CINXE.COM

What Planck Length Is and It's Common Misconceptions

<!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en-US" class="html_stretched responsive av-preloader-disabled html_header_top html_logo_left html_main_nav_header html_menu_right html_custom html_header_sticky html_header_shrinking_disabled html_mobile_menu_phone html_header_searchicon html_content_align_center html_header_unstick_top_disabled html_header_stretch_disabled html_av-submenu-hidden html_av-submenu-display-click html_av-overlay-side html_av-overlay-side-classic html_av-submenu-noclone html_entry_id_4930 av-cookies-no-cookie-consent av-no-preview av-default-lightbox html_text_menu_active av-mobile-menu-switch-default"><head><meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge,chrome=1"><meta charset="UTF-8" /> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-2209856-4"></script> <script>window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'UA-2209856-4');</script> <script data-optimized="1" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/js/2592eef92248026c6738059400d0d827.js?ver=0d827" defer type="text/javascript"></script> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"><meta name='robots' content='index, follow, max-image-preview:large, max-snippet:-1, max-video-preview:-1' /><style>img:is([sizes="auto" i], [sizes^="auto," i]) { contain-intrinsic-size: 3000px 1500px }</style><title>What Planck Length Is and It&#039;s Common Misconceptions</title><meta name="description" content="There are a lot of misconceptions that generally overstate its physical significance, for example, stating that it&#039;s the inherent pixel size of the universe" /><link rel="canonical" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/" /><meta property="og:locale" content="en_US" /><meta property="og:type" content="article" /><meta property="og:title" content="What Planck Length Is and It&#039;s Common Misconceptions" /><meta property="og:description" content="There are a lot of misconceptions that generally overstate its physical significance, for example, stating that it&#039;s the inherent pixel size of the universe" /><meta property="og:url" content="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/" /><meta property="og:site_name" content="Physics Forums Insights" /><meta property="article:publisher" content="https://www.facebook.com/physicsforums" /><meta property="article:published_time" content="2015-09-09T14:00:53+00:00" /><meta property="article:modified_time" content="2025-01-26T15:16:48+00:00" /><meta property="og:image" content="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/planck.png" /><meta property="og:image:width" content="240" /><meta property="og:image:height" content="135" /><meta property="og:image:type" content="image/png" /><meta name="author" content="Alex Klotz" /><meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image" /><meta name="twitter:creator" content="@https://twitter.com/alexanderrklotz" /><meta name="twitter:site" content="@physicsforums" /><meta name="twitter:label1" content="Written by" /><meta name="twitter:data1" content="Alex Klotz" /><meta name="twitter:label2" content="Est. reading time" /><meta name="twitter:data2" content="8 minutes" /> <script type="application/ld+json" class="yoast-schema-graph">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/"},"author":{"name":"Alex Klotz","@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/#/schema/person/c1a2a8b3946f9beba9fab8cf55fb327a"},"headline":"What Planck Length Is and It&#8217;s Common Misconceptions","datePublished":"2015-09-09T14:00:53+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-26T15:16:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/"},"wordCount":1611,"commentCount":29,"publisher":{"@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/planck.png","keywords":["gravity","quantum physics"],"articleSection":["Physics Articles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/","url":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/","name":"What Planck Length Is and It's Common Misconceptions","isPartOf":{"@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/planck.png","datePublished":"2015-09-09T14:00:53+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-26T15:16:48+00:00","description":"There are a lot of misconceptions that generally overstate its physical significance, for example, stating that it's the inherent pixel size of the universe","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#primaryimage","url":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/planck.png","contentUrl":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/planck.png","width":240,"height":135,"caption":"planck"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What Planck Length Is and It&#8217;s Common Misconceptions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/#website","url":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/","name":"Physics Forums Insights","description":"Science and Math Articles, Tutorials and Guides","publisher":{"@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/#organization"},"alternateName":"PF Insights","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/#organization","name":"Physics Forums","url":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/#/schema/logo/image/","url":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/facebook_image-1.png","contentUrl":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/facebook_image-1.png","width":205,"height":200,"caption":"Physics Forums"},"image":{"@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/#/schema/logo/image/"},"sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/physicsforums","https://x.com/physicsforums","https://www.linkedin.com/company/physics-forums","https://www.pinterest.com/physicsforums"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/#/schema/person/c1a2a8b3946f9beba9fab8cf55fb327a","name":"Alex Klotz","description":"Ph.D. McGill University, 2015 Assistant Professor, California State University, Long Beach My research is at the interface of biological physics and soft condensed matter. I am interested in using tools provided from biology to answer questions about the physics of soft materials. In the past I have investigated how DNA partitions itself into small spaces and how knots in DNA molecules move and untie. Moving forward, I will be investigating the physics of non-covalent chemical bonds using \"DNA chainmail\" and exploring non-equilibrium thermodynamics and fluid mechanics using protein gels.","sameAs":["https://ca.linkedin.com/pub/alex-klotz/6a/592/ab0","https://x.com/https://twitter.com/alexanderrklotz"],"url":"https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/author/klotza/"}]}</script> <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Physics Forums Insights &raquo; Feed" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/feed/" /> <script type="text/javascript" id="wpp-js" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-popular-posts/assets/js/wpp.js?ver=7.2.0" data-sampling="0" data-sampling-rate="100" data-api-url="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-json/wordpress-popular-posts" data-post-id="4930" data-token="ed1191d79b" data-lang="0" data-debug="1"></script> <link data-optimized="1" rel='stylesheet' id='xpress_wp_admin_style-css' href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/css/59568f3369115d72ade0de8186a4674e.css?ver=4674e' type='text/css' media='all' /><link data-optimized="1" rel='stylesheet' id='wp-block-library-css' href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/css/ad10b27e06583ae315af8368433fa1f7.css?ver=b9180' type='text/css' media='all' /><style id='global-styles-inline-css' type='text/css'>:root{--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--square: 1;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--4-3: 4/3;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--3-4: 3/4;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--3-2: 3/2;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--2-3: 2/3;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--16-9: 16/9;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--9-16: 9/16;--wp--preset--color--black: #000000;--wp--preset--color--cyan-bluish-gray: #abb8c3;--wp--preset--color--white: #ffffff;--wp--preset--color--pale-pink: #f78da7;--wp--preset--color--vivid-red: #cf2e2e;--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-orange: #ff6900;--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-amber: #fcb900;--wp--preset--color--light-green-cyan: #7bdcb5;--wp--preset--color--vivid-green-cyan: #00d084;--wp--preset--color--pale-cyan-blue: #8ed1fc;--wp--preset--color--vivid-cyan-blue: #0693e3;--wp--preset--color--vivid-purple: #9b51e0;--wp--preset--color--metallic-red: #b02b2c;--wp--preset--color--maximum-yellow-red: #edae44;--wp--preset--color--yellow-sun: #eeee22;--wp--preset--color--palm-leaf: #83a846;--wp--preset--color--aero: #7bb0e7;--wp--preset--color--old-lavender: #745f7e;--wp--preset--color--steel-teal: #5f8789;--wp--preset--color--raspberry-pink: #d65799;--wp--preset--color--medium-turquoise: #4ecac2;--wp--preset--gradient--vivid-cyan-blue-to-vivid-purple: linear-gradient(135deg,rgba(6,147,227,1) 0%,rgb(155,81,224) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--light-green-cyan-to-vivid-green-cyan: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(122,220,180) 0%,rgb(0,208,130) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-vivid-amber-to-luminous-vivid-orange: linear-gradient(135deg,rgba(252,185,0,1) 0%,rgba(255,105,0,1) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-vivid-orange-to-vivid-red: linear-gradient(135deg,rgba(255,105,0,1) 0%,rgb(207,46,46) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--very-light-gray-to-cyan-bluish-gray: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(238,238,238) 0%,rgb(169,184,195) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--cool-to-warm-spectrum: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(74,234,220) 0%,rgb(151,120,209) 20%,rgb(207,42,186) 40%,rgb(238,44,130) 60%,rgb(251,105,98) 80%,rgb(254,248,76) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--blush-light-purple: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(255,206,236) 0%,rgb(152,150,240) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--blush-bordeaux: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(254,205,165) 0%,rgb(254,45,45) 50%,rgb(107,0,62) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-dusk: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(255,203,112) 0%,rgb(199,81,192) 50%,rgb(65,88,208) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--pale-ocean: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(255,245,203) 0%,rgb(182,227,212) 50%,rgb(51,167,181) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--electric-grass: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(202,248,128) 0%,rgb(113,206,126) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--midnight: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(2,3,129) 0%,rgb(40,116,252) 100%);--wp--preset--font-size--small: 1rem;--wp--preset--font-size--medium: 1.125rem;--wp--preset--font-size--large: 1.75rem;--wp--preset--font-size--x-large: clamp(1.75rem, 3vw, 2.25rem);--wp--preset--spacing--20: 0.44rem;--wp--preset--spacing--30: 0.67rem;--wp--preset--spacing--40: 1rem;--wp--preset--spacing--50: 1.5rem;--wp--preset--spacing--60: 2.25rem;--wp--preset--spacing--70: 3.38rem;--wp--preset--spacing--80: 5.06rem;--wp--preset--shadow--natural: 6px 6px 9px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);--wp--preset--shadow--deep: 12px 12px 50px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4);--wp--preset--shadow--sharp: 6px 6px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);--wp--preset--shadow--outlined: 6px 6px 0px -3px rgba(255, 255, 255, 1), 6px 6px rgba(0, 0, 0, 1);--wp--preset--shadow--crisp: 6px 6px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 1);}:root { --wp--style--global--content-size: 800px;--wp--style--global--wide-size: 1130px; }:where(body) { margin: 0; }.wp-site-blocks > .alignleft { float: left; margin-right: 2em; }.wp-site-blocks > .alignright { float: right; margin-left: 2em; }.wp-site-blocks > .aligncenter { justify-content: center; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; }:where(.is-layout-flex){gap: 0.5em;}:where(.is-layout-grid){gap: 0.5em;}.is-layout-flow > .alignleft{float: left;margin-inline-start: 0;margin-inline-end: 2em;}.is-layout-flow > .alignright{float: right;margin-inline-start: 2em;margin-inline-end: 0;}.is-layout-flow > .aligncenter{margin-left: auto !important;margin-right: auto !important;}.is-layout-constrained > .alignleft{float: left;margin-inline-start: 0;margin-inline-end: 2em;}.is-layout-constrained > .alignright{float: right;margin-inline-start: 2em;margin-inline-end: 0;}.is-layout-constrained > .aligncenter{margin-left: auto !important;margin-right: auto !important;}.is-layout-constrained > :where(:not(.alignleft):not(.alignright):not(.alignfull)){max-width: var(--wp--style--global--content-size);margin-left: auto !important;margin-right: auto !important;}.is-layout-constrained > .alignwide{max-width: var(--wp--style--global--wide-size);}body .is-layout-flex{display: flex;}.is-layout-flex{flex-wrap: wrap;align-items: center;}.is-layout-flex > :is(*, div){margin: 0;}body .is-layout-grid{display: grid;}.is-layout-grid > :is(*, div){margin: 0;}body{padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 0px;padding-left: 0px;}a:where(:not(.wp-element-button)){text-decoration: underline;}:root :where(.wp-element-button, .wp-block-button__link){background-color: #32373c;border-width: 0;color: #fff;font-family: inherit;font-size: inherit;line-height: inherit;padding: calc(0.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);text-decoration: none;}.has-black-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--black) !important;}.has-cyan-bluish-gray-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--cyan-bluish-gray) !important;}.has-white-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--white) !important;}.has-pale-pink-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-pink) !important;}.has-vivid-red-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-red) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-orange-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-orange) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-amber-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-amber) !important;}.has-light-green-cyan-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--light-green-cyan) !important;}.has-vivid-green-cyan-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-green-cyan) !important;}.has-pale-cyan-blue-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-cyan-blue-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-purple-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-purple) !important;}.has-metallic-red-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--metallic-red) !important;}.has-maximum-yellow-red-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--maximum-yellow-red) !important;}.has-yellow-sun-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--yellow-sun) !important;}.has-palm-leaf-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--palm-leaf) !important;}.has-aero-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--aero) !important;}.has-old-lavender-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--old-lavender) !important;}.has-steel-teal-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--steel-teal) !important;}.has-raspberry-pink-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--raspberry-pink) !important;}.has-medium-turquoise-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--medium-turquoise) !important;}.has-black-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--black) !important;}.has-cyan-bluish-gray-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--cyan-bluish-gray) !important;}.has-white-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--white) !important;}.has-pale-pink-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-pink) !important;}.has-vivid-red-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-red) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-orange-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-orange) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-amber-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-amber) !important;}.has-light-green-cyan-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--light-green-cyan) !important;}.has-vivid-green-cyan-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-green-cyan) !important;}.has-pale-cyan-blue-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-cyan-blue-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-purple-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-purple) !important;}.has-metallic-red-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--metallic-red) !important;}.has-maximum-yellow-red-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--maximum-yellow-red) !important;}.has-yellow-sun-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--yellow-sun) !important;}.has-palm-leaf-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--palm-leaf) !important;}.has-aero-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--aero) !important;}.has-old-lavender-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--old-lavender) !important;}.has-steel-teal-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--steel-teal) !important;}.has-raspberry-pink-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--raspberry-pink) !important;}.has-medium-turquoise-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--medium-turquoise) !important;}.has-black-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--black) !important;}.has-cyan-bluish-gray-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