CINXE.COM

Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. - Wikipedia

<!DOCTYPE html> <html class="client-nojs vector-feature-language-in-header-enabled vector-feature-language-in-main-page-header-disabled vector-feature-page-tools-pinned-disabled vector-feature-toc-pinned-clientpref-1 vector-feature-main-menu-pinned-disabled vector-feature-limited-width-clientpref-1 vector-feature-limited-width-content-enabled vector-feature-custom-font-size-clientpref-1 vector-feature-appearance-pinned-clientpref-1 vector-feature-night-mode-enabled skin-theme-clientpref-day vector-sticky-header-enabled vector-toc-available" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. - Wikipedia</title> <script>(function(){var className="client-js vector-feature-language-in-header-enabled vector-feature-language-in-main-page-header-disabled vector-feature-page-tools-pinned-disabled vector-feature-toc-pinned-clientpref-1 vector-feature-main-menu-pinned-disabled vector-feature-limited-width-clientpref-1 vector-feature-limited-width-content-enabled vector-feature-custom-font-size-clientpref-1 vector-feature-appearance-pinned-clientpref-1 vector-feature-night-mode-enabled skin-theme-clientpref-day vector-sticky-header-enabled vector-toc-available";var cookie=document.cookie.match(/(?:^|; )enwikimwclientpreferences=([^;]+)/);if(cookie){cookie[1].split('%2C').forEach(function(pref){className=className.replace(new RegExp('(^| )'+pref.replace(/-clientpref-\w+$|[^\w-]+/g,'')+'-clientpref-\\w+( |$)'),'$1'+pref+'$2');});}document.documentElement.className=className;}());RLCONF={"wgBreakFrames":false,"wgSeparatorTransformTable":["",""],"wgDigitTransformTable":["",""],"wgDefaultDateFormat":"dmy","wgMonthNames":["","January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"],"wgRequestId":"874e16d0-2422-484e-827e-fa1a993dfc05","wgCanonicalNamespace":"","wgCanonicalSpecialPageName":false,"wgNamespaceNumber":0,"wgPageName":"Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.","wgTitle":"Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.","wgCurRevisionId":1252176827,"wgRevisionId":1252176827,"wgArticleId":53781950,"wgIsArticle":true,"wgIsRedirect":false,"wgAction":"view","wgUserName":null,"wgUserGroups":["*"],"wgCategories":["Use mdy dates from September 2023","Articles with short description","Short description is different from Wikidata","All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases","Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from April 2022","2017 in United States case law","United States copyright case law","United States Supreme Court cases","United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court","Cheerleading","Fashion design","Copyrightability case law"],"wgPageViewLanguage":"en","wgPageContentLanguage":"en","wgPageContentModel":"wikitext","wgRelevantPageName":"Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.","wgRelevantArticleId":53781950,"wgIsProbablyEditable":true,"wgRelevantPageIsProbablyEditable":true,"wgRestrictionEdit":[],"wgRestrictionMove":[],"wgNoticeProject":"wikipedia","wgCiteReferencePreviewsActive":false,"wgFlaggedRevsParams":{"tags":{"status":{"levels":1}}},"wgMediaViewerOnClick":true,"wgMediaViewerEnabledByDefault":true,"wgPopupsFlags":0,"wgVisualEditor":{"pageLanguageCode":"en","pageLanguageDir":"ltr","pageVariantFallbacks":"en"},"wgMFDisplayWikibaseDescriptions":{"search":true,"watchlist":true,"tagline":false,"nearby":true},"wgWMESchemaEditAttemptStepOversample":false,"wgWMEPageLength":80000,"wgEditSubmitButtonLabelPublish":true,"wgULSPosition":"interlanguage","wgULSisCompactLinksEnabled":false,"wgVector2022LanguageInHeader":true,"wgULSisLanguageSelectorEmpty":false,"wgWikibaseItemId":"Q30634832","wgCheckUserClientHintsHeadersJsApi":["brands","architecture","bitness","fullVersionList","mobile","model","platform","platformVersion"],"GEHomepageSuggestedEditsEnableTopics":true,"wgGETopicsMatchModeEnabled":false,"wgGEStructuredTaskRejectionReasonTextInputEnabled":false,"wgGELevelingUpEnabledForUser":false}; RLSTATE={"ext.globalCssJs.user.styles":"ready","site.styles":"ready","user.styles":"ready","ext.globalCssJs.user":"ready","user":"ready","user.options":"loading","ext.cite.styles":"ready","skins.vector.search.codex.styles":"ready","skins.vector.styles":"ready","skins.vector.icons":"ready","jquery.makeCollapsible.styles":"ready","ext.wikimediamessages.styles":"ready","ext.visualEditor.desktopArticleTarget.noscript":"ready","ext.uls.interlanguage":"ready","wikibase.client.init":"ready"};RLPAGEMODULES=["ext.cite.ux-enhancements","mediawiki.page.media","site","mediawiki.page.ready","jquery.makeCollapsible","mediawiki.toc","skins.vector.js","ext.centralNotice.geoIP","ext.centralNotice.startUp","ext.gadget.ReferenceTooltips","ext.gadget.switcher","ext.urlShortener.toolbar","ext.centralauth.centralautologin","mmv.bootstrap","ext.popups","ext.visualEditor.desktopArticleTarget.init","ext.visualEditor.targetLoader","ext.echo.centralauth","ext.eventLogging","ext.wikimediaEvents","ext.navigationTiming","ext.uls.interface","ext.cx.eventlogging.campaigns","ext.cx.uls.quick.actions","wikibase.client.vector-2022","ext.checkUser.clientHints","ext.growthExperiments.SuggestedEditSession"];</script> <script>(RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.loader.impl(function(){return["user.options@12s5i",function($,jQuery,require,module){mw.user.tokens.set({"patrolToken":"+\\","watchToken":"+\\","csrfToken":"+\\"}); }];});});</script> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/w/load.php?lang=en&amp;modules=ext.cite.styles%7Cext.uls.interlanguage%7Cext.visualEditor.desktopArticleTarget.noscript%7Cext.wikimediamessages.styles%7Cjquery.makeCollapsible.styles%7Cskins.vector.icons%2Cstyles%7Cskins.vector.search.codex.styles%7Cwikibase.client.init&amp;only=styles&amp;skin=vector-2022"> <script async="" src="/w/load.php?lang=en&amp;modules=startup&amp;only=scripts&amp;raw=1&amp;skin=vector-2022"></script> <meta name="ResourceLoaderDynamicStyles" content=""> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/w/load.php?lang=en&amp;modules=site.styles&amp;only=styles&amp;skin=vector-2022"> <meta name="generator" content="MediaWiki 1.44.0-wmf.19"> <meta name="referrer" content="origin"> <meta name="referrer" content="origin-when-cross-origin"> <meta name="robots" content="max-image-preview:standard"> <meta name="format-detection" content="telephone=no"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=1120"> <meta property="og:title" content="Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. - Wikipedia"> <meta property="og:type" content="website"> <link rel="preconnect" href="//upload.wikimedia.org"> <link rel="alternate" media="only screen and (max-width: 640px)" href="//en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc."> <link rel="alternate" type="application/x-wiki" title="Edit this page" href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit"> <link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="/static/apple-touch/wikipedia.png"> <link rel="icon" href="/static/favicon/wikipedia.ico"> <link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="/w/rest.php/v1/search" title="Wikipedia (en)"> <link rel="EditURI" type="application/rsd+xml" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=rsd"> <link rel="canonical" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc."> <link rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en"> <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="Wikipedia Atom feed" href="/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&amp;feed=atom"> <link rel="dns-prefetch" href="//meta.wikimedia.org" /> <link rel="dns-prefetch" href="login.wikimedia.org"> </head> <body class="skin--responsive skin-vector skin-vector-search-vue mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject mw-editable page-Star_Athletica_LLC_v_Varsity_Brands_Inc rootpage-Star_Athletica_LLC_v_Varsity_Brands_Inc skin-vector-2022 action-view"><a class="mw-jump-link" href="#bodyContent">Jump to content</a> <div class="vector-header-container"> <header class="vector-header mw-header"> <div class="vector-header-start"> <nav class="vector-main-menu-landmark" aria-label="Site"> <div id="vector-main-menu-dropdown" class="vector-dropdown vector-main-menu-dropdown vector-button-flush-left vector-button-flush-right" title="Main menu" > <input type="checkbox" id="vector-main-menu-dropdown-checkbox" role="button" aria-haspopup="true" data-event-name="ui.dropdown-vector-main-menu-dropdown" class="vector-dropdown-checkbox " aria-label="Main menu" > <label id="vector-main-menu-dropdown-label" for="vector-main-menu-dropdown-checkbox" class="vector-dropdown-label cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only " aria-hidden="true" ><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-menu mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-menu"></span> <span class="vector-dropdown-label-text">Main menu</span> </label> <div class="vector-dropdown-content"> <div id="vector-main-menu-unpinned-container" class="vector-unpinned-container"> <div id="vector-main-menu" class="vector-main-menu vector-pinnable-element"> <div class="vector-pinnable-header vector-main-menu-pinnable-header vector-pinnable-header-unpinned" data-feature-name="main-menu-pinned" data-pinnable-element-id="vector-main-menu" data-pinned-container-id="vector-main-menu-pinned-container" data-unpinned-container-id="vector-main-menu-unpinned-container" > <div class="vector-pinnable-header-label">Main menu</div> <button class="vector-pinnable-header-toggle-button vector-pinnable-header-pin-button" data-event-name="pinnable-header.vector-main-menu.pin">move to sidebar</button> <button class="vector-pinnable-header-toggle-button vector-pinnable-header-unpin-button" data-event-name="pinnable-header.vector-main-menu.unpin">hide</button> </div> <div id="p-navigation" class="vector-menu mw-portlet mw-portlet-navigation" > <div class="vector-menu-heading"> Navigation </div> <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li id="n-mainpage-description" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Main_Page" title="Visit the main page [z]" accesskey="z"><span>Main page</span></a></li><li id="n-contents" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Contents" title="Guides to browsing Wikipedia"><span>Contents</span></a></li><li id="n-currentevents" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Portal:Current_events" title="Articles related to current events"><span>Current events</span></a></li><li id="n-randompage" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Special:Random" title="Visit a randomly selected article [x]" accesskey="x"><span>Random article</span></a></li><li id="n-aboutsite" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:About" title="Learn about Wikipedia and how it works"><span>About Wikipedia</span></a></li><li id="n-contactpage" class="mw-list-item"><a href="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us" title="How to contact Wikipedia"><span>Contact us</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div id="p-interaction" class="vector-menu mw-portlet mw-portlet-interaction" > <div class="vector-menu-heading"> Contribute </div> <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li id="n-help" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Help:Contents" title="Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia"><span>Help</span></a></li><li id="n-introduction" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Help:Introduction" title="Learn how to edit Wikipedia"><span>Learn to edit</span></a></li><li id="n-portal" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_portal" title="The hub for editors"><span>Community portal</span></a></li><li id="n-recentchanges" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Special:RecentChanges" title="A list of recent changes to Wikipedia [r]" accesskey="r"><span>Recent changes</span></a></li><li id="n-upload" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:File_upload_wizard" title="Add images or other media for use on Wikipedia"><span>Upload file</span></a></li><li id="n-specialpages" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Special:SpecialPages"><span>Special pages</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </nav> <a href="/wiki/Main_Page" class="mw-logo"> <img class="mw-logo-icon" src="/static/images/icons/wikipedia.png" alt="" aria-hidden="true" height="50" width="50"> <span class="mw-logo-container skin-invert"> <img class="mw-logo-wordmark" alt="Wikipedia" src="/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en.svg" style="width: 7.5em; height: 1.125em;"> <img class="mw-logo-tagline" alt="The Free Encyclopedia" src="/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-tagline-en.svg" width="117" height="13" style="width: 7.3125em; height: 0.8125em;"> </span> </a> </div> <div class="vector-header-end"> <div id="p-search" role="search" class="vector-search-box-vue vector-search-box-collapses vector-search-box-show-thumbnail vector-search-box-auto-expand-width vector-search-box"> <a href="/wiki/Special:Search" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only search-toggle" title="Search Wikipedia [f]" accesskey="f"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-search mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-search"></span> <span>Search</span> </a> <div class="vector-typeahead-search-container"> <div class="cdx-typeahead-search cdx-typeahead-search--show-thumbnail cdx-typeahead-search--auto-expand-width"> <form action="/w/index.php" id="searchform" class="cdx-search-input cdx-search-input--has-end-button"> <div id="simpleSearch" class="cdx-search-input__input-wrapper" data-search-loc="header-moved"> <div class="cdx-text-input cdx-text-input--has-start-icon"> <input class="cdx-text-input__input" type="search" name="search" placeholder="Search Wikipedia" aria-label="Search Wikipedia" autocapitalize="sentences" title="Search Wikipedia [f]" accesskey="f" id="searchInput" > <span class="cdx-text-input__icon cdx-text-input__start-icon"></span> </div> <input type="hidden" name="title" value="Special:Search"> </div> <button class="cdx-button cdx-search-input__end-button">Search</button> </form> </div> </div> </div> <nav class="vector-user-links vector-user-links-wide" aria-label="Personal tools"> <div class="vector-user-links-main"> <div id="p-vector-user-menu-preferences" class="vector-menu mw-portlet emptyPortlet" > <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> </ul> </div> </div> <div id="p-vector-user-menu-userpage" class="vector-menu mw-portlet emptyPortlet" > <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> </ul> </div> </div> <nav class="vector-appearance-landmark" aria-label="Appearance"> <div id="vector-appearance-dropdown" class="vector-dropdown " title="Change the appearance of the page&#039;s font size, width, and color" > <input type="checkbox" id="vector-appearance-dropdown-checkbox" role="button" aria-haspopup="true" data-event-name="ui.dropdown-vector-appearance-dropdown" class="vector-dropdown-checkbox " aria-label="Appearance" > <label id="vector-appearance-dropdown-label" for="vector-appearance-dropdown-checkbox" class="vector-dropdown-label cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only " aria-hidden="true" ><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-appearance mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-appearance"></span> <span class="vector-dropdown-label-text">Appearance</span> </label> <div class="vector-dropdown-content"> <div id="vector-appearance-unpinned-container" class="vector-unpinned-container"> </div> </div> </div> </nav> <div id="p-vector-user-menu-notifications" class="vector-menu mw-portlet emptyPortlet" > <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> </ul> </div> </div> <div id="p-vector-user-menu-overflow" class="vector-menu mw-portlet" > <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li id="pt-sitesupport-2" class="user-links-collapsible-item mw-list-item user-links-collapsible-item"><a data-mw="interface" href="https://donate.wikimedia.org/?wmf_source=donate&amp;wmf_medium=sidebar&amp;wmf_campaign=en.wikipedia.org&amp;uselang=en" class=""><span>Donate</span></a> </li> <li id="pt-createaccount-2" class="user-links-collapsible-item mw-list-item user-links-collapsible-item"><a data-mw="interface" href="/w/index.php?title=Special:CreateAccount&amp;returnto=Star+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." title="You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory" class=""><span>Create account</span></a> </li> <li id="pt-login-2" class="user-links-collapsible-item mw-list-item user-links-collapsible-item"><a data-mw="interface" href="/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&amp;returnto=Star+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." title="You&#039;re encouraged to log in; however, it&#039;s not mandatory. [o]" accesskey="o" class=""><span>Log in</span></a> </li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> <div id="vector-user-links-dropdown" class="vector-dropdown vector-user-menu vector-button-flush-right vector-user-menu-logged-out" title="Log in and more options" > <input type="checkbox" id="vector-user-links-dropdown-checkbox" role="button" aria-haspopup="true" data-event-name="ui.dropdown-vector-user-links-dropdown" class="vector-dropdown-checkbox " aria-label="Personal tools" > <label id="vector-user-links-dropdown-label" for="vector-user-links-dropdown-checkbox" class="vector-dropdown-label cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only " aria-hidden="true" ><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-ellipsis mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-ellipsis"></span> <span class="vector-dropdown-label-text">Personal tools</span> </label> <div class="vector-dropdown-content"> <div id="p-personal" class="vector-menu mw-portlet mw-portlet-personal user-links-collapsible-item" title="User menu" > <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li id="pt-sitesupport" class="user-links-collapsible-item mw-list-item"><a href="https://donate.wikimedia.org/?wmf_source=donate&amp;wmf_medium=sidebar&amp;wmf_campaign=en.wikipedia.org&amp;uselang=en"><span>Donate</span></a></li><li id="pt-createaccount" class="user-links-collapsible-item mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Special:CreateAccount&amp;returnto=Star+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." title="You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-userAdd mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-userAdd"></span> <span>Create account</span></a></li><li id="pt-login" class="user-links-collapsible-item mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&amp;returnto=Star+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." title="You&#039;re encouraged to log in; however, it&#039;s not mandatory. [o]" accesskey="o"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-logIn mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-logIn"></span> <span>Log in</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div id="p-user-menu-anon-editor" class="vector-menu mw-portlet mw-portlet-user-menu-anon-editor" > <div class="vector-menu-heading"> Pages for logged out editors <a href="/wiki/Help:Introduction" aria-label="Learn more about editing"><span>learn more</span></a> </div> <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li id="pt-anoncontribs" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Special:MyContributions" title="A list of edits made from this IP address [y]" accesskey="y"><span>Contributions</span></a></li><li id="pt-anontalk" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Special:MyTalk" title="Discussion about edits from this IP address [n]" accesskey="n"><span>Talk</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </div> </nav> </div> </header> </div> <div class="mw-page-container"> <div class="mw-page-container-inner"> <div class="vector-sitenotice-container"> <div id="siteNotice"><!-- CentralNotice --></div> </div> <div class="vector-column-start"> <div class="vector-main-menu-container"> <div id="mw-navigation"> <nav id="mw-panel" class="vector-main-menu-landmark" aria-label="Site"> <div id="vector-main-menu-pinned-container" class="vector-pinned-container"> </div> </nav> </div> </div> <div class="vector-sticky-pinned-container"> <nav id="mw-panel-toc" aria-label="Contents" data-event-name="ui.sidebar-toc" class="mw-table-of-contents-container vector-toc-landmark"> <div id="vector-toc-pinned-container" class="vector-pinned-container"> <div id="vector-toc" class="vector-toc vector-pinnable-element"> <div class="vector-pinnable-header vector-toc-pinnable-header vector-pinnable-header-pinned" data-feature-name="toc-pinned" data-pinnable-element-id="vector-toc" > <h2 class="vector-pinnable-header-label">Contents</h2> <button class="vector-pinnable-header-toggle-button vector-pinnable-header-pin-button" data-event-name="pinnable-header.vector-toc.pin">move to sidebar</button> <button class="vector-pinnable-header-toggle-button vector-pinnable-header-unpin-button" data-event-name="pinnable-header.vector-toc.unpin">hide</button> </div> <ul class="vector-toc-contents" id="mw-panel-toc-list"> <li id="toc-mw-content-text" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-1"> <a href="#" class="vector-toc-link"> <div class="vector-toc-text">(Top)</div> </a> </li> <li id="toc-Background" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-1 vector-toc-list-item-expanded"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Background"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">1</span> <span>Background</span> </div> </a> <button aria-controls="toc-Background-sublist" class="cdx-button cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only vector-toc-toggle"> <span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-expand"></span> <span>Toggle Background subsection</span> </button> <ul id="toc-Background-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> <li id="toc-Fashion_was_uncopyrightable" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Fashion_was_uncopyrightable"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">1.1</span> <span>Fashion was uncopyrightable</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Fashion_was_uncopyrightable-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Varsity_Brands" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Varsity_Brands"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">1.2</span> <span>Varsity Brands</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Varsity_Brands-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Star_Athletica_lawsuit" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Star_Athletica_lawsuit"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">1.3</span> <span>Star Athletica lawsuit</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Star_Athletica_lawsuit-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Amicus_curiae_briefs" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Amicus_curiae_briefs"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">1.4</span> <span><i>Amicus curiae</i> briefs</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Amicus_curiae_briefs-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Oral_arguments" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Oral_arguments"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">1.5</span> <span>Oral arguments</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Oral_arguments-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Opinion_of_the_court" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-1 