date=2002&amp;rft.aulast=Boyd&amp;rft.aufirst=Richard&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fscientific-realism%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-27"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-27">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Specific examples include: <ul><li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFPopper2002" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Karl_Popper" title="Karl Popper">Popper, Karl</a> (2002). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=fZnrUfJWQ-YC&amp;q=conjectures+and+refutations"><i>Conjectures and Refutations</i></a>. London &amp; New York: Routledge Classics. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-415-28594-0" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-415-28594-0"><bdi>978-0-415-28594-0</bdi></a>First published 1963 by Routledge and Kegan Paul</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Conjectures+and+Refutations&amp;rft.place=London+%26+New+York&amp;rft.pub=Routledge+Classics&amp;rft.date=2002&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-415-28594-0&amp;rft.aulast=Popper&amp;rft.aufirst=Karl&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DfZnrUfJWQ-YC%26q%3Dconjectures%2Band%2Brefutations&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span><span class="cs1-maint citation-comment"><code class="cs1-code">{{<a href="/wiki/Template:Cite_book" title="Template:Cite book">cite book</a>}}</code>: CS1 maint: postscript (<a href="/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_postscript" title="Category:CS1 maint: postscript">link</a>)</span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFSmart1968" class="citation book cs1">Smart, J.J.C. (1968). <span class="id-lock-registration" title="Free registration required"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/betweenscienceph0000smar"><i>Between Science and Philosophy</i></a></span>. New York: Random House.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Between+Science+and+Philosophy&amp;rft.place=New+York&amp;rft.pub=Random+House&amp;rft.date=1968&amp;rft.aulast=Smart&amp;rft.aufirst=J.J.C.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdetails%2Fbetweenscienceph0000smar&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFPutnam1975" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Hilary_Putnam" title="Hilary Putnam">Putnam, Hilary</a> (1975). <i>Mathematics, Matter and Method (Philosophical Papers, Vol. I)</i>. London: Cambridge University Press.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Mathematics%2C+Matter+and+Method+%28Philosophical+Papers%2C+Vol.+I%29&amp;rft.place=London&amp;rft.pub=Cambridge+University+Press&amp;rft.date=1975&amp;rft.aulast=Putnam&amp;rft.aufirst=Hilary&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFPutnam1978" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Hilary_Putnam" title="Hilary Putnam">Putnam, Hilary</a> (1978). <i>Meaning and the Moral Sciences</i>. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Meaning+and+the+Moral+Sciences&amp;rft.place=London&amp;rft.pub=Routledge+and+Kegan+Paul&amp;rft.date=1978&amp;rft.aulast=Putnam&amp;rft.aufirst=Hilary&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFBoyd1984" class="citation book cs1">Boyd, Richard (1984). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/scientificrealis0000unse/page/41">"The Current Status of Scientific Realism"</a>. In Jarrett Leplin (ed.). <i>Scientific Realism</i>. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/scientificrealis0000unse/page/41">41–82</a>. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-520-05155-3" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-520-05155-3"><bdi>978-0-520-05155-3</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=The+Current+Status+of+Scientific+Realism&amp;rft.btitle=Scientific+Realism&amp;rft.place=Berkeley&amp;rft.pages=41-82&amp;rft.pub=University+of+California+Press&amp;rft.date=1984&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-520-05155-3&amp;rft.aulast=Boyd&amp;rft.aufirst=Richard&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdetails%2Fscientificrealis0000unse%2Fpage%2F41&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li></ul> </span></li> <li id="cite_note-Stanford2006-28"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Stanford2006_28-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFStanford2006" class="citation book cs1">Stanford, P. Kyle (2006). <i>Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives</i>. Oxford University Press. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-19-517408-3" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-19-517408-3"><bdi>978-0-19-517408-3</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Exceeding+Our+Grasp%3A+Science%2C+History%2C+and+the+Problem+of+Unconceived+Alternatives&amp;rft.pub=Oxford+University+Press&amp;rft.date=2006&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-19-517408-3&amp;rft.aulast=Stanford&amp;rft.aufirst=P.+Kyle&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Laudan1981-29"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Laudan1981_29-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFLaudan1981" class="citation journal cs1"><a href="/wiki/Larry_Laudan" title="Larry Laudan">Laudan, Larry</a> (1981). "A Confutation of Convergent Realism". <i>Philosophy of Science</i>. <b>48</b>: 218–249. <a href="/wiki/CiteSeerX_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="CiteSeerX (identifier)">CiteSeerX</a> <span class="id-lock-free" title="Freely accessible"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.594.2523">10.1.1.594.2523</a></span>. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1086%2F288975">10.1086/288975</a>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:108290084">108290084</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Philosophy+of+Science&amp;rft.atitle=A+Confutation+of+Convergent+Realism&amp;rft.volume=48&amp;rft.pages=218-249&amp;rft.date=1981&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fsummary%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.594.2523%23id-name%3DCiteSeerX&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A108290084%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1086%2F288975&amp;rft.aulast=Laudan&amp;rft.aufirst=Larry&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-vanFraassen1980-30"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-vanFraassen1980_30-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-vanFraassen1980_30-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFvan_Fraassen1980" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Bas_van_Fraassen" title="Bas van Fraassen">van Fraassen, Bas</a> (1980). <i>The Scientific Image</i>. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-19-824424-0" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-19-824424-0"><bdi>978-0-19-824424-0</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+Scientific+Image&amp;rft.place=Oxford&amp;rft.pub=The+Clarendon+Press&amp;rft.date=1980&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-19-824424-0&amp;rft.aulast=van+Fraassen&amp;rft.aufirst=Bas&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Winsberg2006-31"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Winsberg2006_31-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFWinsberg2006" class="citation journal cs1">Winsberg, Eric (September 2006). "Models of Success Versus the Success of Models: Reliability without Truth". <i>Synthese</i>. <b>152</b>: 1–19. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11229-004-5404-6">10.1007/s11229-004-5404-6</a>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:18275928">18275928</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Synthese&amp;rft.atitle=Models+of+Success+Versus+the+Success+of+Models%3A+Reliability+without+Truth&amp;rft.volume=152&amp;rft.pages=1-19&amp;rft.date=2006-09&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1007%2Fs11229-004-5404-6&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A18275928%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft.aulast=Winsberg&amp;rft.aufirst=Eric&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Stanford2000-32"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Stanford2000_32-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFStanford2000" class="citation journal cs1">Stanford, P. Kyle (June 2000). "An Antirealist Explanation of the Success of Science". <i>Philosophy of Science</i>. <b>67</b> (2): 266–284. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1086%2F392775">10.1086/392775</a>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:35878807">35878807</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Philosophy+of+Science&amp;rft.atitle=An+Antirealist+Explanation+of+the+Success+of+Science&amp;rft.volume=67&amp;rft.issue=2&amp;rft.pages=266-284&amp;rft.date=2000-06&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1086%2F392775&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A35878807%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft.aulast=Stanford&amp;rft.aufirst=P.+Kyle&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-33"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-33">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Dennett, D. (1991). Real Patterns. The Journal of Philosophy.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-34"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-34">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Burnston, D. C. (2017). Real Patterns in Biological Explanation. Philosophy of Science.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-35"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-35">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Seifert, V. A. (2022). The Chemical Bond is a Real Pattern. Philosophy of Science.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-36"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-36">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Millhouse, T. (2020). Really real patterns. Australasian Journal of Philosophy.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-37"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-37">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Santa Fe Institute. (2022). Real patterns in science &amp; cognition. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://www.santafe.edu/news-center/news/real-patterns-science-cognition">https://www.santafe.edu/news-center/news/real-patterns-science-cognition</a></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-38"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-38">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFRosenstockLee2002" class="citation journal cs1">Rosenstock, Linda; Lee, Lore Jackson (January 2002). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447376">"Attacks on Science: The Risks to Evidence-Based Policy"</a>. <i>American Journal of Public Health</i>. <b>92</b> (1): 14–18. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.2105%2Fajph.92.1.14">10.2105/ajph.92.1.14</a>. <a href="/wiki/ISSN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISSN (identifier)">ISSN</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0090-0036">0090-0036</a>. <a href="/wiki/PMC_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="PMC (identifier)">PMC</a> <span class="id-lock-free" title="Freely accessible"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447376">1447376</a></span>. <a href="/wiki/PMID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="PMID (identifier)">PMID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11772749">11772749</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=American+Journal+of+Public+Health&amp;rft.atitle=Attacks+on+Science%3A+The+Risks+to+Evidence-Based+Policy&amp;rft.volume=92&amp;rft.issue=1&amp;rft.pages=14-18&amp;rft.date=2002-01&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Fpmc%2Farticles%2FPMC1447376%23id-name%3DPMC&amp;rft.issn=0090-0036&amp;rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F11772749&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2105%2Fajph.92.1.14&amp;rft.aulast=Rosenstock&amp;rft.aufirst=Linda&amp;rft.au=Lee%2C+Lore+Jackson&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Fpmc%2Farticles%2FPMC1447376&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-StanSocial-39"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-StanSocial_39-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFLongino2013" class="citation web cs1">Longino, Helen (2013). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-knowledge-social/">"The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20140326140904/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-knowledge-social/">Archived</a> from the original on 2014-03-26<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2014-03-06</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=The+Social+Dimensions+of+Scientific+Knowledge&amp;rft.date=2013&amp;rft.aulast=Longino&amp;rft.aufirst=Helen&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fscientific-knowledge-social%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-40"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-40">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Douglas Allchin, "Values in Science and in Science Education," in International Handbook of Science Education, B.J. Fraser and K.G. Tobin (eds.), 2:1083–1092, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1988).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-41"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-41">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"> <a href="/wiki/Aristotle" title="Aristotle">Aristotle</a>, "<a href="/wiki/Prior_Analytics" title="Prior Analytics">Prior Analytics</a>", Hugh Tredennick (trans.), pp. 181–531 in <i>Aristotle, Volume 1</i>, <a href="/wiki/Loeb_Classical_Library" title="Loeb Classical Library">Loeb Classical Library</a>, William Heinemann, London, 1938.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-42"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-42">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFLindberg1980" class="citation book cs1">Lindberg, David C. (1980). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=lOCriv4rSCUC&amp;q=alhazen+philosophy+of+science&amp;pg=PA351"><i>Science in the Middle Ages</i></a>. University of Chicago Press. pp. 350–351. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-226-48233-0" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-226-48233-0"><bdi>978-0-226-48233-0</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Science+in+the+Middle+Ages&amp;rft.pages=350-351&amp;rft.pub=University+of+Chicago+Press&amp;rft.date=1980&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-226-48233-0&amp;rft.aulast=Lindberg&amp;rft.aufirst=David+C.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DlOCriv4rSCUC%26q%3Dalhazen%2Bphilosophy%2Bof%2Bscience%26pg%3DPA351&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-First_Scientist,_Clegg-43"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-First_Scientist,_Clegg_43-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFClegg2004" class="citation book cs1">Clegg, Brian (2004). <i>The First Scientist: A Life of Roger Bacon</i>. Da Capo Press. p. 2. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0786713585" title="Special:BookSources/978-0786713585"><bdi>978-0786713585</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+First+Scientist%3A+A+Life+of+Roger+Bacon&amp;rft.pages=2&amp;rft.pub=Da+Capo+Press&amp;rft.date=2004&amp;rft.isbn=978-0786713585&amp;rft.aulast=Clegg&amp;rft.aufirst=Brian&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-44"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-44">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="/wiki/Francis_Bacon_(philosopher)" class="mw-redirect" title="Francis Bacon (philosopher)">Bacon, Francis</a> <i><a href="/wiki/Novum_Organum" title="Novum Organum">Novum Organum</a> (The New Organon)</i>, 1620. Bacon's work described many of the accepted principles, underscoring the importance of empirical results, data gathering and experiment. <i>Encyclopædia Britannica</i> (1911), "<a href="https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Bacon,_Francis" class="extiw" title="s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Bacon, Francis">Bacon, Francis</a>" states: [In Novum Organum, we ] "proceed to apply what is perhaps the most valuable part of the Baconian method, the process of exclusion or rejection. This elimination of the non-essential, ..., is the most important of Bacon's contributions to the logic of induction, and that in which, as he repeatedly says, his method differs from all previous philosophies."</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-www.paricenter.com_mullin02-45"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-www.paricenter.com_mullin02_45-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-www.paricenter.com_mullin02_45-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFMcMullin" class="citation web cs1">McMullin, Ernan. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20151024002127/http://www.paricenter.com/library/papers/mullin02.php">"The Impact of Newton's Principia on the Philosophy of Science"</a>. <i>paricenter.com</i>. Pari Center for New Learning. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.paricenter.com/library/papers/mullin02.php">the original</a> on 24 October 2015<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">29 October</span> 2015</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=paricenter.com&amp;rft.atitle=The+Impact+of+Newton%27s+Principia+on+the+Philosophy+of+Science&amp;rft.aulast=McMullin&amp;rft.aufirst=Ernan&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paricenter.com%2Flibrary%2Fpapers%2Fmullin02.php&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-mill-46"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-mill_46-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill/#SciMet">"John Stuart Mill (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)"</a>. plato.stanford.edu. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20100106122801/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill/#SciMet">Archived</a> from the original on 2010-01-06<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2009-07-31</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=John+Stuart+Mill+%28Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy%29&amp;rft.pub=plato.stanford.edu&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fmill%2F%23SciMet&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Friedman-pxiv-47"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Friedman-pxiv_47-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Michael Friedman, <i>Reconsidering Logical Positivism</i> (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999), <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=e9TjZc9wNUAC&amp;pg=PR14">p. xiv</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160628112455/https://books.google.com/books?id=e9TjZc9wNUAC&amp;pg=PR14">Archived</a> 2016-06-28 at the <a href="/wiki/Wayback_Machine" title="Wayback Machine">Wayback Machine</a>.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-autogenerated1-48"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-autogenerated1_48-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">See <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/vienna-circle">"Vienna Circle"</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150810041731/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/vienna-circle">Archived</a> 2015-08-10 at the <a href="/wiki/Wayback_Machine" title="Wayback Machine">Wayback Machine</a> in <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Smith1986-49"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Smith1986_49-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFSmith1986" class="citation book cs1">Smith, L.D. (1986). <span class="id-lock-registration" title="Free registration required"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/behaviorismlogic0000smit"><i>Behaviorism and Logical Positivism: A Reassessment of the Alliance</i></a></span>. Stanford University Press. p. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/behaviorismlogic0000smit/page/314">314</a>. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-8047-1301-6" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-8047-1301-6"><bdi>978-0-8047-1301-6</bdi></a>. <a href="/wiki/LCCN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="LCCN (identifier)">LCCN</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://lccn.loc.gov/85030366">85030366</a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2016-01-27</span></span>. <q>The secondary and historical literature on logical positivism affords substantial grounds for concluding that logical positivism failed to solve many of the central problems it generated for itself. Prominent among the unsolved problems was the failure to find an acceptable statement of the verifiability (later confirmability) criterion of meaningfulness. Until a competing tradition emerged (about the late 1950s), the problems of logical positivism continued to be attacked from within that tradition. But as the new tradition in the philosophy of science began to demonstrate its effectiveness—by dissolving and rephrasing old problems as well as by generating new ones—philosophers began to shift allegiances to the new tradition, even though that tradition has yet to receive a canonical formulation.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Behaviorism+and+Logical+Positivism%3A+A+Reassessment+of+the+Alliance&amp;rft.pages=314&amp;rft.pub=Stanford+University+Press&amp;rft.date=1986&amp;rft_id=info%3Alccn%2F85030366&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-8047-1301-6&amp;rft.aulast=Smith&amp;rft.aufirst=L.D.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdetails%2Fbehaviorismlogic0000smit&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Bunge1996-50"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Bunge1996_50-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFBunge1996" class="citation book cs1">Bunge, M.A. (1996). <span class="id-lock-registration" title="Free registration required"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/findingphilosoph0000bung"><i>Finding Philosophy in Social Science</i></a></span>. Yale University Press. p. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/findingphilosoph0000bung/page/317">317</a>. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-300-06606-7" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-300-06606-7"><bdi>978-0-300-06606-7</bdi></a>. <a href="/wiki/LCCN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="LCCN (identifier)">LCCN</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://lccn.loc.gov/lc96004399">lc96004399</a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2016-01-27</span></span>. <q>To conclude, logical positivism was progressive compared with the classical positivism of <a href="/wiki/Ptolemy" title="Ptolemy">Ptolemy</a>, <a href="/wiki/David_Hume" title="David Hume">Hume</a>, <a href="/wiki/Jean_le_Rond_d%27Alembert" title="Jean le Rond d'Alembert">d'Alembert</a>, <a href="/wiki/Auguste_Comte" title="Auguste Comte">Comte</a>, <a href="/wiki/John_Stuart_Mill" title="John Stuart Mill">John Stuart Mill</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Ernst_Mach" title="Ernst Mach">Ernst Mach</a>. It was even more so by comparison with its contemporary rivals—<a href="/wiki/Neo-Thomism" class="mw-redirect" title="Neo-Thomism">neo-Thomism</a>, <a href="/wiki/Neo-Kantianism" title="Neo-Kantianism">neo-Kantianism</a>, <a href="/wiki/Intuitionism" title="Intuitionism">intuitionism</a>, dialectical materialism, phenomenology, and <a href="/wiki/Existentialism" title="Existentialism">existentialism</a>. However, neo-positivism failed dismally to give a faithful account of science, whether natural or social. It failed because it remained anchored to sense-data and to a phenomenalist metaphysics, overrated the power of induction and underrated that of hypothesis, and denounced realism and materialism as metaphysical nonsense. Although it has never been practiced consistently in the advanced natural sciences and has been criticized by many philosophers, notably Popper (1959 [1935], 1963), logical positivism remains the tacit philosophy of many scientists. Regrettably, the anti-positivism fashionable in the metatheory of social science is often nothing but an excuse for sloppiness and wild speculation.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Finding+Philosophy+in+Social+Science&amp;rft.pages=317&amp;rft.pub=Yale+University+Press&amp;rft.date=1996&amp;rft_id=info%3Alccn%2Flc96004399&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-300-06606-7&amp;rft.aulast=Bunge&amp;rft.aufirst=M.A.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdetails%2Ffindingphilosoph0000bung&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-51"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-51">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20140107230818/http://www.drury.edu/ess/philsci/popper.html">"Popper, Falsifiability, and the Failure of Positivism"</a>. 7 August 2000. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.drury.edu/ess/philsci/popper.html">the original</a> on January 7, 2014<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">7 January</span> 2014</span>. <q>The upshot is that the positivists seem caught between insisting on the V.C. [Verifiability Criterion]—but for no defensible reason—or admitting that the V.C. requires a background language, etc., which opens the door to relativism, etc. In light of this dilemma, many folk—especially following Popper's "last-ditch" effort to "save" empiricism/positivism/realism with the falsifiability criterion—have agreed that positivism is a dead-end.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Popper%2C+Falsifiability%2C+and+the+Failure+of+Positivism&amp;rft.date=2000-08-07&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.drury.edu%2Fess%2Fphilsci%2Fpopper.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Friedman-pxii-52"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Friedman-pxii_52-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Friedman, <i>Reconsidering Logical Positivism</i> (Cambridge U P, 1999), <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=e9TjZc9wNUAC&amp;pg=PR12">p. xii</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160628220109/https://books.google.com/books?id=e9TjZc9wNUAC&amp;pg=PR12">Archived</a> 2016-06-28 at the <a href="/wiki/Wayback_Machine" title="Wayback Machine">Wayback Machine</a>.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-53"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-53">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFBird2013" class="citation journal cs1">Bird, Alexander (2013). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/thomas-kuhn/">"Thomas Kuhn"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20170713100633/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/thomas-kuhn/">Archived</a> from the original on 2017-07-13<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2015-10-26</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Thomas+Kuhn&amp;rft.date=2013&amp;rft.aulast=Bird&amp;rft.aufirst=Alexander&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Farchives%2Ffall2013%2Fentries%2Fthomas-kuhn%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-KuhnP206-54"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-KuhnP206_54-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">T.S. Kuhn, <i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</i>, 2nd. ed., Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Pr., 1970, p. 206. <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-226-45804-0" title="Special:BookSources/0-226-45804-0">0-226-45804-0</a></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Priddy_1998-55"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Priddy_1998_55-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFPriddy1998" class="citation book cs1">Priddy, Robert (1998). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://robertpriddy.com/lim/5.html">"Chapter Five, Scientific Objectivity in Question"</a>. <i>Science Limited</i>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Chapter+Five%2C+Scientific+Objectivity+in+Question&amp;rft.btitle=Science+Limited&amp;rft.date=1998&amp;rft.aulast=Priddy&amp;rft.aufirst=Robert&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Frobertpriddy.com%2Flim%2F5.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEWhitehead1997135-56"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEWhitehead1997135_56-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFWhitehead1997">Whitehead 1997</a>, p. 135.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-57"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-57">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFBoldman2007" class="citation web cs1">Boldman, Lee (2007). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p98831/pdf/ch0615.pdf">"Chapter 6, The Privileged Status of Science"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Chapter+6%2C+The+Privileged+Status+of+Science&amp;rft.date=2007&amp;rft.aulast=Boldman&amp;rft.aufirst=Lee&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fpress-files.anu.edu.au%2Fdownloads%2Fpress%2Fp98831%2Fpdf%2Fch0615.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-58"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-58">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Papineau, David <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism/">"Naturalism"</a>, in <i>The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>, quote, "The great majority of contemporary philosophers would happily... reject 'supernatural' entities, and allow that science is a possible route (if not necessarily the only one) to important truths about the 'human spirit'."</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii-59"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii_59-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii_59-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii_59-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHeilbron2003vii_59-3"><sup><i><b>d</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFHeilbron2003">Heilbron 2003</a>, p. vii.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEChen20091–2-60"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932_60-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932_60-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932_60-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932_60-3"><sup><i><b>d</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932_60-4"><sup><i><b>e</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932_60-5"><sup><i><b>f</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEChen20091%E2%80%932_60-6"><sup><i><b>g</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFChen2009">Chen 2009</a>, pp. 1–2.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEDurak2008-61"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEDurak2008_61-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEDurak2008_61-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEDurak2008_61-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFDurak2008">Durak 2008</a>.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-62"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-62">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFVaccaro" class="citation web cs1">Vaccaro, Joan. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.ict.griffith.edu.au/joan/atheism/reality.php">"Reality"</a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">22 December</span> 2017</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Reality&amp;rft.aulast=Vaccaro&amp;rft.aufirst=Joan&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ict.griffith.edu.au%2Fjoan%2Fatheism%2Freality.php&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-63"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-63">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFVaccaro" class="citation web cs1">Vaccaro, Joan. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.ict.griffith.edu.au/joan/atheism/objectivism.php">"Objectiveism"</a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">22 December</span> 2017</span>. <q>Objective reality exists beyond or outside our self. Any belief that it arises from a real world outside us is actually an assumption. It seems more beneficial to assume that an objective reality exists than to live with solipsism, and so people are quite happy to make this assumption. In fact we made this assumption unconsciously when we began to learn about the world as infants. The world outside ourselves appears to respond in ways which are consistent with it being real. The assumption of objectivism is essential if we are to attach the contemporary meanings to our sensations and feelings and make more sense of them.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Objectiveism&amp;rft.aulast=Vaccaro&amp;rft.aufirst=Joan&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ict.griffith.edu.au%2Fjoan%2Fatheism%2Fobjectivism.php&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTESobottka200511-64"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTESobottka200511_64-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTESobottka200511_64-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFSobottka2005">Sobottka 2005</a>, p. 11.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-65"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-65">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFGauch2002">Gauch 2002</a>, p. 154, "Expressed as a single grand statement, science presupposes that the physical world is orderly and comprehensible. The most obvious components of this comprehensive presupposition are that the physical world exists and that our sense perceptions are generally reliable."</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-66"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-66">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFGould1987">Gould 1987</a>, p. 120, "You cannot go to a rocky outcrop and observe either the constancy of nature's laws or the working of known processes. It works the other way around." You first assume these propositions and "then you go to the outcrop of rock."</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-67"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-67">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFSimpson1963">Simpson 1963</a>, pp. 24–48, "Uniformity is an unprovable postulate justified, or indeed required, on two grounds. First, nothing in our incomplete but extensive knowledge of history disagrees with it. Second, only with this postulate is a rational interpretation of history possible and we are justified in seeking—as scientists we must seek—such a rational interpretation."</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEGould1965223–228-68"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEGould1965223%E2%80%93228_68-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFGould1965">Gould 1965</a>, pp. 223–228.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEGould198411-69"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEGould198411_69-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFGould1984">Gould 1984</a>, p. 11.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEHooykaas196338-70"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEHooykaas196338_70-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFHooykaas1963">Hooykaas 1963</a>, p. 38.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-71"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-71">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180102073443/http://www.betterevaluation.org/evaluation-options/simplerandom">"Simple Random Sampling"</a>. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://betterevaluation.org/evaluation-options/simplerandom">the original</a> on 2018-01-02<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2018-01-06</span></span>. <q>A simple random sample (SRS) is the most basic probabilistic option used for creating a sample from a population. Each SRS is made of individuals drawn from a larger population, completely at random. As a result, said individuals have an equal chance of being selected throughout the sampling process. The benefit of SRS is that as a result, the investigator is guaranteed to choose a sample which is representative of the population, which ensures statistically valid conclusions.