--cyan-bluish-gray) !important;}.has-white-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--white) !important;}.has-pale-pink-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-pink) !important;}.has-vivid-red-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-red) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-orange-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-orange) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-amber-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-amber) !important;}.has-light-green-cyan-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--light-green-cyan) !important;}.has-vivid-green-cyan-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-green-cyan) !important;}.has-pale-cyan-blue-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-cyan-blue-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-purple-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-purple) !important;}.has-metallic-red-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--metallic-red) !important;}.has-maximum-yellow-red-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--maximum-yellow-red) !important;}.has-yellow-sun-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--yellow-sun) !important;}.has-palm-leaf-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--palm-leaf) !important;}.has-aero-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--aero) !important;}.has-old-lavender-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--old-lavender) !important;}.has-steel-teal-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--steel-teal) !important;}.has-raspberry-pink-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--raspberry-pink) !important;}.has-medium-turquoise-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--medium-turquoise) !important;}.has-vivid-cyan-blue-to-vivid-purple-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--vivid-cyan-blue-to-vivid-purple) !important;}.has-light-green-cyan-to-vivid-green-cyan-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--light-green-cyan-to-vivid-green-cyan) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-amber-to-luminous-vivid-orange-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-vivid-amber-to-luminous-vivid-orange) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-orange-to-vivid-red-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-vivid-orange-to-vivid-red) !important;}.has-very-light-gray-to-cyan-bluish-gray-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--very-light-gray-to-cyan-bluish-gray) !important;}.has-cool-to-warm-spectrum-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--cool-to-warm-spectrum) !important;}.has-blush-light-purple-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--blush-light-purple) !important;}.has-blush-bordeaux-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--blush-bordeaux) !important;}.has-luminous-dusk-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-dusk) !important;}.has-pale-ocean-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--pale-ocean) !important;}.has-electric-grass-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--electric-grass) !important;}.has-midnight-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--midnight) !important;}.has-small-font-size{font-size: var(--wp--preset--font-size--small) !important;}.has-medium-font-size{font-size: var(--wp--preset--font-size--medium) !important;}.has-large-font-size{font-size: var(--wp--preset--font-size--large) !important;}.has-x-large-font-size{font-size: var(--wp--preset--font-size--x-large) !important;} :where(.wp-block-post-template.is-layout-flex){gap: 1.25em;}:where(.wp-block-post-template.is-layout-grid){gap: 1.25em;} :where(.wp-block-columns.is-layout-flex){gap: 2em;}:where(.wp-block-columns.is-layout-grid){gap: 2em;} :root :where(.wp-block-pullquote){font-size: 1.5em;line-height: 1.6;}</style><link data-optimized="1" rel='stylesheet' id='ez-toc-css' href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/css/008d509d4fec340652d0312244582360.css?ver=d7f24' type='text/css' media='all' /><style id='ez-toc-inline-css' type='text/css'>div#ez-toc-container .ez-toc-title {font-size: 120%;}div#ez-toc-container .ez-toc-title {font-weight: 500;}div#ez-toc-container ul li {font-size: 95%;}div#ez-toc-container ul li {font-weight: 500;}div#ez-toc-container nav ul ul li {font-size: 90%;}div#ez-toc-container {background: #fff;border: 1px solid #ddd;}div#ez-toc-container p.ez-toc-title , #ez-toc-container .ez_toc_custom_title_icon , #ez-toc-container .ez_toc_custom_toc_icon {color: #4c4c4c;}div#ez-toc-container ul.ez-toc-list a {color: #066fac;}div#ez-toc-container ul.ez-toc-list a:hover {color: #235887;}div#ez-toc-container ul.ez-toc-list a:visited {color: #4594d1;} .ez-toc-container-direction {direction: ltr;}.ez-toc-counter ul{counter-reset: item ;}.ez-toc-counter nav ul li a::before {content: counters(item, '.', decimal) '. ';display: inline-block;counter-increment: item;flex-grow: 0;flex-shrink: 0;margin-right: .2em; float: left; }.ez-toc-widget-direction {direction: ltr;}.ez-toc-widget-container ul{counter-reset: item ;}.ez-toc-widget-container nav ul li a::before {content: counters(item, '.', decimal) '. ';display: inline-block;counter-increment: item;flex-grow: 0;flex-shrink: 0;margin-right: .2em; float: left; }</style><link data-optimized="1" rel='stylesheet' id='wordpress-popular-posts-css-css' href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/css/f37de7c74c7905b881abee3714c59450.css?ver=b2ec6' type='text/css' media='all' /><link data-optimized="1" rel='stylesheet' id='avia-merged-styles-css' href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/css/820f1a9cc2793db8f9fe7fdd0a2a765a.css?ver=a765a' type='text/css' media='all' /> <script data-optimized="1" type="text/javascript" async='async' src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/js/b1c84e2e0f329a7697c4102475f95b4a.js?ver=95b4a" id="avia-head-scripts-js"></script> <style id="wpp-loading-animation-styles">@-webkit-keyframes bgslide{from{background-position-x:0}to{background-position-x:-200%}}@keyframes bgslide{from{background-position-x:0}to{background-position-x:-200%}}.wpp-widget-block-placeholder,.wpp-shortcode-placeholder{margin:0 auto;width:60px;height:3px;background:#dd3737;background:linear-gradient(90deg,#dd3737 0%,#571313 10%,#dd3737 100%);background-size:200% auto;border-radius:3px;-webkit-animation:bgslide 1s infinite linear;animation:bgslide 1s infinite linear}</style><link rel="profile" href="https://gmpg.org/xfn/11" /><link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Physics Forums Insights RSS2 Feed" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/feed/" /><link rel="pingback" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/xmlrpc.php" /><style type='text/css' media='screen'>#top #header_main > .container, #top #header_main > .container .main_menu .av-main-nav > li > a, #top #header_main #menu-item-shop .cart_dropdown_link{ height:70px; line-height: 70px; } .html_top_nav_header .av-logo-container{ height:70px; } .html_header_top.html_header_sticky #top #wrap_all #main{ padding-top:70px; }</style><!--[if lt IE 9]><script src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/themes/enfold/js/html5shiv.js"></script><![endif]--><link rel="icon" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/favicon.ico" type="image/x-icon"><style type="text/css">.saboxplugin-wrap{-webkit-box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;-ms-box-sizing:border-box;box-sizing:border-box;border:1px solid #eee;width:100%;clear:both;display:block;overflow:hidden;word-wrap:break-word;position:relative}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-gravatar{float:left;padding:0 20px 20px 20px}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-gravatar img{max-width:100px;height:auto;border-radius:0;}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-authorname{font-size:18px;line-height:1;margin:20px 0 0 20px;display:block}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-authorname a{text-decoration:none}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-authorname a:focus{outline:0}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-desc{display:block;margin:5px 20px}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-desc a{text-decoration:underline}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-desc p{margin:5px 0 12px}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-web{margin:0 20px 15px;text-align:left}.saboxplugin-wrap .sab-web-position{text-align:right}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-web a{color:#ccc;text-decoration:none}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-socials{position:relative;display:block;background:#fcfcfc;padding:5px;border-top:1px solid #eee}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-socials a svg{width:20px;height:20px}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-socials a svg .st2{fill:#fff; transform-origin:center center;}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-socials a svg .st1{fill:rgba(0,0,0,.3)}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-socials a:hover{opacity:.8;-webkit-transition:opacity .4s;-moz-transition:opacity .4s;-o-transition:opacity .4s;transition:opacity .4s;box-shadow:none!important;-webkit-box-shadow:none!important}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-socials .saboxplugin-icon-color{box-shadow:none;padding:0;border:0;-webkit-transition:opacity .4s;-moz-transition:opacity .4s;-o-transition:opacity .4s;transition:opacity .4s;display:inline-block;color:#fff;font-size:0;text-decoration:inherit;margin:5px;-webkit-border-radius:0;-moz-border-radius:0;-ms-border-radius:0;-o-border-radius:0;border-radius:0;overflow:hidden}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-socials .saboxplugin-icon-grey{text-decoration:inherit;box-shadow:none;position:relative;display:-moz-inline-stack;display:inline-block;vertical-align:middle;zoom:1;margin:10px 5px;color:#444;fill:#444}.clearfix:after,.clearfix:before{content:' ';display:table;line-height:0;clear:both}.ie7 .clearfix{zoom:1}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-twitch{border-color:#38245c}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-addthis{border-color:#e91c00}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-behance{border-color:#003eb0}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-delicious{border-color:#06c}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-deviantart{border-color:#036824}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-digg{border-color:#00327c}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-dribbble{border-color:#ba1655}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-facebook{border-color:#1e2e4f}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-flickr{border-color:#003576}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-github{border-color:#264874}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-google{border-color:#0b51c5}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-googleplus{border-color:#96271a}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-html5{border-color:#902e13}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-instagram{border-color:#1630aa}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-linkedin{border-color:#00344f}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-pinterest{border-color:#5b040e}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-reddit{border-color:#992900}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-rss{border-color:#a43b0a}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-sharethis{border-color:#5d8420}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-skype{border-color:#00658a}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-soundcloud{border-color:#995200}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-spotify{border-color:#0f612c}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-stackoverflow{border-color:#a95009}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-steam{border-color:#006388}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-user_email{border-color:#b84e05}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-stumbleUpon{border-color:#9b280e}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-tumblr{border-color:#10151b}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-twitter{border-color:#0967a0}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-vimeo{border-color:#0d7091}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-windows{border-color:#003f71}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-whatsapp{border-color:#003f71}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-wordpress{border-color:#0f3647}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-yahoo{border-color:#14002d}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-youtube{border-color:#900}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-xing{border-color:#000202}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-mixcloud{border-color:#2475a0}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-vk{border-color:#243549}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-medium{border-color:#00452c}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-quora{border-color:#420e00}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-meetup{border-color:#9b181c}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-goodreads{border-color:#000}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-snapchat{border-color:#999700}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-500px{border-color:#00557f}.saboxplugin-socials.sabox-colored .saboxplugin-icon-color .sab-mastodont{border-color:#185886}.sabox-plus-item{margin-bottom:20px}@media screen and (max-width:480px){.saboxplugin-wrap{text-align:center}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-gravatar{float:none;padding:20px 0;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;display:block}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-gravatar img{float:none;display:inline-block;display:-moz-inline-stack;vertical-align:middle;zoom:1}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-desc{margin:0 10px 20px;text-align:center}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-authorname{text-align:center;margin:10px 0 20px}}body .saboxplugin-authorname a,body .saboxplugin-authorname a:hover{box-shadow:none;-webkit-box-shadow:none}a.sab-profile-edit{font-size:16px!important;line-height:1!important}.sab-edit-settings a,a.sab-profile-edit{color:#0073aa!important;box-shadow:none!important;-webkit-box-shadow:none!important}.sab-edit-settings{margin-right:15px;position:absolute;right:0;z-index:2;bottom:10px;line-height:20px}.sab-edit-settings i{margin-left:5px}.saboxplugin-socials{line-height:1!important}.rtl .saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-gravatar{float:right}.rtl .saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-authorname{display:flex;align-items:center}.rtl .saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-authorname .sab-profile-edit{margin-right:10px}.rtl .sab-edit-settings{right:auto;left:0}img.sab-custom-avatar{max-width:75px;}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-gravatar img {-webkit-border-radius:50%;-moz-border-radius:50%;-ms-border-radius:50%;-o-border-radius:50%;border-radius:50%;}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-gravatar img {-webkit-border-radius:50%;-moz-border-radius:50%;-ms-border-radius:50%;-o-border-radius:50%;border-radius:50%;}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-gravatar img {-webkit-transition:all .5s ease;-moz-transition:all .5s ease;-o-transition:all .5s ease;transition:all .5s ease;}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-gravatar img:hover {-webkit-transform:rotate(45deg);-moz-transform:rotate(45deg);-o-transform:rotate(45deg);-ms-transform:rotate(45deg);transform:rotate(45deg);}.saboxplugin-wrap {margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; padding: 0px 0px }.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-authorname {font-size:18px; line-height:25px;}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-desc p, .saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-desc {font-size:14px !important; line-height:21px !important;}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-web {font-size:14px;}.saboxplugin-wrap .saboxplugin-socials a svg {width:18px;height:18px;}</style> <script type="text/javascript">'use strict';var avia_is_mobile=!1;if(/Android|webOS|iPhone|iPad|iPod|BlackBerry|IEMobile|Opera Mini/i.test(navigator.userAgent)&&'ontouchstart' in document.documentElement){avia_is_mobile=!0;document.documentElement.className+=' avia_mobile '} else{document.documentElement.className+=' avia_desktop '};document.documentElement.className+=' js_active ';(function(){var e=['-webkit-','-moz-','-ms-',''],n='',o=!1,a=!1;for(var t in e){if(e[t]+'transform' in document.documentElement.style){o=!0;n=e[t]+'transform'};if(e[t]+'perspective' in document.documentElement.style){a=!0}};if(o){document.documentElement.className+=' avia_transform '};if(a){document.documentElement.className+=' avia_transform3d '};if(typeof document.getElementsByClassName=='function'&&typeof document.documentElement.getBoundingClientRect=='function'&&avia_is_mobile==!1){if(n&&window.innerHeight>0){setTimeout(function(){var e=0,o={},a=0,t=document.getElementsByClassName('av-parallax'),i=window.pageYOffset||document.documentElement.scrollTop;for(e=0;e<t.length;e++){t[e].style.top='0px';o=t[e].getBoundingClientRect();a=Math.ceil((window.innerHeight+i-o.top)*0.3);t[e].style[n]='translate(0px, '+a+'px)';t[e].style.top='auto';t[e].className+=' enabled-parallax '}},50)}}})();</script><style type="text/css">@font-face {font-family: 'entypo-fontello'; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; font-display: swap; src: url('https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/themes/enfold/config-templatebuilder/avia-template-builder/assets/fonts/entypo-fontello.woff2') format('woff2'), url('https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/themes/enfold/config-templatebuilder/avia-template-builder/assets/fonts/entypo-fontello.woff') format('woff'), url('https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/themes/enfold/config-templatebuilder/avia-template-builder/assets/fonts/entypo-fontello.ttf') format('truetype'), url('https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/themes/enfold/config-templatebuilder/avia-template-builder/assets/fonts/entypo-fontello.svg#entypo-fontello') format('svg'), url('https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/themes/enfold/config-templatebuilder/avia-template-builder/assets/fonts/entypo-fontello.eot'), url('https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/themes/enfold/config-templatebuilder/avia-template-builder/assets/fonts/entypo-fontello.eot?