vector-toc-list-item-expanded"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Opinion_of_the_court"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">2</span> <span>Opinion of the court</span> </div> </a> <button aria-controls="toc-Opinion_of_the_court-sublist" class="cdx-button cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only vector-toc-toggle"> <span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-expand"></span> <span>Toggle Opinion of the court subsection</span> </button> <ul id="toc-Opinion_of_the_court-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> <li id="toc-Majority_opinion" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Majority_opinion"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">2.1</span> <span>Majority opinion</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Majority_opinion-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Concurring_opinion" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Concurring_opinion"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">2.2</span> <span>Concurring opinion</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Concurring_opinion-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Dissent" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Dissent"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">2.3</span> <span>Dissent</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Dissent-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Subsequent_developments" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-1 vector-toc-list-item-expanded"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Subsequent_developments"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">3</span> <span>Subsequent developments</span> </div> </a> <button aria-controls="toc-Subsequent_developments-sublist" class="cdx-button cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only vector-toc-toggle"> <span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-expand"></span> <span>Toggle Subsequent developments subsection</span> </button> <ul id="toc-Subsequent_developments-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> <li id="toc-Immediate_reactions" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Immediate_reactions"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">3.1</span> <span>Immediate reactions</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Immediate_reactions-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Case_resolution" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Case_resolution"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">3.2</span> <span>Case resolution</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Case_resolution-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Legal_analyses" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-2"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Legal_analyses"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">3.3</span> <span>Legal analyses</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Legal_analyses-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> <li id="toc-Expanded_separability" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-3"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Expanded_separability"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">3.3.1</span> <span>Expanded separability</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Expanded_separability-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-Other_analyses" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-3"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#Other_analyses"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">3.3.2</span> <span>Other analyses</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-Other_analyses-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-References" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-1 vector-toc-list-item-expanded"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#References"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">4</span> <span>References</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-References-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> <li id="toc-External_links" class="vector-toc-list-item vector-toc-level-1 vector-toc-list-item-expanded"> <a class="vector-toc-link" href="#External_links"> <div class="vector-toc-text"> <span class="vector-toc-numb">5</span> <span>External links</span> </div> </a> <ul id="toc-External_links-sublist" class="vector-toc-list"> </ul> </li> </ul> </div> </div> </nav> </div> </div> <div class="mw-content-container"> <main id="content" class="mw-body"> <header class="mw-body-header vector-page-titlebar"> <nav aria-label="Contents" class="vector-toc-landmark"> <div id="vector-page-titlebar-toc" class="vector-dropdown vector-page-titlebar-toc vector-button-flush-left" title="Table of Contents" > <input type="checkbox" id="vector-page-titlebar-toc-checkbox" role="button" aria-haspopup="true" data-event-name="ui.dropdown-vector-page-titlebar-toc" class="vector-dropdown-checkbox " aria-label="Toggle the table of contents" > <label id="vector-page-titlebar-toc-label" for="vector-page-titlebar-toc-checkbox" class="vector-dropdown-label cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only " aria-hidden="true" ><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-listBullet mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-listBullet"></span> <span class="vector-dropdown-label-text">Toggle the table of contents</span> </label> <div class="vector-dropdown-content"> <div id="vector-page-titlebar-toc-unpinned-container" class="vector-unpinned-container"> </div> </div> </div> </nav> <h1 id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading mw-first-heading"><i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i></h1> <div id="p-lang-btn" class="vector-dropdown mw-portlet mw-portlet-lang" > <input type="checkbox" id="p-lang-btn-checkbox" role="button" aria-haspopup="true" data-event-name="ui.dropdown-p-lang-btn" class="vector-dropdown-checkbox mw-interlanguage-selector" aria-label="This article exist only in this language. Add the article for other languages" > <label id="p-lang-btn-label" for="p-lang-btn-checkbox" class="vector-dropdown-label cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--action-progressive mw-portlet-lang-heading-0" aria-hidden="true" ><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-language-progressive mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-language-progressive"></span> <span class="vector-dropdown-label-text">Add languages</span> </label> <div class="vector-dropdown-content"> <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> </ul> <div class="after-portlet after-portlet-lang"><span class="uls-after-portlet-link"></span><span class="wb-langlinks-add wb-langlinks-link"><a href="https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntityPage/Q30634832#sitelinks-wikipedia" title="Add interlanguage links" class="wbc-editpage">Add links</a></span></div> </div> </div> </div> </header> <div class="vector-page-toolbar"> <div class="vector-page-toolbar-container"> <div id="left-navigation"> <nav aria-label="Namespaces"> <div id="p-associated-pages" class="vector-menu vector-menu-tabs mw-portlet mw-portlet-associated-pages" > <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li id="ca-nstab-main" class="selected vector-tab-noicon mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc." title="View the content page [c]" accesskey="c"><span>Article</span></a></li><li id="ca-talk" class="vector-tab-noicon mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Talk:Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc." rel="discussion" title="Discuss improvements to the content page [t]" accesskey="t"><span>Talk</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div id="vector-variants-dropdown" class="vector-dropdown emptyPortlet" > <input type="checkbox" id="vector-variants-dropdown-checkbox" role="button" aria-haspopup="true" data-event-name="ui.dropdown-vector-variants-dropdown" class="vector-dropdown-checkbox " aria-label="Change language variant" > <label id="vector-variants-dropdown-label" for="vector-variants-dropdown-checkbox" class="vector-dropdown-label cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet" aria-hidden="true" ><span class="vector-dropdown-label-text">English</span> </label> <div class="vector-dropdown-content"> <div id="p-variants" class="vector-menu mw-portlet mw-portlet-variants emptyPortlet" > <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </div> </nav> </div> <div id="right-navigation" class="vector-collapsible"> <nav aria-label="Views"> <div id="p-views" class="vector-menu vector-menu-tabs mw-portlet mw-portlet-views" > <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li id="ca-view" class="selected vector-tab-noicon mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc."><span>Read</span></a></li><li id="ca-edit" class="vector-tab-noicon mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit" title="Edit this page [e]" accesskey="e"><span>Edit</span></a></li><li id="ca-history" class="vector-tab-noicon mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=history" title="Past revisions of this page [h]" accesskey="h"><span>View history</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </div> </nav> <nav class="vector-page-tools-landmark" aria-label="Page tools"> <div id="vector-page-tools-dropdown" class="vector-dropdown vector-page-tools-dropdown" > <input type="checkbox" id="vector-page-tools-dropdown-checkbox" role="button" aria-haspopup="true" data-event-name="ui.dropdown-vector-page-tools-dropdown" class="vector-dropdown-checkbox " aria-label="Tools" > <label id="vector-page-tools-dropdown-label" for="vector-page-tools-dropdown-checkbox" class="vector-dropdown-label cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet" aria-hidden="true" ><span class="vector-dropdown-label-text">Tools</span> </label> <div class="vector-dropdown-content"> <div id="vector-page-tools-unpinned-container" class="vector-unpinned-container"> <div id="vector-page-tools" class="vector-page-tools vector-pinnable-element"> <div class="vector-pinnable-header vector-page-tools-pinnable-header vector-pinnable-header-unpinned" data-feature-name="page-tools-pinned" data-pinnable-element-id="vector-page-tools" data-pinned-container-id="vector-page-tools-pinned-container" data-unpinned-container-id="vector-page-tools-unpinned-container" > <div class="vector-pinnable-header-label">Tools</div> <button class="vector-pinnable-header-toggle-button vector-pinnable-header-pin-button" data-event-name="pinnable-header.vector-page-tools.pin">move to sidebar</button> <button class="vector-pinnable-header-toggle-button vector-pinnable-header-unpin-button" data-event-name="pinnable-header.vector-page-tools.unpin">hide</button> </div> <div id="p-cactions" class="vector-menu mw-portlet mw-portlet-cactions emptyPortlet vector-has-collapsible-items" title="More options" > <div class="vector-menu-heading"> Actions </div> <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li id="ca-more-view" class="selected vector-more-collapsible-item mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc."><span>Read</span></a></li><li id="ca-more-edit" class="vector-more-collapsible-item mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit" title="Edit this page [e]" accesskey="e"><span>Edit</span></a></li><li id="ca-more-history" class="vector-more-collapsible-item mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=history"><span>View history</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div id="p-tb" class="vector-menu mw-portlet mw-portlet-tb" > <div class="vector-menu-heading"> General </div> <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li id="t-whatlinkshere" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc." title="List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [j]" accesskey="j"><span>What links here</span></a></li><li id="t-recentchangeslinked" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/wiki/Special:RecentChangesLinked/Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc." rel="nofollow" title="Recent changes in pages linked from this page [k]" accesskey="k"><span>Related changes</span></a></li><li id="t-upload" class="mw-list-item"><a href="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard" title="Upload files [u]" accesskey="u"><span>Upload file</span></a></li><li id="t-permalink" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;oldid=1252176827" title="Permanent link to this revision of this page"><span>Permanent link</span></a></li><li id="t-info" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=info" title="More information about this page"><span>Page information</span></a></li><li id="t-cite" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Special:CiteThisPage&amp;page=Star_Athletica%2C_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands%2C_Inc.&amp;id=1252176827&amp;wpFormIdentifier=titleform" title="Information on how to cite this page"><span>Cite this page</span></a></li><li id="t-urlshortener" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Special:UrlShortener&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FStar_Athletica%2C_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands%2C_Inc."><span>Get shortened URL</span></a></li><li id="t-urlshortener-qrcode" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Special:QrCode&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FStar_Athletica%2C_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands%2C_Inc."><span>Download QR code</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div id="p-coll-print_export" class="vector-menu mw-portlet mw-portlet-coll-print_export" > <div class="vector-menu-heading"> Print/export </div> <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li id="coll-download-as-rl" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Special:DownloadAsPdf&amp;page=Star_Athletica%2C_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands%2C_Inc.&amp;action=show-download-screen" title="Download this page as a PDF file"><span>Download as PDF</span></a></li><li id="t-print" class="mw-list-item"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;printable=yes" title="Printable version of this page [p]" accesskey="p"><span>Printable version</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div id="p-wikibase-otherprojects" class="vector-menu mw-portlet mw-portlet-wikibase-otherprojects" > <div class="vector-menu-heading"> In other projects </div> <div class="vector-menu-content"> <ul class="vector-menu-content-list"> <li class="wb-otherproject-link wb-otherproject-wikisource mw-list-item"><a href="https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc." hreflang="en"><span>Wikisource</span></a></li><li id="t-wikibase" class="wb-otherproject-link wb-otherproject-wikibase-dataitem mw-list-item"><a href="https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntityPage/Q30634832" title="Structured data on this page hosted by Wikidata [g]" accesskey="g"><span>Wikidata item</span></a></li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </nav> </div> </div> </div> <div class="vector-column-end"> <div class="vector-sticky-pinned-container"> <nav class="vector-page-tools-landmark" aria-label="Page tools"> <div id="vector-page-tools-pinned-container" class="vector-pinned-container"> </div> </nav> <nav class="vector-appearance-landmark" aria-label="Appearance"> <div id="vector-appearance-pinned-container" class="vector-pinned-container"> <div id="vector-appearance" class="vector-appearance vector-pinnable-element"> <div class="vector-pinnable-header vector-appearance-pinnable-header vector-pinnable-header-pinned" data-feature-name="appearance-pinned" data-pinnable-element-id="vector-appearance" data-pinned-container-id="vector-appearance-pinned-container" data-unpinned-container-id="vector-appearance-unpinned-container" > <div class="vector-pinnable-header-label">Appearance</div> <button class="vector-pinnable-header-toggle-button vector-pinnable-header-pin-button" data-event-name="pinnable-header.vector-appearance.pin">move to sidebar</button> <button class="vector-pinnable-header-toggle-button vector-pinnable-header-unpin-button" data-event-name="pinnable-header.vector-appearance.unpin">hide</button> </div> </div> </div> </nav> </div> </div> <div id="bodyContent" class="vector-body" aria-labelledby="firstHeading" data-mw-ve-target-container> <div class="vector-body-before-content"> <div class="mw-indicators"> </div> <div id="siteSub" class="noprint">From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</div> </div> <div id="contentSub"><div id="mw-content-subtitle"></div></div> <div id="mw-content-text" class="mw-body-content"><div class="mw-content-ltr mw-parser-output" lang="en" dir="ltr"><p class="mw-empty-elt"> </p> <div class="shortdescription nomobile noexcerpt noprint searchaux" style="display:none">2017 United States Supreme Court case</div><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1257001546">.mw-parser-output .infobox-subbox{padding:0;border:none;margin:-3px;width:auto;min-width:100%;font-size:100%;clear:none;float:none;background-color:transparent}.mw-parser-output .infobox-3cols-child{margin:auto}.mw-parser-output .infobox .navbar{font-size:100%}@media screen{html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .infobox-full-data:not(.notheme)>div:not(.notheme)[style]{background:#1f1f23!important;color:#f8f9fa}}@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .infobox-full-data:not(.notheme) div:not(.notheme){background:#1f1f23!important;color:#f8f9fa}}@media(min-width:640px){body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .infobox-table{display:table!important}body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .infobox-table>caption{display:table-caption!important}body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .infobox-table>tbody{display:table-row-group}body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .infobox-table tr{display:table-row!important}body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .infobox-table th,body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .infobox-table td{padding-left:inherit;padding-right:inherit}}</style><table class="infobox scotus" style="line-height: 1.4em"><tbody><tr><th colspan="2" class="infobox-above fn" style="background-color: #99c0ff; padding: 0.2em; line-height: 1.4em; font-size:125%; font-style: italic">Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="infobox-image"><span typeof="mw:File"><span title="Seal of the United States Supreme Court"><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f3/Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court.svg/100px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court.svg.png" decoding="async" width="100" height="100" class="mw-file-element" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f3/Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court.svg/150px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court.svg.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f3/Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court.svg/200px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court.svg.png 2x" data-file-width="720" data-file-height="720" /></span></span><div class="infobox-caption" style="padding-top: 0.5em; font-weight: bold"><a href="/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States" title="Supreme Court of the United States">Supreme Court of the United States</a></div></td></tr><tr><th colspan="2" class="infobox-header" style="background-color: #99c0ff; white-space:nowrap">Argued October 31, 2016<br />Decided March 22, 2017</th></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="infobox-label">Full case name</th><td class="infobox-data"><i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc., et al.</i></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="infobox-label">Docket no.</th><td class="infobox-data"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docketfiles/15-866.htm">15-866</a></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="infobox-label">Citations</th><td class="infobox-data">580 <a href="/wiki/United_States_Reports" title="United States Reports">U.S.</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-866_0971.pdf">___</a> (<i><a href="/wiki/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_580" title="List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 580">more</a></i>)<div>137 S. Ct. 1002; 197 <a href="/wiki/L._Ed._2d" class="mw-redirect" title="L. Ed. 2d">L. Ed. 2d</a> 354; 2017 <a href="/wiki/U.S._LEXIS" class="mw-redirect" title="U.S. LEXIS">U.S. LEXIS</a> 2026</div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="infobox-label">Argument</th><td class="infobox-data"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2016/15-866">Oral argument</a></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="infobox-label">Opinion announcement</th><td class="infobox-data"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2016/15-866">Opinion announcement</a></td></tr><tr><th colspan="2" class="infobox-header" style="background-color: #99c0ff; white-space:nowrap">Case history</th></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="infobox-label">Prior</th><td class="infobox-data"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1126788409">.mw-parser-output .plainlist ol,.mw-parser-output .plainlist ul{line-height:inherit;list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.mw-parser-output .plainlist ol li,.mw-parser-output .plainlist ul li{margin-bottom:0}</style><div class="plainlist"> <ul><li>Judgement for Star Athletica, <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4384232/199/varsity-brands-inc-v-star-athletica-llc/">No. 2:10-cv-02508</a>, 2014 WL 819422 (<a href="/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Tennessee" title="United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee">W.D. Tenn.</a> Mar. 1, 2014)</li> <li>Reversed, 799 <a href="/wiki/F.3d" class="mw-redirect" title="F.3d">F.3d</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20150819101">468</a> (<a href="/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit" title="United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit">6th Cir.</a> 2015)</li> <li>Writ of <i>certiorari</i> granted, 136 S.Ct. 1823 (2016)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="infobox-label">Subsequent</th><td class="infobox-data">Case settled over Star Athletica's objection (2017)</td></tr><tr><th colspan="2" class="infobox-header" style="background-color: #99c0ff; white-space:nowrap">Holding</th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="infobox-full-data">Aesthetic design elements on useful articles, like clothing, can be copyrightable if they can be separately identified as art and exist independently of the useful article.