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Simple+Random+Sampling&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fbetterevaluation.org%2Fevaluation-options%2Fsimplerandom&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-72"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-72">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFOlsson2014" class="citation journal cs1">Olsson, Erik (2014). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/justep-coherence/">"Coherentist Theories of Epistemic Justification"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180914115858/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/justep-coherence/">Archived</a> from the original on 2018-09-14<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2015-10-26</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Coherentist+Theories+of+Epistemic+Justification&amp;rft.date=2014&amp;rft.aulast=Olsson&amp;rft.aufirst=Erik&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Farchives%2Fspr2014%2Fentries%2Fjustep-coherence%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Harding1976-73"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Harding1976_73-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFSandra_Harding1976" class="citation book cs1">Sandra Harding (1976). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=Uwit8JTcLfAC&amp;pg=PR9"><i>Can theories be refuted?: essays on the Dunhem–Quine thesis</i></a>. Springer Science &amp; Business Media. pp. 9–. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-90-277-0630-0" title="Special:BookSources/978-90-277-0630-0"><bdi>978-90-277-0630-0</bdi></a>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160628144135/https://books.google.com/books?id=Uwit8JTcLfAC&amp;pg=PR9">Archived</a> from the original on 2016-06-28<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2016-01-27</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Can+theories+be+refuted%3F%3A+essays+on+the+Dunhem%E2%80%93Quine+thesis&amp;rft.pages=9-&amp;rft.pub=Springer+Science+%26+Business+Media&amp;rft.date=1976&amp;rft.isbn=978-90-277-0630-0&amp;rft.au=Sandra+Harding&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DUwit8JTcLfAC%26pg%3DPR9&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Popper_2005ch3-4-74"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Popper_2005ch3-4_74-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFPopper2005" class="citation book cs1">Popper, Karl (2005). <i>The Logic of Scientific Discovery</i> (Taylor &amp; Francis e-Library ed.). London and New York: Routledge / Taylor &amp; Francis e-Library. chapters 3–4. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-203-99462-7" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-203-99462-7"><bdi>978-0-203-99462-7</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+Logic+of+Scientific+Discovery&amp;rft.place=London+and+New+York&amp;rft.pages=chapters+3-4&amp;rft.edition=Taylor+%26+Francis+e-Library&amp;rft.pub=Routledge+%2F+Taylor+%26+Francis+e-Library&amp;rft.date=2005&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-203-99462-7&amp;rft.aulast=Popper&amp;rft.aufirst=Karl&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-sep-75"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-sep_75-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFPreston2007" class="citation encyclopaedia cs1">Preston, John (2007-02-15). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feyerabend/">"Paul Feyerabend"</a>. In <a href="/wiki/Edward_N._Zalta" title="Edward N. Zalta">Zalta, Edward N.</a> (ed.). <i><a href="/wiki/Stanford_Encyclopedia_of_Philosophy" title="Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy">Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</a></i>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Paul+Feyerabend&amp;rft.btitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.date=2007-02-15&amp;rft.aulast=Preston&amp;rft.aufirst=John&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Ffeyerabend%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-KuhnPostParadigm-76"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-KuhnPostParadigm_76-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFKuhn,_T.S.1996" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Thomas_Samuel_Kuhn" class="mw-redirect" title="Thomas Samuel Kuhn">Kuhn, T.S.</a> (1996). "[Postscript]". <i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd. ed</i>. [Univ. of Chicago Pr]. p. 176. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-226-45808-3" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-226-45808-3"><bdi>978-0-226-45808-3</bdi></a>. <q>A paradigm is what the members of a community of scientists share, <i>and</i>, conversely, a scientific community consists of men who share a paradigm.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=%5BPostscript%5D&amp;rft.btitle=The+Structure+of+Scientific+Revolutions%2C+3rd.+ed&amp;rft.pages=176&amp;rft.pub=%5BUniv.+of+Chicago+Pr%5D&amp;rft.date=1996&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-226-45808-3&amp;rft.au=Kuhn%2C+T.S.&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-77"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-77">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite class="citation encyclopaedia cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://iep.utm.edu/foucault/#H3">"Foucault, Michel"</a>. <i>Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">29 August</span> 2022</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Foucault%2C+Michel&amp;rft.btitle=Internet+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fiep.utm.edu%2Ffoucault%2F%23H3&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-78"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-78">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFMorrison2018" class="citation magazine cs1">Morrison, Thomas (2018). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://philosophynow.org/issues/127/Foucaults_Elephant">"Foucault's Elephant"</a>. <i>Philosophy Now</i>. No. 127<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">29 August</span> 2022</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Philosophy+Now&amp;rft.atitle=Foucault%27s+Elephant&amp;rft.issue=127&amp;rft.date=2018&amp;rft.aulast=Morrison&amp;rft.aufirst=Thomas&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fphilosophynow.org%2Fissues%2F127%2FFoucaults_Elephant&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-79"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-79">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFPower2015" class="citation journal cs1">Power, Jason L. (2015). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.worldscientificnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/WSN-7-2015-15-29.pdf">"<span class="cs1-kern-left"></span>'Disciplining' Truth and Science: Michel Foucault and the Power of Social Science"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. <i>World Scientific News</i>. <b>7</b>: 15–29. <a href="/wiki/ISSN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISSN (identifier)">ISSN</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://search.worldcat.org/issn/2392-2192">2392-2192</a>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.worldscientificnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/WSN-7-2015-15-29.pdf">Archived</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> from the original on 2022-10-09.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=World+Scientific+News&amp;rft.atitle=%27Disciplining%27+Truth+and+Science%3A+Michel+Foucault+and+the+Power+of+Social+Science&amp;rft.volume=7&amp;rft.pages=15-29&amp;rft.date=2015&amp;rft.issn=2392-2192&amp;rft.aulast=Power&amp;rft.aufirst=Jason+L.&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldscientificnews.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2FWSN-7-2015-15-29.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span> </span> </li> <li id="cite_note-80"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-80">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFQuine,_Willard_Van_Orman1980" class="citation book cs1">Quine, Willard Van Orman (1980). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html">"Two Dogmas of Empiricism"</a>. <i>From a Logical Point of View</i>. <a href="/wiki/Harvard_University_Press" title="Harvard University Press">Harvard University Press</a>. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-674-32351-3" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-674-32351-3"><bdi>978-0-674-32351-3</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Two+Dogmas+of+Empiricism&amp;rft.btitle=From+a+Logical+Point+of+View&amp;rft.pub=Harvard+University+Press&amp;rft.date=1980&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-674-32351-3&amp;rft.au=Quine%2C+Willard+Van+Orman&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ditext.com%2Fquine%2Fquine.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-81"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-81">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFAshmanBarringer2001" class="citation book cs1">Ashman, Keith M.; Barringer, Philip S., eds. (2001). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=XImEAgAAQBAJ&amp;q=After+the+science+wars&amp;pg=PR1"><i>After the Science Wars</i></a>. London: Routledge. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-415-21209-0" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-415-21209-0"><bdi>978-0-415-21209-0</bdi></a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">29 October</span> 2015</span>. <q>The 'war' is between scientists who believe that science and its methods are objective, and an increasing number of social scientists, historians, philosophers, and others gathered under the umbrella of Science Studies.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=After+the+Science+Wars&amp;rft.place=London&amp;rft.pub=Routledge&amp;rft.date=2001&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-415-21209-0&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DXImEAgAAQBAJ%26q%3DAfter%2Bthe%2Bscience%2Bwars%26pg%3DPR1&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-82"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-82">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"> Woodhouse, Edward. Science Technology and Society. Spring 2015 ed. n.p.: U Readers, 2014. Print.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-83"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-83">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFHatab2008" class="citation journal cs1">Hatab, Lawrence J. (2008). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&amp;type=summary&amp;url=/journals/journal_of_nietzsche_studies/v035/35.hatab.html">"How Does the Ascetic Ideal Function in Nietzsche's <i>Genealogy</i>?"</a>. <i>The Journal of Nietzsche Studies</i>. <b>35</b> (35/36): 106–123. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<span class="id-lock-free" title="Freely accessible"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2Fjnietstud.35.2008.0106">10.2307/jnietstud.35.2008.0106</a></span>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:170630145">170630145</a>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160304213251/https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&amp;type=summary&amp;url=%2Fjournals%2Fjournal_of_nietzsche_studies%2Fv035%2F35.hatab.html">Archived</a> from the original on 2016-03-04<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-10-22</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+Nietzsche+Studies&amp;rft.atitle=How+Does+the+Ascetic+Ideal+Function+in+Nietzsche%27s+Genealogy%3F&amp;rft.volume=35&amp;rft.issue=35%2F36&amp;rft.pages=106-123&amp;rft.date=2008&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2307%2Fjnietstud.35.2008.0106&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A170630145%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft.aulast=Hatab&amp;rft.aufirst=Lawrence+J.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fmuse.jhu.edu%2Flogin%3Fauth%3D0%26type%3Dsummary%26url%3D%2Fjournals%2Fjournal_of_nietzsche_studies%2Fv035%2F35.hatab.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Gutting-84"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Gutting_84-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Gutting, Gary (2004), <i>Continental Philosophy of Science</i>, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Wheeler2015-85"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Wheeler2015_85-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFWheeler2015" class="citation web cs1">Wheeler, Michael (2015). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/">"Martin Heidegger"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20151016055622/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/">Archived</a> from the original on 2015-10-16<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2015-10-29</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Martin+Heidegger&amp;rft.date=2015&amp;rft.aulast=Wheeler&amp;rft.aufirst=Michael&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fheidegger%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-86"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-86">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFFoucault1961" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Michel_Foucault" title="Michel Foucault">Foucault, Michel</a> (1961). Khalfa, Jean (ed.). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=OT-VBQAAQBAJ"><i>History of Madness</i></a> [<i>Folie et Déraison: Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique</i>]. Translated by Murphy, Jonathan; Khalfa, Jean. London: Routledge (published 2013). <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781134473809" title="Special:BookSources/9781134473809"><bdi>9781134473809</bdi></a>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190715083016/https://books.google.com/books?id=OT-VBQAAQBAJ">Archived</a> from the original on 15 July 2019<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">3 Mar</span> 2019</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=History+of+Madness&amp;rft.place=London&amp;rft.pub=Routledge&amp;rft.date=1961&amp;rft.isbn=9781134473809&amp;rft.aulast=Foucault&amp;rft.aufirst=Michel&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DOT-VBQAAQBAJ&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-StanUnity-87"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-StanUnity_87-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFCat2013" class="citation web cs1">Cat, Jordi (2013). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-unity/">"The Unity of Science"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20140407014121/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-unity/">Archived</a> from the original on 2014-04-07<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2014-03-01</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=The+Unity+of+Science&amp;rft.date=2013&amp;rft.aulast=Cat&amp;rft.aufirst=Jordi&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fscientific-unity%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-88"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-88">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFLevine2008" class="citation book cs1">Levine, George (2008). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=koy-zqecyewC&amp;q=dennett+%22greedy+reductionism%22+%22bad+science%22&amp;pg=PA104"><i>Darwin Loves You: Natural Selection and the Re-enchantment of the World</i></a>. Princeton University Press. p. 104. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-691-13639-4" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-691-13639-4"><bdi>978-0-691-13639-4</bdi></a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">28 October</span> 2015</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Darwin+Loves+You%3A+Natural+Selection+and+the+Re-enchantment+of+the+World&amp;rft.pages=104&amp;rft.pub=Princeton+University+Press&amp;rft.date=2008&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-691-13639-4&amp;rft.aulast=Levine&amp;rft.aufirst=George&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3Dkoy-zqecyewC%26q%3Ddennett%2B%2522greedy%2Breductionism%2522%2B%2522bad%2Bscience%2522%26pg%3DPA104&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-89"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-89">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFKitcher2001" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Philip_Kitcher" title="Philip Kitcher">Kitcher, Philip</a> (2001). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=frrhdqnMNzsC"><i>Science, Truth, and Democracy</i></a>. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Science. New York: Oxford University Press. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780198033356" title="Special:BookSources/9780198033356"><bdi>9780198033356</bdi></a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">26 September</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Science%2C+Truth%2C+and+Democracy&amp;rft.place=New+York&amp;rft.series=Oxford+Studies+in+Philosophy+of+Science&amp;rft.pub=Oxford+University+Press&amp;rft.date=2001&amp;rft.isbn=9780198033356&amp;rft.aulast=Kitcher&amp;rft.aufirst=Philip&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DfrrhdqnMNzsC&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-90"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-90">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFDennett1995" class="citation book cs1">Dennett, Daniel (1995). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=Y77BAwAAQBAJ&amp;q=%22there+is+only+science+whose+philosophical+baggage+is+taken+on+board%22&amp;pg=PA21"><i>Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life</i></a>. Simon and Schuster. p. 21. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-1-4391-2629-5" title="Special:BookSources/978-1-4391-2629-5"><bdi>978-1-4391-2629-5</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Darwin%27s+Dangerous+Idea%3A+Evolution+and+the+Meanings+of+Life&amp;rft.pages=21&amp;rft.pub=Simon+and+Schuster&amp;rft.date=1995&amp;rft.isbn=978-1-4391-2629-5&amp;rft.aulast=Dennett&amp;rft.aufirst=Daniel&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DY77BAwAAQBAJ%26q%3D%2522there%2Bis%2Bonly%2Bscience%2Bwhose%2Bphilosophical%2Bbaggage%2Bis%2Btaken%2Bon%2Bboard%2522%26pg%3DPA21&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-StanPhilNeuro-91"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-StanPhilNeuro_91-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-StanPhilNeuro_91-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFBickleMandikLandreth2010" class="citation web cs1">Bickle, John; Mandik, Peter; Landreth, Anthony (2010). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/neuroscience/">"The Philosophy of Neuroscience"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20131202064113/http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/neuroscience/">Archived</a> from the original on 2013-12-02<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2015-12-28</span></span>(Summer 2010 Edition)</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=The+Philosophy+of+Neuroscience&amp;rft.date=2010&amp;rft.aulast=Bickle&amp;rft.aufirst=John&amp;rft.au=Mandik%2C+Peter&amp;rft.au=Landreth%2C+Anthony&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Farchives%2Fsum2010%2Fentries%2Fneuroscience%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span><span class="cs1-maint citation-comment"><code class="cs1-code">{{<a href="/wiki/Template:Cite_web" title="Template:Cite web">cite web</a>}}</code>: CS1 maint: postscript (<a href="/wiki/Category:CS1_maint:_postscript" title="Category:CS1 maint: postscript">link</a>)</span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-92"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-92">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFRomeijn2014" class="citation journal cs1">Romeijn, Jan-Willem (2014). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/statistics/">"Philosophy of Statistics"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180914115858/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/statistics/">Archived</a> from the original on 2018-09-14<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2015-10-29</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Philosophy+of+Statistics&amp;rft.date=2014&amp;rft.aulast=Romeijn&amp;rft.aufirst=Jan-Willem&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Farchives%2Fwin2014%2Fentries%2Fstatistics%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-93"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-93">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFHorsten2015" class="citation journal cs1">Horsten, Leon (2015). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/philosophy-mathematics/">"Philosophy of Mathematics"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2015-10-29</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Philosophy+of+Mathematics&amp;rft.date=2015&amp;rft.aulast=Horsten&amp;rft.aufirst=Leon&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Farchives%2Fspr2015%2Fentries%2Fphilosophy-mathematics%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-94"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-94">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFIsmael2015" class="citation web cs1">Ismael, Jenann (2015). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm/">"Quantum Mechanics"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20151106193537/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm/">Archived</a> from the original on 2015-11-06<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2015-10-29</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Quantum+Mechanics&amp;rft.date=2015&amp;rft.aulast=Ismael&amp;rft.aufirst=Jenann&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fqm%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-WeisbergEtal2011-95"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-WeisbergEtal2011_95-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFWeisbergNeedhamHendry2011" class="citation web cs1">Weisberg, Michael; Needham, Paul; Hendry, Robin (2011). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chemistry/">"Philosophy of Chemistry"</a>. <i>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20140407013224/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chemistry/">Archived</a> from the original on 2014-04-07<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2014-02-14</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Stanford+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Philosophy+of+Chemistry&amp;rft.date=2011&amp;rft.aulast=Weisberg&amp;rft.aufirst=Michael&amp;rft.au=Needham%2C+Paul&amp;rft.au=Hendry%2C+Robin&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fchemistry%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-96"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-96">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www2.lse.ac.uk/philosophy/LakatosAward/lakatosawardarchive/lakatosaward2010announcement.aspx">"Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method"</a>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20120802034342/http://www2.lse.ac.uk/philosophy/LakatosAward/lakatosawardarchive/lakatosaward2010announcement.aspx">Archived</a> from the original on 2012-08-02<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2018-07-03</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Philosophy%2C+Logic+and+Scientific+Method&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww2.lse.ac.uk%2Fphilosophy%2FLakatosAward%2Flakatosawardarchive%2Flakatosaward2010announcement.aspx&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Gewertz2007-97"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Gewertz2007_97-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFGewertz2007" class="citation journal cs1">Gewertz, Ken (February 8, 2007). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20081011132246/http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2007/02.08/03-godfreysmith.html">"The philosophy of evolution: Godfrey-Smith takes an ingenious evolutionary approach to how the mind works"</a>. <i>Harvard University Gazette</i>. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2007/02.08/03-godfreysmith.html">the original</a> on October 11, 2008<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 3,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Harvard+University+Gazette&amp;rft.atitle=The+philosophy+of+evolution%3A+Godfrey-Smith+takes+an+ingenious+evolutionary+approach+to+how+the+mind+works&amp;rft.date=2007-02-08&amp;rft.aulast=Gewertz&amp;rft.aufirst=Ken&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.news.harvard.edu%2Fgazette%2F2007%2F02.08%2F03-godfreysmith.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span>.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-98"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-98">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford University Press. 2010.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-99"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-99">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Hull D. (1969), What philosophy of biology is not, Journal of the History of Biology, 2, pp. 241–268.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-100"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-100">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Recent examples include Okasha S. (2006), <i>Evolution and the Levels of Selection</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, and Godfrey-Smith P. (2009), <i>Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Papineau_1994-101"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Papineau_1994_101-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFPapineau1994" class="citation journal cs1">Papineau, D (1994). "The Virtues of Randomization". <i>British Journal for the Philosophy of Science</i>. <b>45</b> (2): 437–450. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fbjps%2F45.2.437">10.1093/bjps/45.2.437</a>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:123314067">123314067</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=British+Journal+for+the+Philosophy+of+Science&amp;rft.atitle=The+Virtues+of+Randomization&amp;rft.volume=45&amp;rft.issue=2&amp;rft.pages=437-450&amp;rft.date=1994&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1093%2Fbjps%2F45.2.437&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A123314067%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft.aulast=Papineau&amp;rft.aufirst=D&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Worrall_2002-102"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Worrall_2002_102-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFWorrall2002" class="citation journal cs1">Worrall, J (2002). "What Evidence in Evidence-Based Medicine?". <i>Philosophy of Science</i>. <b>69</b> (3): S316–330. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1086%2F341855">10.1086/341855</a>. <a href="/wiki/JSTOR_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="JSTOR (identifier)">JSTOR</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/3081103">3081103</a>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55078796">55078796</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Philosophy+of+Science&amp;rft.atitle=What+Evidence+in+Evidence-Based+Medicine%3F&amp;rft.volume=69&amp;rft.issue=3&amp;rft.pages=S316-330&amp;rft.date=2002&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A55078796%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jstor.org%2Fstable%2F3081103%23id-name%3DJSTOR&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1086%2F341855&amp;rft.aulast=Worrall&amp;rft.aufirst=J&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Worrall_2007-103"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Worrall_2007_103-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFWorrall2007" class="citation journal cs1">Worrall, J. (2007). "Why there's no cause to randomize". <i>British Journal for the Philosophy of Science</i>. <b>58</b> (3): 451–488. <a href="/wiki/CiteSeerX_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="CiteSeerX (identifier)">CiteSeerX</a> <span class="id-lock-free" title="Freely accessible"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.120.7314">10.1.1.120.7314</a></span>. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fbjps%2Faxm024">10.1093/bjps/axm024</a>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16964968">16964968</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=British+Journal+for+the+Philosophy+of+Science&amp;rft.atitle=Why+there%27s+no+cause+to+randomize&amp;rft.volume=58&amp;rft.issue=3&amp;rft.pages=451-488&amp;rft.date=2007&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fsummary%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.120.7314%23id-name%3DCiteSeerX&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A16964968%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1093%2Fbjps%2Faxm024&amp;rft.aulast=Worrall&amp;rft.aufirst=J.&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Lee_2012-104"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Lee_2012_104-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Lee, K., 2012. <i>The Philosophical Foundations of Modern Medicine</i>, London/New York, Palgrave/Macmillan.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Grünbaum_1981-105"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Gr%C3%BCnbaum_1981_105-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFGrünbaum1981" class="citation journal cs1">Grünbaum, A (1981). "The Placebo Concept". <i>Behaviour Research and Therapy</i>. <b>19</b> (2): 157–167. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1016%2F0005-7967%2881%2990040-1">10.1016/0005-7967(81)90040-1</a>. <a href="/wiki/PMID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="PMID (identifier)">PMID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7271692">7271692</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Behaviour+Research+and+Therapy&amp;rft.atitle=The+Placebo+Concept&amp;rft.volume=19&amp;rft.issue=2&amp;rft.pages=157-167&amp;rft.date=1981&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1016%2F0005-7967%2881%2990040-1&amp;rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F7271692&amp;rft.aulast=Gr%C3%BCnbaum&amp;rft.aufirst=A&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Gøtzsche_1994-106"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-G%C3%B8tzsche_1994_106-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFGøtzsche1994" class="citation journal cs1">Gøtzsche, P.C. (1994). "Is there logic in the placebo?". <i>Lancet</i>. <b>344</b> (8927): 925–926. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fs0140-6736%2894%2992273-x">10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92273-x</a>. <a href="/wiki/PMID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="PMID (identifier)">PMID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7934350">7934350</a>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:33650340">33650340</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Lancet&amp;rft.atitle=Is+there+logic+in+the+placebo%3F&amp;rft.volume=344&amp;rft.issue=8927&amp;rft.pages=925-926&amp;rft.date=1994&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A33650340%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F7934350&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1016%2Fs0140-6736%2894%2992273-x&amp;rft.aulast=G%C3%B8tzsche&amp;rft.aufirst=P.C.&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Nunn_2009-107"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Nunn_2009_107-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Nunn, R., 2009. It's time to put the placebo out of our misery" <i>British Medical Journal</i> 338, b1568.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Turner_2012-108"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Turner_2012_108-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFTurner2012" class="citation journal cs1">Turner, A (2012). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/en/publications/placebos-and-the-logic-of-placebo-comparison(6426ce5a-ab57-419c-bc3c-e57d20608807).html">"Placebos" and the logic of placebo comparison"</a>. <i>Biology &amp; Philosophy</i>. <b>27</b> (3): 419–432. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10539-011-9289-8">10.1007/s10539-011-9289-8</a>. <a href="/wiki/Hdl_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Hdl (identifier)">hdl</a>:<span class="id-lock-free" title="Freely accessible"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://hdl.handle.net/1983%2F6426ce5a-ab57-419c-bc3c-e57d20608807">1983/6426ce5a-ab57-419c-bc3c-e57d20608807</a></span>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:4488616">4488616</a>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20181229075454/https://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/en/publications/placebos-and-the-logic-of-placebo-comparison(6426ce5a-ab57-419c-bc3c-e57d20608807).html">Archived</a> from the original on 2018-12-29<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2018-12-29</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Biology+%26+Philosophy&amp;rft.atitle=Placebos%22+and+the+logic+of+placebo+comparison&amp;rft.volume=27&amp;rft.issue=3&amp;rft.pages=419-432&amp;rft.date=2012&amp;rft_id=info%3Ahdl%2F1983%2F6426ce5a-ab57-419c-bc3c-e57d20608807&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A4488616%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1007%2Fs10539-011-9289-8&amp;rft.aulast=Turner&amp;rft.aufirst=A&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fresearch-information.bristol.ac.uk%2Fen%2Fpublications%2Fplacebos-and-the-logic-of-placebo-comparison%286426ce5a-ab57-419c-bc3c-e57d20608807%29.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Worrall_2011-109"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Worrall_2011_109-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFWorrall2011" class="citation journal cs1">Worrall, J (2011). "Causality in medicine: getting back to the Hill top". <i>Preventive Medicine</i>. <b>53</b> (4–5): 235–238. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ypmed.2011.08.009">10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.08.009</a>. <a href="/wiki/PMID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="PMID (identifier)">PMID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21888926">21888926</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Preventive+Medicine&amp;rft.atitle=Causality+in+medicine%3A+getting+back+to+the+Hill+top&amp;rft.volume=53&amp;rft.issue=4%E2%80%935&amp;rft.pages=235-238&amp;rft.date=2011&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1016%2Fj.ypmed.2011.08.009&amp;rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F21888926&amp;rft.aulast=Worrall&amp;rft.aufirst=J&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Cartwright_2009-110"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Cartwright_2009_110-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFCartwright2009" class="citation journal cs1">Cartwright, N (2009). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://cloudfront.escholarship.org/dist/prd/content/qt42v4w8k1/qt42v4w8k1.pdf">"What are randomised controlled trials good for?"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. <i>Philosophical Studies</i>. <b>147</b> (1): 59–70. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<span class="id-lock-free" title="Freely accessible"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11098-009-9450-2">10.1007/s11098-009-9450-2</a></span>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:56203659">56203659</a>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180724112810/https://cloudfront.escholarship.org/dist/prd/content/qt42v4w8k1/qt42v4w8k1.pdf">Archived</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> from the original on 2018-07-24<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-09-01</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Philosophical+Studies&amp;rft.atitle=What+are+randomised+controlled+trials+good+for%3F&amp;rft.volume=147&amp;rft.issue=1&amp;rft.pages=59-70&amp;rft.date=2009&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1007%2Fs11098-009-9450-2&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A56203659%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft.aulast=Cartwright&amp;rft.aufirst=N&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.escholarship.org%2Fdist%2Fprd%2Fcontent%2Fqt42v4w8k1%2Fqt42v4w8k1.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-111"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-111">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Murphy, Dominic (Spring 2015). "<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/psychiatry/">Philosophy of Psychiatry</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190318031208/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/psychiatry/">Archived</a> 2019-03-18 at the <a href="/wiki/Wayback_Machine" title="Wayback Machine">Wayback Machine</a>". <i><a href="/wiki/The_Stanford_Encyclopedia_of_Philosophy" class="mw-redirect" title="The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy">The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</a></i>, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed 18 August 2016.