#iefix') format('embedded-opentype'); } #top .avia-font-entypo-fontello, body .avia-font-entypo-fontello, html body [data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello']:before{ font-family: 'entypo-fontello'; }</style></head><body id="top" class="post-template-default single single-post postid-4930 single-format-standard stretched avia-mobile-no-animations rtl_columns av-curtain-numeric arial-websave arial avia-responsive-images-support" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/WebPage" ><div id='wrap_all'><header id='header' class='all_colors header_color light_bg_color av_header_top av_logo_left av_main_nav_header av_menu_right av_custom av_header_sticky av_header_shrinking_disabled av_header_stretch_disabled av_mobile_menu_phone av_header_searchicon av_header_unstick_top_disabled av_bottom_nav_disabled av_header_border_disabled' aria-label="Header" data-av_shrink_factor='50' role="banner" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/WPHeader" ><div id='header_main' class='container_wrap container_wrap_logo'><div class='container av-logo-container'><div class='inner-container'><span class='logo avia-standard-logo'><a href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/' class='' aria-label='Physics_Forums_Insights_logo' title='Physics_Forums_Insights_logo'><img data-lazyloaded="1" src="" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png" height="100" width="300" alt='Physics Forums Insights' title='Physics_Forums_Insights_logo' /><noscript><img src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png" height="100" width="300" alt='Physics Forums Insights' title='Physics_Forums_Insights_logo' /></noscript></a></span><nav class='main_menu' data-selectname='Select a page' role="navigation" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/SiteNavigationElement" ><div class="avia-menu av-main-nav-wrap"><ul role="menu" class="menu av-main-nav" id="avia-menu"><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-27276" class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-has-children menu-item-top-level menu-item-top-level-1"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/trending-physics-articles/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Physics</span><span class="avia-menu-fx"><span class="avia-arrow-wrap"><span class="avia-arrow"></span></span></span></a><ul class="sub-menu"><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26559" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category current-post-ancestor current-menu-parent current-post-parent"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-articles/physics-articles/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Physics Articles</span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26568" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-tutorials/physics-tutorials/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Physics Tutorials</span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26564" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-guides/physics-guides/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Physics Guides</span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26561" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-faqs/physics-faqs/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Physics FAQs</span></a></li></ul></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-27288" class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-has-children menu-item-top-level menu-item-top-level-2"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/trending-math-articles/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Math</span><span class="avia-menu-fx"><span class="avia-arrow-wrap"><span class="avia-arrow"></span></span></span></a><ul class="sub-menu"><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26558" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-articles/math-articles/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Math Articles</span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26567" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-tutorials/math-tutorials/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Math Tutorials</span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26563" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-guides/math-guides/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Math Guides</span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26560" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-faqs/math-faqs/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Math FAQs</span></a></li></ul></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-27287" class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-has-children menu-item-top-level menu-item-top-level-3"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/trending-bio-chem-tech-articles/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Bio/Chem/Tech</span><span class="avia-menu-fx"><span class="avia-arrow-wrap"><span class="avia-arrow"></span></span></span></a><ul class="sub-menu"><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26556" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-articles/biology-chemistry-articles/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Bio/Chem Articles</span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26566" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-tutorials/computer-science-tutorials/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Computer Science Tutorials</span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26565" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-guides/technology-guides/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Technology Guides</span></a></li></ul></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-27286" class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-has-children menu-item-top-level menu-item-top-level-4"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/trending-education-articles/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Education</span><span class="avia-menu-fx"><span class="avia-arrow-wrap"><span class="avia-arrow"></span></span></span></a><ul class="sub-menu"><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26557" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-articles/education-articles/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Education Articles</span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26562" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-guides/education-guides/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Education Guides</span></a></li></ul></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26569" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category menu-item-top-level menu-item-top-level-5"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/scientist-interviews/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Interviews</span><span class="avia-menu-fx"><span class="avia-arrow-wrap"><span class="avia-arrow"></span></span></span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26570" class="menu-item menu-item-type-taxonomy menu-item-object-category menu-item-top-level menu-item-top-level-6"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-quizzes/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Quizzes</span><span class="avia-menu-fx"><span class="avia-arrow-wrap"><span class="avia-arrow"></span></span></span></a></li><li role="menuitem" id="menu-item-26571" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-top-level menu-item-top-level-7"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/" itemprop="url" tabindex="0"><span class="avia-bullet"></span><span class="avia-menu-text">Forums</span><span class="avia-menu-fx"><span class="avia-arrow-wrap"><span class="avia-arrow"></span></span></span></a></li><li id="menu-item-search" class="noMobile menu-item menu-item-search-dropdown menu-item-avia-special" role="menuitem"><a aria-label="Search" href="?s=" rel="nofollow" data-avia-search-tooltip=" &lt;search&gt; &lt;form role=&quot;search&quot; action=&quot;https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/&quot; id=&quot;searchform&quot; method=&quot;get&quot; class=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; value=&quot;&quot; id=&quot;searchsubmit&quot; class=&quot;button avia-font-entypo-fontello&quot; title=&quot;Enter at least 3 characters to show search results in a dropdown or click to route to search result page to show all results&quot; /&gt; &lt;input type=&quot;search&quot; id=&quot;s&quot; name=&quot;s&quot; value=&quot;&quot; aria-label=&#039;Search&#039; placeholder=&#039;Search&#039; required /&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/form&gt; &lt;/search&gt; " aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello'><span class="avia_hidden_link_text">Search</span></a></li><li class="av-burger-menu-main menu-item-avia-special " role="menuitem"> <a href="#" aria-label="Menu" aria-hidden="false"> <span class="av-hamburger av-hamburger--spin av-js-hamburger"> <span class="av-hamburger-box"> <span class="av-hamburger-inner"></span> <strong>Menu</strong> </span> </span> <span class="avia_hidden_link_text">Menu</span> </a></li></ul></div></nav></div></div></div><div class="header_bg"></div></header><div id='main' class='all_colors' data-scroll-offset='70'><div class='container_wrap container_wrap_first main_color sidebar_right'><div class='container template-blog template-single-blog '><main class='content units av-content-small alpha av-blog-meta-html-info-disabled av-main-single' role="main" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/Blog" ><article class="post-entry post-entry-type-standard post-entry-4930 post-loop-1 post-parity-odd post-entry-last single-big with-slider post-4930 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-physics-articles tag-gravity tag-quantum-physics" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/BlogPosting" itemprop="blogPost" ><div class="big-preview single-big" itemprop="image" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/ImageObject" ><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/planck.png" title="planck" ><img data-lazyloaded="1" src="" loading="lazy" width="240" height="135" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/planck.png" class="wp-image-4955 avia-img-lazy-loading-4955 attachment-entry_with_sidebar size-entry_with_sidebar wp-post-image" alt="planck" decoding="async" /><noscript><img loading="lazy" width="240" height="135" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/planck.png" class="wp-image-4955 avia-img-lazy-loading-4955 attachment-entry_with_sidebar size-entry_with_sidebar wp-post-image" alt="planck" decoding="async" /></noscript></a></div><div class="blog-meta"></div><div class='entry-content-wrapper clearfix standard-content'><header class="entry-content-header" aria-label="Post: What Planck Length Is and It&#8217;s Common Misconceptions"><h1 class='post-title entry-title ' itemprop="headline" >What Planck Length Is and It&#8217;s Common Misconceptions<span class="post-format-icon minor-meta"></span></h1><span class="post-meta-infos"><time class="date-container minor-meta updated" itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2015-09-09T14:00:53-05:00" >September 9, 2015</time><span class="text-sep">/</span><span class="comment-container minor-meta"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comments" class="comments-link" >29 Comments</a></span><span class="text-sep">/</span><span class="blog-categories minor-meta">in <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/science-math-articles/physics-articles/" rel="tag">Physics Articles</a></span><span class="text-sep">/</span><span class="blog-author minor-meta">by <span class="entry-author-link" itemprop="author" ><span class="author"><span class="fn"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/author/klotza/" title="Posts by Alex Klotz" rel="author">Alex Klotz</a></span></span></span></span></span></header><div class="entry-content" itemprop="text" ><div><strong>Estimated Read Time:</strong> 7 minute(s)</div><div><strong>Common Topics:</strong> planck, length, quantum, constant, gravity</div><div><p>The Planck length is an extremely small distance constructed from physical constants. Many misconceptions generally overstate its physical significance, stating that it&#8217;s the inherent pixel size of the universe. The Planck length does have physical significance, and I&#8217;ll discuss what it is and what it isn&#8217;t.</p><div id="ez-toc-container" class="ez-toc-v2_0_72 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-custom ez-toc-container-direction"><p class="ez-toc-title" style="cursor:inherit">Table of Contents</p> <label for="ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-67b39179c721c" class="ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-label"><span class="ez-toc-cssicon"><span class="eztoc-hide" style="display:none;">Toggle</span><span class="ez-toc-icon-toggle-span"><svg style="fill: #4c4c4c;color:#4c4c4c" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" class="list-377408" width="20px" height="20px" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none"><path d="M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z" fill="currentColor"></path></svg><svg style="fill: #4c4c4c;color:#4c4c4c" class="arrow-unsorted-368013" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="10px" height="10px" viewBox="0 0 24 24" version="1.2" baseProfile="tiny"><path d="M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z"/></svg></span></span></label><input type="checkbox" id="ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-67b39179c721c" aria-label="Toggle" /><nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class="ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1" href="#What-is-the-Planck-Length" title="What is the Planck Length?">What is the Planck Length?</a></li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class="ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2" href="#How-is-it-relevant-to-physics" title="How is it relevant to physics?">How is it relevant to physics?</a></li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class="ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3" href="#How-is-it-not-relevant-to-physics" title="How is it not relevant to physics?">How is it not relevant to physics?</a></li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class="ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4" href="#How-might-it-be-relevant-to-physics" title="How might it be relevant to physics?">How might it be relevant to physics?</a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class="ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5" href="#More-Related-Articles" title="More Related Articles">More Related Articles</a></li></ul></li></ul></nav></div><h2><span class="ez-toc-section" id="What-is-the-Planck-Length"></span><b>What is the Planck Length?</b><span class="ez-toc-section-end"></span></h2><p>Planck units are defined based on physical constants rather than human-scale phenomena. So while the second is originally one-86400th of a day, the Planck time is based on the speed of light, Newton&#8217;s gravitational constant, and Planck&#8217;s (reduced) constant, which is twice the angular momentum of an electron. Hypothetically, if we met a group of aliens and wanted to discuss weights and measures, we could use Planck units and they&#8217;d know what we are talking about. There is a push towards making our human units based on physical constants, like defining the meter in terms of the speed of light, but at this time the kilogram is still the mass of a brick in France.</p><p>&#8220;Natural&#8221; units still have a bit of choice regarding their definitions. Convention has chosen Planck&#8217;s reduced constant over Planck&#8217;s regular constant (they differ by a factor of 2##\pi##), and chosen to use the Coulomb constant instead of the dielectric constant or the fundamental charge for electromagnetic units. The latter provides a great example showing that Planck units are not inherently fundamental quantities: the Planck charge is roughly 11.7 times the actual fundamental charge of the universe.</p><p>So what is the Planck length? It is defined as:</p><p>$$\ell_{p}=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar\,G}{c^3}}$$</p><p>This is how far light can go in a unit of Planck time because the <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/speed-light-galilean-relativity/">speed of light</a> is the &#8220;Planck speed.&#8221; In SI units, this is on the order of 10<sup>-35</sup> meters. By comparison, one of the smallest lengths that have been &#8220;measured&#8221; is the upper bound on the electron&#8217;s radius (if an electron has a radius, what can we certainly say it is smaller than?) is 10<sup>-22</sup> meters, about ten-trillion Planck lengths. It is really small. And so far, it is just a unit. The meter is a useful unit for measuring length, but there&#8217;s nothing inherently special about it. The Planck length is not useful for measuring any length, but is there anything special about it?