</td></tr><tr><th colspan="2" class="infobox-header" style="background-color: #99c0ff; white-space:nowrap">Court membership</th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="infobox-full-data"><dl style="margin:0; padding:0.1em 0.5em; text-align:center; line-height:1.3em;"> <dt style="margin:0;">Chief Justice</dt> <dd style="margin:0 0 0.3em;"><a href="/wiki/John_Roberts" title="John Roberts">John Roberts</a> </dd> <dt style="margin:0;">Associate Justices</dt> <dd style="margin:0;"><a href="/wiki/Anthony_Kennedy" title="Anthony Kennedy">Anthony Kennedy</a>&#160;<b>&#183;</b>&#32; <a href="/wiki/Clarence_Thomas" title="Clarence Thomas">Clarence Thomas</a><br /><a href="/wiki/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg" title="Ruth Bader Ginsburg">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</a>&#160;<b>&#183;</b>&#32; <a href="/wiki/Stephen_Breyer" title="Stephen Breyer">Stephen Breyer</a><br /><a href="/wiki/Samuel_Alito" title="Samuel Alito">Samuel Alito</a>&#160;<b>&#183;</b>&#32; <a href="/wiki/Sonia_Sotomayor" title="Sonia Sotomayor">Sonia Sotomayor</a><br /><a href="/wiki/Elena_Kagan" title="Elena Kagan">Elena Kagan</a> </dd></dl></td></tr><tr><th colspan="2" class="infobox-header" style="background-color: #99c0ff; white-space:nowrap">Case opinions</th></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="infobox-label">Majority</th><td class="infobox-data">Thomas, joined by Roberts, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan</td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="infobox-label">Concurrence</th><td class="infobox-data">Ginsburg</td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="infobox-label">Dissent</th><td class="infobox-data">Breyer, joined by Kennedy</td></tr><tr><th colspan="2" class="infobox-header" style="background-color: #99c0ff; white-space:nowrap">Laws applied</th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="infobox-full-data"><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976" title="Copyright Act of 1976">Copyright Act of 1976</a> (<a href="/wiki/Title_17_of_the_United_States_Code" title="Title 17 of the United States Code">17&#160;U.S.C.</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/101">§&#160;101</a>)</td></tr></tbody></table> <p><i><b>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</b></i>, 580 U.S. 405 (2017), was a <a href="/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States" title="Supreme Court of the United States">U.S. Supreme Court</a> case in which the court decided under what circumstances aesthetic elements of "useful articles" can be restricted by <a href="/wiki/Copyright" title="Copyright">copyright</a> law. The Court created a two-prong "separability" test, granting copyrightability based on separate identification and independent existence; the aesthetic elements must be identifiable as art if mentally separated from the article's practical use, and must qualify as copyrightable pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works if expressed in any medium. </p><p>The case was a dispute between two clothing manufacturers, Star Athletica and <a href="/wiki/Varsity_Brands" title="Varsity Brands">Varsity Brands</a>. Star Athletica began creating <a href="/wiki/Cheerleading_uniform" title="Cheerleading uniform">cheerleading uniforms</a> with <a href="/wiki/Stripe_(pattern)" title="Stripe (pattern)">stripes</a>, <a href="/wiki/Zigzag" title="Zigzag">zigzags</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Chevron_(insignia)" title="Chevron (insignia)">chevron</a> insignia similar to those made by <a href="/wiki/Varsity_Spirit" title="Varsity Spirit">a Varsity subsidiary</a>, but at a lower price. Varsity sued Star Athletica for <a href="/wiki/Copyright_infringement" title="Copyright infringement">copyright infringement</a>, and Star Athletica said that the clothing designs were uncopyrightable because their aesthetic designs were tied closely to (and guided by) their utilitarian purpose as uniforms. The court rejected this argument with a close reading of the statute and established that the clothing designs, as aesthetic elements of a useful article of clothing, could be copyrightable. It declined to hear Star Athletica's follow-up question about whether Varsity's designs were original enough to be copyrightable, so that part of the case remained unaddressed and Varsity's copyright registrations stood. </p><p>The court's conclusion that aesthetic elements of useful articles (and, thereby, clothing-design elements) could be copyrighted intrigued <a href="/wiki/Fashion_designer" class="mw-redirect" title="Fashion designer">fashion designers</a> and <a href="/wiki/Intellectual_property" title="Intellectual property">intellectual property</a> scholars. Some were pleased with the decision because they saw extending copyright to clothes as parity with other <a href="/wiki/Creative_industries" title="Creative industries">creative industries</a> which had had copyrights for much longer. Others denounced the court's opinion because of ambiguities in how to enforce the new rules and because of its potential to end <a href="/wiki/Fad" title="Fad">fashion trends</a> in generic clothing. </p> <meta property="mw:PageProp/toc" /> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="Background">Background</h2><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=1" title="Edit section: Background"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Fashion_was_uncopyrightable">Fashion was uncopyrightable</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=2" title="Edit section: Fashion was uncopyrightable"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <p>Clothing designs were originally <a href="/wiki/Copyright_law_of_the_United_States#Works_subject_to_copyright_law" title="Copyright law of the United States">not subject to copyright law</a> ("uncopyrightable") in the United States.<sup id="cite_ref-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-1"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>1<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-2"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>2<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Telfer_3-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Telfer-3"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>3<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> In 1941, the court heard <i><a href="/wiki/Fashion_Originators%27_Guild_of_America_v._FTC" title="Fashion Originators&#39; Guild of America v. FTC">Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC</a>.</i> This case considered the <a href="/wiki/Fashion" title="Fashion">fashion</a> industry's practice of boycotting the sale of its "high fashion" works at places which would sell knock-offs made by other companies for lower prices, known as "style piracy". The court ruled against the Guild, saying that its practice of attempting to create a <a href="/wiki/Monopoly" title="Monopoly">monopoly</a> outside the copyright system suppressed <a href="/wiki/Free_market" title="Free market">competition</a> and violated the <a href="/wiki/Sherman_Antitrust_Act" title="Sherman Antitrust Act">Sherman Antitrust Act</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-4"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>4<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Outside fashion, <i><a href="/wiki/Mazer_v._Stein" title="Mazer v. Stein">Mazer v. Stein</a></i> established in 1954 that an artistic statue created to adorn a lamp base could be copyrightable separately from the lamp under expansions of the <a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1909" title="Copyright Act of 1909">Copyright Act of 1909</a>; the statue's mass production with the lamp did not invalidate that.<sup id="cite_ref-5" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-5"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>5<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Another barrier to copyrightability in the United States is a vague <a href="/wiki/Threshold_of_originality#United_States" title="Threshold of originality">threshold of originality</a> which must be met to be eligible for an intellectual-property monopoly like a copyright or <a href="/wiki/Patent" title="Patent">patent</a>. In 1964's <i><a href="/wiki/Sears,_Roebuck_%26_Co._v._Stiffel_Co." title="Sears, Roebuck &amp; Co. v. Stiffel Co.">Sears, Roebuck &amp; Co. v. Stiffel Co.</a></i>, the court upheld a lower-court ruling that Stiffel's popular lamp design was not original enough to warrant a patent, rescinding that restriction and passing the design into the <a href="/wiki/Public_domain" title="Public domain">public domain</a>. The court's opinion indicated that the same logic would apply to an inappropriate copyright.<sup id="cite_ref-6" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-6"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>6<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>In the <a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976" title="Copyright Act of 1976">Copyright Act of 1976</a>, <a href="/wiki/United_States_Congress" title="United States Congress">Congress</a> changed the copyright law to allow copyrighting aesthetic features of "useful articles"<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> or "an article having an intrinsic utilitarian function that is not merely to portray the appearance of the article or to convey information."<sup id="cite_ref-17USC101_8-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-17USC101-8"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>8<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Congress intended to better incorporate the <i>Mazer v. Stein</i> ruling by doing so,<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-9" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-9"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>9<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> clarifying the difference between the copyrightability of "<a href="/wiki/Applied_art" class="mw-redirect" title="Applied art">applied art</a>" and the traditional, lesser restriction of "<a href="/wiki/Industrial_design" title="Industrial design">industrial design</a>" (the combination of features provided by <a href="/wiki/Design_patent" title="Design patent">design patents</a> or <a href="/wiki/Trade_dress" title="Trade dress">trade dress</a>). According to the Act, "pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features" of useful articles were copyrightable only if "separable" from the utilitarian aspects of the design and capable of existing independently of the article.<sup id="cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ClaimingDesign-10"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>10<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> This broad, definitional language led to about ten competing, inconsistent legal tests for that separability,<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-11" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-11"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>11<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-12" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-12"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>12<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> a state of affairs which was criticized for appearing to require judges to be art critics.<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Because clothes have both aesthetic and utilitarian features in their design, they fall into this useful-article category; therefore, the shapes and cuts of clothing are not copyrightable. Designs placed on clothing were opened up to the possibility of copyrightability, subject to those tests.<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The law was construed to mean that copyrighted two-dimensional designs could be placed on clothing and fabric-pattern sheets could be copyrighted before being cut to make clothing, but an article of clothing's overall color scheme and design could not be copyrighted because it was not capable of existing independently of the final useful article.<sup id="cite_ref-13" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-13"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>13<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Some fashion designers bristled under the rules, wondering why other creative industries like <a href="/wiki/Film_industry" title="Film industry">films</a> or <a href="/wiki/Music_industry" title="Music industry">music</a> were allowed to restrict access to their products with copyright and they were not.<sup id="cite_ref-14" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-14"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>14<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-15" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-15"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>15<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-CouncilBrief_16-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CouncilBrief-16"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>16<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Others interpreted fashion's successes as an industry thriving in the absence of copyright, <a href="/wiki/Criticism_of_copyright" title="Criticism of copyright">perhaps in part because of that</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-17" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-17"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>17<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-3DPrintingAmicus_18-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-3DPrintingAmicus-18"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>18<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-19" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-19"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>19<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-20" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-20"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>20<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Members of Congress introduced several bills to remove the separability requirement from the law, but none were signed into law.<sup id="cite_ref-21" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-21"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>21<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>As alternatives, fashion designers turned to other forms of intellectual property: <a href="/wiki/Design_patent" title="Design patent">design patents</a> and <a href="/wiki/Trade_dress" title="Trade dress">trade dress</a>, an aspect of <a href="/wiki/Trademark" title="Trademark">trademark</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-Telfer_3-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Telfer-3"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>3<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> These generally provided designers causes of action to sue suspected infringers.<sup id="cite_ref-22" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-22"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>22<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-23" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-23"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>23<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-24" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-24"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>24<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> However, they were critical of the hurdles necessary to acquire these. The process to acquire a design patent could last longer than the trend on which the designer wanted to capitalize.<sup id="cite_ref-Telfer_3-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Telfer-3"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>3<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup class="noprint Inline-Template" style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Unsupported_attributions" title="Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch"><span title="The material near this tag possibly uses too-vague attribution or weasel words. (April 2022)">who?</span></a></i>&#93;</sup> Trade dress required the public to recognize a <a href="/wiki/Secondary_meaning" class="mw-redirect" title="Secondary meaning">secondary meaning</a> associating the design with its origin, and was subject to contradictory rulings from the Supreme Court. It was also vulnerable to dilution if courts determined that it was not being policed sufficiently.<sup id="cite_ref-25" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-25"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>25<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Giles_26-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Giles-26"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>26<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Defenders of the slow design-patent process said that the design patent's hurdle benefited society as a whole because the extra time prevented ill-advised patents which would disrupt innovation.<sup id="cite_ref-27" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-27"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>27<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Extending trademark to fashion had its critics, who argued that the court was out of line when it applied the trade-dress doctrine to fashion after Congress declined to extend trade dress to it in the past.<sup id="cite_ref-Giles_26-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Giles-26"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>26<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup class="noprint Inline-Template" style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Unsupported_attributions" title="Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch"><span title="The material near this tag possibly uses too-vague attribution or weasel words. (April 2022)">who?</span></a></i>&#93;</sup> Apart from intellectual property, there were also remedies under laws banning the sale of counterfeits and post-sale protection confusion.<sup id="cite_ref-Giles_26-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Giles-26"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>26<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup class="noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact" style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Explanationism" title="Wikipedia:Explanationism"><span title="This sentence or topic needs more explanation.">more detail needed</span></a></i>&#93;</sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Varsity_Brands">Varsity Brands</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=3" title="Edit section: Varsity Brands"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <p>Varsity Brands was the parent company of Varsity Spirit, which had become the largest <a href="/wiki/Cheerleading" title="Cheerleading">cheerleading</a> and <a href="/wiki/Sportswear_(activewear)" class="mw-redirect" title="Sportswear (activewear)">sports-uniform</a> manufacturer in the world by the end of the 2000s.<sup id="cite_ref-VarsityBrandsOwnsCheerleading_28-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-VarsityBrandsOwnsCheerleading-28"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>28<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-29" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-29"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>29<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Because of the law, Varsity could not <a href="/wiki/Copyright_registration" title="Copyright registration">register copyrights</a> for its cheerleading-uniform designs as clothing. Instead, Varsity applied for copyrights on drawings and photographs of those designs<sup id="cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ClaimingDesign-10"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>10<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-SupremeCourtHearsArguments_30-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-SupremeCourtHearsArguments-30"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>30<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> as "two-dimensional artwork" or "fabric design (artwork)." The design in the images would then be applied to the clothing with sewing or sublimation, a process where designs are printed on paper, placed on the fabric, and heated so the ink sinks in.<sup id="cite_ref-Benson2018_31-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Benson2018-31"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>31<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> After rejections by the <a href="/wiki/United_States_Copyright_Office" title="United States Copyright Office">Copyright Office</a>, Varsity described the uniforms in extremely specific detail to make the registration appear limited and improve its registration chances. The Copyright Office approved<sup id="cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ClaimingDesign-10"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>10<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> over 200<sup id="cite_ref-slipop1_32-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop1-32"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>32<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> of these copyrights with meticulous descriptions like "has a central field of black bordered at the bottom by a gray/white/black multistripe forming a shallow 'vee' of which the left-hand leg is horizontal, while the right-hand leg stretches 'northeast' at approximately a forty-five degree angle." Varsity frequently filed lawsuits alleging infringement with accusations of general copying<sup id="cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ClaimingDesign-10"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>10<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> to halt other companies from merchandising competing uniforms. The competitors regarded the lawsuits as frivolous because the claimed designs were so simple.<sup id="cite_ref-WhoOwnsCheerleaderUniforms_33-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-WhoOwnsCheerleaderUniforms-33"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>33<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Star_Athletica_lawsuit">Star Athletica lawsuit</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=4" title="Edit section: Star Athletica lawsuit"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <figure class="mw-default-size mw-halign-left" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Uniform_designs_at_issue_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png" class="mw-file-description"><img alt="Drawings of five cheerleading uniforms" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fb/Uniform_designs_at_issue_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png/220px-Uniform_designs_at_issue_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png" decoding="async" width="220" height="91" class="mw-file-element" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fb/Uniform_designs_at_issue_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png/330px-Uniform_designs_at_issue_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fb/Uniform_designs_at_issue_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png 2x" data-file-width="398" data-file-height="165" /></a><figcaption>The five cheerleading-uniform designs involved in the case</figcaption></figure> <p>The Liebe Company founded Star Athletica as a subsidiary in January 2010. Varsity Brands had cancelled an agreement with The Liebe Company's sports-lettering subsidiary, and Varsity accused The Liebe company of founding Star Athletica to retaliate by leveraging former Varsity employees' knowledge of Varsity designs. Later that year,<sup id="cite_ref-WhoOwnsCheerleaderUniforms_33-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-WhoOwnsCheerleaderUniforms-33"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>33<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Varsity Brands sued Star Athletica for infringing five of its copyrighted designs for cheerleading uniforms.