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Routpsych-112"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Routpsych_112-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Routpsych_112-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFMasonSripadaStich2010" class="citation book cs1">Mason, Kelby; Sripada, Chandra Sekhar; Stich, Stephen (2010). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20170517012459/http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~stich/Publications/Papers/PHILOSOPHYofPSYCHOLOGY.pdf">"Philosophy of Psychology"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. In Moral, Dermot (ed.). <i>Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy</i>. London: Routledge. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~stich/Publications/Papers/PHILOSOPHYofPSYCHOLOGY.pdf">the original</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> on 2017-05-17<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2014-02-20</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Philosophy+of+Psychology&amp;rft.btitle=Routledge+Companion+to+Twentieth-Century+Philosophy&amp;rft.place=London&amp;rft.pub=Routledge&amp;rft.date=2010&amp;rft.aulast=Mason&amp;rft.aufirst=Kelby&amp;rft.au=Sripada%2C+Chandra+Sekhar&amp;rft.au=Stich%2C+Stephen&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rci.rutgers.edu%2F~stich%2FPublications%2FPapers%2FPHILOSOPHYofPSYCHOLOGY.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-113"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-113">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFHollis1994" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Martin_Hollis_(philosopher)" title="Martin Hollis (philosopher)">Hollis, Martin</a> (1994). <i>The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction</i>. Cambridge. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-521-44780-5" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-521-44780-5"><bdi>978-0-521-44780-5</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+Philosophy+of+Social+Science%3A+An+Introduction&amp;rft.pub=Cambridge&amp;rft.date=1994&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-521-44780-5&amp;rft.aulast=Hollis&amp;rft.aufirst=Martin&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-114"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-114">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/comte/">"Stanford Encyclopaedia: Auguste Comte"</a>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20171011041841/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/comte/">Archived</a> from the original on 2017-10-11<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2010-01-10</span></span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Stanford+Encyclopaedia%3A+Auguste+Comte&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fplato.stanford.edu%2Fentries%2Fcomte%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-115"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-115">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFGiddens1974" class="citation book cs1">Giddens, Anthony (1974). <i>Positivism and Sociology</i>. Heinemann. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0435823405" title="Special:BookSources/978-0435823405"><bdi>978-0435823405</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Positivism+and+Sociology&amp;rft.pub=Heinemann&amp;rft.date=1974&amp;rft.isbn=978-0435823405&amp;rft.aulast=Giddens&amp;rft.aufirst=Anthony&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-116"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-116">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Schunk, <i>Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective</i>, 5th, 315</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-117"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-117">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Outhwaite, William, 1988 <i>Habermas: Key Contemporary Thinkers</i>, Polity Press (Second Edition 2009), <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-7456-4328-1" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-7456-4328-1">978-0-7456-4328-1</a> p. 68</span> </li> </ol></div> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Sources">Sources</h3><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=38" title="Edit section: Sources" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div> <style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1239549316">.mw-parser-output .refbegin{margin-bottom:0.5em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul{margin-left:0}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul>li{margin-left:0;padding-left:3.2em;text-indent:-3.2em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents ul,.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents ul li{list-style:none}@media(max-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .refbegin-hanging-indents>ul>li{padding-left:1.6em;text-indent:-1.6em}}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-columns{margin-top:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-columns ul{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .refbegin-columns li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .refbegin{font-size:90%}}</style><div class="refbegin refbegin-columns references-column-width" style="column-width: 30em"> <ul><li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFChen2009" class="citation journal cs1">Chen, Christina S. (2009). Larson, Thomas (ed.). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://lyceumphilosophy.com/?q=node/117">"Atheism and the Assumptions of Science and Religion"</a>. <i>Lyceum</i>. <b>X</b> (2): 1–10.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Lyceum&amp;rft.atitle=Atheism+and+the+Assumptions+of+Science+and+Religion&amp;rft.volume=X&amp;rft.issue=2&amp;rft.pages=1-10&amp;rft.date=2009&amp;rft.aulast=Chen&amp;rft.aufirst=Christina+S.&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Flyceumphilosophy.com%2F%3Fq%3Dnode%2F117&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFDurak2008" class="citation web cs1">Durak, Antoine Berke (6 June 2008). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://lambda-diode.com/opinion/the-nature-of-reality-and-knowledge">"The nature of reality and knowledge"</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=The+nature+of+reality+and+knowledge&amp;rft.date=2008-06-06&amp;rft.aulast=Durak&amp;rft.aufirst=Antoine+Berke&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Flambda-diode.com%2Fopinion%2Fthe-nature-of-reality-and-knowledge&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFGauch2002" class="citation book cs1">Gauch, Hugh G. (2002). <i>Scientific Method in Practice</i>. <a href="/wiki/Cambridge_University_Press" title="Cambridge University Press">Cambridge University Press</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Scientific+Method+in+Practice&amp;rft.pub=Cambridge+University+Press&amp;rft.date=2002&amp;rft.aulast=Gauch&amp;rft.aufirst=Hugh+G.&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFGould1965" class="citation journal cs1">Gould, Stephen J (1965). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://ajsonline.org/article/61297">"Is uniformitarianism necessary?"</a>. <i>American Journal of Science</i>. <b>263</b> (3): 223–228. <a href="/wiki/Bibcode_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Bibcode (identifier)">Bibcode</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1965AmJS..263..223G">1965AmJS..263..223G</a>. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.2475%2Fajs.263.3.223">10.2475/ajs.263.3.223</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=American+Journal+of+Science&amp;rft.atitle=Is+uniformitarianism+necessary%3F&amp;rft.volume=263&amp;rft.issue=3&amp;rft.pages=223-228&amp;rft.date=1965&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2475%2Fajs.263.3.223&amp;rft_id=info%3Abibcode%2F1965AmJS..263..223G&amp;rft.aulast=Gould&amp;rft.aufirst=Stephen+J&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fajsonline.org%2Farticle%2F61297&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFGould1984" class="citation book cs1">Gould, Stephen J (1984). "Toward the vindication of punctuational change in catastrophes and earth history". <i>Catastrophes and Earth History</i>. Princeton University Press. p. 9–34.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Toward+the+vindication+of+punctuational+change+in+catastrophes+and+earth+history&amp;rft.btitle=Catastrophes+and+Earth+History&amp;rft.pages=9-34&amp;rft.pub=Princeton+University+Press&amp;rft.date=1984&amp;rft.aulast=Gould&amp;rft.aufirst=Stephen+J&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFGould1987" class="citation book cs1">Gould, Stephen J (1987). <span class="id-lock-registration" title="Free registration required"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/timesarrowtimesc00step_0"><i>Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle: Myth and Metaphor in the Discovery of Geological Time</i></a></span>. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/timesarrowtimesc00step_0/page/120">120</a>. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-674-89199-9" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-674-89199-9"><bdi>978-0-674-89199-9</bdi></a>. <q>You first assume.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Time%27s+Arrow%2C+Time%27s+Cycle%3A+Myth+and+Metaphor+in+the+Discovery+of+Geological+Time&amp;rft.place=Cambridge&amp;rft.pages=120&amp;rft.pub=Harvard+University+Press&amp;rft.date=1987&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-674-89199-9&amp;rft.aulast=Gould&amp;rft.aufirst=Stephen+J&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdetails%2Ftimesarrowtimesc00step_0&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFHeilbron2003" class="citation book cs1">Heilbron, J.L., ed. (2003). <i>The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science</i>. New York: Oxford University Press. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-19-511229-0" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-19-511229-0"><bdi>978-0-19-511229-0</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+Oxford+Companion+to+the+History+of+Modern+Science&amp;rft.place=New+York&amp;rft.pub=Oxford+University+Press&amp;rft.date=2003&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-19-511229-0&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFHooykaas1963" class="citation book cs1">Hooykaas, R (1963). <i>The principle of uniformity in geology, biology, and theology, 2nd impression</i>. London: E.J. Brill.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+principle+of+uniformity+in+geology%2C+biology%2C+and+theology%2C+2nd+impression&amp;rft.pub=London%3A+E.J.+Brill&amp;rft.date=1963&amp;rft.aulast=Hooykaas&amp;rft.aufirst=R&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFSimpson1963" class="citation book cs1">Simpson, G.G. (1963). "Historical science". In Albritton, Jr., C.C. (ed.). <i>Fabric of geology</i>. Stanford, California: Freeman, Cooper, and Company. pp. 24–48.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Historical+science&amp;rft.btitle=Fabric+of+geology&amp;rft.place=Stanford%2C+California&amp;rft.pages=24-48&amp;rft.pub=Freeman%2C+Cooper%2C+and+Company&amp;rft.date=1963&amp;rft.aulast=Simpson&amp;rft.aufirst=G.G.&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFSobottka2005" class="citation web cs1">Sobottka, Stanley (2005). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.stillnessspeaks.com/images/uploaded/file/Sobottka.pdf">"Consciousness"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. p. 11.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Consciousness&amp;rft.pages=11&amp;rft.date=2005&amp;rft.aulast=Sobottka&amp;rft.aufirst=Stanley&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.stillnessspeaks.com%2Fimages%2Fuploaded%2Ffile%2FSobottka.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFWhitehead1997" class="citation book cs1">Whitehead, A.N. (1997) [1920]. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=L6kZPLbCrScC&amp;pg=PA135"><i>Science and the Modern World</i></a>. Lowell Lectures. New York: Free Press. p. 135. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-684-83639-3" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-684-83639-3"><bdi>978-0-684-83639-3</bdi></a>. <a href="/wiki/LCCN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="LCCN (identifier)">LCCN</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://lccn.loc.gov/67002244">67002244</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Science+and+the+Modern+World&amp;rft.place=New+York&amp;rft.series=Lowell+Lectures&amp;rft.pages=135&amp;rft.pub=Free+Press&amp;rft.date=1997&amp;rft_id=info%3Alccn%2F67002244&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-684-83639-3&amp;rft.aulast=Whitehead&amp;rft.aufirst=A.N.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DL6kZPLbCrScC%26pg%3DPA135&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li></ul> </div> </section><div class="mw-heading mw-heading2 section-heading" onclick="mfTempOpenSection(8)"><span class="indicator mf-icon mf-icon-expand mf-icon--small"></span><h2 id="Further_reading">Further reading</h2><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=39" title="Edit section: Further reading" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div><section class="mf-section-8 collapsible-block" id="mf-section-8"> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1239549316"><div class="refbegin refbegin-columns references-column-width" style="column-width: 30em"> <ul><li>Bovens, L. and Hartmann, S. (2003), <i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Bayesian_Epistemology&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Bayesian Epistemology (page does not exist)">Bayesian Epistemology</a></i>, Oxford University Press, Oxford.</li> <li>Gutting, Gary (2004), <i>Continental Philosophy of Science</i>, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA.</li> <li>Godfrey-Smith, Peter (2003), <i>Theory and Reality: An Introduction the Philosophy of Science</i>, University of Chicago Press.</li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFKuhn,_T._S.1970" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Thomas_Samuel_Kuhn" class="mw-redirect" title="Thomas Samuel Kuhn">Kuhn, T. S.</a> (1970). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.org/details/structureofscie000kuhn"><i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd. ed</i></a>. Univ. of Chicago Press. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-226-45804-5" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-226-45804-5"><bdi>978-0-226-45804-5</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+Structure+of+Scientific+Revolutions%2C+2nd.+ed&amp;rft.pub=Univ.+of+Chicago+Press&amp;rft.date=1970&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-226-45804-5&amp;rft.au=Kuhn%2C+T.+S.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdetails%2Fstructureofscie000kuhn&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li>Losee, J. (1998), <i>A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science</i>, Oxford University Press, Oxford.</li> <li>Papineau, David (2005) <i>Problems of the Philosophy of Science</i>. Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford.</li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFSalmonScience1992" class="citation book cs1">Salmon, Merrilee H.; Science, University of Pittsburgh. Department of the History and Philosophy of (1992). <i>Introduction to the Philosophy of Science</i>. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-13-663345-7" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-13-663345-7"><bdi>978-0-13-663345-7</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Introduction+to+the+Philosophy+of+Science&amp;rft.place=Upper+Saddle+River%2C+N.J&amp;rft.pub=Prentice+Hall&amp;rft.date=1992&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-13-663345-7&amp;rft.aulast=Salmon&amp;rft.aufirst=Merrilee+H.&amp;rft.au=Science%2C+University+of+Pittsburgh.+Department+of+the+History+and+Philosophy+of&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li>Popper, Karl, (1963) <i><a href="/wiki/Conjectures_and_Refutations" class="mw-redirect" title="Conjectures and Refutations">Conjectures and Refutations</a>: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge</i>, <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-415-04318-2" title="Special:BookSources/0-415-04318-2">0-415-04318-2</a>.</li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite id="CITEREFvan_Fraassen1980" class="citation book cs1"><a href="/wiki/Bas_van_Fraassen" title="Bas van Fraassen">van Fraassen, Bas</a> (1980). <i>The Scientific Image</i>. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. <a href="/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a> <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-19-824424-0" title="Special:BookSources/978-0-19-824424-0"><bdi>978-0-19-824424-0</bdi></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=The+Scientific+Image&amp;rft.place=Oxford&amp;rft.pub=The+Clarendon+Press&amp;rft.date=1980&amp;rft.isbn=978-0-19-824424-0&amp;rft.aulast=van+Fraassen&amp;rft.aufirst=Bas&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li> <li>Ziman, John (2000). <i>Real Science: what it is, and what it means</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</li></ul> </div> </section><div class="mw-heading mw-heading2 section-heading" onclick="mfTempOpenSection(9)"><span class="indicator mf-icon mf-icon-expand mf-icon--small"></span><h2 id="External_links">External links</h2><span class="mw-editsection"> <a role="button" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=edit&amp;section=40" title="Edit section: External links" class="cdx-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--icon-only cdx-button--weight-quiet "> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon--edit"></span> <span>edit</span> </a> </span> </div><section class="mf-section-9 collapsible-block" id="mf-section-9"> <style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1235681985">.mw-parser-output .side-box{margin:4px 0;box-sizing:border-box;border:1px solid #aaa;font-size:88%;line-height:1.25em;background-color:var(--background-color-interactive-subtle,#f8f9fa);display:flow-root}.mw-parser-output .side-box-abovebelow,.mw-parser-output .side-box-text{padding:0.25em 0.9em}.mw-parser-output .side-box-image{padding:2px 0 2px 0.9em;text-align:center}.mw-parser-output .side-box-imageright{padding:2px 0.9em 2px 0;text-align:center}@media(min-width:500px){.mw-parser-output .side-box-flex{display:flex;align-items:center}.mw-parser-output .side-box-text{flex:1;min-width:0}}@media(min-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .side-box{width:238px}.mw-parser-output .side-box-right{clear:right;float:right;margin-left:1em}.mw-parser-output .side-box-left{margin-right:1em}}</style><div class="side-box metadata side-box-right"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1126788409"> <div class="side-box-abovebelow"> <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library" title="Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library">Library resources</a> about <br> <b>Philosophy of science</b> <hr></div> <div class="side-box-flex"> <div class="side-box-text plainlist"><ul><li><a class="external text" href="https://ftl.toolforge.org/cgi-bin/ftl?st=wp&amp;su=Philosophy+of+science">Resources in your library</a></li> <li><a class="external text" href="https://ftl.toolforge.org/cgi-bin/ftl?st=wp&amp;su=Philosophy+of+science&amp;library=0CHOOSE0">Resources in other libraries</a></li> </ul></div></div> </div><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1235681985"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1237033735">@media print{body.ns-0 .mw-parser-output .sistersitebox{display:none!important}}@media screen{html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .sistersitebox img[src*="Wiktionary-logo-en-v2.svg"]{background-color:white}}@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .sistersitebox img[src*="Wiktionary-logo-en-v2.svg"]{background-color:white}}</style><div class="side-box side-box-right plainlinks sistersitebox"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1126788409"> <div class="side-box-flex"> <div class="side-box-image"><span class="noviewer" typeof="mw:File"><span><noscript><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/Wikiquote-logo.svg/34px-Wikiquote-logo.svg.png" decoding="async" width="34" height="40" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="300" data-file-height="355"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 34px;height: 40px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/Wikiquote-logo.svg/34px-Wikiquote-logo.svg.png" data-alt="" data-width="34" data-height="40" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/Wikiquote-logo.svg/51px-Wikiquote-logo.svg.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/Wikiquote-logo.svg/68px-Wikiquote-logo.svg.png 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></span></span></div> <div class="side-box-text plainlist">Wikiquote has quotations related to <i><b><a href="https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Special:Search/Philosophy_of_science" class="extiw" title="q:Special:Search/Philosophy of science">Philosophy of science</a></b></i>.</div></div> </div> <link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1235681985"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1237033735"><div class="side-box side-box-right plainlinks sistersitebox"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1126788409"> <div class="side-box-flex"> <div class="side-box-image"><span class="noviewer" typeof="mw:File"><span><noscript><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4a/Commons-logo.svg/30px-Commons-logo.svg.png" decoding="async" width="30" height="40" class="mw-file-element" data-file-width="1024" data-file-height="1376"></noscript><span class="lazy-image-placeholder" style="width: 30px;height: 40px;" data-src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4a/Commons-logo.svg/30px-Commons-logo.svg.png" data-alt="" data-width="30" data-height="40" data-srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4a/Commons-logo.svg/45px-Commons-logo.svg.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4a/Commons-logo.svg/59px-Commons-logo.svg.png 2x" data-class="mw-file-element">&nbsp;</span></span></span></div> <div class="side-box-text plainlist">Wikimedia Commons has media related to <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Philosophy_of_science" class="extiw" title="commons:Category:Philosophy of science">Philosophy of science</a></span>.</div></div> </div> <ul><li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://philpapers.org/browse/general-philosophy-of-science">Philosophy of science</a> at <a href="/wiki/PhilPapers" title="PhilPapers">PhilPapers</a></li> <li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.inphoproject.org/taxonomy/2218">Philosophy of science</a> at the <a href="/wiki/Indiana_Philosophy_Ontology_Project" class="mw-redirect" title="Indiana Philosophy Ontology Project">Indiana Philosophy Ontology Project</a></li> <li><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222"><cite class="citation encyclopaedia cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.iep.utm.edu/category/s-l-m/science/">"Philosophy of science"</a>. <i><a href="/wiki/Internet_Encyclopedia_of_Philosophy" title="Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy">Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy</a></i>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.atitle=Philosophy+of+science&amp;rft.btitle=Internet+Encyclopedia+of+Philosophy&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iep.utm.edu%2Fcategory%2Fs-l-m%2Fscience%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3APhilosophy+of+science" class="Z3988"></span></li></ul> <div class="navbox-styles"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1129693374"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1236075235">.mw-parser-output .navbox{box-sizing:border-box;border:1px solid #a2a9b1;width:100%;clear:both;font-size:88%;text-align:center;padding:1px;margin:1em auto 0}.mw-parser-output .navbox .navbox{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .navbox+.navbox,.mw-parser-output .navbox+.navbox-styles+.navbox{margin-top:-1px}.mw-parser-output .navbox-inner,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup{width:100%}.mw-parser-output .navbox-group,.mw-parser-output .navbox-title,.mw-parser-output .navbox-abovebelow{padding:0.25em 1em;line-height:1.5em;text-align:center}.mw-parser-output .navbox-group{white-space:nowrap;text-align:right}.mw-parser-output .navbox,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup{background-color:#fdfdfd}.mw-parser-output .navbox-list{line-height:1.5em;border-color:#fdfdfd}.mw-parser-output .navbox-list-with-group{text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid}.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-abovebelow,.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-group,.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-image,.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-list{border-top:2px solid #fdfdfd}.mw-parser-output .navbox-title{background-color:#ccf}.mw-parser-output .navbox-abovebelow,.mw-parser-output .navbox-group,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup .navbox-title{background-color:#ddf}.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup .navbox-group,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup .navbox-abovebelow{background-color:#e6e6ff}.mw-parser-output .navbox-even{background-color:#f7f7f7}.mw-parser-output .navbox-odd{background-color:transparent}.mw-parser-output .navbox .hlist td dl,.mw-parser-output .navbox .hlist td ol,.mw-parser-output .navbox .hlist td ul,.mw-parser-output .navbox td.hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .navbox td.hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .navbox td.hlist ul{padding:0.125em 0}.mw-parser-output .navbox .navbar{display:block;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .navbox-title .navbar{float:left;text-align:left;margin-right:0.5em}body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .navbox-image img{max-width:none!important}@media print{body.ns-0 .mw-parser-output .navbox{display:none!important}}</style></div> <div class="navbox-styles"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236075235"></div> <div class="navbox-styles"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1129693374"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236075235"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1038841319">.mw-parser-output .tooltip-dotted{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}</style><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1038841319"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1038841319"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1038841319"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1038841319"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1038841319"></div> <!-- NewPP limit report Parsed by mw‐web.codfw.main‐f69cdc8f6‐59bnt Cached time: 20241124053323 Cache expiry: 2592000 Reduced expiry: false Complications: [vary‐revision‐sha1, show‐toc] CPU time usage: 1.993 seconds Real time usage: 2.346 seconds Preprocessor visited node count: 11892/1000000 Post‐expand include size: 531044/2097152 bytes Template argument size: 81405/2097152 bytes Highest expansion depth: 16/100 Expensive parser function count: 36/500 Unstrip recursion depth: 1/20 Unstrip post‐expand size: 464796/5000000 bytes Lua time usage: 1.168/10.000 seconds Lua memory usage: 17812270/52428800 bytes Lua Profile: ? 300 ms 24.2% dataWrapper <mw.lua:672> 200 ms 16.1% MediaWiki\Extension\Scribunto\Engines\LuaSandbox\LuaSandboxCallback::callParserFunction 140 ms 11.3% MediaWiki\Extension\Scribunto\Engines\LuaSandbox\LuaSandboxCallback::gsub 100 ms 8.1% MediaWiki\Extension\Scribunto\Engines\LuaSandbox\LuaSandboxCallback::anchorEncode 80 ms 6.5% type 80 ms 6.5% <mw.lua:694> 60 ms 4.8% MediaWiki\Extension\Scribunto\Engines\LuaSandbox\LuaSandboxCallback::sub 40 ms 3.2% makeMessage <mw.message.lua:76> 40 ms 3.2% MediaWiki\Extension\Scribunto\Engines\LuaSandbox\LuaSandboxCallback::getExpensiveData 40 ms 3.2% [others] 160 ms 12.9% Number of Wikibase entities loaded: 1/400 --> <!-- Transclusion expansion time report (%,ms,calls,template) 100.00% 1929.489 1 -total 37.22% 718.091 1 Template:Reflist 11.15% 215.165 45 Template:Cite_book 10.19% 196.612 1 Template:Trim 7.51% 144.976 25 Template:Cite_web 6.88% 132.817 20 Template:Sfn 6.81% 131.407 1 Template:Philosophy_sidebar 6.65% 128.390 23 Template:Cite_journal 6.36% 122.768 1 Template:Langx 6.14% 118.449 5 Template:Cite_encyclopedia --> <!-- Saved in parser cache with key enwiki:pcache:37010:|#|:idhash:canonical and timestamp 20241124053323 and revision id 1254841328. Rendering was triggered because: page-view --> </section></div> <!-- MobileFormatter took 0.053 seconds --><!--esi <esi:include src="/esitest-fa8a495983347898/content" /> --><noscript><img src="https://login.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAutoLogin/start?type=1x1&amp;mobile=1" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="border: none; position: absolute;"></noscript> <div class="printfooter" data-nosnippet="">Retrieved from "<a dir="ltr" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;oldid=1254841328">https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;oldid=1254841328</a>"</div></div> </div> <div class="post-content" id="page-secondary-actions"> </div> </main> <footer class="mw-footer minerva-footer" role="contentinfo"> <a class="last-modified-bar" href="/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;action=history"> <div class="post-content last-modified-bar__content"> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon-size-medium minerva-icon--modified-history"></span> <span class="last-modified-bar__text modified-enhancement" data-user-name="24.56.238.67" data-user-gender="unknown" data-timestamp="1730504470"> <span>Last edited on 1 November 2024, at 23:41</span> </span> <span class="minerva-icon minerva-icon-size-small minerva-icon--expand"></span> </div> </a> <div class="post-content footer-content"> <div id='mw-data-after-content'> <div class="read-more-container"></div> </div> <div id="p-lang"> <h4>Languages</h4> <section> <ul id="p-variants" class="minerva-languages"></ul> <ul class="minerva-languages"><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-af mw-list-item"><a href="https://af.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetenskapsfilosofie" title="Wetenskapsfilosofie – Afrikaans" lang="af" hreflang="af" data-title="Wetenskapsfilosofie" data-language-autonym="Afrikaans" data-language-local-name="Afrikaans" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Afrikaans</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-als mw-list-item"><a href="https://als.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wissenschaftstheorie" title="Wissenschaftstheorie – Alemannic" lang="gsw" hreflang="gsw" data-title="Wissenschaftstheorie" data-language-autonym="Alemannisch" data-language-local-name="Alemannic" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Alemannisch</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-am mw-list-item"><a href="https://am.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E1%8B%A8%E1%88%B3%E1%8B%AD%E1%8A%95%E1%88%B5_%E1%8D%8D%E1%88%8D%E1%88%B5%E1%8D%8D%E1%8A%93" title="የሳይንስ ፍልስፍና – Amharic" lang="am" hreflang="am" data-title="የሳይንስ ፍልስፍና" data-language-autonym="አማርኛ" data-language-local-name="Amharic" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>አማርኛ</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ar mw-list-item"><a href="https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%81%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%81%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%88%D9%85" title="فلسفة العلوم – Arabic" lang="ar" hreflang="ar" data-title="فلسفة العلوم" data-language-autonym="العربية" data-language-local-name="Arabic" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>العربية</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-as badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle mw-list-item" title="featured article badge"><a href="https://as.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%9C%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%9E%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%B0_%E0%A6%A6%E0%A7%B0%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%B6%E0%A6%A8" title="বিজ্ঞানৰ দৰ্শন – Assamese" lang="as" hreflang="as" data-title="বিজ্ঞানৰ দৰ্শন" data-language-autonym="অসমীয়া" data-language-local-name="Assamese" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>অসমীয়া</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ast mw-list-item"><a href="https://ast.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filosof%C3%ADa_de_la_ciencia" title="Filosofía de la ciencia – Asturian" lang="ast" hreflang="ast" data-title="Filosofía de la ciencia" data-language-autonym="Asturianu" data-language-local-name="Asturian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Asturianu</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-az mw-list-item"><a href="https://az.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elmin_f%C9%99ls%C9%99f%C9%99si" title="Elmin fəlsəfəsi – Azerbaijani" lang="az" hreflang="az" data-title="Elmin fəlsəfəsi" data-language-autonym="Azərbaycanca" data-language-local-name="Azerbaijani" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Azərbaycanca</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-bn mw-list-item"><a href="https://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%9C%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%9E%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B0_%E0%A6%A6%E0%A6%B0%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%B6%E0%A6%A8" title="বিজ্ঞানের দর্শন – Bangla" lang="bn" hreflang="bn" data-title="বিজ্ঞানের দর্শন" data-language-autonym="বাংলা" data-language-local-name="Bangla" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>বাংলা</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-min-nan mw-list-item"><a href="https://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kho-ha%CC%8Dk_tiat-ha%CC%8Dk" title="Kho-ha̍k tiat-ha̍k – Minnan" lang="nan" hreflang="nan" data-title="Kho-ha̍k tiat-ha̍k" data-language-autonym="閩南語 / Bân-lâm-gú" data-language-local-name="Minnan" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>閩南語 / Bân-lâm-gú</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-bh mw-list-item"><a href="https://bh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%9C%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%9E%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A8_%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%87_%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%A8" title="बिज्ञान के दर्शन – Bhojpuri" lang="bh" hreflang="bh" data-title="बिज्ञान के दर्शन" data-language-autonym="भोजपुरी" data-language-local-name="Bhojpuri" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>भोजपुरी</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-bg mw-list-item"><a href="https://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0" title="Философия на науката – Bulgarian" lang="bg" hreflang="bg" data-title="Философия на науката" data-language-autonym="Български" data-language-local-name="Bulgarian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Български</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ca mw-list-item"><a href="https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filosofia_de_la_ci%C3%A8ncia" title="Filosofia de la ciència – Catalan" lang="ca" hreflang="ca" data-title="Filosofia de la ciència" data-language-autonym="Català" data-language-local-name="Catalan" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Català</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-cv mw-list-item"><a href="https://cv.