</p><h2><span class="ez-toc-section" id="How-is-it-relevant-to-physics"></span><b>How is it relevant to physics?</b><span class="ez-toc-section-end"></span></h2><p><b><br /> </b><br /> The Planck length is the length scale at which quantum gravity becomes relevant. It is roughly the distance things have to be before you start to consider &#8220;Hmm I wonder if there&#8217;s a chance this whole system randomly forms a <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/universe-black-hole/">black hole.&#8221;</a> I did not understand this until I convinced myself with the following derivation, which was the main inspiration for this article.</p><p>Consider the energy (E) between two charges (let&#8217;s say they&#8217;re electrons) at some distance r. Doesn&#8217;t matter if they&#8217;re attracting or repelling right now.</p><p>$$E=\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon\,r}$$</p><p>Just to clarify the symbols, e is the fundamental charge, ##\epsilon## is the dielectric constant. Now let&#8217;s change the units around, using the definition of the fine structure constant ##\alpha##, which is roughly 1/137.</p><p>$$\alpha=\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon}\frac{1}{\hbar\,c}$$</p><p>This lets us swap out the electromagnetic constants e and ##\epsilon## with the more &#8220;general&#8221; constants ##\hbar## and c. The Coulomb energy now looks like this:</p><p>$$E=\frac{\alpha\hbar\,c}{r}$$</p><p>This is where the hand-waving will begin. If a given volume at rest has a certain amount of energy within, it will have a rest mass m=E/c##^2##. From Newtonian gravity, we can calculate the gravitational <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/energy-gained-charge-electrostatic-field/">energy associated with our charges</a>.</p><p>$$E_{g}=G\frac{M^2}{r}=G\frac{\left(\frac{\alpha\hbar\,c}{rc^{2}}\right)^{2}}{r}=\frac{G\alpha^{2}\hbar^{2}}{c^{2}r^{3}}$$</p><p>We are neglecting the rest masses of the charges, but those are much smaller than the interaction energy.</p><p>The question now is: at what distance is the electrostatic energy equal to the gravitational energy it causes? So we solve for r&#8230;</p><p>$$r=\sqrt{\frac{\alpha\,G\hbar}{c^3}}=\sqrt{\alpha}\ell_{p}$$</p><p>and we find that the radius at which the gravitation of the interaction energy is as important as the interaction energy itself is roughly the Planck length (divided by the 11.7, the square root of 137, but we&#8217;ll hand-wave that away for now). This is where it is important: if things are interacting at distances close to the Planck length, you will have to take quantum gravity into account.</p><p>One of the only physical systems where quantum gravity is relevant is the black hole. When calculating the entropy of a <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/time-dilation-redshift-static-black-hole/">black hole</a>, Hawking and Bekenstein found that it was equal to the number of Planck areas (Planck lengths squared) that can fit in the cross-sectional area of a Schwartzschild black hole (or a quarter of its total surface area), in units of the Boltzmann constant. The Hawking temperature of a black hole is one of the only equations where ##\hbar##, c, and G all appear, making it a quantum relativistic gravitational equation. However, the mass of a black hole can be continuous so the number of Planck areas on its surface need not be an integer.</p><h2><span class="ez-toc-section" id="How-is-it-not-relevant-to-physics"></span><b></b><br /> <b>How is it <i>not </i>relevant to physics?</b><span class="ez-toc-section-end"></span></h2><p><b><br /> </b><br /> There is a misconception that the universe is fundamentally divided into Planck-sized pixels, that nothing can be smaller than the Planck length, and that things move through space by progressing one Planck length every Planck time. Judging by the ultimate source, <a href="http://i.imgur.com/92cqoCk.png" target="_blank">a cursory search of Reddit questions</a>, the misconception is fairly common.</p><p>There is nothing in established physics that says this is the case, nothing in general relativity or <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-mechanics-difficult/">quantum mechanics</a> pointing to it. I have an idea as to where the misconception might arise, that I can&#8217;t back up but I will state anyway. I think that when people learn that the energy states of <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/dont-electrons-crash-nucleus-atoms/">electrons in an atom</a> are quantized and that Planck&#8217;s constant is involved, a leap is made toward the pixel fallacy. I remember in my early teens reading about the Planck time in National Geographic, and hearing about Planck&#8217;s constant in high school physics or chemistry, and thinking they were the same.</p><p>As I mentioned earlier, just because units are &#8220;natural&#8221; it doesn&#8217;t mean they are &#8220;fundamental,&#8221; due to the choice of constants used to define the units. The simplest reason that Planck-pixels don&#8217;t make up the universe is special relativity and the idea that all inertial reference frames are equally valid. If there is a rest frame in which the matrix of these Planck-pixels is isotropic, in other frames they would be length contracted in one direction, and moving diagonally concerning his matrix might impart angle-dependence on how you experience the universe. If an electromagnetic wave with the wavelength of one Planck length was propagating through space, its wavelength could be made even smaller by transforming to a <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/speed-light-frames-reference/">reference frame</a> in which the wavelength is even smaller, so the idea of rest-frame equivalence and a minimal length is inconsistent with one another.</p><p>To add to people&#8217;s confusion, a lot of the Wikipedia articles on the Planck length were corrupted by one person trying to promote his papers by posting them on Wikipedia, making nonsensical claims with &#8220;proof&#8221; that a Planck-wavelength photon will collapse into a black hole (again, Lorentz symmetry explains why this doesn&#8217;t make sense). There is a surreal and amusing dialogue trying to get to the bottom of this, that you can still read in the discussion section of the Planck length Wikipedia page.</p><p>There was an <a href="http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.231103" target="_blank">analysis</a> recently of gamma-ray arrival times from a burst in a distant galaxy. The author considered what effect a discretization of space might have on the travel speed of photons of differing energy (it would no longer necessarily be constant), and found that to explain the observations the length scale of the discretization must be at least 525 smaller than the Planck-length. I&#8217;m not too sure how seriously people in the field take this paper.</p><h2><span class="ez-toc-section" id="How-might-it-be-relevant-to-physics"></span><b>How <i>might </i>it be relevant to physics?</b><span class="ez-toc-section-end"></span></h2><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Lorentz symmetry explains why Planck-pixels don&#8217;t make sense within current physics, however, current physics is incomplete, especially about quantum gravity. Going beyond established physics, is there more of a roll for the Planck length? I&#8217;m a bit out of my element talking about this, so I&#8217;ll be brief.</p><p>The closest beyond-standard theory to the Planck-pixel idea is Loop Quantum Gravity and the concept of quantum foam. At least that is what I thought before <a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/" target="_blank">John Baez</a> corrected me. One of the features of Loop Quantum Gravity is that for something to have a surface area or a volume, it must have at least a certain quantum value of surface area or volume, but will not necessarily have integer values of that quantum, and the quantum is not <i>exactly</i> the square or cube of the Planck length, although it is of that order.</p><p>Another potential model of <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/newideaofquantumfieldtheory-spacetime/">quantum gravity is string theory</a>, based on the dynamics of really small strings. To have these dynamics explain gravity, they are of order Planck length, but not specifically <i>the</i> Planck length. The first iteration of string theory was theorized to explain nuclear physics rather than gravity, and the length scale of the strings was much much larger.</p><p><b>So to summarize, </b>the Planck length is an important order of magnitude when quantum gravity is being discussed, but it is not the fundamental pixel size of the universe.</p><p>Thanks to John Baez and Nima Lashkari for answering some questions about quantum gravity.</p><p><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/a-hand-wavy-discussion-of-the-planck-length-comments.831640/">Click For Forum Comments</a></p><p><br /> <script type="application/ld+json">{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebPage", "headline": "What Planck Length Is and It's Common Misconceptions | Physics Forums", "about": [ {"@type": "Thing","name": "Physics","sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics"}, {"@type": "Thing","name": "misconceptions","sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error"}, {"@type": "Person","name": "Planck","sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck"} ], "mentions": [ {"@type": "Thing","name": "significance","sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance"}, {"@type": "Thing","name": "pixel","sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel"}, {"@type": "Thing","name": "distance","sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_(graph_theory)"}, {"@type": "Thing","name": "constructed","sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction"}, {"@type": "Thing","name": "universe","sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe"}, {"@type": "Thing","name": "quantum gravity","sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics"}, {"@type": "Thing","name": "speed","sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed"} ] }</script></p></div><div class="saboxplugin-wrap" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope itemprop="author"><div class="saboxplugin-tab"><div class="saboxplugin-gravatar"></div><div class="saboxplugin-authorname"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/author/klotza/" class="vcard author" rel="author"><span class="fn">Alex Klotz</span></a></div><div class="saboxplugin-desc"><div itemprop="description"><p>Ph.D. McGill University, 2015</p><div><em class="field field-name-field-position-title field-type-text field-label-hidden">Assistant Professor, California State University, Long Beach</em></div><div><div id="content" class="column" role="main"><article class="node-407116 node node-profile view-mode-full clearfix" data-quickedit-entity-id="node/407116"><div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden" data-quickedit-field-id="node/407116/body/und/full"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>My research is at the interface of biological physics and soft condensed matter. I am interested in using tools provided from biology to answer questions about the physics of soft materials. In the past I have investigated how DNA partitions itself into small spaces and how knots in DNA molecules move and untie. Moving forward, I will be investigating the physics of non-covalent chemical bonds using &#8220;DNA chainmail&#8221; and exploring non-equilibrium thermodynamics and fluid mechanics using protein gels.</p></div></div></div></article></div></div><div></div></div></div><div class="clearfix"></div><div class="saboxplugin-socials "><a title="Linkedin" target="_blank" href="https://ca.linkedin.com/pub/alex-klotz/6a/592/ab0" rel="nofollow noopener" class="saboxplugin-icon-grey"><svg aria-hidden="true" class="sab-linkedin" role="img" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 448 512"><path fill="currentColor" d="M100.3 480H7.4V180.9h92.9V480zM53.8 140.1C24.1 140.1 0 115.5 0 85.8 0 56.1 24.1 32 53.8 32c29.7 0 53.8 24.1 53.8 53.8 0 29.7-24.1 54.3-53.8 54.3zM448 480h-92.7V334.4c0-34.7-.7-79.2-48.3-79.2-48.3 0-55.7 37.7-55.7 76.7V480h-92.8V180.9h89.1v40.8h1.3c12.4-23.5 42.7-48.3 87.9-48.3 94 0 111.3 61.9 111.3 142.3V480z"></path></svg></span></a><a title="Reddit" target="_blank" href="https://www.reddit.com/user/iorgfeflkd" rel="nofollow noopener" class="saboxplugin-icon-grey"><svg aria-hidden="true" class="sab-reddit" role="img" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 512 512"><path fill="currentColor" d="M201.5 305.5c-13.8 0-24.9-11.1-24.9-24.6 0-13.8 11.1-24.9 24.9-24.9 13.6 0 24.6 11.1 24.6 24.9 0 13.6-11.1 24.6-24.6 24.6zM504 256c0 137-111 248-248 248S8 393 8 256 119 8 256 8s248 111 248 248zm-132.3-41.2c-9.4 0-17.7 3.9-23.8 10-22.4-15.5-52.6-25.5-86.1-26.6l17.4-78.3 55.4 12.5c0 13.6 11.1 24.6 24.6 24.6 13.8 0 24.9-11.3 24.9-24.9s-11.1-24.9-24.9-24.9c-9.7 0-18 5.8-22.1 13.8l-61.2-13.6c-3-.8-6.1 1.4-6.9 4.4l-19.1 86.4c-33.2 1.4-63.1 11.3-85.5 26.8-6.1-6.4-14.7-10.2-24.1-10.2-34.9 0-46.3 46.9-14.4 62.8-1.1 5-1.7 10.2-1.7 15.5 0 52.6 59.2 95.2 132 95.2 73.1 0 132.3-42.6 132.3-95.2 0-5.3-.6-10.8-1.9-15.8 31.3-16 19.8-62.5-14.9-62.5zM302.8 331c-18.2 18.2-76.1 17.9-93.6 0-2.2-2.2-6.1-2.2-8.3 0-2.5 2.5-2.5 6.4 0 8.6 22.8 22.8 87.3 22.8 110.2 0 2.5-2.2 2.5-6.1 0-8.6-2.2-2.2-6.1-2.2-8.3 0zm7.7-75c-13.6 0-24.6 11.1-24.6 24.9 0 13.6 11.1 24.6 24.6 24.6 13.8 0 24.9-11.1 24.9-24.6 0-13.8-11-24.9-24.9-24.9z"></path></svg></span></a><a title="Twitter" target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/alexanderrklotz" rel="nofollow noopener" class="saboxplugin-icon-grey"><svg aria-hidden="true" class="sab-twitter" role="img" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 512 512"><path fill="currentColor" d="M459.37 151.716c.325 4.548.325 9.097.325 13.645 0 138.72-105.583 298.558-298.558 298.558-59.452 0-114.68-17.219-161.137-47.106 8.447.974 16.568 1.299 25.34 1.299 49.055 0 94.213-16.568 130.274-44.832-46.132-.975-84.792-31.188-98.112-72.772 6.498.974 12.995 1.624 19.818 1.624 9.421 0 18.843-1.3 27.614-3.573-48.081-9.747-84.143-51.98-84.143-102.985v-1.299c13.969 7.797 30.214 12.67 47.431 13.319-28.264-18.843-46.781-51.005-46.781-87.391 0-19.492 5.197-37.36 14.294-52.954 51.655 63.675 129.3 105.258 216.365 109.807-1.624-7.797-2.599-15.918-2.599-24.04 0-57.828 46.782-104.934 104.934-104.934 30.213 0 57.502 12.67 76.67 33.137 23.715-4.548 46.456-13.32 66.599-25.34-7.798 24.366-24.366 44.833-46.132 57.827 21.117-2.273 41.584-8.122 60.426-16.243-14.292 20.791-32.161 39.308-52.628 54.253z"></path></svg></span></a></div></div></div><style>.lwrp.link-whisper-related-posts{ margin-top: 25px; margin-bottom: 25px; } .lwrp .lwrp-title{ }.lwrp .lwrp-description{ } .lwrp .lwrp-list-container{ } .lwrp .lwrp-list-multi-container{ display: flex; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-double{ width: 48%; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-triple{ width: 32%; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-row-container{ display: flex; justify-content: space-between; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-row-container .lwrp-list-item{ width: calc(33% - 20px); } .lwrp .lwrp-list-item:not(.lwrp-no-posts-message-item){ margin-bottom: 25px; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-item img{ max-width: 100%; height: auto; object-fit: cover; aspect-ratio: 1 / 1; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-item.lwrp-empty-list-item{ background: initial !important; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-item .lwrp-list-link .lwrp-list-link-title-text, .lwrp .lwrp-list-item .lwrp-list-no-posts-message{ }@media screen and (max-width: 480px) { .lwrp.link-whisper-related-posts{ } .lwrp .lwrp-title{ }.lwrp .lwrp-description{ } .lwrp .lwrp-list-multi-container{ flex-direction: column; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-multi-container ul.lwrp-list{ margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-double, .lwrp .lwrp-list-triple{ width: 100%; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-row-container{ justify-content: initial; flex-direction: column; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-row-container .lwrp-list-item{ width: 100%; } .lwrp .lwrp-list-item:not(.lwrp-no-posts-message-item){ } .lwrp .lwrp-list-item .lwrp-list-link .lwrp-list-link-title-text, .lwrp .lwrp-list-item .lwrp-list-no-posts-message{ }; }</style><div id="link-whisper-related-posts-widget" class="link-whisper-related-posts lwrp"><h3 class="lwrp-title">More Related Articles</h3><div class="lwrp-list-container"><div class="lwrp-list-multi-container"><ul class="lwrp-list lwrp-list-double lwrp-list-left"><li class="lwrp-list-item"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/blockworld-foundational-implications-part-5-delayed-choice-no-counterfactual-definiteness/" class="lwrp-list-link"><span class="lwrp-list-link-title-text">Blockworld and its Foundational Implications: Delayed Choice and No Counterfactual Definiteness</span></a></li><li class="lwrp-list-item"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/does-the-block-universe-of-physics-mean-time-is-an-illusion/" class="lwrp-list-link"><span class="lwrp-list-link-title-text">Does the Block Universe of Physics Mean Time is an Illusion?