<sup id="cite_ref-slipop2quote_34-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop2quote-34"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>34<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The Star Athletica designs were not exactly identical (physically or graphically), but Varsity's general description of allegedly-copied elements in court filings ("the lines, stripes, coloring, angles, V's [or chevrons], and shapes and the arrangement and placement of those elements") suited both designs and the case moved forward.<sup id="cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ClaimingDesign-10"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>10<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Varsity also sued for <a href="/wiki/Trademark_infringement" title="Trademark infringement">trademark infringement</a> under the <a href="/wiki/Lanham_Act" title="Lanham Act">Lanham Act</a><sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-5" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> and Star Athletica counter-sued Varsity under the Sherman Antitrust Act for allegedly monopolizing the cheerleading industry,<sup id="cite_ref-VarsityBrief_35-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-VarsityBrief-35"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>35<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> but those claims were dismissed.<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-6" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-VarsityBrief_35-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-VarsityBrief-35"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>35<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>In 2014, the <a href="/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Tennessee" title="United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee">United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee</a> ruled in Star Athletica's favor on the grounds that the designs were not eligible for copyright restriction. According to <a href="/wiki/United_States_federal_judge" title="United States federal judge">Judge</a> <a href="/wiki/Robert_Hardy_Cleland" title="Robert Hardy Cleland">Robert Hardy Cleland</a>, a design without distinctive marks (like chevrons and zigzags) would not be identifiable as cheerleading uniforms, so the designs were not separately identifiable. They were not conceptually separable because the marks, outside the context of the clothing, would have still evoked the idea of a cheerleading uniform.<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-7" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-36" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-36"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>36<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-37" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-37"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>37<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>The district court's decision was reversed on <a href="/wiki/Appeal" title="Appeal">appeal</a> by the <a href="/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit" title="United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit">United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit</a>, Judge <a href="/wiki/Karen_Nelson_Moore" title="Karen Nelson Moore">Karen Nelson Moore</a>'s majority opinion said that the district court should have deferred to the fact that the Copyright Office's trained personnel had granted the copyright registrations. On the questions of the case, Moore evaluated the competing separability tests and created a new five-step test for the Circuit Court analysis. The court found that the designs were copyrightable because the clothes were usable as athletic wear and removing the designs did not affect their utility. Moore said that the design could be separately identifiable because it could be held "side by side" with a blank dress and there would be no utilitarian difference; it could exist independently, because individual aspects (such as chevrons) could appear in designs of other clothing items. She also said that a ruling in favor of Star Athletica would have rendered all paintings uncopyrightable because they decorated the rooms in which they hung. Judge <a href="/wiki/David_McKeague" title="David McKeague">David McKeague</a> dissented, disagreeing about the application of one of the test's steps. The third step asked the court to determine the useful article's "utilitarian aspects." Instead of the majority's more-general assessment of athletic wear, McKeague would have defined the uniforms as clothing the body "in an attractive way for a special occasion" and "identify[ing] the wearer as a cheerleader;" their aesthetic features, therefore, could not be separated from the utilitarian.<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-8" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-38" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-38"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>38<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Star Athletica filed to be heard by the United States Supreme Court in January 2016. On May 2 of that year, the court granted <i><a href="/wiki/Certiorari" title="Certiorari">certiorari</a></i> "to resolve widespread disagreement over the proper test for implementing §&#160;101's separate-identification and independent-existence requirements." Star Athletica also wanted the court to decide if Varsity's designs were sufficiently original to be copyrighted, but the court declined.<sup id="cite_ref-39" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-39"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>39<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Amicus_curiae_briefs"><span class="anchor" id="&#39;&#39;Amicus_curiae&#39;&#39;"></span><i>Amicus curiae</i> briefs</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=5" title="Edit section: Amicus curiae briefs"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <figure class="mw-halign-right" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Cosplay_of_Inner_Senshi.jpg" class="mw-file-description"><img src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/14/Cosplay_of_Inner_Senshi.jpg/300px-Cosplay_of_Inner_Senshi.jpg" decoding="async" width="300" height="200" class="mw-file-element" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/14/Cosplay_of_Inner_Senshi.jpg/450px-Cosplay_of_Inner_Senshi.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/14/Cosplay_of_Inner_Senshi.jpg/600px-Cosplay_of_Inner_Senshi.jpg 2x" data-file-width="800" data-file-height="533" /></a><figcaption>These cosplayers are wearing outfits copied from the <i><a href="/wiki/Sailor_Moon" title="Sailor Moon">Sailor Moon</a></i> series.</figcaption></figure> <p>The case attracted the attention of interest groups which filed fifteen <i><a href="/wiki/Amicus_curiae" title="Amicus curiae">amicus curiae</a></i> briefs.<sup id="cite_ref-docket_40-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-docket-40"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>40<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Among Star Athletica's advocates was <a href="/wiki/Public_Knowledge" title="Public Knowledge">Public Knowledge</a>, which helped draft a brief representing the views of costuming groups (particularly <a href="/wiki/Cosplay" title="Cosplay">cosplayers</a> of the <a href="/wiki/Honorverse" title="Honorverse">Royal Manticoran Navy</a> and the International Costuming Guild) which were concerned that a ruling in Varsity's favor could endanger their craft. Much of cosplaying involved recreating designs recognizable from <a href="/wiki/Pop_culture" class="mw-redirect" title="Pop culture">pop culture</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-41" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-41"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>41<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-42" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-42"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>42<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> When the legality of creating costumes based on pop culture had been questioned, the Copyright Office decided that costumes were uncopyrightable, useful articles for the practical purpose of covering the body;<sup id="cite_ref-43" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-43"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>43<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> there was debate over this rationale.<sup id="cite_ref-Costumes_and_Copyright_Concerns_44-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Costumes_and_Copyright_Concerns-44"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>44<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-45" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-45"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>45<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Cosplay" title="Cosplay">Cosplayers</a> also cited <a href="/wiki/Fair_use" title="Fair use">fair use</a> to justify their hobby.<sup id="cite_ref-46" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-46"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>46<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The Royal Manticoran Navy filed a separate supporting brief in <i>Star Athletica</i> which emphasized fair use in costuming, voicing a concern that allowing clothing-design copyrights would further strengthen Varsity Brands's position in the cheerleading industry,<sup id="cite_ref-SupremeCourtPondersCostumes_47-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-SupremeCourtPondersCostumes-47"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>47<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Manticore_48-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Manticore-48"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>48<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> one commonly described as monopolistic because of its 80-percent market share.<sup id="cite_ref-VarsityBrandsOwnsCheerleading_28-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-VarsityBrandsOwnsCheerleading-28"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>28<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Manticore_48-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Manticore-48"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>48<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-StarAthleticaBrief_49-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StarAthleticaBrief-49"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>49<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-50" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-50"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>50<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-51" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-51"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>51<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Public Knowledge was involved in a brief from <a href="/wiki/Shapeways" title="Shapeways">Shapeways</a>, the <a href="/wiki/Open_Source_Hardware_Association" title="Open Source Hardware Association">Open Source Hardware Association</a>, <a href="/wiki/Formlabs" title="Formlabs">Formlabs</a> and the <a href="/wiki/Organization_for_Transformative_Works" title="Organization for Transformative Works">Organization for Transformative Works</a>, who were concerned that copyright restriction would impact <a href="/wiki/3D_printing" title="3D printing">3D printing</a> by making it difficult to share designs and by creating a fiscal incentive for media companies to crack down on <a href="/wiki/Derivative_work" title="Derivative work">derivative works</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-3DPrintingAmicus_18-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-3DPrintingAmicus-18"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>18<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-52" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-52"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>52<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-53" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-53"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>53<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-TheMakerMovement_54-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-TheMakerMovement-54"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>54<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-55" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-55"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>55<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Another group of supporters ("Intellectual Property Professors") objected to broadly expanding copyright to useful-article designs because they considered design patents sufficient. Citing examples of what Congress considered copyrightable in drafting the 1976 law, they argued that extending copyright to uniform designs would unduly stretch Congress's intent to copyright minor detailing on industrial designs, such as like floral engravings on silverware, carvings on the backs of chairs, or printing on T-shirts.<sup id="cite_ref-IntellectualPropertyProfessorsBrief_56-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-IntellectualPropertyProfessorsBrief-56"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>56<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Varsity was endorsed by the <a href="/wiki/Council_of_Fashion_Designers_of_America" title="Council of Fashion Designers of America">Council of Fashion Designers of America</a>, which believed that extending copyright to clothing designs was critical to prevent exploitative copyists and preserve the United States' rapid rate of expansion in the worldwide fashion industry: $370 billion in domestic <a href="/wiki/Consumer_spending" title="Consumer spending">consumer spending</a> and 1.8 million jobs.<sup id="cite_ref-CouncilBrief_16-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CouncilBrief-16"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>16<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-WhoOwnsCheerleaderUniforms_33-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-WhoOwnsCheerleaderUniforms-33"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>33<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The <a href="/wiki/Fashion_Law_Institute" title="Fashion Law Institute">Fashion Law Institute</a> shared these interests, saying that a decision to copyright clothing designs would be a proper reading of the <i>Mazer v. Stein</i> ruling's incorporation into the 1976 Copyright Act.<sup id="cite_ref-SupremeCourtPondersCostumes_47-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-SupremeCourtPondersCostumes-47"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>47<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-FashionLawBrief_57-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FashionLawBrief-57"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>57<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Both criticized the "<a href="/wiki/Fast_fashion" title="Fast fashion">fast fashion</a>" industry of duplicating expensive designs with increasingly-cheap 3D printing technology without payment to their original creators.<sup id="cite_ref-CouncilBrief_16-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CouncilBrief-16"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>16<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-FashionLawBrief_57-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FashionLawBrief-57"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>57<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The Institute cited "geek fashion," including cosplay, as a burgeoning part of the industry.<sup id="cite_ref-FashionLawBrief_57-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FashionLawBrief-57"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>57<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>The <a href="/wiki/Federal_government_of_the_United_States" title="Federal government of the United States">United States government</a> also supported Varsity. The government said that the question of a proper separability analysis was unnecessary because, in creating the designs as drawings, Varsity had received a copyright for them and reserved the ability to reproduce that design however they chose to in any medium. It pointed to a concession from Star Athletica that if Varsity (hypothetically) controlled <i><a href="/wiki/The_Starry_Night" title="The Starry Night">The Starry Night</a></i>, the company would be able to restrict the painting's printing on dresses.<sup id="cite_ref-UnitedStatesBrief_58-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-UnitedStatesBrief-58"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>58<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Star Athletica had conceded this because it was an abstract painting (not a dress design),<sup id="cite_ref-StarAthleticaBrief_49-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-StarAthleticaBrief-49"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>49<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> but the government said that the painting would cover the entire dress surface and was no different than the Varsity designs. It also said that, in applying the requested conceptual-separability analysis, what mattered was that a uniform stripped of the design "remain[ed] similarly useful" compared to the original; a blank dress was equivalent to a designed one, so the design was copyrightable.<sup id="cite_ref-UnitedStatesBrief_58-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-UnitedStatesBrief-58"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>58<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Oral_arguments">Oral arguments</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=6" title="Edit section: Oral arguments"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <p><a href="/wiki/Oral_argument" title="Oral argument">Oral arguments</a> began on October 31, 2016, with Star Athletica represented by <a href="/wiki/John_J._Bursch" title="John J. Bursch">John J. Bursch</a> and Varsity by William M. Jay. Eric Feigin also spoke on Varsity's behalf, representing the United States as an <i>amicus curiae</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-ViewFromTheCourtroom_59-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ViewFromTheCourtroom-59"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>59<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-60" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-60"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>60<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-61" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-61"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>61<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Star Athletica's lawyers gave the court examples of the graphic designs' utility. The designs' colors and shapes were arranged to create <a href="/wiki/Optical_illusion" title="Optical illusion">optical effects</a> such as the <a href="/wiki/M%C3%BCller-Lyer_illusion" title="Müller-Lyer illusion">Müller-Lyer illusion</a>, changing a cheerleader's appearance to make them look taller, thinner, and generally more appealing. The company considered this distinct from applying a pre-existing two-dimensional image to the uniform because the lines required for the illusions needed to be properly located on a properly-fitted uniform;<sup id="cite_ref-ViewFromTheCourtroom_59-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ViewFromTheCourtroom-59"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>59<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> people often made utilitarian decisions about their clothing to make themselves look better.<sup id="cite_ref-NYTOct31_62-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-NYTOct31-62"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>62<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Those designs on another object, such as a lunchbox, would not serve that utilitarian purpose.<sup id="cite_ref-63" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-63"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>63<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Associate_justice" title="Associate justice">Justice</a> <a href="/wiki/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg" title="Ruth Bader Ginsburg">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</a> rejected that line of argument, citing the fact that the examples presented in evidence were two-dimensional works. In her view, it did not matter that the submitted designs were "superimposed" on three-dimensional uniforms; they were submitted in two-dimensional images separated from the uniforms and copyrightable. Both parties agreed that the physical, three-dimensional uniform's cut and how it physically framed the body were not copyrightable, and they were interested in the colors and aesthetic designs as applied to the useful article.<sup id="cite_ref-NYTOct31_62-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-NYTOct31-62"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>62<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Ginsburg was uncomfortable with the vagueness she perceived in Star Athletica wanting the court to decide when a given two-dimensional design "is what makes an article utilitarian" when that design could conceivably be placed on anything.<sup id="cite_ref-ArgumentAnalysisJusticesWorry_64-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ArgumentAnalysisJusticesWorry-64"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>64<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Chief_Justice" class="mw-redirect" title="Chief Justice">Chief Justice</a> <a href="/wiki/John_Roberts" title="John Roberts">John Roberts</a> agreed, adding that the designs did more than sit on the body; they sent a "particular message" (that the wearer was "a member of a cheerleading squad"), and Roberts leaned toward thinking of them as copyrightable.<sup id="cite_ref-NYTOct31_62-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-NYTOct31-62"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>62<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>The court also considered more abstract aspects of the case. For example, it was unclear how a decision in Varsity's favor might affect military-style <a href="/wiki/Camouflage" title="Camouflage">camouflage</a> patterns, and whether they could be restricted if fashion designs were copyrightable. Varsity supported the idea of camouflage copyrights, although Justice <a href="/wiki/Elena_Kagan" title="Elena Kagan">Elena Kagan</a> pointed out the clearly utilitarian function of camouflage patterns: concealment. On the industry side, women's fashion was a concern worth hundreds of billions of dollars worldwide. Justice <a href="/wiki/Stephen_Breyer" title="Stephen Breyer">Stephen Breyer</a> speculated that the price of dresses could conceivably double if copyright terms were applied to designs, and knock-off brands could not compete at lower prices.