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%82%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2_%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%B9%C4%95" title="Ăслав философийĕ – Chuvash" lang="cv" hreflang="cv" data-title="Ăслав философийĕ" data-language-autonym="Чӑвашла" data-language-local-name="Chuvash" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Чӑвашла</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-cs mw-list-item"><a href="https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filozofie_v%C4%9Bdy" title="Filozofie vědy – Czech" lang="cs" hreflang="cs" data-title="Filozofie vědy" data-language-autonym="Čeština" data-language-local-name="Czech" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Čeština</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-da mw-list-item"><a href="https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videnskabsfilosofi" title="Videnskabsfilosofi – Danish" lang="da" hreflang="da" data-title="Videnskabsfilosofi" data-language-autonym="Dansk" data-language-local-name="Danish" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Dansk</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-de mw-list-item"><a href="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wissenschaftstheorie" title="Wissenschaftstheorie – German" lang="de" hreflang="de" data-title="Wissenschaftstheorie" data-language-autonym="Deutsch" data-language-local-name="German" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Deutsch</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-et mw-list-item"><a href="https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teadusfilosoofia" title="Teadusfilosoofia – Estonian" lang="et" hreflang="et" data-title="Teadusfilosoofia" data-language-autonym="Eesti" data-language-local-name="Estonian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Eesti</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-el mw-list-item"><a href="https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A6%CE%B9%CE%BB%CE%BF%CF%83%CE%BF%CF%86%CE%AF%CE%B1_%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%82_%CE%B5%CF%80%CE%B9%CF%83%CF%84%CE%AE%CE%BC%CE%B7%CF%82" title="Φιλοσοφία της επιστήμης – Greek" lang="el" hreflang="el" data-title="Φιλοσοφία της επιστήμης" data-language-autonym="Ελληνικά" data-language-local-name="Greek" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Ελληνικά</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-es mw-list-item"><a href="https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filosof%C3%ADa_de_la_ciencia" title="Filosofía de la ciencia – Spanish" lang="es" hreflang="es" data-title="Filosofía de la ciencia" data-language-autonym="Español" data-language-local-name="Spanish" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Español</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-eo mw-list-item"><a href="https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filozofio_de_scienco" title="Filozofio de scienco – Esperanto" lang="eo" hreflang="eo" data-title="Filozofio de scienco" data-language-autonym="Esperanto" data-language-local-name="Esperanto" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Esperanto</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-eu mw-list-item"><a href="https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zientziaren_filosofia" title="Zientziaren filosofia – Basque" lang="eu" hreflang="eu" data-title="Zientziaren filosofia" data-language-autonym="Euskara" data-language-local-name="Basque" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Euskara</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-fa mw-list-item"><a href="https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%81%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%81%D9%87_%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85" title="فلسفه علم – Persian" lang="fa" hreflang="fa" data-title="فلسفه علم" data-language-autonym="فارسی" data-language-local-name="Persian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>فارسی</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-fr mw-list-item"><a href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophie_des_sciences" title="Philosophie des sciences – French" lang="fr" hreflang="fr" data-title="Philosophie des sciences" data-language-autonym="Français" data-language-local-name="French" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Français</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ga mw-list-item"><a href="https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feals%C3%BAnacht_na_heola%C3%ADochta" title="Fealsúnacht na heolaíochta – Irish" lang="ga" hreflang="ga" data-title="Fealsúnacht na heolaíochta" data-language-autonym="Gaeilge" data-language-local-name="Irish" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Gaeilge</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-gl mw-list-item"><a href="https://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filosof%C3%ADa_da_ciencia" title="Filosofía da ciencia – Galician" lang="gl" hreflang="gl" data-title="Filosofía da ciencia" data-language-autonym="Galego" data-language-local-name="Galician" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Galego</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ko mw-list-item"><a href="https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EA%B3%BC%ED%95%99%EC%B2%A0%ED%95%99" title="과학철학 – Korean" lang="ko" hreflang="ko" data-title="과학철학" data-language-autonym="한국어" data-language-local-name="Korean" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>한국어</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-hy mw-list-item"><a href="https://hy.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D4%B3%D5%AB%D5%BF%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%A9%D5%B5%D5%A1%D5%B6_%D6%83%D5%AB%D5%AC%D5%AB%D5%BD%D5%B8%D6%83%D5%A1%D5%B5%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%A9%D5%B5%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%B6" title="Գիտության փիլիսոփայություն – Armenian" lang="hy" hreflang="hy" data-title="Գիտության փիլիսոփայություն" data-language-autonym="Հայերեն" data-language-local-name="Armenian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Հայերեն</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-hi mw-list-item"><a href="https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%9C%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%9E%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A8_%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BE_%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%A8" title="विज्ञान का दर्शन – Hindi" lang="hi" hreflang="hi" data-title="विज्ञान का दर्शन" data-language-autonym="हिन्दी" data-language-local-name="Hindi" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>हिन्दी</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-io mw-list-item"><a href="https://io.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filozofio_di_la_cienco" title="Filozofio di la cienco – Ido" lang="io" hreflang="io" data-title="Filozofio di la cienco" data-language-autonym="Ido" data-language-local-name="Ido" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Ido</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-id mw-list-item"><a href="https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filsafat_ilmu" title="Filsafat ilmu – Indonesian" lang="id" hreflang="id" data-title="Filsafat ilmu" data-language-autonym="Bahasa Indonesia" data-language-local-name="Indonesian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Bahasa Indonesia</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-is mw-list-item"><a href="https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%ADsindaheimspeki" title="Vísindaheimspeki – Icelandic" lang="is" hreflang="is" data-title="Vísindaheimspeki" data-language-autonym="Íslenska" data-language-local-name="Icelandic" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Íslenska</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-it mw-list-item"><a href="https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filosofia_della_scienza" title="Filosofia della scienza – Italian" lang="it" hreflang="it" data-title="Filosofia della scienza" data-language-autonym="Italiano" data-language-local-name="Italian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Italiano</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-he mw-list-item"><a href="https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%95%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%94_%D7%A9%D7%9C_%D7%94%D7%9E%D7%93%D7%A2" title="פילוסופיה של המדע – Hebrew" lang="he" hreflang="he" data-title="פילוסופיה של המדע" data-language-autonym="עברית" data-language-local-name="Hebrew" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>עברית</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ks mw-list-item"><a href="https://ks.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%81%D9%90%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%81%DB%8C" title="فِلاسفی – Kashmiri" lang="ks" hreflang="ks" data-title="فِلاسفی" data-language-autonym="कॉशुर / کٲشُر" data-language-local-name="Kashmiri" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>कॉशुर / کٲشُر</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-kk mw-list-item"><a href="https://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D2%92%D1%8B%D0%BB%D1%8B%D0%BC_%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%8F%D1%81%D1%8B" title="Ғылым философиясы – Kazakh" lang="kk" hreflang="kk" data-title="Ғылым философиясы" data-language-autonym="Қазақша" data-language-local-name="Kazakh" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Қазақша</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-gcr mw-list-item"><a href="https://gcr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filozofi_si_s%C3%A9_syans" title="Filozofi si sé syans – Guianan Creole" lang="gcr" hreflang="gcr" data-title="Filozofi si sé syans" data-language-autonym="Kriyòl gwiyannen" data-language-local-name="Guianan Creole" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Kriyòl gwiyannen</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-lld mw-list-item"><a href="https://lld.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filosofia_dla_sci%C3%ABnza" title="Filosofia dla sciënza – Ladin" lang="lld" hreflang="lld" data-title="Filosofia dla sciënza" data-language-autonym="Ladin" data-language-local-name="Ladin" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Ladin</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-la mw-list-item"><a href="https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophia_scientiae" title="Philosophia scientiae – Latin" lang="la" hreflang="la" data-title="Philosophia scientiae" data-language-autonym="Latina" data-language-local-name="Latin" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Latina</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-lv mw-list-item"><a href="https://lv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zin%C4%81tnes_filozofija" title="Zinātnes filozofija – Latvian" lang="lv" hreflang="lv" data-title="Zinātnes filozofija" data-language-autonym="Latviešu" data-language-local-name="Latvian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Latviešu</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-lt mw-list-item"><a href="https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mokslo_filosofija" title="Mokslo filosofija – Lithuanian" lang="lt" hreflang="lt" data-title="Mokslo filosofija" data-language-autonym="Lietuvių" data-language-local-name="Lithuanian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Lietuvių</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-hu mw-list-item"><a href="https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tudom%C3%A1nyfiloz%C3%B3fia" title="Tudományfilozófia – Hungarian" lang="hu" hreflang="hu" data-title="Tudományfilozófia" data-language-autonym="Magyar" data-language-local-name="Hungarian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Magyar</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-mk mw-list-item"><a href="https://mk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0" title="Филозофија на науката – Macedonian" lang="mk" hreflang="mk" data-title="Филозофија на науката" data-language-autonym="Македонски" data-language-local-name="Macedonian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Македонски</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ms mw-list-item"><a href="https://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsafah_sains" title="Falsafah sains – Malay" lang="ms" hreflang="ms" data-title="Falsafah sains" data-language-autonym="Bahasa Melayu" data-language-local-name="Malay" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Bahasa Melayu</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-nl mw-list-item"><a href="https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetenschapsfilosofie" title="Wetenschapsfilosofie – Dutch" lang="nl" hreflang="nl" data-title="Wetenschapsfilosofie" data-language-autonym="Nederlands" data-language-local-name="Dutch" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Nederlands</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ja mw-list-item"><a href="https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6" title="科学哲学 – Japanese" lang="ja" hreflang="ja" data-title="科学哲学" data-language-autonym="日本語" data-language-local-name="Japanese" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>日本語</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-no mw-list-item"><a href="https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitenskapsteori" title="Vitenskapsteori – Norwegian Bokmål" lang="nb" hreflang="nb" data-title="Vitenskapsteori" data-language-autonym="Norsk bokmål" data-language-local-name="Norwegian Bokmål" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Norsk bokmål</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-nn mw-list-item"><a href="https://nn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitskapsteori" title="Vitskapsteori – Norwegian Nynorsk" lang="nn" hreflang="nn" data-title="Vitskapsteori" data-language-autonym="Norsk nynorsk" data-language-local-name="Norwegian Nynorsk" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Norsk nynorsk</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-pa mw-list-item"><a href="https://pa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A8%B5%E0%A8%BF%E0%A8%97%E0%A8%BF%E0%A8%86%E0%A8%A8_%E0%A8%A6%E0%A8%BE_%E0%A8%A6%E0%A8%B0%E0%A8%B8%E0%A8%BC%E0%A8%A8" title="ਵਿਗਿਆਨ ਦਾ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ – Punjabi" lang="pa" hreflang="pa" data-title="ਵਿਗਿਆਨ ਦਾ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ" data-language-autonym="ਪੰਜਾਬੀ" data-language-local-name="Punjabi" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ps mw-list-item"><a href="https://ps.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AF_%D8%B3%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%B3_%D9%81%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%81%D9%87" title="د ساینس فلسفه – Pashto" lang="ps" hreflang="ps" data-title="د ساینس فلسفه" data-language-autonym="پښتو" data-language-local-name="Pashto" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>پښتو</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-jam mw-list-item"><a href="https://jam.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filasafi_a_sayans" title="Filasafi a sayans – Jamaican Creole English" lang="jam" hreflang="jam" data-title="Filasafi a sayans" data-language-autonym="Patois" data-language-local-name="Jamaican Creole English" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Patois</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-pl mw-list-item"><a href="https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filozofia_nauki" title="Filozofia nauki – Polish" lang="pl" hreflang="pl" data-title="Filozofia nauki" data-language-autonym="Polski" data-language-local-name="Polish" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Polski</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-pt mw-list-item"><a href="https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filosofia_da_ci%C3%AAncia" title="Filosofia da ciência – Portuguese" lang="pt" hreflang="pt" data-title="Filosofia da ciência" data-language-autonym="Português" data-language-local-name="Portuguese" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Português</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ro mw-list-item"><a href="https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filozofia_%C8%99tiin%C8%9Bei" title="Filozofia științei – Romanian" lang="ro" hreflang="ro" data-title="Filozofia științei" data-language-autonym="Română" data-language-local-name="Romanian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Română</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ru mw-list-item"><a href="https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B8" title="Философия науки – Russian" lang="ru" hreflang="ru" data-title="Философия науки" data-language-autonym="Русский" data-language-local-name="Russian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Русский</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-sq mw-list-item"><a href="https://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filozofia_e_shkenc%C3%ABs" title="Filozofia e shkencës – Albanian" lang="sq" hreflang="sq" data-title="Filozofia e shkencës" data-language-autonym="Shqip" data-language-local-name="Albanian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Shqip</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-si mw-list-item"><a href="https://si.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B7%80%E0%B7%92%E0%B6%AF%E0%B7%8A%E2%80%8D%E0%B6%BA%E0%B7%8F%E0%B7%80%E0%B7%9A_%E0%B6%AF%E0%B6%BB%E0%B7%8A%E0%B7%81%E0%B6%B1%E0%B6%BA" title="විද්‍යාවේ දර්ශනය – Sinhala" lang="si" hreflang="si" data-title="විද්‍යාවේ දර්ශනය" data-language-autonym="සිංහල" data-language-local-name="Sinhala" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>සිංහල</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-simple mw-list-item"><a href="https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_science" title="Philosophy of science – Simple English" lang="en-simple" hreflang="en-simple" data-title="Philosophy of science" data-language-autonym="Simple English" data-language-local-name="Simple English" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Simple English</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-sd mw-list-item"><a href="https://sd.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%86%D8%B3_%D8%AC%D9%88_%D9%81%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%81%D9%88" title="سائنس جو فلسفو – Sindhi" lang="sd" hreflang="sd" data-title="سائنس جو فلسفو" data-language-autonym="سنڌي" data-language-local-name="Sindhi" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>سنڌي</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-sk mw-list-item"><a href="https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filozofia_vedy" title="Filozofia vedy – Slovak" lang="sk" hreflang="sk" data-title="Filozofia vedy" data-language-autonym="Slovenčina" data-language-local-name="Slovak" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Slovenčina</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ckb mw-list-item"><a href="https://ckb.