</span></a></li><li class="lwrp-list-item"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/blockworld-foundational-implications-part-3-general-relativity-big-bang/" class="lwrp-list-link"><span class="lwrp-list-link-title-text">Blockworld and its Foundational Implications: General Relativity and the Big Bang</span></a></li></ul><ul class="lwrp-list lwrp-list-double lwrp-list-right"><li class="lwrp-list-item"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/a-principle-explanation-of-the-mysteries-of-modern-physics/" class="lwrp-list-link"><span class="lwrp-list-link-title-text">A Principle Explanation of the &#8220;Mysteries&#8221; of Modern Physics</span></a></li><li class="lwrp-list-item"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/struggles-continuum-part-1/" class="lwrp-list-link"><span class="lwrp-list-link-title-text">Struggles With the Continuum: Is Spacetime Really a Continuum?</span></a></li><li class="lwrp-list-item"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-mechanics-difficult/" class="lwrp-list-link"><span class="lwrp-list-link-title-text">Why Is Quantum Mechanics So Difficult?</span></a></li></ul></div></div></div></div><footer class="entry-footer"><span class="blog-tags minor-meta"><strong>Tags:</strong><span> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/gravity/" rel="tag">gravity</a>, <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/quantum-physics/" rel="tag">quantum physics</a></span></span><div class='av-social-sharing-box av-social-sharing-box-default av-social-sharing-box-fullwidth'><div class="av-share-box"><h5 class='av-share-link-description av-no-toc '>Share this entry</h5><ul class="av-share-box-list noLightbox"><li class='av-share-link av-social-link-facebook' ><a target="_blank" aria-label="Share on Facebook" href='https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/&#038;t=What%20Planck%20Length%20Is%20and%20It%E2%80%99s%20Common%20Misconceptions' aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' title='' data-avia-related-tooltip='Share on Facebook' rel="noopener"><span class='avia_hidden_link_text'>Share on Facebook</span></a></li><li class='av-share-link av-social-link-twitter' ><a target="_blank" aria-label="Share on X" href='https://twitter.com/share?text=What%20Planck%20Length%20Is%20and%20It%E2%80%99s%20Common%20Misconceptions&#038;url=https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/?p=4930' aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' title='' data-avia-related-tooltip='Share on X' rel="noopener"><span class='avia_hidden_link_text'>Share on X</span></a></li><li class='av-share-link av-social-link-whatsapp' ><a target="_blank" aria-label="Share on WhatsApp" href='https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/' aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' title='' data-avia-related-tooltip='Share on WhatsApp' rel="noopener"><span class='avia_hidden_link_text'>Share on WhatsApp</span></a></li><li class='av-share-link av-social-link-linkedin' ><a target="_blank" aria-label="Share on LinkedIn" href='https://linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&#038;title=What%20Planck%20Length%20Is%20and%20It%E2%80%99s%20Common%20Misconceptions&#038;url=https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/' aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' title='' data-avia-related-tooltip='Share on LinkedIn' rel="noopener"><span class='avia_hidden_link_text'>Share on LinkedIn</span></a></li><li class='av-share-link av-social-link-reddit' ><a target="_blank" aria-label="Share on Reddit" href='https://reddit.com/submit?url=https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/&#038;title=What%20Planck%20Length%20Is%20and%20It%E2%80%99s%20Common%20Misconceptions' aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' title='' data-avia-related-tooltip='Share on Reddit' rel="noopener"><span class='avia_hidden_link_text'>Share on Reddit</span></a></li><li class='av-share-link av-social-link-mail' ><a aria-label="Share by Mail" href='mailto:?subject=What%20Planck%20Length%20Is%20and%20It%E2%80%99s%20Common%20Misconceptions&#038;body=https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/' aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' title='' data-avia-related-tooltip='Share by Mail'><span class='avia_hidden_link_text'>Share by Mail</span></a></li></ul></div></div></footer><div class='post_delimiter'></div></div><div class="post_author_timeline"></div><span class='hidden'> <span class='av-structured-data' itemprop="image" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/ImageObject" > <span itemprop='url'>https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/planck.png</span> <span itemprop='height'>135</span> <span itemprop='width'>240</span> </span> <span class='av-structured-data' itemprop="publisher" itemtype="https://schema.org/Organization" itemscope="itemscope" > <span itemprop='name'>Alex Klotz</span> <span itemprop='logo' itemscope itemtype='https://schema.org/ImageObject'> <span itemprop='url'>https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Physics_Forums_Insights_logo.png</span> </span> </span><span class='av-structured-data' itemprop="author" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/Person" ><span itemprop='name'>Alex Klotz</span></span><span class='av-structured-data' itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2015-09-09T14:00:53-05:00" >2015-09-09 14:00:53</span><span class='av-structured-data' itemprop="dateModified" itemtype="https://schema.org/dateModified" >2025-01-26 09:16:48</span><span class='av-structured-data' itemprop="mainEntityOfPage" itemtype="https://schema.org/mainEntityOfPage" ><span itemprop='name'>What Planck Length Is and It&#8217;s Common Misconceptions</span></span></span></article><div class='single-big'></div><div class='related_posts clearfix av-related-style-full'><h5 class="related_title">You might also like</h5><div class="related_entries_container"><div class='av_one_half no_margin alpha relThumb relThumb1 relThumbOdd post-format-standard related_column'><a href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wigners-friend/' class='relThumWrap noLightbox' title='The Quantum Mystery of Wigner&#8217;s Friend'><span class='related_image_wrap' ><img data-lazyloaded="1" src="" loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/quantum_eraser-180x135.png" class="wp-image-22768 avia-img-lazy-loading-22768 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="Quantum Eraser" title="quantum_eraser" decoding="async" /><noscript><img loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/quantum_eraser-180x135.png" class="wp-image-22768 avia-img-lazy-loading-22768 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="Quantum Eraser" title="quantum_eraser" decoding="async" /></noscript><span class='related-format-icon '><span class='related-format-icon-inner' aria-hidden='true' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello'></span></span></span><strong class="av-related-title">The Quantum Mystery of Wigner&#8217;s Friend</strong></a></div><div class='av_one_half no_margin relThumb relThumb2 relThumbEven post-format-standard related_column'><a href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/is-pressure-a-source-of-gravity/' class='relThumWrap noLightbox' title='Is Pressure A Source Of Gravity?'><span class='related_image_wrap' ><img data-lazyloaded="1" src="" loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/is_pressure_a_source_of_gravity-180x135.png" class="wp-image-30007 avia-img-lazy-loading-30007 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="pressure is a source of gravity" title="is_pressure_a_source_of_gravity" decoding="async" /><noscript><img loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/is_pressure_a_source_of_gravity-180x135.png" class="wp-image-30007 avia-img-lazy-loading-30007 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="pressure is a source of gravity" title="is_pressure_a_source_of_gravity" decoding="async" /></noscript><span class='related-format-icon '><span class='related-format-icon-inner' aria-hidden='true' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello'></span></span></span><strong class="av-related-title">Is Pressure A Source Of Gravity?</strong></a></div><div class='av_one_half no_margin relThumb relThumb3 relThumbOdd post-format-standard related_column'><a href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/understanding-general-relativity-view-gravity-earth/' class='relThumWrap noLightbox' title='Understanding the General Relativity View of Gravity on Earth'><span class='related_image_wrap' ><img data-lazyloaded="1" src="" loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/gravity-180x135.png" class="wp-image-4010 avia-img-lazy-loading-4010 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="gravity" title="gravity" decoding="async" /><noscript><img loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/gravity-180x135.png" class="wp-image-4010 avia-img-lazy-loading-4010 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="gravity" title="gravity" decoding="async" /></noscript><span class='related-format-icon '><span class='related-format-icon-inner' aria-hidden='true' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello'></span></span></span><strong class="av-related-title">Understanding the General Relativity View of Gravity on Earth</strong></a></div><div class='av_one_half no_margin relThumb relThumb4 relThumbEven post-format-standard related_column'><a href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/either-the-sun-is-getting-smaller-or-gravity-is-getting-weaker/' class='relThumWrap noLightbox' title='Either the Sun Is Getting Smaller or Gravity Is Getting Weaker'><span class='related_image_wrap' ><img data-lazyloaded="1" src="" loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/sun_getting_smaller-180x135.png" class="wp-image-18902 avia-img-lazy-loading-18902 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="sun_getting_smaller" title="sun_getting_smaller" decoding="async" /><noscript><img loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/sun_getting_smaller-180x135.png" class="wp-image-18902 avia-img-lazy-loading-18902 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="sun_getting_smaller" title="sun_getting_smaller" decoding="async" /></noscript><span class='related-format-icon '><span class='related-format-icon-inner' aria-hidden='true' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello'></span></span></span><strong class="av-related-title">Either the Sun Is Getting Smaller or Gravity Is Getting Weaker</strong></a></div><div class='av_one_half no_margin relThumb relThumb5 relThumbOdd post-format-standard related_column'><a href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/interview-with-astrophysicist-adam-becker/' class='relThumWrap noLightbox' title='Interview with Astrophysicist Adam Becker'><span class='related_image_wrap' ><img data-lazyloaded="1" src="" loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/adam_becker-180x135.png" class="wp-image-18760 avia-img-lazy-loading-18760 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="adam_becker" title="adam_becker" decoding="async" /><noscript><img loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/adam_becker-180x135.png" class="wp-image-18760 avia-img-lazy-loading-18760 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="adam_becker" title="adam_becker" decoding="async" /></noscript><span class='related-format-icon '><span class='related-format-icon-inner' aria-hidden='true' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello'></span></span></span><strong class="av-related-title">Interview with Astrophysicist Adam Becker</strong></a></div><div class='av_one_half no_margin omega relThumb relThumb6 relThumbEven post-format-standard related_column'><a href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-physics-via-quantum-tomography-a-new-approach-to-quantum-mechanics/' class='relThumWrap noLightbox' title='Quantum Physics via Quantum Tomography: A New Approach to Quantum Mechanics'><span class='related_image_wrap' ><img data-lazyloaded="1" src="" loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/quantum-mechanics-new-approach-180x135.png" class="wp-image-40043 avia-img-lazy-loading-40043 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="quantum mechanics new approach" title="quantum-mechanics-new-approach" decoding="async" /><noscript><img loading="lazy" width="180" height="135" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/quantum-mechanics-new-approach-180x135.png" class="wp-image-40043 avia-img-lazy-loading-40043 attachment-square size-square wp-post-image" alt="quantum mechanics new approach" title="quantum-mechanics-new-approach" decoding="async" /></noscript><span class='related-format-icon '><span class='related-format-icon-inner' aria-hidden='true' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello'></span></span></span><strong class="av-related-title">Quantum Physics via Quantum Tomography: A New Approach to Quantum Mechanics</strong></a></div></div></div><div class='comment-entry post-entry'><div class='comment_meta_container'><div class='side-container-comment'><div class='side-container-comment-inner'> <span class='comment-count'>29</span> <span class='comment-text'>replies</span> <span class='center-border center-border-left'></span> <span class='center-border center-border-right'></span></div></div></div><div class='comment_container'><ol class="commentlist" id="comments"><li class="comment even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2763"><div id="comment-2763"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">Benwade</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2763"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;I do understand the argument that the Planck length is not fundamental cause there is quite some choice left when it comes to defining such a length. What I don&#8217;t understand is how you can take arguments from the continuous paradigm (which is theories in terms of differential equations on real numbers) and argue about the invalidity of ideas from the discrete paradigm (universe being pixelated, things moving at the speed of light one unit at a time, &#8230;). From my point of view this chain of argument is invalid, exactly because the continuous paradigm breaks down around the scale when spacetime supposedly becomes discrete.</p><p>As for myself I&#8217;m taking serious the idea, that all our established physical theories (including GR and QM) are effective theories in the sense, that they don&#8217;t express anything fundamental about the ultimate nature of reality, but instead are approximations to the inner workings of reality in the discrete paradigm. Any thoughts?&#8221;<br /> Hi, I am a complete physics idiot, but I read your posting. Are you saying that the equations the author of this article uses break down/or do not apply in this situation? I would be interested in hearing more about this. Thank you.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-nugatory odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2762"><div id="comment-2762"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">Nugatory</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2762"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8221;<br /> As for myself I&#8217;m taking serious the idea, that all our established physical theories (including GR and QM) are effective theories in the sense, that they don&#8217;t express anything fundamental about the ultimate nature of reality, but instead are approximations to the inner workings of reality in the discrete paradigm. Any thoughts?&#8221;</p><p>Could be&#8230; There&#8217;s no way of disproving the possibility. But absent a candidate theory based on this discrete paradigm, there&#8217;s also nothing to discuss under the Physics Forums rules.</p><p>This thread is closed. As always, PM me or another mentor if you have more to add and want it reopened.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-ken-g even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2761"><div id="comment-2761"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">Ken G</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2761"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>If there is anything that the history of physics has shown us, it is that we don&#8217;t shoot with high percentage when we try to anticipate the behavior in fundamentally new regimes. So I think what we really need are experiments that are capable of looking for evidence of discreteness. Until we have that, any theory will be pretty much guessing, in my opinion. But I do agree that all theories should be regarded as effective theories until demonstrated otherwise, with attention to the fact that they are impossible to demonstrate otherwise!</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2760"><div id="comment-2760"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">kalimaa</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2760"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>I do understand the argument that the Planck length is not fundamental cause there is quite some choice left when it comes to defining such a length. What I don&#8217;t understand is how you can take arguments from the continuous paradigm (which is theories in terms of differential equations on real numbers) and argue about the invalidity of ideas from the discrete paradigm (universe being pixelated, things moving at the speed of light one unit at a time, &#8230;). From my point of view this chain of argument is invalid, exactly because the continuous paradigm breaks down around the scale when spacetime supposedly becomes discrete.</p><p>As for myself I&#8217;m taking serious the idea, that all our established physical theories (including GR and QM) are effective theories in the sense, that they don&#8217;t express anything fundamental about the ultimate nature of reality, but instead are approximations to the inner workings of reality in the discrete paradigm. Any thoughts?