<sup id="cite_ref-NYTOct31_62-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-NYTOct31-62"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>62<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Breyer and Justice <a href="/wiki/Sonia_Sotomayor" title="Sonia Sotomayor">Sonia Sotomayor</a> questioned Varsity about possible monopolization; a uniform design could become part of a school's identity, compelling it to buy exclusively from Varsity for a century of copyright restriction. Breyer was concerned that designers or lawyers might sue over the design of any dress or suit based on generic drawings.<sup id="cite_ref-ArgumentAnalysisJusticesWorry_64-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ArgumentAnalysisJusticesWorry-64"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>64<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Sotomayor, who once represented <a href="/wiki/Fendi" title="Fendi">Fendi</a> in cases brought against knock-offs, wondered if a decision for Varsity would destroy those knock-off brands, and was unsure if that would be a bad thing.<sup id="cite_ref-SupremeCourtHearsArguments_30-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-SupremeCourtHearsArguments-30"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>30<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Justice <a href="/wiki/Anthony_Kennedy" title="Anthony Kennedy">Anthony Kennedy</a> wondered if it was "the domain of copyright to [restrict] the way people present themselves to the world."<sup id="cite_ref-ArgumentAnalysisJusticesWorry_64-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ArgumentAnalysisJusticesWorry-64"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>64<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Breyer received media attention for saying of the purpose of fashion, "The clothes on the hanger do nothing; the clothes on the woman do everything," a sentiment Kagan thought was "so romantic."<sup id="cite_ref-SupremeCourtHearsArguments_30-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-SupremeCourtHearsArguments-30"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>30<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-ViewFromTheCourtroom_59-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ViewFromTheCourtroom-59"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>59<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-NYTOct31_62-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-NYTOct31-62"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>62<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="Opinion_of_the_court"><span class="anchor" id="Opinion_of_the_Court"></span>Opinion of the court</h2><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=7" title="Edit section: Opinion of the court"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Majority_opinion">Majority opinion</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=8" title="Edit section: Majority opinion"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <p>Justice <a href="/wiki/Clarence_Thomas" title="Clarence Thomas">Clarence Thomas</a> delivered the majority opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices <a href="/wiki/Samuel_Alito" title="Samuel Alito">Alito</a>, Sotomayor, and Kagan.<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-9" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The court defined its task as "whether the lines, chevrons, and colorful shapes appearing on the surface of [Varsity Brands'] cheerleading uniforms are eligible for copyright restriction as separable features of the design of those cheerleading uniforms",<sup id="cite_ref-65" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-65"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>65<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> and did not consider whether the designs in the case met copyright's <a href="/wiki/Threshold_of_originality" title="Threshold of originality">threshold of originality</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt-66"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>66<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Thomas rejected arguments from Varsity and the United States that separability analysis was unneeded,<sup id="cite_ref-67" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-67"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>67<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> and did away with all previous lower-court tests. The opinion provided a two-part test, based on the 1976 statute and the <i>Mazer v. Stein</i> decision:<sup id="cite_ref-68" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-68"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>68<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1244412712">.mw-parser-output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 32px}.mw-parser-output .templatequotecite{line-height:1.5em;text-align:left;margin-top:0}@media(min-width:500px){.mw-parser-output .templatequotecite{padding-left:1.6em}}</style><blockquote class="templatequote"><p>... an artistic feature of the design of a useful article is eligible for copyright protection if the feature (1) can be perceived as a two- or three-dimensional work of art separate from the useful article and (2) would qualify as a protectable pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work either on its own or in some other medium if imagined separately from the useful article.<sup id="cite_ref-slipop11_69-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop11-69"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>69<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup></p></blockquote> <p>After applying this test to the cheerleading uniforms, the court ruled in Varsity's favor that the designs were separable from the useful article and could be copyrighted.<sup id="cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt-66"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>66<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-slipop10_70-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop10-70"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>70<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The separability analysis started with an admittedly-permissive first requirement, describing the designs as separately-identifiable "pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works." The design needed to exist independently, and Thomas concluded that it did when it appeared in other media (such as the two-dimensional drawings submitted to the Copyright Office). In his view, this conceptual separation would not necessarily recreate the useful dress because the design's elements (like the chevrons) could appear on items in different contexts;<sup id="cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt-66"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>66<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-slipop7-8_71-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop7-8-71"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>71<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> the graphic design itself did not make a garment a cheerleader uniform, even it appeared on a different kind of clothing.<sup id="cite_ref-slipop10_70-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop10-70"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>70<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> This analysis moved the consideration away from whether the item left after separation was useful, and to whether or not the design itself was useful. A feature incapable of separation was a utilitarian feature, Thomas said.<sup id="cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt-66"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>66<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-slipop7-8_71-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop7-8-71"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>71<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Addressing concerns that this would grant control over more than the design, Thomas said that the separated aesthetic element could not be a useful article; someone could not copyright a design and then exert control over its physical representation. A drawing (or small model) of a car, copyrighted, could not restrict production of a functional automobile with the same body by a competitor. The car drawing would not suppress a rival car manufacturer in the automobile market, so Varsity's uniform drawing would not suppress Star Athletica in the uniform market because their uniforms could have the same cut.<sup id="cite_ref-slipop7-8_71-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop7-8-71"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>71<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>The final section of the opinion discussed objections to the decision raised by the parties in their briefs. There were no requirements that there be an equivalent useful article remaining after the design element was conceptually removed or that the removed element be "solely artistic." Thomas said that discussions of the blank dress were unnecessary because the statute did not require the remaining work to be useful (or "similarly useful", as the government had put it), because all that mattered was if the separated element was a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work. He said that adopting this requirement would have overruled <i>Mazer</i>; the statue in that case was considered "applied art" because the 1909 act had removed an earlier distinction between aesthetic and useful works of art. That distinction was not reinstated by the 1976 act, so there was no distinguishing between "conceptual" and "physical" separability.<sup id="cite_ref-slipop12-15_72-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop12-15-72"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>72<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Thomas rejected Star Athletica's additional, "objective" considerations from preexisting tests that a work be identified as artistic contributions from a designer, independent of its utilitarian purpose, and be marketable without the design's utilitarian function.<sup id="cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt-66"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>66<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-slipop15-17_73-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop15-17-73"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>73<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> These were not within the statute and Thomas dismissed them, saying that all that mattered was consumer perception&#160;&#8211;&#32;not the design's intent. About <a href="/wiki/Legislative_history#United_States" title="Legislative history">Congress's reluctance</a> to apply copyright to useful articles in general, Thomas said that congressional inaction was not usually a significant judicial argument. He found much of the discussion moot; copyright could not restrict the cut of the design, and copyright coverage did not prevent design patenting.<sup id="cite_ref-slipop15-17_73-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop15-17-73"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>73<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Thomas rejected the arguments of Justice Breyer's dissent and Star Athletica's similar contention that the designs were uncopyrightable because they would have the same outline as the useful article. He analogized the uniform's design to a mural on a curved dome, saying that the contour of the dome would not make the mural uncopyrightable. He thought that Breyer's traditional view that a preexisting two-dimensional artwork applied to a portion of the clothing could be copyrighted was contradictory; the statute would provide copyright restriction to designs which covered part of the clothing surface, but not to designs that covered all of it.<sup id="cite_ref-slipop11_69-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-slipop11-69"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>69<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Ginsburg's concurrence agreed on the second point in its notes; portions of Varsity's claimed uniform designs appear on other merchandise, such as T-shirts.<sup id="cite_ref-74" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-74"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>74<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Concurring_opinion"><span class="anchor" id="Concurrence"></span>Concurring opinion</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=9" title="Edit section: Concurring opinion"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <figure class="mw-default-size" typeof="mw:File/Thumb"><a href="/wiki/File:Attachment_to_2017_opinion_of_Justice_Ginsburg_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png" class="mw-file-description"><img alt="See caption" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/43/Attachment_to_2017_opinion_of_Justice_Ginsburg_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png/220px-Attachment_to_2017_opinion_of_Justice_Ginsburg_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png" decoding="async" width="220" height="335" class="mw-file-element" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/43/Attachment_to_2017_opinion_of_Justice_Ginsburg_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png/330px-Attachment_to_2017_opinion_of_Justice_Ginsburg_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/43/Attachment_to_2017_opinion_of_Justice_Ginsburg_in_Star_Athletica_v_Varsity_Brands.png 2x" data-file-width="341" data-file-height="520" /></a><figcaption>Page six of Justice Ginsburg's <a href="/wiki/Concurring_opinion" title="Concurring opinion">concurring opinion</a>, which noted that the designs were registered with the U.S. Copyright Office as two-dimensional artwork</figcaption></figure> <p>Justice Ginsburg wrote an opinion, concurring that the cheerleading uniform designs were separable without joining in the majority's reasoning, and emphasized that the copyrights were not registered for the useful articles of clothing; the registrations were for pictorial and graphic works which were then <em>reproduced on</em> the clothing.<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-10" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-75" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-75"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>75<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Because the Copyright Act of 1976 provided copyright claimants "the right to reproduce the work in or on any kind of article, whether useful or otherwise,"<sup id="cite_ref-76" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-76"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>76<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> the claimant of a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work's copyright could restrict others from reproducing the work's elements on their useful articles. According to Ginsburg, there was no need for the court to address the separability-analysis issue.<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-11" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-ReferenceA_77-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ReferenceA-77"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>77<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> She attached to her decision several pages of applications submitted by Varsity Brands to the Copyright Office, pointing to their claimed types of work: "2-dimensional artwork" or "fabric design (artwork)."<sup id="cite_ref-78" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-78"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>78<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> In her notes, Ginsburg said that she did not take a stand about whether or not Varsity's designs were original enough for copyright; she referred to <i><a href="/wiki/Feist_Publications,_Inc.,_v._Rural_Telephone_Service_Co." title="Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.">Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.</a></i>, quoting its conclusion that "the requisite level of creativity [for copyrightability] is extremely low; even a slight amount will suffice."<sup id="cite_ref-ReferenceA_77-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ReferenceA-77"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>77<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Dissent">Dissent</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=10" title="Edit section: Dissent"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <p>Justices Breyer dissented, and Justice Kennedy joined him. While Breyer agreed with much of the majority's reasoning, he disagreed with the framing and application of the majority's test and concluded that the design was not separable from the uniform as a useful article.<sup id="cite_ref-breyer1_79-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-breyer1-79"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>79<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Breyer also criticized what he considered vagueness in the majority's test. He thought that under it, "virtually any industrial design" could be considered separable as soon as it was thought of in terms of art, whether giving it a picture frame or <a href="/wiki/Found_object" title="Found object">merely calling an object "art"</a> (like a <a href="/wiki/Marcel_Duchamp" title="Marcel Duchamp">Marcel Duchamp</a> <a href="/wiki/Readymades_of_Marcel_Duchamp" title="Readymades of Marcel Duchamp">series</a>).<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-12" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-80" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-80"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>80<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Breyer's approach to the problem was to interpret what "identified separately" meant in the context of the statute. His reading was that to be separable, the design features needed to be physically separable from the article (leaving the utilitarian object functional) or the design features needed to be conceivably separable without conjuring a picture of the utilitarian object in a person's mind. He returned to <i>Mazer v. Stein</i> and applied his reasoning to two lamps, one with a <a href="/wiki/Siamese_cat" title="Siamese cat">Siamese cat</a> statuette for a pole and one with a brass-rod pole and a cat statuette attached to its base. On the base, the cat could be physically separable and was copyrightable as a figurine. When the cat was the pole, it could not be physically separated; it could be conceptually separated from the context of the lamp without conjuring the idea of a lamp, however, and was copyrightable as a figurine.<sup id="cite_ref-81" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-81"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>81<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Applying his version of the test to the cheerleader uniforms, he found that the design was not physically separable. Picturing the design separately would reveal a cheerleader uniform "coextensive with that design and cut", so the design and useful article were not conceptually separable either.<sup id="cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-5" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt-66"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>66<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-breyer1_79-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-breyer1-79"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>79<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-breyer11_82-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-breyer11-82"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>82<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Breyer then considered <a href="/wiki/Still_life_paintings_by_Vincent_van_Gogh_(Paris)#Pair_of_shoes" title="Still life paintings by Vincent van Gogh (Paris)">shoes painted by</a> <a href="/wiki/Vincent_van_Gogh" title="Vincent van Gogh">Vincent van Gogh</a> and turned to the examples of Congress's intended targets of copyright in the <i>amicus curiae</i> brief filed by the Intellectual Property Professors. He found that copyrighting those embellishments was not the same as copyrighting an entire cheerleading uniform design; those examples were conceptually separable, while the uniform design was not. Breyer reiterated that van Gogh could certainly have received a copyright to prevent people from reproducing his painting, but the request in <i>Star Athletica</i> was an injunction against reproducing uniforms; he felt that this decision would be equivalent to giving van Gogh a design copyright which could prevent others from producing those shoes.<sup id="cite_ref-83" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-83"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>83<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> He accused Varsity Brands of trying to acquire copyrights to "prevent its competitors from making useful three-dimensional cheerleader uniforms by submitting plainly unoriginal chevrons and stripes as cut and arranged on a useful article."<sup id="cite_ref-breyer11_82-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-breyer11-82"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>82<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Breyer studied the state of the fashion industry at the time of the decision. Recent Congresses had rejected 70 bills to extend copyright to cover designs on useful articles, which he interpreted as <a href="/wiki/Legislative_intent" title="Legislative intent">an unwillingness of lawmakers</a> to enact the change. He cited the metrics provided by the Varsity <i>amici</i> Council of Fashion Designers of America to show that the fashion industry was successful without copyright and quoted warnings from <a href="/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson" title="Thomas Jefferson">Thomas Jefferson</a> and <a href="/wiki/Thomas_Babington_Macaulay" title="Thomas Babington Macaulay">Thomas Babington Macaulay</a> against wantonly expanding copyright monopolies. Seeing no pressing need to extend the restriction, he did not want to overstep the bounds of the <a href="/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States" title="Constitution of the United States">Constitution</a>'s <a href="/wiki/Copyright_Clause" title="Copyright Clause">Copyright Clause</a>, especially when the available design patents afforded fifteen years of restriction and copyright could offer more than a century.