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%81%DB%95%D9%84%D8%B3%DB%95%D9%81%DB%95%DB%8C_%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%AA" title="فەلسەفەی زانست – Central Kurdish" lang="ckb" hreflang="ckb" data-title="فەلسەفەی زانست" data-language-autonym="کوردی" data-language-local-name="Central Kurdish" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>کوردی</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-sr mw-list-item"><a href="https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B5" title="Филозофија науке – Serbian" lang="sr" hreflang="sr" data-title="Филозофија науке" data-language-autonym="Српски / srpski" data-language-local-name="Serbian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Српски / srpski</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-sh mw-list-item"><a href="https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filozofija_nauke" title="Filozofija nauke – Serbo-Croatian" lang="sh" hreflang="sh" data-title="Filozofija nauke" data-language-autonym="Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски" data-language-local-name="Serbo-Croatian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-su mw-list-item"><a href="https://su.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filsafat_%C3%89lmu" title="Filsafat Élmu – Sundanese" lang="su" hreflang="su" data-title="Filsafat Élmu" data-language-autonym="Sunda" data-language-local-name="Sundanese" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Sunda</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-fi mw-list-item"><a href="https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tieteenfilosofia" title="Tieteenfilosofia – Finnish" lang="fi" hreflang="fi" data-title="Tieteenfilosofia" data-language-autonym="Suomi" data-language-local-name="Finnish" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Suomi</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-sv mw-list-item"><a href="https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vetenskapsteori" title="Vetenskapsteori – Swedish" lang="sv" hreflang="sv" data-title="Vetenskapsteori" data-language-autonym="Svenska" data-language-local-name="Swedish" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Svenska</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-tl mw-list-item"><a href="https://tl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilosopiya_ng_agham" title="Pilosopiya ng agham – Tagalog" lang="tl" hreflang="tl" data-title="Pilosopiya ng agham" data-language-autonym="Tagalog" data-language-local-name="Tagalog" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Tagalog</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ta mw-list-item"><a href="https://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%AE%85%E0%AE%B1%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%B5%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%AF%E0%AE%B2%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%A9%E0%AF%8D_%E0%AE%AE%E0%AF%86%E0%AE%AF%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%AF%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%AF%E0%AE%B2%E0%AF%8D" title="அறிவியலின் மெய்யியல் – Tamil" lang="ta" hreflang="ta" data-title="அறிவியலின் மெய்யியல்" data-language-autonym="தமிழ்" data-language-local-name="Tamil" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>தமிழ்</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-tr mw-list-item"><a href="https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilim_felsefesi" title="Bilim felsefesi – Turkish" lang="tr" hreflang="tr" data-title="Bilim felsefesi" data-language-autonym="Türkçe" data-language-local-name="Turkish" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Türkçe</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-uk mw-list-item"><a href="https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D1%96%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%84%D1%96%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B8" title="Філософія науки – Ukrainian" lang="uk" hreflang="uk" data-title="Філософія науки" data-language-autonym="Українська" data-language-local-name="Ukrainian" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Українська</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-vi mw-list-item"><a href="https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tri%E1%BA%BFt_h%E1%BB%8Dc_khoa_h%E1%BB%8Dc" title="Triết học khoa học – Vietnamese" lang="vi" hreflang="vi" data-title="Triết học khoa học" data-language-autonym="Tiếng Việt" data-language-local-name="Vietnamese" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>Tiếng Việt</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-wuu mw-list-item"><a href="https://wuu.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6" title="科学哲学 – Wu" lang="wuu" hreflang="wuu" data-title="科学哲学" data-language-autonym="吴语" data-language-local-name="Wu" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>吴语</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-yue mw-list-item"><a href="https://zh-yue.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%B8%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%B8" title="科學哲學 – Cantonese" lang="yue" hreflang="yue" data-title="科學哲學" data-language-autonym="粵語" data-language-local-name="Cantonese" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>粵語</span></a></li><li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-zh badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle mw-list-item" title="good article badge"><a href="https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6" title="科学哲学 – Chinese" lang="zh" hreflang="zh" data-title="科学哲学" data-language-autonym="中文" data-language-local-name="Chinese" class="interlanguage-link-target"><span>中文</span></a></li></ul> </section> </div> <div class="minerva-footer-logo"><img src="/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en.svg" alt="Wikipedia" width="120" height="18" style="width: 7.5em; height: 1.125em;"/> </div> <ul id="footer-info" class="footer-info hlist hlist-separated"> <li id="footer-info-lastmod"> This page was last edited on 1 November 2024, at 23:41<span class="anonymous-show">&#160;(UTC)</span>.</li> <li id="footer-info-copyright">Content is available under <a class="external" rel="nofollow" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en">CC BY-SA 4.0</a> unless otherwise noted.</li> </ul> <ul id="footer-places" class="footer-places hlist hlist-separated"> <li id="footer-places-privacy"><a href="https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Privacy_policy">Privacy policy</a></li> <li id="footer-places-about"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:About">About Wikipedia</a></li> <li id="footer-places-disclaimers"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer">Disclaimers</a></li> <li id="footer-places-contact"><a href="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us">Contact Wikipedia</a></li> <li id="footer-places-wm-codeofconduct"><a href="https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Universal_Code_of_Conduct">Code of Conduct</a></li> <li id="footer-places-developers"><a href="https://developer.wikimedia.org">Developers</a></li> <li id="footer-places-statslink"><a href="https://stats.wikimedia.org/#/en.wikipedia.org">Statistics</a></li> <li id="footer-places-cookiestatement"><a href="https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Cookie_statement">Cookie statement</a></li> <li id="footer-places-terms-use"><a href="https://foundation.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Terms_of_Use">Terms of Use</a></li> <li id="footer-places-desktop-toggle"><a id="mw-mf-display-toggle" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philosophy_of_science&amp;mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop" data-event-name="switch_to_desktop">Desktop</a></li> </ul> </div> </footer> </div> </div> <div class="mw-notification-area" data-mw="interface"></div> <!-- v:8.3.1 --> <script>(RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgHostname":"mw-web.codfw.main-f69cdc8f6-qnvsb","wgBackendResponseTime":230,"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"1.993","walltime":"2.346","ppvisitednodes":{"value":11892,"limit":1000000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":531044,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":81405,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":16,"limit":100},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":36,"limit":500},"unstrip-depth":{"value":1,"limit":20},"unstrip-size":{"value":464796,"limit":5000000},"entityaccesscount":{"value":1,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 1929.489 1 -total"," 37.22% 718.091 1 Template:Reflist"," 11.15% 215.165 45 Template:Cite_book"," 10.19% 196.612 1 Template:Trim"," 7.51% 144.976 25 Template:Cite_web"," 6.88% 132.817 20 Template:Sfn"," 6.81% 131.407 1 Template:Philosophy_sidebar"," 6.65% 128.390 23 Template:Cite_journal"," 6.36% 122.768 1 Template:Langx"," 6.14% 118.449 5 Template:Cite_encyclopedia"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"1.168","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":17812270,"limit":52428800},"limitreport-logs":"table#1 {\n [\"size\"] = \"tiny\",\n}\ntable#1 {\n [\"size\"] = \"tiny\",\n}\nanchor_id_list = table#1 {\n [\"CITEREFAshmanBarringer2001\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFBaker2013\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFBennett2003\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFBickleMandikLandreth2010\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFBird2013\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFBogen2013\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFBoyd1984\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFBoyd2002\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFBunge1996\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFCartwright2009\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFCat2013\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFChen2009\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFClegg2004\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFDennett1995\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFDurak2008\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFFeyerabend1993\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFFeynman\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFFoucault1961\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFGauch2002\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFGewertz2007\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFGiddens1974\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFGordin2012\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFGould1965\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFGould1984\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFGould1987\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFGrünbaum1981\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFGøtzsche1994\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFHansson1996\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFHatab2008\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFHeilbron2003\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFHempelOppenheim1948\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFHewittSuchockiHewitt2003\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFHollis1994\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFHooykaas1963\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFHorsten2015\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFIsmael2015\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFKitcher2001\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFKuhn,_T.S.1996\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFKuhn,_T._S.1970\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFLaudan1981\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFLaudan1983\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFLevin1984\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFLevine2008\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFLindberg1980\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFLongino2013\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFMasonSripadaStich2010\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFMcMullin\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFMorrison2018\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFNational_Science_FoundationDivision_of_Science_Resources_Statistics2006\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFOlsson2014\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFPapineau1994\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFPopper2002\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFPopper2004\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFPopper2005\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFPower2015\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFPreston2007\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFPutnam1975\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFPutnam1978\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFQuine,_Willard_Van_Orman1980\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFRomeijn2014\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFRosenstockLee2002\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFSalmon1971\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFSalmonEarmanGlymourLenno1992\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFSalmonScience1992\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFSandra_Harding1976\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFShermer1997\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFSimpson1963\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFSmart1968\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFSmith1986\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFSobottka2005\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFStanford2000\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFStanford2006\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFThornton2006\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFTurner2012\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFUebel2006\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFVickers2013\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFWeisbergNeedhamHendry2011\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFWheeler2015\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFWhitehead1997\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFWinsberg2006\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFWoodward2003\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFWorrall2002\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFWorrall2007\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFWorrall2011\"] = 1,\n [\"CITEREFvan_Fraassen1980\"] = 2,\n}\ntemplate_list = table#1 {\n [\"!\"] = 1,\n [\"About\"] = 1,\n [\"Authority control\"] = 1,\n [\"Blockquote\"] = 1,\n [\"By whom\"] = 2,\n [\"Citation needed\"] = 2,\n [\"Cite IEP\"] = 1,\n [\"Cite SEP\"] = 1,\n [\"Cite book\"] = 44,\n [\"Cite dictionary\"] = 1,\n [\"Cite encyclopedia\"] = 4,\n [\"Cite journal\"] = 23,\n [\"Cite magazine\"] = 1,\n [\"Cite web\"] = 21,\n [\"Clear\"] = 1,\n [\"Colend\"] = 1,\n [\"Cols\"] = 1,\n [\"Commons category\"] = 1,\n [\"Explanation needed\"] = 1,\n [\"ISBN\"] = 3,\n [\"InPho\"] = 1,\n [\"Langx\"] = 1,\n [\"Library resources box\"] = 1,\n [\"Main\"] = 17,\n [\"Mdash\"] = 3,\n [\"Navboxes\"] = 1,\n [\"PhilPapers\"] = 1,\n [\"Philosophy of science\"] = 1,\n [\"Philosophy sidebar\"] = 1,\n [\"Philosophy topics\"] = 1,\n [\"Portal\"] = 1,\n [\"Refbegin\"] = 2,\n [\"Refend\"] = 2,\n [\"Reflist\"] = 1,\n [\"Science\"] = 1,\n [\"Science and technology studies\"] = 1,\n [\"See also\"] = 3,\n [\"Short description\"] = 1,\n [\"Social sciences\"] = 1,\n [\"Transcluded section\"] = 1,\n [\"Trim\"] = 1,\n [\"Webarchive\"] = 6,\n [\"Wikiquote\"] = 1,\n}\narticle_whitelist = table#1 {\n}\ntable#1 {\n}\ntable#1 {\n}\ntable#1 {\n [\"size\"] = \"tiny\",\n}\ntable#1 {\n}\n","limitreport-profile":[["?","300","24.2"],["dataWrapper \u003Cmw.lua:672\u003E","200","16.1"],["MediaWiki\\Extension\\Scribunto\\Engines\\LuaSandbox\\LuaSandboxCallback::callParserFunction","140","11.3"],["MediaWiki\\Extension\\Scribunto\\Engines\\LuaSandbox\\LuaSandboxCallback::gsub","100","8.1"],["MediaWiki\\Extension\\Scribunto\\Engines\\LuaSandbox\\LuaSandboxCallback::anchorEncode","80","6.5"],["type","80","6.5"],["\u003Cmw.lua:694\u003E","60","4.8"],["MediaWiki\\Extension\\Scribunto\\Engines\\LuaSandbox\\LuaSandboxCallback::sub","40","3.2"],["makeMessage \u003Cmw.message.lua:76\u003E","40","3.2"],["MediaWiki\\Extension\\Scribunto\\Engines\\LuaSandbox\\LuaSandboxCallback::getExpensiveData","40","3.2"],["[others]","160","12.9"]]},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw-web.codfw.main-f69cdc8f6-59bnt","timestamp":"20241124053323","ttl":2592000,"transientcontent":false}}});});</script> <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"Article","name":"Philosophy of science","url":"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_science","sameAs":"http:\/\/www.wikidata.org\/entity\/Q59115","mainEntity":"http:\/\/www.wikidata.org\/entity\/Q59115","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Contributors to Wikimedia projects"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/www.wikimedia.org\/static\/images\/wmf-hor-googpub.png"}},"datePublished":"2002-01-29T10:08:00Z","dateModified":"2024-11-01T23:41:10Z","image":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/e\/e7\/Bertini_fresco_of_Galileo_Galilei_and_Doge_of_Venice.jpg","headline":"branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science"}</script><script>(window.NORLQ=window.NORLQ||[]).push(function(){var ns,i,p,img;ns=document.getElementsByTagName('noscript');for(i=0;i<ns.length;i++){p=ns[i].nextSibling;if(p&&p.className&&p.className.indexOf('lazy-image-placeholder')>-1){img=document.createElement('img');img.setAttribute('src',p.getAttribute('data-src'));img.setAttribute('width',p.getAttribute('data-width'));img.setAttribute('height',p.getAttribute('data-height'));img.setAttribute('alt',p.getAttribute('data-alt'));p.parentNode.replaceChild(img,p);}}});</script> </body> </html>

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10