</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2759"><div id="comment-2759"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">Benwade</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2759"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;I would probably go the other way&#8230; Obviously if your theory implies that something is turning into a black hole according to one observer, but is not turning into a black hole according to another observer, then your theory has been essentially discounted by reductio ab adsurdam.</p><p>I believe the problem is with the premise than an object&#8217;s mass increases as it approaches the speed of light. An object&#8217;s MOMENTUM increases as [tex]p = frac{m}{sqrt{1 &#8211; (frac v c)^2}}v[/tex]; I feel that has been pretty well reasoned out. But the claim that an object&#8217;s actual mass has increased (and hence it&#8217;s capacitiy to pull other objects toward it by gravity) is NOT well supported by any reasoning I&#8217;m familiar with. I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;ve seen this point made explicitly in some texts, but at 43, I&#8217;m well into my fifth decade of memory failure.&#8221;</p><p>I (a complete physics idiot) actually posted a question that made the assumption that objects gained mass as they approached the speed of light. I was soon set right. Thank you for your explication, hand-wavey or not, of the Planck length, because I was a victim of the (erroneous) Planck-length = pixel size fiction as well.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-mfb odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2758"><div id="comment-2758"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">mfb</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2758"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>A &#8220;classical&#8221; 4D planck volume of one planck length in spatial directions and one planck time in time direction would be crossed by light diagonally, as light moves by one planck length per planck time. A transformed planck volume with a shorter distance but a longer time loses this property.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-ken-g even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2757"><div id="comment-2757"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">Ken G</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2757"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not a fan of this theory, but there is an idea that spacetime is divided into pre-existing irregular grains of 1 Planck volume. This is called spacetime &#8220;glass&#8221; quantization, as opposed to &#8220;crystal&#8221; quantization should the grains be regular. The glassy properties of the quantization help it escape the usual problems with Lorentz invariance.&#8221;<br /> Thank you for that insight. I would indeed think that if one wishes to regard spacetime as in some sense &#8220;coarse-grained&#8221; at the Planck scale, one must use a version of coarse-graining that is Lorentz invariant, meaning that the grains are defined by their volume but not their shape. This is hardly unprecedented&#8211; the same thing is done to &#8220;coarse grain&#8221; phase space for statistical mechanical calculations, since there is no need to use a cubic tiling of &#8220;equal lengths&#8221; of distance and momentum when deciding how to count states. I don&#8217;t mean to be unresponsive to the comment<br /> [quote=mfb] To make it worse, if you transform pixels, the relation between (dilated) Planck time and (contracted in one dimension) distance does not hold any more.[/quote]<br /> I simply didn&#8217;t understand it. It was my impression that volumes in spacetime would be Lorentz invariant, but perhaps there is something I am missing.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2756"><div id="comment-2756"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">haael</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2756"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;On the topic of the &#8220;Planck pixel,&#8221; perhaps this overall idea is being rejected too sweepingly. Presumably, the &#8220;pixels&#8221; would be in 4-D spacetime, not 3-D space, and volumes in 4-D spacetime are invariant, are they not? So I would imagine that if someone wanted to formulate a theory that said spacetime itself was parceled into &#8220;Planck pixels&#8221;, they would play the usual game that in different reference frames, meaning along different world lines, the &#8220;pixels&#8221; would distort, but they&#8217;d still tile the spacetime in the same way. Yes that means objects don&#8217;t &#8220;move one Planck length every Planck time&#8221;, but that&#8217;s obvious&#8211; any such object would be perceived as moving at the speed of light. Instead, a &#8220;Planck pixel&#8221; idea could say that spacetime is discretely tiled, in the sense that world lines cannot be defined with finer precision than that&#8211; similar to the way quantum mechanics &#8220;tiles&#8221; phase space in statistical mechanics.</p><p>Also, if we think of the &#8220;Planck pixels&#8221; as being in spacetime, their 1-D version also takes on some kind of meaning. If we choose c=1, it is often said that all objects seem to &#8220;move through&#8221; spacetime at a rate of 1 unit of spacetime displacement per unit of coordinate time. In that sense, an object could appear to move one Planck length each Planck time, and not seem to move at the speed of light, if the &#8220;Planck length&#8221; was interpreted broadly as also existing in the time dimension. It seems to me that could all be formulated in an invariant way, though its usefulness and/or ramifications I could not say. Most likely it would be some kind of &#8220;ultraviolet cutoff&#8221; to doing path integrals in spacetime, or some such thing.&#8221;<br /> I&#8217;m not a fan of this theory, but there is an idea that spacetime is divided into pre-existing irregular grains of 1 Planck volume. This is called spacetime &#8220;glass&#8221; quantization, as opposed to &#8220;crystal&#8221; quantization should the grains be regular. The glassy properties of the quantization help it escape the usual problems with Lorentz invariance.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2755"><div id="comment-2755"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">OCR</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2755"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;To see how the calculation works, go here:<br /> [URL]http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/lengths.html#planck_length[/URL]</p><p>[RIGHT]Last edited by a moderator: Yesterday at 1:24 PM[/RIGHT]<br /> &#8221;</p><p>&#8220;[URL]http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/lengths.html#planck_length[/URL]</p><p>Fixed that for you&#8230;[COLOR=black]..[/COLOR] :oldsmile:&#8221;</p><p>Aww, gee&#8230; thanks for the help&#8230;[COLOR=black].:oldeyes:..[/COLOR]<br /> &#8220;Last edited by a moderator: Yesterday at 1:24 PM&#8221;<br /> [COLOR=black]&#8221;..&#8221;&#8230;[/COLOR]</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-bigyellowhat odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2754"><div id="comment-2754"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">BiGyElLoWhAt</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2754"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;Hint: compare the user name with the url.<br /> [SIZE=2]Sorry, could not resist.[/SIZE]&#8221;<br /> Hahahaha! Observation OP!</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-mfb even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2753"><div id="comment-2753"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">mfb</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2753"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;That&#8217;s not how I interpreted that link. It seems to me what the author is saying [&#8230;]&#8221;Hint: compare the user name with the url.<br /> [size=2]Sorry, could not resist.[/size]</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-bigyellowhat odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2752"><div id="comment-2752"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">BiGyElLoWhAt</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2752"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8221; ..it takes approximately enough energy to create a black hole whose Schwarzschild radius is&#8230; the Planck length!&#8230; &#8221;</p><p>That&#8217;s not how I interpreted that link. It seems to me what the author is saying is that if you try to measure a black hole of the plank scale within the accuracy of a radius, then there is enough uncertainty in the momentum that there [i]could exist[/i] another black hole due to the corresponding energy uncertainty of the system (differing by a factor of v/2, classically)</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-klotza bypostauthor even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2751"><div id="comment-2751"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">klotza</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2751"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;Nice post! Another way to think about the Planck length is that if you try to measure the position of an object to within in accuracy of the Planck length, it takes approximately enough energy to create a black hole whose Schwarzschild radius is&#8230; the Planck length! So, one can argue that it&#8217;s impossible to measure distances shorter than this &#8211; though the argument is a bit hand-wavy.</p><p>To see how the calculation works, go here:</p><p>[URL]http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/lengths.html#planck_length[/URL]&#8221;</p><p>Hand-wavy is the name of the game here! Thanks for the link, and for the advice.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2750"><div id="comment-2750"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">OCR</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2750"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;To see how the calculation works, go here:&#8221;</p><p>[URL]http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/lengths.html#planck_length[/URL]</p><p>Fixed that for you&#8230;[COLOR=black]..[/COLOR] :oldsmile:</p><p>BTW, I&#8217;ve been there many, many times&#8230;[COLOR=black]&#8230;:oldwink:&#8230;[/COLOR]</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-bigyellowhat even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2749"><div id="comment-2749"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">BiGyElLoWhAt</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2749"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;Eisberg?&#8221;<br /> Indeed it is.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2748"><div id="comment-2748"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">JDoolin</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2748"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;[USER=268035]@JDoolin[/USER]: That neutrino would need an incredible energy. Neglecting factors of 2, we have ##m_nu m_P = 3 eV cdot E_nu## where the lightest neutrino mass is probably of the order of 1 meV.&#8221;</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;m doing this right, but I just googled &#8220;energy of a neutrino collision&#8221; and found mention of an apparent 5000-10,000 TeV neutrino.</p><p>at [URL]http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/physics/fastest-neutrino-ever-detected-has-1000x-the-energy-of-the-lhc/[/URL]</p><p>So with a bit of estimation, assuming (1) the rest mass energy of a neutrino is about equal to 1 meV, (2) oncoming blueshift is approximately equal to the lorentz contraction factor here. (3) [itex]gamma approx frac{10 times 10^{12} }{1times 10^{-3}}=10^{16}[/itex]</p><p>Yes, if we started with visible light, at around [itex]10^{-7}[/itex] meters, it would be blueshifted to a wavelength around [itex]10^{-23}[/itex] meters; a trillion times longer than the Planck Length.</p><p>To do what I imagined and have a neutrino observer see my ordinary light-bulb-photon have a wavelength at the Planck Length, it would have to be a Yotta-eV neutrino. So yes, as you say, &#8220;an incredible energy&#8221;</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-bigyellowhat even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2747"><div id="comment-2747"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">BiGyElLoWhAt</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2747"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>Eisberg?</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-bigyellowhat odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2746"><div id="comment-2746"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">BiGyElLoWhAt</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2746"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>I&#8217;m not going to argue within the last 30 years. I thinknthe book was &#8217;56 or there abouts. Fundamentals of modern physics, and it was by a german author, I&#8217;ll try to dig it up here sometime soon.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-mfb even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2745"><div id="comment-2745"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">mfb</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2745"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;Mass increasing is definitely included in some texts, so you&#8217;re not losing that memory just yet! My first text that I read on SR had a thought experiment with 2 bouncing balls and 2 observers, and used it to demonstrate relativistic mass.&#8221;Try to find any publication of the last 30 years using that concept.</p><p>&#8220;and volumes in 4-D spacetime are invariant, are they not?&#8221;You would still get different pixels in each frame. To make it worse, if you transform pixels, the relation between (dilated) Planck time and (contracted in one dimension) distance does not hold any more.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-ken-g odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2744"><div id="comment-2744"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">Ken G</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2744"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>On the topic of the &#8220;Planck pixel,&#8221; perhaps this overall idea is being rejected too sweepingly. Presumably, the &#8220;pixels&#8221; would be in 4-D spacetime, not 3-D space, and volumes in 4-D spacetime are invariant, are they not? So I would imagine that if someone wanted to formulate a theory that said spacetime itself was parceled into &#8220;Planck pixels&#8221;, they would play the usual game that in different reference frames, meaning along different world lines, the &#8220;pixels&#8221; would distort, but they&#8217;d still tile the spacetime in the same way. Yes that means objects don&#8217;t &#8220;move one Planck length every Planck time&#8221;, but that&#8217;s obvious&#8211; any such object would be perceived as moving at the speed of light. Instead, a &#8220;Planck pixel&#8221; idea could say that spacetime is discretely tiled, in the sense that world lines cannot be defined with finer precision than that&#8211; similar to the way quantum mechanics &#8220;tiles&#8221; phase space in statistical mechanics.</p><p>Also, if we think of the &#8220;Planck pixels&#8221; as being in spacetime, their 1-D version also takes on some kind of meaning. If we choose c=1, it is often said that all objects seem to &#8220;move through&#8221; spacetime at a rate of 1 unit of spacetime displacement per unit of coordinate time. In that sense, an object could appear to move one Planck length each Planck time, and not seem to move at the speed of light, if the &#8220;Planck length&#8221; was interpreted broadly as also existing in the time dimension. It seems to me that could all be formulated in an invariant way, though its usefulness and/or ramifications I could not say. Most likely it would be some kind of &#8220;ultraviolet cutoff&#8221; to doing path integrals in spacetime, or some such thing.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-bigyellowhat even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2743"><div id="comment-2743"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">BiGyElLoWhAt</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2743"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>Mass increasing is definitely included in some texts, so you&#8217;re not losing that memory just yet! My first text that I read on SR had a thought experiment with 2 bouncing balls and 2 observers, and used it to demonstrate relativistic mass.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-mfb odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2742"><div id="comment-2742"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">mfb</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2742"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>The use of relativistic mass is purely historic (and in bad popular science).</p><p>General relativity predicts that objects can collapse under certain conditions, usually described as sufficient energy density in their rest-frame. GR does not predict the collapse of something just because it moves at high speed, independent of the reference frame chosen to describe the system.</p><p>[USER=268035]@JDoolin[/USER]: That neutrino would need an incredible energy. Neglecting factors of 2, we have ##m_nu m_P = 3 eV cdot E_nu## where the lightest neutrino mass is probably of the order of 1 meV.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2741"><div id="comment-2741"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">JDoolin</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2741"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>&#8220;I can&#8217;t remember what it&#8217;s called, even enough to search it via google, but there is actually a solution to this problem. The example provided on the wiki page that I remember used larger masses, as opposed to photons. Basically it says that as you approach the speed of light and pass a large mass, it can&#8217;t turn into a black hole due to your reference frame. I really wish I could remember what it was called.