<sup id="cite_ref-84" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-84"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>84<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="Subsequent_developments">Subsequent developments</h2><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=11" title="Edit section: Subsequent developments"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Immediate_reactions">Immediate reactions</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=12" title="Edit section: Immediate reactions"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <p>Varsity Brands's leadership and supporters were pleased by the decision. Varsity founder Jeff Webb said that it was a win for "the basic idea that designers everywhere can create excellent work and make investments in their future without fear of having it stolen or copied." <a href="/wiki/Susan_Scafidi" title="Susan Scafidi">Susan Scafidi</a>, founder of the Fashion Law Institute, had been involved with the case from the district-court level and was sorry that it had to go all the way to the Supreme Court. However, she praised Thomas's decision as a maintenance of the status quo based on the copyrightability of fabric patterns. Although it was important to her because she believed that fashion designers deserved to restrict their designs with copyright, she did not think that it would change things for designers because it was based on the language of the preexisting statute.<sup id="cite_ref-OneYearLater_85-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-OneYearLater-85"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>85<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-86" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-86"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>86<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>On March 31, 2017,<sup id="cite_ref-87" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-87"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>87<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Puma_SE" class="mw-redirect" title="Puma SE">Puma</a> sued <a href="/wiki/Forever_21" title="Forever 21">Forever 21</a> for alleged violations of Puma's intellectual-property rights. Puma based the copyright-infringement portion of its case on the nine-day-old precedent, and said that Forever 21 shoes included copyrighted elements of similar Puma products. Forever 21, a supplier of knock-offs, had been sued for copyright infringement in the past; this was among the first times that a company used the argument that, in the case of Puma's <a href="/wiki/Rihanna" title="Rihanna">Fenty</a> Fur Slides, their "wide plush fur strap extending to the base of the sandal" was capable of being represented in another medium and was covered by copyright as separable from the shoe itself. Puma claimed "a casually knotted satin bow with pointed endings atop a satin-lined side strap that extends to the base of the sandal" was a copyrighted element on its Bow Slides.<sup id="cite_ref-88" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-88"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>88<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-89" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-89"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>89<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Forever 21 responded with a detailed motion to dismiss which said that the Fenti line resembled <a href="/wiki/Prior_art" title="Prior art">prior art</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-90" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-90"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>90<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The companies settled in November 2018.<sup id="cite_ref-91" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-91"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>91<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>The United States Copyright Office, arbiter of copyright registration, updated its <a href="/wiki/Compendium_of_U.S._Copyright_Office_Practices" title="Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices"><i>Compendium</i></a> of rules for validating registrations with preliminary rules taking the <i>Star Athletica</i> developments into account.<sup id="cite_ref-92" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-92"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>92<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The report, published on September 29, 2017, said that useful articles<sup id="cite_ref-93" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-93"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>93<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> and (specifically) clothing articles were not copyrightable.<sup id="cite_ref-94" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-94"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>94<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> About two-dimensional visual designs applied to useful articles, the <i>Compendium</i> reduced its 2014 discussion of the copyrightability of designs of useful articles<sup id="cite_ref-95" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-95"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>95<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> to one section in the 2017 guide which quoted <i>Star Athletica</i><span class="nowrap" style="padding-left:0.1em;">&#39;</span>s two-step separability test. A note indicated that the office was "developing updated guidance" on the matter for a future version of the report.<sup id="cite_ref-96" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-96"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>96<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The office released a draft of the new edition of the <i>Compendium</i> on March 15, 2019, including new material which addressed <i>Star Athletica</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-97" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-97"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>97<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-98" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-98"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>98<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Case_resolution">Case resolution</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=13" title="Edit section: Case resolution"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <p>The case was passed back to the district court in Tennessee and, in August 2017, was settled out of court in favor of Varsity Brands (over Star Athletica's objection) by Star Athletica's insurance company. Star Athletica wanted to press a counter-claim after the Supreme Court's ruling that designs on the uniforms <em>could</em> be copyrightable with an argument that the <em>particular</em> Varsity designs in the case <em>should not</em> be copyrightable due to their simplicity. The settlement precluded that argument and closed the case <a href="/wiki/Prejudice_(legal_term)#With_prejudice_and_without_prejudice" title="Prejudice (legal term)">with prejudice</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-AnUnsatisfyingEnd_99-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-AnUnsatisfyingEnd-99"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>99<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-100" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-100"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>100<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Legal_analyses">Legal analyses</h3><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=14" title="Edit section: Legal analyses"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <p><a href="/wiki/Intellectual_property" title="Intellectual property">Intellectual property</a> attorneys were split about the opinion; some thought that it clarified the law,<sup id="cite_ref-Benson2018_31-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Benson2018-31"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>31<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-OneYearLater_85-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-OneYearLater-85"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>85<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-101" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-101"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>101<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> and others thought that it made the law more ambiguous.<sup id="cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-5" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ClaimingDesign-10"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>10<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-102" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-102"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>102<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-103" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-103"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>103<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Clarity notwithstanding, many have noted that <i>Star Athletica</i> was an important case for the fashion industry because it overturned the prevailing wisdom that fashion designs were generally uncopyrightable. The effects of this shift in thought remain to be seen, however, as more designers apply for copyrights and awareness of the change grows.<sup id="cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-6" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt-66"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>66<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-Benson2018_31-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Benson2018-31"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>31<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Negative effects on fashion trends (which involve some degree of copying basic styles among designers throughout the industry)<sup id="cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-7" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt-66"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>66<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-104" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-104"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>104<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-105" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-105"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>105<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-106" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-106"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>106<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> and an anticipated increase in infringement lawsuits have been speculated.<sup id="cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-8" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt-66"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>66<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Generic or "knock-off" clothing could cease to exist due to the restriction of the designer brands' designs,<sup id="cite_ref-Benson2018_31-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Benson2018-31"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>31<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> although designer brands were also accused of copying independent artists before the decision.<sup id="cite_ref-107" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-107"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>107<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>In its broad interpretation of the statute, the ruling did not make conclusive determinations about competition and copyright. <a href="/wiki/Columbia_Law_School" title="Columbia Law School">Columbia Law School</a> professor Ronald Mann analyzed the decision for <a href="/wiki/SCOTUSblog" title="SCOTUSblog">SCOTUSblog</a>, saying that the court's opinion did not address the minimal threshold of creativity required for copyright restriction under <i>Feist v. Rural</i>. Mann called Thomas's dismissal of the opposing arguments "half-hearted" and predicted that scholarly debate of the separability test's shift in copyright law would continue.<sup id="cite_ref-108" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-108"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>108<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Professors Jeanne C. Fromer and Mark P. McKenna criticized the decision's ambiguity; the three major stages of litigation resulted in three different majority decisions on three different grounds, with more divergent opinions in the dissents and concurrence. The courts allowed Varsity to define extremely narrow copyright restrictions in the registration and then sue others (such as Star Athletica) with court filings that only described the designs generally, so Fromer and McKenna were concerned that this disconnect in requirements would lead to more controversial lawsuits (even outside the useful-article realm). A model car could be copyrighted as a sculpture, a drawing of that model could be copyrighted, and the claimant could use the features of either to file copyright claims. Which features of either were actually restricted was left up to debate, because the registration's description could diverge from a lawsuit. Fromer and McKenna said that it would be impossible to know what the copyright holder considered restricted before they described it in a lawsuit or before the second party began copying. In the absence of a description, they said that it was impossible to perform a separability analysis and determine if the feature was copyrightable before litigation began.<sup id="cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-6" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ClaimingDesign-10"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>10<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading4"><h4 id="Expanded_separability"><span class="anchor" id="Separability_expands_further"></span>Expanded separability</h4><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=15" title="Edit section: Expanded separability"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <p>The <i><a href="/wiki/Harvard_Law_Review" title="Harvard Law Review">Harvard Law Review</a></i> said that <i>Star Athletica</i> was an important step towards removing subjectivity from the tests in this area of the law, removing the framing problem which changed the outcome of the analysis based on the definition of article usefulness. The decision may not fully resolve conflicting lower-court rulings, however, because its majority and dissent were based on close readings of the statute without enough differentiating examples in the majority to discredit the alternative view. Potential contradictions in Thomas's majority opinion (assertions that surface designs are "inherently separable" from useful articles without being useful articles themselves, and other clothing with the design do not conjure the original useful article) may muddy the waters. According to the <i>Review</i>, "These <a href="/wiki/Dicta" class="mw-redirect" title="Dicta">dicta</a> imply that the independently existing work can have the shape and look of the article, evoke the same concepts, and even perform the same function and still be separable" (making it copyrightable).<sup id="cite_ref-HLR_7-13" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p><i>Silvertop Assocs., Inc. v. Kangaroo Mfg., Inc.</i>, a 2018 district court case, ruled that a banana costume's physical features were separable from the costume and copyrightable because they could be painted on a canvas.<sup id="cite_ref-109" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-109"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>109<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> It was upheld on appeal the following year.<sup id="cite_ref-110" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-110"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>110<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> In February 2019, however, the Copyright Office's review board used <i>Star Athletica</i> as a justification for refusing to register the design of a work glove. The office determined that it failed the second step of the test because panels on the back of the hand and other features of the glove were "apparently deliberately engineered and repeatedly tested to qualify with <a href="/wiki/American_National_Standards_Institute" title="American National Standards Institute">ANSI</a> cut-level standards while allowing finger and hand movement." The office determined that the design was not sufficiently original to be copyrightable because its "common and familiar uncopyrightable shapes" conformed to the human hand "in the most predictable manner."<sup id="cite_ref-111" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-111"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>111<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>In 2019, the office's decision to register the <a href="/wiki/Adidas_Yeezy" title="Adidas Yeezy">Adidas Yeezy</a> Boost 350 shoe design was considered a significant expansion of the copyrightability of useful articles in the wake of <i>Star Athletica</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-JusticeBreyerFear_112-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-JusticeBreyerFear-112"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>112<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-OtherShoeDrops_113-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-OtherShoeDrops-113"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>113<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-114" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-114"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>114<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-BoostForCopyright_115-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-BoostForCopyright-115"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>115<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The Copyright Office rejected the designs twice, followed by requests for reconsideration by <a href="/wiki/Adidas" title="Adidas">Adidas</a>. The 2017 refusal, immediately after <i>Star Athletica</i>, was because the shoes were a useful article (a common response from the office then). The 2018 refusal was because the Copyright Office determined that the shoes' design did not meet the originality requirement. On its third consideration, the office determined that the two- and three-dimensional designs could be perceived separately from the shoes and their design's individually-uncopyrightable elements combined to overcome the originality requirement.<sup id="cite_ref-JusticeBreyerFear_112-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-JusticeBreyerFear-112"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>112<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-OtherShoeDrops_113-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-OtherShoeDrops-113"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>113<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The Yeezy's color design overcoming the originality requirement may spur fashion companies to pursue copyright more aggressively for designs more complex than basic shape variations.<sup id="cite_ref-OtherShoeDrops_113-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-OtherShoeDrops-113"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>113<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> The Yeezy designs had already been restricted by the design-patent system, so the Copyright Office's decision was also read to establish that copyright was an acceptable addition to design patents for useful articles in general and clothing in particular.<sup id="cite_ref-BoostForCopyright_115-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-BoostForCopyright-115"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>115<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> This was an outcome the Intellectual Property Professors<sup id="cite_ref-IntellectualPropertyProfessorsBrief_56-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-IntellectualPropertyProfessorsBrief-56"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>56<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> and Justice Breyer feared while <i>Star Athletica</i> was under consideration,<sup id="cite_ref-116" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-116"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>116<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> although Justice Thomas said that they were "not mutually exclusive" according to <i>Mazer v. Stein</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-117" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-117"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>117<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading4"><h4 id="Other_analyses"><span class="anchor" id="Other_takes"></span>Other analyses</h4><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=16" title="Edit section: Other analyses"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <p>For cosplayers, the decision made the possibility of lawsuits by copyright holders and official licensees less unlikely. Different parts of costumes may be subject to different levels of restriction, where fair use and utility are not clear; the shape of a <a href="/wiki/Domino_mask" title="Domino mask">superhero's mask</a> could be considered more ornamental than useful. Cosplay props which are not clothing might be even more easily restricted because they are not a necessary element of a costume's function as clothing. Unauthorized replicas of these items may involve more legal hazard than before <i>Star Athletica</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-Costumes_and_Copyright_Concerns_44-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Costumes_and_Copyright_Concerns-44"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>44<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Meredith Rose, policy counsel of <a href="/wiki/Public_Knowledge" title="Public Knowledge">Public Knowledge</a> and involved in the group's cosplay <i>amicus</i> brief, later wrote for the group that fair-use rights could still apply to cosplay.<sup id="cite_ref-WorkingWithAnAwkwardFit_118-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-WorkingWithAnAwkwardFit-118"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>118<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Rose agreed that ornamental designs and props could be restricted more easily because "when copyright law looks at props, cosplay armor, and accessories, it sees sculptures",<sup id="cite_ref-119" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-119"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>119<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> but said that cosplay was not going anywhere because the companies behind pop culture had embraced and encouraged it.<sup id="cite_ref-WorkingWithAnAwkwardFit_118-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-WorkingWithAnAwkwardFit-118"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>118<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p><i>Star Athletica</i> caused uncertainty in the 3D-printing community;<sup id="cite_ref-ShapewaysResponse_120-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ShapewaysResponse-120"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>120<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-MaySpellDisaster_121-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-MaySpellDisaster-121"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>121<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-122" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-122"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>122<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-123" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-123"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>123<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> 3D printing was a relatively-new field, and the rules could have outsized effects on the development of its cultural norms.