</p><p>If I remember correctly (I very well could not), it has to do something with the geodesics of spacetime warping under the energy tensor from the relative speed of you and the mass you&#8217;re observing. Now, this doesn&#8217;t necessarily apply when we&#8217;re talking photons. Darn my memory, and I&#8217;m only 23! I guess it&#8217;s all downhill from here =/&#8221;</p><p>I would probably go the other way&#8230; Obviously if your theory implies that something is turning into a black hole according to one observer, but is not turning into a black hole according to another observer, then your theory has been essentially discounted by reductio ab adsurdam.</p><p>I believe the problem is with the premise than an object&#8217;s mass increases as it approaches the speed of light. An object&#8217;s MOMENTUM increases as [tex]p = frac{m}{sqrt{1 &#8211; (frac v c)^2}}v[/tex]; I feel that has been pretty well reasoned out. But the claim that an object&#8217;s actual mass has increased (and hence it&#8217;s capacitiy to pull other objects toward it by gravity) is NOT well supported by any reasoning I&#8217;m familiar with. I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;ve seen this point made explicitly in some texts, but at 43, I&#8217;m well into my fifth decade of memory failure.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-2740"><div id="comment-2740"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">JDoolin</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2740"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>Have you considered the idea of extremely high blueshift reference frames?</p><p>I have a common ordinary lightbulb producing wavelengths of light between 400 to 700 nanometers. However, from the point-of-view of a passing neutrino; with it&#8217;s velocity negligibly below the speed of light, that same light bulb could be producing light with wavelengths less than the Planck Length.</p><p>So, perhaps the light from my lightbulb is producing a black hole in some frames of reference, but producing ordinary visible light in other frames of reference?</p><p>I&#8217;m highlighting the issue with a rather extreme case&#8211;the observer on the neutrino. Some people may argue that neutrino observers are not valid, because they have no ears, no eyes, and no souls, and that their reference frame doesn&#8217;t exist. But consider if we took a light of wavelength JUST OVER the planck length, and had one observer fly away from it, while another flew toward it. The observer flying toward it would find that the wavelength of the photon was smaller than the Schwarzschild radius of the photon&#8217;s energy. But the observer flying away would find that the wavelength of the same photon was larger than the Schwarzschild radius of the photon&#8217;s energy.</p><p>Well, I guess my point is that radiant energy&#8211; E = hf = hc/lambda, is simply not the same as mass energy E=mc^2.</p><p>The mass has its own reference frame independent of everything else in the universe&#8211;mass is an intrinsic property. Also, being a black hole, or NOT being a black hole is an intrinsic feature of matter. The light only has a reference frame in reference to its source and its observer, and frequency and wavelength of light are extrinsic features&#8211;observer dependent&#8230; Relatively moving observers are going to measure different wavelengths of the same light, so if this idea is accurate, they would also disagree on whether the light spontaneously collapsed into a black hole.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment byuser comment-author-jtbell even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-2739"><div id="comment-2739"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">jtbell</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-2739"> <time > May 19, 2016 at 3:58 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>[quote]There is a misconception that the universe is fundamentally divided into Planck-sized pixels, that nothing can be smaller than the Planck length, that things move through space by progressing one Planck length every Planck time. Judging by the ultimate source, [URL=&#8217;http://i.imgur.com/92cqoCk.png&#8217;]a cursory search of reddit questions[/URL], the misconception is fairly common.[/quote]</p><p>This misconception turns up a lot here on PF, too:</p><p>[URL]https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=%22planck+length%22+site:physicsforums.com[/URL]</p><p>I&#8217;m glad to have a good article now to point people to, when it comes up again. Thanks! :biggrin:</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-713"><div id="comment-713"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">John Baez</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-713"> <time > September 14, 2015 at 7:11 am </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>Nice post!&nbsp; Another way to think about the Planck length is that if you try to measure the position of an object to within in accuracy of the Planck length, it takes approximately enough energy to create a black hole whose Schwarzschild radius is&#8230; the Planck length!&nbsp; So, one can argue that it&#039;s impossible to measure distances shorter than this &#8211; though the argument is a bit hand-wavy.&nbsp; To see how the calculation works, go here:<a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/lengths.html#planck_length" rel="nofollow ugc">http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/lengths.html#planck_length</a></p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-693"><div id="comment-693"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">Tyler Witte</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-693"> <time > September 10, 2015 at 3:02 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>I can&#039;t remember what it&#039;s called, even enough to search it via google, but there is actually a solution to this problem. The example provided on the wiki page that I remember used larger masses, as opposed to photons. Basically it says that as you approach the speed of light and pass a large mass, it can&#039;t turn into a black hole due to your reference frame. I really wish I could remember what it was called. If I remember correctly (I very well could not), it has to do something with the geodesics of spacetime warping under the energy tensor from the relative speed of you and the mass you&#039;re observing. Now, this doesn&#039;t necessarily apply when we&#039;re talking photons. Darn my memory, and I&#039;m only 23! I guess it&#039;s all downhill from here =/</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1" id="li-comment-692"><div id="comment-692"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">JDoolin</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-692"> <time > September 10, 2015 at 2:23 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>Ah, upon rereading the article, I see that you really pretty much hit on my issues in my last post.</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li><li class="comment even thread-even depth-1" id="li-comment-689"><div id="comment-689"><article><div class="gravatar"></div><div class='comment_content'><header class="comment-header" aria-label="Comment Info" > <cite class="author_name heading"><cite class="comment_author_name">Greg Bernhardt</cite></cite> <span class="says">says:</span><div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#comment-689"> <time > September 9, 2015 at 4:23 pm </time> </a></div></header><div class='comment_text entry-content-wrapper clearfix' ><p>Nice work!</p> <a rel="nofollow" class="comment-reply-login" href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">Log in to Reply</a></div></div></article></div></li></ol></div><div class="comment_container"><h3 class='miniheading '>Leave a Reply</h3><span class="minitext">Want to join the discussion?<br />Feel free to contribute!</span><div id="respond" class="comment-respond"><h3 id="reply-title" class="comment-reply-title">Leave a Reply <small><a rel="nofollow" id="cancel-comment-reply-link" href="/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/#respond" style="display:none;">Cancel reply</a></small></h3><p class="must-log-in">You must be <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Finsights%2Fhand-wavy-discussion-planck-length%2F">logged in</a> to post a comment.</p></div></div></div></main><aside class='sidebar sidebar_right smartphones_sidebar_active alpha units' aria-label="Sidebar" role="complementary" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/WPSideBar" ><div class="inner_sidebar extralight-border"><section id="custom_html-2" class="widget_text widget clearfix widget_custom_html"><div class="textwidget custom-html-widget"><h2 class="widgettitle">Trending Articles</h2><ul class="wpp-list wpp-sunset"><li class="" style="--item-position: 1;--total-items: 10"><div class="item-position"></div><div class="item-data"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/valentines-reflections-mathematical-matters-of-the-heart/" class="wpp-post-title" target="_self">Valentine’s Reflections: Mathematical Matters of the Heart</a></div></li><li class="" style="--item-position: 2;--total-items: 10"><div class="item-position"></div><div class="item-data"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-is-a-tensor/" class="wpp-post-title" target="_self">What Is a Tensor? The mathematical point of view.</a></div></li><li class="current" style="--item-position: 3;--total-items: 10"><div class="item-position"></div><div class="item-data"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/hand-wavy-discussion-planck-length/" class="wpp-post-title" target="_self">What Planck Length Is and It’s Common Misconceptions</a></div></li><li class="" style="--item-position: 4;--total-items: 10"><div class="item-position"></div><div class="item-data"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/vacuum-fluctuation-myth/" class="wpp-post-title" target="_self">Explore The Vacuum Fluctuation Myth in Quantum Theory</a></div></li><li class="" style="--item-position: 5;--total-items: 10"><div class="item-position"></div><div class="item-data"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/can-see-atom/" class="wpp-post-title" target="_self">Can We See an Atom?</a></div></li><li class="" style="--item-position: 6;--total-items: 10"><div class="item-position"></div><div class="item-data"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/all-about-earths-gravity/" class="wpp-post-title" target="_self">Learn All About Earth’s Gravity</a></div></li><li class="" style="--item-position: 7;--total-items: 10"><div class="item-position"></div><div class="item-data"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/sins-physics-didactics/" class="wpp-post-title" target="_self">Explore Some Sins in Physics Didactics</a></div></li><li class="" style="--item-position: 8;--total-items: 10"><div class="item-position"></div><div class="item-data"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/misconceptions-virtual-particles/" class="wpp-post-title" target="_self">Top Misconceptions about Virtual Particles</a></div></li><li class="" style="--item-position: 9;--total-items: 10"><div class="item-position"></div><div class="item-data"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/why-chatgpt-is-not-reliable/" class="wpp-post-title" target="_self">Why ChatGPT AI Is Not Reliable</a></div></li><li class="" style="--item-position: 10;--total-items: 10"><div class="item-position"></div><div class="item-data"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/the-7-basic-rules-of-quantum-mechanics/" class="wpp-post-title" target="_self">The 7 Basic Rules of Quantum Mechanics</a></div></li></ul></div><span class="seperator extralight-border"></span></section><section id="nav_menu-3" class="widget clearfix widget_nav_menu"><h3 class="widgettitle">Physics Forums</h3><div class="menu-sidebar-forums-container"><ul id="menu-sidebar-forums" class="menu"><li id="menu-item-26724" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-26724"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/classical-physics.61/">Classical Physics</a></li><li id="menu-item-26725" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-26725"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/atomic-and-condensed-matter.64/">Atomic and Condensed Matter</a></li><li id="menu-item-26726" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-26726"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/quantum-physics.62/">Quantum Physics</a></li><li id="menu-item-26727" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-26727"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/special-and-general-relativity.70/">Special and General Relativity</a></li><li id="menu-item-26728" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-26728"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/beyond-the-standard-model.66/">Beyond the Standard Model</a></li><li id="menu-item-26729" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-26729"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/high-energy-nuclear-particle-physics.65/">High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics</a></li><li id="menu-item-26731" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-26731"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/astronomy-and-astrophysics.71/">Astronomy and Astrophysics</a></li><li id="menu-item-26732" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-26732"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/cosmology.69/">Cosmology</a></li><li id="menu-item-26730" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-26730"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/other-physics-topics.111/">Other Physics Topics</a></li></ul></div><span class="seperator extralight-border"></span></section><section id="text-4" class="widget clearfix widget_text"><h3 class="widgettitle">Receive Insights Articles to Your Inbox</h3><div class="textwidget"><form style="border:0px solid #ccc;text-align:left;" action="https://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify" method="post" target="popupwindow" onsubmit="window.open('https://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=PhysicsForumsInsights', 'popupwindow', 'scrollbars=yes,width=550,height=520');return true"><p>Enter your email address:</p><p><input type="text" style="width:200px;border:2px solid #ccc;" name="email"/></p><input type="hidden" value="PhysicsForumsInsights" name="uri"/><input type="hidden" name="loc" value="en_US"/><input type="submit" value="Subscribe" /></p></form></div> <span class="seperator extralight-border"></span></section><section id="nav_menu-2" class="widget clearfix widget_nav_menu"><h3 class="widgettitle">Blog Information</h3><div class="menu-sidebar-container"><ul id="menu-sidebar" class="menu"><li id="menu-item-14015" class="menu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-14015"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/register">Become a Member!</a></li><li id="menu-item-14012" class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-14012"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/application/">Write for Us!</a></li><li id="menu-item-18348" class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-18348"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/postindex/">Table of Contents</a></li><li id="menu-item-18353" class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-18353"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/authors/">Blog Author List</a></li></ul></div><span class="seperator extralight-border"></span></section><section id="tag_cloud-3" class="widget clearfix widget_tag_cloud"><h3 class="widgettitle">Popular Topics</h3><div class="tagcloud"><a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/astronomy/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-307 tag-link-position-1" style="font-size: 9.1666666666667pt;" aria-label="astronomy (17 items)">astronomy<span class="tag-link-count"> (17)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/black-holes/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-28 tag-link-position-2" style="font-size: 9.1666666666667pt;" aria-label="black holes (17 items)">black holes<span class="tag-link-count"> (17)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/classical-physics/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-852 tag-link-position-3" style="font-size: 20.833333333333pt;" aria-label="classical physics (35 items)">classical physics<span class="tag-link-count"> (35)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/cosmology/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-224 tag-link-position-4" style="font-size: 8pt;" aria-label="cosmology (16 items)">cosmology<span class="tag-link-count"> (16)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/education/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-104 tag-link-position-5" style="font-size: 13.833333333333pt;" aria-label="education (23 items)">education<span class="tag-link-count"> (23)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/electromagnetism/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-21 tag-link-position-6" style="font-size: 10.722222222222pt;" aria-label="electromagnetism (19 items)">electromagnetism<span class="tag-link-count"> (19)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/general-relativity/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-333 tag-link-position-7" style="font-size: 10.722222222222pt;" aria-label="general relativity (19 items)">general relativity<span class="tag-link-count"> (19)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/gravity/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-40 tag-link-position-8" style="font-size: 14.611111111111pt;" aria-label="gravity (24 items)">gravity<span class="tag-link-count"> (24)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/interview/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-858 tag-link-position-9" style="font-size: 13.055555555556pt;" aria-label="interview (22 items)">interview<span class="tag-link-count"> (22)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/mathematics/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-69 tag-link-position-10" style="font-size: 22pt;" aria-label="mathematics (38 items)">mathematics<span class="tag-link-count"> (38)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/mathematics-self-study/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-484 tag-link-position-11" style="font-size: 11.5pt;" aria-label="mathematics self-study (20 items)">mathematics self-study<span class="tag-link-count"> (20)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/physicist/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-11 tag-link-position-12" style="font-size: 15.777777777778pt;" aria-label="Physicist (26 items)">Physicist<span class="tag-link-count"> (26)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/programming/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-42 tag-link-position-13" style="font-size: 9.9444444444444pt;" aria-label="programming (18 items)">programming<span class="tag-link-count"> (18)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/quantum-field-theory/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-87 tag-link-position-14" style="font-size: 18.888888888889pt;" aria-label="Quantum Field Theory (31 items)">Quantum Field Theory<span class="tag-link-count"> (31)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/quantum-mechanics/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-62 tag-link-position-15" style="font-size: 21.222222222222pt;" aria-label="quantum mechanics (36 items)">quantum mechanics<span class="tag-link-count"> (36)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/quantum-physics/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-314 tag-link-position-16" style="font-size: 13.055555555556pt;" aria-label="quantum physics (22 items)">quantum physics<span class="tag-link-count"> (22)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/relativity/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-114 tag-link-position-17" style="font-size: 22pt;" aria-label="relativity (38 items)">relativity<span class="tag-link-count"> (38)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/special-relativity/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-89 tag-link-position-18" style="font-size: 8pt;" aria-label="Special Relativity (16 items)">Special Relativity<span class="tag-link-count"> (16)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/technology/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-861 tag-link-position-19" style="font-size: 10.722222222222pt;" aria-label="technology (19 items)">technology<span class="tag-link-count"> (19)</span></a> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tag/universe/" class="tag-cloud-link tag-link-265 tag-link-position-20" style="font-size: 12.277777777778pt;" aria-label="universe (21 items)">universe<span class="tag-link-count"> (21)</span></a></div> <span class="seperator extralight-border"></span></section></div></aside></div></div><footer class='container_wrap socket_color' id='socket' role="contentinfo" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="https://schema.org/WPFooter" aria-label="Copyright and company info" ><div class='container'><span class='copyright'> 2024 © Physics Forums, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/misc/contact">Contact Us</a> - <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/physics-forums-privacy-policy.797829/">Privacy Policy</a> - <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/about-pf-insights/">About PF Insights</a></span><ul class='noLightbox social_bookmarks icon_count_4'><li class='social_bookmarks_twitter av-social-link-twitter social_icon_1'><a target="_blank" aria-label="Link to X" href="https://twitter.com/physicsforums" aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' title='X' rel="noopener"><span class='avia_hidden_link_text'>X</span></a></li><li class='social_bookmarks_facebook av-social-link-facebook social_icon_2'><a target="_blank" aria-label="Link to Facebook" href='https://www.facebook.com/physicsforums' aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' title='Facebook' rel="noopener"><span class='avia_hidden_link_text'>Facebook</span></a></li><li class='social_bookmarks_linkedin av-social-link-linkedin social_icon_3'><a target="_blank" aria-label="Link to LinkedIn" href='https://www.linkedin.com/company/physics-forums/' aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' title='LinkedIn' rel="noopener"><span class='avia_hidden_link_text'>LinkedIn</span></a></li><li class='social_bookmarks_youtube av-social-link-youtube social_icon_4'><a target="_blank" aria-label="Link to Youtube" href='https://www.youtube.com/@physicsforum' aria-hidden='false' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' title='Youtube' rel="noopener"><span class='avia_hidden_link_text'>Youtube</span></a></li></ul></div></footer></div><a class='avia-post-nav avia-post-prev with-image' href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/struggles-continuum-part-2/' ><span class="label iconfont" aria-hidden='true' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello'></span><span class="entry-info-wrap"><span class="entry-info"><span class='entry-title'>Struggles With The Continuum: Quantum Mechanics of Charged Particles</span><span class='entry-image'><img data-lazyloaded="1" src="" loading="lazy" width="80" height="45" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/spacetime2.png" class="wp-image-4941 avia-img-lazy-loading-4941 attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="spacetime2" decoding="async" /><noscript><img loading="lazy" width="80" height="45" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/spacetime2.png" class="wp-image-4941 avia-img-lazy-loading-4941 attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="spacetime2" decoding="async" /></noscript></span></span></span></a><a class='avia-post-nav avia-post-next with-image' href='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/why-does-c-have-a-particular-value-and-can-it-change/' ><span class="label iconfont" aria-hidden='true' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello'></span><span class="entry-info-wrap"><span class="entry-info"><span class='entry-image'><img data-lazyloaded="1" src="" loading="lazy" width="80" height="45" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/speedoflight.png" class="wp-image-4972 avia-img-lazy-loading-4972 attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="speedoflight" decoding="async" /><noscript><img loading="lazy" width="80" height="45" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/speedoflight.png" class="wp-image-4972 avia-img-lazy-loading-4972 attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="speedoflight" decoding="async" /></noscript></span><span class='entry-title'>Why Does C Have a Particular Value, and Can It Change?</span></span></span></a></div><a href='#top' title='Scroll to top' id='scroll-top-link' aria-hidden='true' data-av_icon='' data-av_iconfont='entypo-fontello' tabindex='-1'><span class="avia_hidden_link_text">Scroll to top</span></a><div id="fb-root"></div> <script data-optimized="1" type="text/javascript" src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/js/ffe2445567cebbe851874e864ab606aa.js?ver=606aa" defer></script> <script type='text/javascript'>/* */ var avia_framework_globals = avia_framework_globals || {}; avia_framework_globals.frameworkUrl = 'https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/themes/enfold/framework/'; avia_framework_globals.installedAt = 'https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/themes/enfold/'; avia_framework_globals.ajaxurl = 'https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php'; /* */</script> <script type="text/javascript" async='async' src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.7.1" id="jquery-core-js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" id="wpil-frontend-script-js-extra">/* */ var wpilFrontend = {"ajaxUrl":"\/insights\/wp-admin\/admin-ajax.php","postId":"4930","postType":"post","openInternalInNewTab":"0","openExternalInNewTab":"1","disableClicks":"0","openLinksWithJS":"0","trackAllElementClicks":"0","clicksI18n":{"imageNoText":"Image in link: No Text","imageText":"Image Title: ","noText":"No Anchor Text Found"}}; /* */</script> <script data-optimized="1" type="text/javascript" async='async' src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/js/32fbbb44e22394d8c0f1ada21cfadab5.js?ver=58fb9" id="wpil-frontend-script-js"></script> <script data-optimized="1" type="text/javascript" async='async' src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/js/28eaaf920db7121b0c5763a98afd6217.js?ver=f2d22" id="comment-reply-js" async="async" data-wp-strategy="async"></script> <script data-optimized="1" type="text/javascript" async='async' src="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/litespeed/js/5269dc1c70ad20093a6da3e7d95ccca0.js?ver=ccca0" id="avia-footer-scripts-js"></script> <script data-no-optimize="1">!function(t,e){"object"==typeof exports&&"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=e():"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define(e):(t="undefined"!=typeof globalThis?globalThis:t||self).LazyLoad=e()}(this,function(){"use strict";function e(){return(e=Object.assign||function(t){for(var e=1;e<arguments.length;e++){var n,a=arguments[e];for(n in a)Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(a,n)&&(t[n]=a[n])}return t}).apply(this,arguments)}function i(t){return e({},it,t)}function o(t,e){var n,a="LazyLoad::Initialized",i=new t(e);try{n=new CustomEvent(a,{detail:{instance:i}})}catch(t){(n=document.createEvent("CustomEvent")).initCustomEvent(a,!1,!1,{instance:i})}window.dispatchEvent(n)}function l(t,e){return t.getAttribute(gt+e)}function c(t){return l(t,bt)}function s(t,e){return function(t,e,n){e=gt+e;null!==n?t.setAttribute(e,n):t.removeAttribute(e)}(t,bt,e)}function r(t){return s(t,null),0}function u(t){return null===c(t)}function d(t){return c(t)===vt}function f(t,e,n,a){t&&(void 0===a?void 0===n?t(e):t(e,n):t(e,n,a))}function _(t,e){nt?t.classList.add(e):t.className+=(t.className?" ":"")+e}function v(t,e){nt?t.classList.remove(e):t.className=t.className.replace(new RegExp("(^|\\s+)"+e+"(\\s+|$)")," ").replace(/^\s+/,"").replace(/\s+$/,"")}function g(t){return t.llTempImage}function b(t,e){!e||(e=e._observer)&&e.unobserve(t)}function p(t,e){t&&(t.loadingCount+=e)}function h(t,e){t&&(t.toLoadCount=e)}function n(t){for(var e,n=[],a=0;e=t.children[a];a+=1)"SOURCE"===e.tagName&&n.push(e);return n}function m(t,e){(t=t.parentNode)&&"PICTURE"===t.tagName&&n(t).forEach(e)}function a(t,e){n(t).forEach(e)}function E(t){return!!t[st]}function I(t){return t[st]}function y(t){return delete t[st]}function A(e,t){var n;E(e)||(n={},t.forEach(function(t){n[t]=e.getAttribute(t)}),e[st]=n)}function k(a,t){var i;E(a)&&(i=I(a),t.forEach(function(t){var e,n;e=a,(t=i[n=t])?e.setAttribute(n,t):e.removeAttribute(n)}))}function L(t,e,n){_(t,e.class_loading),s(t,ut),n&&(p(n,1),f(e.callback_loading,t,n))}function w(t,e,n){n&&t.setAttribute(e,n)}function x(t,e){w(t,ct,l(t,e.data_sizes)),w(t,rt,l(t,e.data_srcset)),w(t,ot,l(t,e.data_src))}function O(t,e,n){var a=l(t,e.data_bg_multi),i=l(t,e.data_bg_multi_hidpi);(a=at&&i?i:a)&&(t.style.backgroundImage=a,n=n,_(t=t,(e=e).class_applied),s(t,ft),n&&(e.unobserve_completed&&b(t,e),f(e.callback_applied,t,n)))}function N(t,e){!e||0<e.loadingCount||0<e.toLoadCount||f(t.callback_finish,e)}function C(t,e,n){t.addEventListener(e,n),t.llEvLisnrs[e]=n}function M(t){return!!t.llEvLisnrs}function z(t){if(M(t)){var e,n,a=t.llEvLisnrs;for(e in a){var i=a[e];n=e,i=i,t.removeEventListener(n,i)}delete t.llEvLisnrs}}function R(t,e,n){var a;delete t.llTempImage,p(n,-1),(a=n)&&--a.toLoadCount,v(t,e.class_loading),e.unobserve_completed&&b(t,n)}function T(o,r,c){var l=g(o)||o;M(l)||function(t,e,n){M(t)||(t.llEvLisnrs={});var a="VIDEO"===t.tagName?"loadeddata":"load";C(t,a,e),C(t,"error",n)}(l,function(t){var e,n,a,i;n=r,a=c,i=d(e=o),R(e,n,a),_(e,n.class_loaded),s(e,dt),f(n.callback_loaded,e,a),i||N(n,a),z(l)},function(t){var e,n,a,i;n=r,a=c,i=d(e=o),R(e,n,a),_(e,n.class_error),s(e,_t),f(n.callback_error,e,a),i||N(n,a),z(l)})}function G(t,e,n){var a,i,o,r,c;t.llTempImage=document.createElement("IMG"),T(t,e,n),E(c=t)||(c[st]={backgroundImage:c.style.backgroundImage}),o=n,r=l(a=t,(i=e).data_bg),c=l(a,i.data_bg_hidpi),(r=at&&c?c:r)&&(a.style.backgroundImage='url("'.concat(r,'")'),g(a).setAttribute(ot,r),L(a,i,o)),O(t,e,n)}function D(t,e,n){var a;T(t,e,n),a=e,e=n,(t=It[(n=t).tagName])&&(t(n,a),L(n,a,e))}function V(t,e,n){var a;a=t,(-1<yt.indexOf(a.tagName)?D:G)(t,e,n)}function F(t,e,n){var a;t.setAttribute("loading","lazy"),T(t,e,n),a=e,(e=It[(n=t).tagName])&&e(n,a),s(t,vt)}function j(t){t.removeAttribute(ot),t.removeAttribute(rt),t.removeAttribute(ct)}function P(t){m(t,function(t){k(t,Et)}),k(t,Et)}function S(t){var e;(e=At[t.tagName])?e(t):E(e=t)&&(t=I(e),e.style.backgroundImage=t.backgroundImage)}function U(t,e){var n;S(t),n=e,u(e=t)||d(e)||(v(e,n.class_entered),v(e,n.class_exited),v(e,n.class_applied),v(e,n.class_loading),v(e,n.class_loaded),v(e,n.class_error)),r(t),y(t)}function $(t,e,n,a){var i;n.cancel_on_exit&&(c(t)!==ut||"IMG"===t.tagName&&(z(t),m(i=t,function(t){j(t)}),j(i),P(t),v(t,n.class_loading),p(a,-1),r(t),f(n.callback_cancel,t,e,a)))}function q(t,e,n,a){var i,o,r=(o=t,0<=pt.indexOf(c(o)));s(t,"entered"),_(t,n.class_entered),v(t,n.class_exited),i=t,o=a,n.unobserve_entered&&b(i,o),f(n.callback_enter,t,e,a),r||V(t,n,a)}function H(t){return t.use_native&&"loading"in HTMLImageElement.prototype}function B(t,i,o){t.forEach(function(t){return(a=t).isIntersecting||0<a.intersectionRatio?q(t.target,t,i,o):(e=t.target,n=t,a=i,t=o,void(u(e)||(_(e,a.class_exited),$(e,n,a,t),f(a.callback_exit,e,n,t))));var e,n,a})}function J(e,n){var t;et&&!H(e)&&(n._observer=new IntersectionObserver(function(t){B(t,e,n)},{root:(t=e).container===document?null:t.container,rootMargin:t.thresholds||t.threshold+"px"}))}function K(t){return Array.prototype.slice.call(t)}function Q(t){return t.container.querySelectorAll(t.elements_selector)}function W(t){return c(t)===_t}function X(t,e){return e=t||Q(e),K(e).filter(u)}function Y(e,t){var n;(n=Q(e),K(n).filter(W)).forEach(function(t){v(t,e.class_error),r(t)}),t.update()}function t(t,e){var n,a,t=i(t);this._settings=t,this.loadingCount=0,J(t,this),n=t,a=this,Z&&window.addEventListener("online",function(){Y(n,a)}),this.update(e)}var Z="undefined"!=typeof window,tt=Z&&!("onscroll"in window)||"undefined"!=typeof navigator&&/(gle|ing|ro)bot|crawl|spider/i.test(navigator.userAgent),et=Z&&"IntersectionObserver"in window,nt=Z&&"classList"in document.createElement("p"),at=Z&&1<window.devicePixelRatio,it={elements_selector:".lazy",container:tt||Z?document:null,threshold:300,thresholds:null,data_src:"src",data_srcset:"srcset",data_sizes:"sizes",data_bg:"bg",data_bg_hidpi:"bg-hidpi",data_bg_multi:"bg-multi",data_bg_multi_hidpi:"bg-multi-hidpi",data_poster:"poster",class_applied:"applied",class_loading:"litespeed-loading",class_loaded:"litespeed-loaded",class_error:"error",class_entered:"entered",class_exited:"exited",unobserve_completed:!0,unobserve_entered:!1,cancel_on_exit:!0,callback_enter:null,callback_exit:null,callback_applied:null,callback_loading:null,callback_loaded:null,callback_error:null,callback_finish:null,callback_cancel:null,use_native:!1},ot="src",rt="srcset",ct="sizes",lt="poster",st="llOriginalAttrs",ut="loading",dt="loaded",ft="applied",_t="error",vt="native",gt="data-",bt="ll-status",pt=[ut,dt,ft,_t],ht=[ot],mt=[ot,lt],Et=[ot,rt,ct],It={IMG:function(t,e){m(t,function(t){A(t,Et),x(t,e)}),A(t,Et),x(t,e)},IFRAME:function(t,e){A(t,ht),w(t,ot,l(t,e.data_src))},VIDEO:function(t,e){a(t,function(t){A(t,ht),w(t,ot,l(t,e.data_src))}),A(t,mt),w(t,lt,l(t,e.data_poster)),w(t,ot,l(t,e.data_src)),t.load()}},yt=["IMG","IFRAME","VIDEO"],At={IMG:P,IFRAME:function(t){k(t,ht)},VIDEO:function(t){a(t,function(t){k(t,ht)}),k(t,mt),t.load()}},kt=["IMG","IFRAME","VIDEO"];return t.prototype={update:function(t){var e,n,a,i=this._settings,o=X(t,i);{if(h(this,o.length),!tt&&et)return H(i)?(e=i,n=this,o.forEach(function(t){-1!==kt.indexOf(t.tagName)&&F(t,e,n)}),void h(n,0)):(t=this._observer,i=o,t.disconnect(),a=t,void i.forEach(function(t){a.observe(t)}));this.loadAll(o)}},destroy:function(){this._observer&&this._observer.disconnect(),Q(this._settings).forEach(function(t){y(t)}),delete this._observer,delete this._settings,delete this.loadingCount,delete this.toLoadCount},loadAll:function(t){var e=this,n=this._settings;X(t,n).forEach(function(t){b(t,e),V(t,n,e)})},restoreAll:function(){var e=this._settings;Q(e).forEach(function(t){U(t,e)})}},t.load=function(t,e){e=i(e);V(t,e)},t.resetStatus=function(t){r(t)},Z&&function(t,e){if(e)if(e.length)for(var n,a=0;n=e[a];a+=1)o(t,n);else o(t,e)}(t,window.lazyLoadOptions),t});!function(e,t){"use strict";function a(){t.body.classList.add("litespeed_lazyloaded")}function n(){console.log("[LiteSpeed] Start Lazy Load Images"),d=new LazyLoad({elements_selector:"[data-lazyloaded]",callback_finish:a}),o=function(){d.update()},e.MutationObserver&&new MutationObserver(o).observe(t.documentElement,{childList:!0,subtree:!0,attributes:!0})}var d,o;e.addEventListener?e.addEventListener("load",n,!1):e.attachEvent("onload",n)}(window,document);</script></body></html> <!-- Page optimized by LiteSpeed Cache @2025-02-17 13:43:54 --> <!-- Page cached by LiteSpeed Cache 6.5.4 on 2025-02-17 13:43:53 -->

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10