<sup id="cite_ref-124" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-124"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>124<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Shapeways" title="Shapeways">Shapeways</a>, one of the <i>amici</i>, criticized the court's test because it prioritized artistic considerations over the utility of an item. In its view, this made the test easier but inappropriately expanded copyright in ways which would impact its interests. The company said that a better test would have first considered an item's function, removing parts which accomplished that task from copyright consideration.<sup id="cite_ref-ShapewaysResponse_120-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ShapewaysResponse-120"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>120<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-MaySpellDisaster_121-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-MaySpellDisaster-121"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>121<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Sara Benson, a lawyer who agreed with the decision, wondered if the court's rejection of a copyrightability test which valued artistic effort on the designer's part may harm the perception of a designer's value to their clients. Benson said that the test had allowed designers to leverage their creativity for respect and credibility during the corporate design process, and its removal may have removed some of their negotiating power.<sup id="cite_ref-Benson2018_31-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Benson2018-31"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>31<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>David Kluft of <a href="/wiki/Foley_Hoag" title="Foley Hoag">Foley Hoag</a> said that the new ability to copyright design elements is accompanied by criminal penalties if the elements have utility. If the entity applying for copyright of a design knew about that utility, it would be considered false representation of a material fact in its copyright registration.<sup id="cite_ref-125" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-125"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>125<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> </p><p>Uncertainty exists about how this decision may impact the copyrightability of food.<sup id="cite_ref-MichelinStarAthletica_126-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-MichelinStarAthletica-126"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>126<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> Top chefs had been seeking copyrightability for years before <i>Star Athletica</i>,<sup id="cite_ref-EatYourArtOut_127-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-EatYourArtOut-127"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>127<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> and some prohibiting customers from <a href="/wiki/Food_porn" title="Food porn">taking photographs of the food</a> because of a supposed copyright restriction.<sup id="cite_ref-ProtectingFoodCreations_128-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ProtectingFoodCreations-128"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>128<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-129" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-129"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>129<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> According to the pre-<i>Star Athletica</i> interpretation of separability, the copyrightability of food as a sculpture with artistic features did not contribute to its purpose as a consumable.<sup id="cite_ref-ProtectingFoodCreations_128-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ProtectingFoodCreations-128"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>128<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-EatYourArtOut_127-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-EatYourArtOut-127"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>127<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup> James P. Flynn of Epstein Becker &amp; Green wondered if <i>Star Athletica</i> might have changed the fate of served food.<sup id="cite_ref-MichelinStarAthletica_126-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-MichelinStarAthletica-126"><span class="cite-bracket">&#91;</span>126<span class="cite-bracket">&#93;</span></a></sup><sup class="noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact" style="white-space:nowrap;">&#91;<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Explanationism" title="Wikipedia:Explanationism"><span title="This sentence or topic needs more explanation.">more detail needed</span></a></i>&#93;</sup> </p> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="References">References</h2><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=17" title="Edit section: References"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1239543626">.mw-parser-output .reflist{margin-bottom:0.5em;list-style-type:decimal}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .reflist{font-size:90%}}.mw-parser-output .reflist .references{font-size:100%;margin-bottom:0;list-style-type:inherit}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-2{column-width:30em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-3{column-width:25em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns{margin-top:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns ol{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-alpha{list-style-type:upper-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-roman{list-style-type:upper-roman}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-alpha{list-style-type:lower-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-greek{list-style-type:lower-greek}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-roman{list-style-type:lower-roman}</style><div class="reflist reflist-columns references-column-width" style="column-width: 30em;"> <ol class="references"> <li id="cite_note-1"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-1">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Leslie J. Hagin, <i>A Comparative Analysis of Laws Applied to Fashion Works: Renewing the Proposal for Folding Fashion Works Into the United States Copyright Statute</i>, <i>in</i> 40 Copyright Law Symposium 331 (1997).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-2"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-2">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1238218222">.mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit;word-wrap:break-word}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"\"""\"""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation:target{background-color:rgba(0,127,255,0.133)}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-free.id-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Lock-green.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited.id-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration.id-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription.id-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg")right 0.1em center/12px no-repeat}body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-free a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background-size:contain;padding:0 1em 0 0}.mw-parser-output .cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:none;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;color:var(--color-error,#d33)}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{color:var(--color-error,#d33)}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#085;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right{padding-right:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .citation .mw-selflink{font-weight:inherit}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{color:#18911f}}@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{color:#18911f}}</style><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=69e25e3d-9be9-46b0-9172-31da225e8834">"Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands: Supreme Court Rules Apparel Design Copyrightable"</a>. <i>Lexology</i>. Lane Powell PC. March 29, 2017<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">April 14,</span> 2022</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Lexology&amp;rft.atitle=Star+Athletica+v.+Varsity+Brands%3A+Supreme+Court+Rules+Apparel+Design+Copyrightable&amp;rft.date=2017-03-29&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lexology.com%2Flibrary%2Fdetail.aspx%3Fg%3D69e25e3d-9be9-46b0-9172-31da225e8834&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Telfer-3"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Telfer_3-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Telfer_3-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Telfer_3-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFTelfer2017" class="citation web cs1">Telfer, Tori (March 29, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.bustle.com/articles/4527-fashion-designs-arent-protected-by-copyright-law-so-knockoffs-thrive-as-designers-suffer">"Fashion Designs Aren't Protected By Copyright Law, So Knockoffs Thrive as Designers Suffer"</a>. <i>Bustle</i>. Lane Powell PC<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">April 14,</span> 2022</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Bustle&amp;rft.atitle=Fashion+Designs+Aren%27t+Protected+By+Copyright+Law%2C+So+Knockoffs+Thrive+as+Designers+Suffer&amp;rft.date=2017-03-29&amp;rft.aulast=Telfer&amp;rft.aufirst=Tori&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bustle.com%2Farticles%2F4527-fashion-designs-arent-protected-by-copyright-law-so-knockoffs-thrive-as-designers-suffer&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-4"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-4">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i><a href="/wiki/Fashion_Originators%27_Guild_of_America_v._FTC" title="Fashion Originators&#39; Guild of America v. FTC">Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC</a></i>,&#32;<a href="/wiki/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_312" title="List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 312">312</a>&#32;<a href="/wiki/United_States_Reports" title="United States Reports">U.S.</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/312/457/">457</a>&#32;(1941)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-5"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-5">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i><a href="/wiki/Mazer_v._Stein" title="Mazer v. Stein">Mazer v. Stein</a></i>,&#32;<a href="/wiki/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_347" title="List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 347">347</a>&#32;<a href="/wiki/United_States_Reports" title="United States Reports">U.S.</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/201/">201</a>&#32;(1954)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-6"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-6">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i><a href="/wiki/Sears,_Roebuck_%26_Co._v._Stiffel_Co." title="Sears, Roebuck &amp; Co. v. Stiffel Co.">Sears, Roebuck &amp; Co. v. Stiffel Co.</a></i>,&#32;<a href="/wiki/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_376" title="List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 376">376</a>&#32;<a href="/wiki/United_States_Reports" title="United States Reports">U.S.</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/225/">225</a>&#32;(1964)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-HLR-7"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-3"><sup><i><b>d</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-4"><sup><i><b>e</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-5"><sup><i><b>f</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-6"><sup><i><b>g</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-7"><sup><i><b>h</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-8"><sup><i><b>i</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-9"><sup><i><b>j</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-10"><sup><i><b>k</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-11"><sup><i><b>l</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-12"><sup><i><b>m</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-HLR_7-13"><sup><i><b>n</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://harvardlawreview.org/2017/11/star-athletica-l-l-c-v-varsity-brands-inc/">"Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc"</a>. <i>Harvard Law Review</i>. November 4, 2017<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 16,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Harvard+Law+Review&amp;rft.atitle=Star+Athletica%2C+L.L.C.+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc.&amp;rft.date=2017-11-04&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fharvardlawreview.org%2F2017%2F11%2Fstar-athletica-l-l-c-v-varsity-brands-inc%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-17USC101-8"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-17USC101_8-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="/wiki/Title_17_of_the_United_States_Code" title="Title 17 of the United States Code">17&#160;U.S.C.</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/101">§&#160;101</a></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-9"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-9">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFRobert_Kastenmeier1976" class="citation report cs1"><a href="/wiki/Robert_Kastenmeier" title="Robert Kastenmeier">Robert Kastenmeier</a> (September 3, 1976). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.copyright.gov/history/law/clrev_94-1476.pdf">House of Representatives Report No. 94-1476</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> (Report). United States House of Representatives. p.&#160;105<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>. <q>Section 113 deals with the extent of copyright protection in "works of applied art." The section takes as its starting point the Supreme Court's decision in <i>Mazer v. Stein</i>, 347 U.S. 201 (1954), and the first sentence of subsection (a) restates the basic principle established by that decision.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=report&amp;rft.btitle=House+of+Representatives+Report+No.+94-1476&amp;rft.pages=105&amp;rft.pub=United+States+House+of+Representatives&amp;rft.date=1976-09-03&amp;rft.au=Robert+Kastenmeier&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Fhistory%2Flaw%2Fclrev_94-1476.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-ClaimingDesign-10"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-3"><sup><i><b>d</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-4"><sup><i><b>e</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-5"><sup><i><b>f</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ClaimingDesign_10-6"><sup><i><b>g</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFFromerMcKenna2018" class="citation journal cs1">Fromer, Jeanne C.; McKenna, Mark P. (May 30, 2018). "Claiming Design". <i>University of Pennsylvania Law Review</i>. <b>167</b>. <a href="/wiki/SSRN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="SSRN (identifier)">SSRN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3186762">3186762</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=University+of+Pennsylvania+Law+Review&amp;rft.atitle=Claiming+Design&amp;rft.volume=167&amp;rft.date=2018-05-30&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D3186762%23id-name%3DSSRN&amp;rft.aulast=Fromer&amp;rft.aufirst=Jeanne+C.&amp;rft.au=McKenna%2C+Mark+P.&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-11"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-11">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFGinsburg2016" class="citation journal cs1">Ginsburg, Jane C. (September 1, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://lawandarts.org/article/courts-have-twisted-themselves-into-knots-u-s-copyright-protection-for-applied-art/">"<span class="cs1-kern-left"></span>'Courts Have Twisted Themselves into Knots': US Copyright Protection for Applied Art"</a>. <i>The Columbia Journal of Law &amp; the Arts</i>. <b>40</b> (1). Rochester, NY. <a href="/wiki/SSRN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="SSRN (identifier)">SSRN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2837728">2837728</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=The+Columbia+Journal+of+Law+%26+the+Arts&amp;rft.atitle=%27Courts+Have+Twisted+Themselves+into+Knots%27%3A+US+Copyright+Protection+for+Applied+Art&amp;rft.volume=40&amp;rft.issue=1&amp;rft.date=2016-09-01&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D2837728%23id-name%3DSSRN&amp;rft.aulast=Ginsburg&amp;rft.aufirst=Jane+C.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Flawandarts.org%2Farticle%2Fcourts-have-twisted-themselves-into-knots-u-s-copyright-protection-for-applied-art%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-12"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-12">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFFisher2016" class="citation web cs1">Fisher, Daniel (May 2, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2016/05/02/supreme-court-dives-into-copyright-fight-over-cheerleader-uniforms/#224b16325244">"Supreme Court Dives Into Copyright Fight Over Cheerleader Uniforms"</a>. <i>Forbes</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Forbes&amp;rft.atitle=Supreme+Court+Dives+Into+Copyright+Fight+Over+Cheerleader+Uniforms&amp;rft.date=2016-05-02&amp;rft.aulast=Fisher&amp;rft.aufirst=Daniel&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fdanielfisher%2F2016%2F05%2F02%2Fsupreme-court-dives-into-copyright-fight-over-cheerleader-uniforms%2F%23224b16325244&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-13"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-13">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation report cs1">"924.3(A) Clothing Designs". <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/docs/compendium-12-22-14.pdf"><i>Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition</i></a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> (Report). <a href="/wiki/United_States_Copyright_Office" title="United States Copyright Office">United States Copyright Office</a>. December 22, 2014. p.&#160;41<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 11,</span> 2018</span>. <q>Clothing such as shirts, dresses, pants, coats, shoes, and outerwear are not eligible for copyright protection because they are considered useful articles. This is because clothing provides utilitarian functions, such as warmth, protection, and modesty.... Although the copyright law does not protect the shape or design of clothing...designs imprinted in or on fabric are considered conceptually separable from the utilitarian aspects of garments, linens, furniture, or other useful articles. Therefore, a fabric or textile design may be registered if the design contains a sufficient amount of creative expression.</q></cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=report&amp;rft.btitle=Compendium+of+US+Copyright+Office+Practices%2C+Third+Edition&amp;rft.pages=41&amp;rft.pub=United+States+Copyright+Office&amp;rft.date=2014-12-22&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Fcomp3%2Fdocs%2Fcompendium-12-22-14.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-14"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-14">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFKover2005" class="citation web cs1">Kover, Amy (June 19, 2005). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/19/business/yourmoney/that-looks-familiar-didnt-i-design-it.html?mtrref=undefined">"That Looks Familiar. Didn't I Design It?"</a>. <i>The New York Times</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=The+New+York+Times&amp;rft.atitle=That+Looks+Familiar.+Didn%27t+I+Design+It%3F&amp;rft.date=2005-06-19&amp;rft.aulast=Kover&amp;rft.aufirst=Amy&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2005%2F06%2F19%2Fbusiness%2Fyourmoney%2Fthat-looks-familiar-didnt-i-design-it.html%3Fmtrref%3Dundefined&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-15"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-15">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFTelfer2013" class="citation web cs1">Telfer, Tori (September 3, 2013). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.bustle.com/articles/4527-fashion-designs-arent-protected-by-copyright-law-so-knockoffs-thrive-as-designers-suffer">"Fashion Designs Aren't Protected By Copyright Law, So Knockoffs Thrive as Designers Suffer"</a>. <i>Bustle</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Bustle&amp;rft.atitle=Fashion+Designs+Aren%27t+Protected+By+Copyright+Law%2C+So+Knockoffs+Thrive+as+Designers+Suffer&amp;rft.date=2013-09-03&amp;rft.aulast=Telfer&amp;rft.aufirst=Tori&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bustle.com%2Farticles%2F4527-fashion-designs-arent-protected-by-copyright-law-so-knockoffs-thrive-as-designers-suffer&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-CouncilBrief-16"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-CouncilBrief_16-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CouncilBrief_16-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CouncilBrief_16-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/15-866-respondent-amicus-CFDA-updated.pdf">Brief of Council of Fashion Designers of America as <i>Amicus Curiae</i></a>, <i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i>, No. 15-866, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-17"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-17">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFBollierRacine2003" class="citation web cs1">Bollier, David; Racine, Laurie (September 9, 2003). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0909/p09s01-coop.html">"Control of creativity? Fashion's secret"</a>. <i>Christian Science Monitor</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Christian+Science+Monitor&amp;rft.atitle=Control+of+creativity%3F+Fashion%27s+secret&amp;rft.date=2003-09-09&amp;rft.aulast=Bollier&amp;rft.aufirst=David&amp;rft.au=Racine%2C+Laurie&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.csmonitor.com%2F2003%2F0909%2Fp09s01-coop.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-3DPrintingAmicus-18"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-3DPrintingAmicus_18-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-3DPrintingAmicus_18-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/15-866_amicus_pet_public_knowledge.pdf">Brief of Public Knowledge, the International Costumers Guild, Shapeways, Inc., the Open Source Hardware Association, Formlabs Inc., Printrbot Inc., the Organization For Transformative Works, the American Library Association, the Association of Research Libraries, and The Association of College and Research Libraries as <i>Amici Curiae</i></a>, <i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i>, No. 15-866, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-19"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-19">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMorning_Edition2012" class="citation web cs1">Morning Edition (September 10, 2012). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.npr.org/2012/09/10/160746195/why-knockoffs-are-good-for-the-fashion-industry">"Why Knockoffs Are Good For The Fashion Industry"</a>. <i>NPR.org</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=NPR.org&amp;rft.atitle=Why+Knockoffs+Are+Good+For+The+Fashion+Industry&amp;rft.date=2012-09-10&amp;rft.au=Morning+Edition&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npr.org%2F2012%2F09%2F10%2F160746195%2Fwhy-knockoffs-are-good-for-the-fashion-industry&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-20"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-20">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFRaustialaSprigman2006" class="citation journal cs1">Raustiala, Kal; Sprigman, Christopher (January 26, 2006). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.virginialawreview.org/volumes/content/piracy-paradox-innovation-and-intellectual-property-fashion-design">"The Piracy Paradox: Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design"</a>. <i>Virginia Law Review</i>. <b>92</b>: 1687. <a href="/wiki/SSRN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="SSRN (identifier)">SSRN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=878401">878401</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Virginia+Law+Review&amp;rft.atitle=The+Piracy+Paradox%3A+Innovation+and+Intellectual+Property+in+Fashion+Design&amp;rft.volume=92&amp;rft.pages=1687&amp;rft.date=2006-01-26&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D878401%23id-name%3DSSRN&amp;rft.aulast=Raustiala&amp;rft.aufirst=Kal&amp;rft.au=Sprigman%2C+Christopher&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.virginialawreview.org%2Fvolumes%2Fcontent%2Fpiracy-paradox-innovation-and-intellectual-property-fashion-design&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-21"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-21">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFZarocostas2018" class="citation web cs1">Zarocostas, John (August 2018). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2018/04/article_0006.html">"The role of IP rights in the fashion business: a US perspective"</a>. <i>www.wipo.int</i>. WIPO Magazine<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 22,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=www.wipo.int&amp;rft.atitle=The+role+of+IP+rights+in+the+fashion+business%3A+a+US+perspective&amp;rft.date=2018-08&amp;rft.aulast=Zarocostas&amp;rft.aufirst=John&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wipo.int%2Fwipo_magazine%2Fen%2F2018%2F04%2Farticle_0006.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-22"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-22">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.thefashionlaw.com/resource-center/trademark-law/">"Trademark Law"</a>. <i>The Fashion Law</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">April 14,</span> 2022</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=The+Fashion+Law&amp;rft.atitle=Trademark+Law&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefashionlaw.com%2Fresource-center%2Ftrademark-law%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-23"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-23">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFSamuelsonGergen2019" class="citation journal cs1"><a href="/wiki/Pamela_Samuelson" title="Pamela Samuelson">Samuelson, Pamela</a>; Gergen, Mark P. (February 2019). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.californialawreview.org/print/disgorgement-remedy-design-patent-law/">"The Disgorgement Remedy of Design Patent Law"</a>. <i>California Law Review</i>. <b>108</b>. <a href="/wiki/SSRN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="SSRN (identifier)">SSRN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3353536">3353536</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=California+Law+Review&amp;rft.atitle=The+Disgorgement+Remedy+of+Design+Patent+Law&amp;rft.volume=108&amp;rft.date=2019-02&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D3353536%23id-name%3DSSRN&amp;rft.aulast=Samuelson&amp;rft.aufirst=Pamela&amp;rft.au=Gergen%2C+Mark+P.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.californialawreview.org%2Fprint%2Fdisgorgement-remedy-design-patent-law%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-24"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-24">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFKane2016" class="citation journal cs1">Kane, Julie (June 3, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/06/03/differences-design-patents-trade-dress/id=69591/">"The Differences Between Design Patents and Trade Dress"</a>. <i>IPWatchdog.com</i>: 371. <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1353%2Fthr.2019.0057">10.1353/thr.2019.0057</a>. <a href="/wiki/S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258102688">258102688</a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">April 14,</span> 2022</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=IPWatchdog.com&amp;rft.atitle=The+Differences+Between+Design+Patents+and+Trade+Dress&amp;rft.pages=371&amp;rft.date=2016-06-03&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1353%2Fthr.2019.0057&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.semanticscholar.org%2FCorpusID%3A258102688%23id-name%3DS2CID&amp;rft.aulast=Kane&amp;rft.aufirst=Julie&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipwatchdog.com%2F2016%2F06%2F03%2Fdifferences-design-patents-trade-dress%2Fid%3D69591%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-25"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-25">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFTu2010" class="citation journal cs1">Tu, Kevin V. (2010). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://tiplj.org/wp-content/uploads/Volumes/v18/v18p419.pdf">"Counterfeit Fashion: The Interplay between Copyright and Trademark Law in Original Fashion Designs and Designer Knockoffs"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. <i>Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal</i>. <b>18</b> (3). Rochester, NY: <span class="nowrap">433–</span>436. <a href="/wiki/SSRN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="SSRN (identifier)">SSRN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1681053">1681053</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Texas+Intellectual+Property+Law+Journal&amp;rft.atitle=Counterfeit+Fashion%3A+The+Interplay+between+Copyright+and+Trademark+Law+in+Original+Fashion+Designs+and+Designer+Knockoffs&amp;rft.volume=18&amp;rft.issue=3&amp;rft.pages=%3Cspan+class%3D%22nowrap%22%3E433-%3C%2Fspan%3E436&amp;rft.date=2010&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D1681053%23id-name%3DSSRN&amp;rft.aulast=Tu&amp;rft.aufirst=Kevin+V.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Ftiplj.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FVolumes%2Fv18%2Fv18p419.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Giles-26"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Giles_26-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Giles_26-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Giles_26-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFGiles2015" class="citation ssrn cs1">Giles, Shayna (2015). "Trade Dress: An Unsuitable Fit for Product Design in the Fashion Industry". <a href="/wiki/SSRN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="SSRN (identifier)">SSRN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2715146">2715146</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=preprint&amp;rft.jtitle=Social+Science+Research+Network&amp;rft.atitle=Trade+Dress%3A+An+Unsuitable+Fit+for+Product+Design+in+the+Fashion+Industry&amp;rft.date=2015&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D2715146%23id-name%3DSSRN&amp;rft.aulast=Giles&amp;rft.aufirst=Shayna&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-27"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-27">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFBurstein2016" class="citation journal cs1">Burstein, Sarah (2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://kb.osu.edu/handle/1811/77627">"Costly Designs"</a>. <i>Ohio State Law Journal</i>. <b>77</b>: <span class="nowrap">107–</span>157. <a href="/wiki/Hdl_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Hdl (identifier)">hdl</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://hdl.handle.net/1811%2F77627">1811/77627</a>. <a href="/wiki/ISSN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISSN (identifier)">ISSN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0048-1572">0048-1572</a>. <a href="/wiki/SSRN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="SSRN (identifier)">SSRN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2627065">2627065</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Ohio+State+Law+Journal&amp;rft.atitle=Costly+Designs&amp;rft.volume=77&amp;rft.pages=%3Cspan+class%3D%22nowrap%22%3E107-%3C%2Fspan%3E157&amp;rft.date=2016&amp;rft_id=info%3Ahdl%2F1811%2F77627&amp;rft.issn=0048-1572&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D2627065%23id-name%3DSSRN&amp;rft.aulast=Burstein&amp;rft.aufirst=Sarah&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fkb.osu.edu%2Fhandle%2F1811%2F77627&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-VarsityBrandsOwnsCheerleading-28"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-VarsityBrandsOwnsCheerleading_28-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-VarsityBrandsOwnsCheerleading_28-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFReigstad2015" class="citation web cs1">Reigstad, Leif (July 21, 2015). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.houstonpress.com/news/varsity-brands-owns-cheerleading-and-fights-to-keep-it-from-becoming-an-official-sport-7606297">"Varsity Brands Owns Cheerleading and Fights to Keep it From Becoming an Official Sport"</a>. <i>Houston Press</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Houston+Press&amp;rft.atitle=Varsity+Brands+Owns+Cheerleading+and+Fights+to+Keep+it+From+Becoming+an+Official+Sport&amp;rft.date=2015-07-21&amp;rft.aulast=Reigstad&amp;rft.aufirst=Leif&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.houstonpress.com%2Fnews%2Fvarsity-brands-owns-cheerleading-and-fights-to-keep-it-from-becoming-an-official-sport-7606297&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-29"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-29">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFKeesShaw2017" class="citation web cs1">Kees, Laura A.; Shaw, Stephen (March 24, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.natlawreview.com/article/knock-offs-beware-scotus-makes-fashion-forward-decision">"<span class="cs1-kern-left"></span>"Knock-Offs" Beware: SCOTUS Makes a Fashion-Forward Decision"</a>. <i>National Law Review</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=National+Law+Review&amp;rft.atitle=%22Knock-Offs%22+Beware%3A+SCOTUS+Makes+a+Fashion-Forward+Decision&amp;rft.date=2017-03-24&amp;rft.aulast=Kees&amp;rft.aufirst=Laura+A.&amp;rft.au=Shaw%2C+Stephen&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.natlawreview.com%2Farticle%2Fknock-offs-beware-scotus-makes-fashion-forward-decision&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-SupremeCourtHearsArguments-30"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-SupremeCourtHearsArguments_30-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-SupremeCourtHearsArguments_30-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-SupremeCourtHearsArguments_30-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFBarnes2016" class="citation news cs1">Barnes, Robert (October 31, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-cases-centering-on-cheerleading-outfits-and-a-goldendoodle-service-dog/2016/10/31/5e486ce0-9f9d-11e6-a44d-cc2898cfab06_story.html">"Supreme Court hears arguments in cases centering on cheerleading outfits and a goldendoodle service dog"</a>. <i>The Washington Post</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 15,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=The+Washington+Post&amp;rft.atitle=Supreme+Court+hears+arguments+in+cases+centering+on+cheerleading+outfits+and+a+goldendoodle+service+dog&amp;rft.date=2016-10-31&amp;rft.aulast=Barnes&amp;rft.aufirst=Robert&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fpolitics%2Fcourts_law%2Fsupreme-court-hears-arguments-in-cases-centering-on-cheerleading-outfits-and-a-goldendoodle-service-dog%2F2016%2F10%2F31%2F5e486ce0-9f9d-11e6-a44d-cc2898cfab06_story.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Benson2018-31"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Benson2018_31-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Benson2018_31-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Benson2018_31-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Benson2018_31-3"><sup><i><b>d</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Benson2018_31-4"><sup><i><b>e</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFBenson2018" class="citation journal cs1">Benson, Sara R. (2018). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jcel-pub.org/jcel/article/view/6575">"Sports Uniforms and Copyright: Implications for Applied Art Educators from the Star Athletica Decision"</a>. <i>Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship</i>. <b>2</b> (1). <a href="/wiki/Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<span class="id-lock-free" title="Freely accessible"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.17161%2Fjcel.v2i1.6575">10.17161/jcel.v2i1.6575</a></span>. <a href="/wiki/Hdl_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Hdl (identifier)">hdl</a>:<span class="id-lock-free" title="Freely accessible"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://hdl.handle.net/2142%2F99551">2142/99551</a></span>. <a href="/wiki/ISSN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISSN (identifier)">ISSN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://search.worldcat.org/issn/2473-8336">2473-8336</a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Journal+of+Copyright+in+Education+and+Librarianship&amp;rft.atitle=Sports+Uniforms+and+Copyright%3A+Implications+for+Applied+Art+Educators+from+the+Star+Athletica+Decision&amp;rft.volume=2&amp;rft.issue=1&amp;rft.date=2018&amp;rft_id=info%3Ahdl%2F2142%2F99551&amp;rft.issn=2473-8336&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.17161%2Fjcel.v2i1.6575&amp;rft.aulast=Benson&amp;rft.aufirst=Sara+R.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jcel-pub.org%2Fjcel%2Farticle%2Fview%2F6575&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-slipop1-32"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-slipop1_32-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 1.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-WhoOwnsCheerleaderUniforms-33"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-WhoOwnsCheerleaderUniforms_33-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-WhoOwnsCheerleaderUniforms_33-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-WhoOwnsCheerleaderUniforms_33-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFSmith2016" class="citation web cs1">Smith, Erin Geiger (October 31, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/sports/who-owns-cheerleader-uniform-designs-its-up-to-the-supreme-court.html">"Who Owns Cheerleader Uniform Designs? It's up to the Supreme Court"</a>. <i>The New York Times</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 15,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=The+New+York+Times&amp;rft.atitle=Who+Owns+Cheerleader+Uniform+Designs%3F+It%27s+up+to+the+Supreme+Court&amp;rft.date=2016-10-31&amp;rft.aulast=Smith&amp;rft.aufirst=Erin+Geiger&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2016%2F10%2F30%2Fsports%2Fwho-owns-cheerleader-uniform-designs-its-up-to-the-supreme-court.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-slipop2quote-34"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-slipop2quote_34-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 2 (quoting <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=%22Star+Athletica%22&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=40006&amp;case=7992815185039286726&amp;scilh=0">2014 WL 819422</a>, *8-*9 (WD Tenn., Mar. 1, 2014)).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-VarsityBrief-35"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-VarsityBrief_35-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-VarsityBrief_35-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/15-866-respondent-merits.pdf">Brief of the Respondents</a> (Sep. 14, 2016), Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc., No. 15-866, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-36"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-36">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite><i>Varsity Brands, Inc. v. Star Athletica, LLC</i></cite>&#32;(W.D. Tenn.&#32;Mar. 1, 2014),&#32;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-tnwd-2_10-cv-02508/pdf/USCOURTS-tnwd-2_10-cv-02508-9.pdf">Text</a>.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-37"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-37">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFTewarie2014" class="citation web cs1">Tewarie, Shrutih V. (April 30, 2014). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/310600/Copyright/District+Court+Struggles+With+Copyright+Protection+For+CheerleadingUniformness">"District Court Struggles With Copyright Protection For 'Cheerleading-Uniformness'<span class="cs1-kern-right"></span>"</a>. <i>Mondaq</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Mondaq&amp;rft.atitle=District+Court+Struggles+With+Copyright+Protection+For+%27Cheerleading-Uniformness%27&amp;rft.date=2014-04-30&amp;rft.aulast=Tewarie&amp;rft.aufirst=Shrutih+V.&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mondaq.com%2Funitedstates%2Fx%2F310600%2FCopyright%2FDistrict%2BCourt%2BStruggles%2BWith%2BCopyright%2BProtection%2BFor%2BCheerleadingUniformness&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-38"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-38">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite><i>Varsity Brands, Inc. v. Star Athletica, LLC</i></cite>&#32;(6th Cir.&#32;Aug. 19, 2015),&#32;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/15a0194p-06.pdf">Text</a>.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-39"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-39">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/15-866.htm"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 1; see also <i>No. 15-866</i> (docket), United States Supreme Court</a> (last visited April 15, 2017) ("May 2, 2016 Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.")</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-docket-40"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-docket_40-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/15-866.htm"><i>No. 15-866</i> (<i>Star Athletica</i> docket), United States Supreme Court</a> (last visited July 20, 2018)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-41"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-41">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/brief-varsity-brands_final.pdf">Brief of Public Knowledge, Royal Manticoran Navy, and International Costumer's Guild as <i>Amicus Curiae</i></a>, <i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i>, No. 15-866, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-42"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-42">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Nicholas Datlowe, <i><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.bna.com/cosplay-comes-scotus-b57982079221/">Cosplay Comes to SCOTUS on Halloween</a></i>, Bloomberg BNA (October 27, 2016)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-43"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-43">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation report cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://cdn.loc.gov/copyright/history/mls/ML-435.pdf">ML-435: Policy Decision: Registrability of Costume Designs</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> (Report). United States Copyright Office. October 29, 1991<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">January 4,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=report&amp;rft.btitle=ML-435%3A+Policy+Decision%3A+Registrability+of+Costume+Designs&amp;rft.pub=United+States+Copyright+Office&amp;rft.date=1991-10-29&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.loc.gov%2Fcopyright%2Fhistory%2Fmls%2FML-435.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Costumes_and_Copyright_Concerns-44"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Costumes_and_Copyright_Concerns_44-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Costumes_and_Copyright_Concerns_44-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFHolt2016" class="citation web cs1">Holt, Jake (May 25, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://thetmca.com/comic-con-costumes-and-copyright-concerns/">"Comic-Con, Costumes, and Copyright Concerns"</a>. <i>The TMCA</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">January 5,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=The+TMCA&amp;rft.atitle=Comic-Con%2C+Costumes%2C+and+Copyright+Concerns&amp;rft.date=2016-05-25&amp;rft.aulast=Holt&amp;rft.aufirst=Jake&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fthetmca.com%2Fcomic-con-costumes-and-copyright-concerns%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-45"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-45">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFBacoyanis2015" class="citation web cs1">Bacoyanis, Amanda (July 31, 2015). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/07/31/comic-con-considerations-cosplay-the-right-of-publicity-and-copyright-concerns/id=60084/">"Comic-Con Considerations: Cosplay, the Right of Publicity, and Copyright Concerns"</a>. <i>IP Watchdog</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">January 5,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=IP+Watchdog&amp;rft.atitle=Comic-Con+Considerations%3A+Cosplay%2C+the+Right+of+Publicity%2C+and+Copyright+Concerns&amp;rft.date=2015-07-31&amp;rft.aulast=Bacoyanis&amp;rft.aufirst=Amanda&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipwatchdog.com%2F2015%2F07%2F31%2Fcomic-con-considerations-cosplay-the-right-of-publicity-and-copyright-concerns%2Fid%3D60084%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-46"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-46">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMadonia2016" class="citation journal cs1">Madonia, Molly Rose (2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1291&amp;context=iplr">"All's Fair in Copyright and Costumes: Fair Use Defense to Copyright Infringement in Cosplay"</a>. <i>Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review</i>. <b>20</b>: <span class="nowrap">177–</span>193.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Marquette+Intellectual+Property+Law+Review&amp;rft.atitle=All%27s+Fair+in+Copyright+and+Costumes%3A+Fair+Use+Defense+to+Copyright+Infringement+in+Cosplay&amp;rft.volume=20&amp;rft.pages=%3Cspan+class%3D%22nowrap%22%3E177-%3C%2Fspan%3E193&amp;rft.date=2016&amp;rft.aulast=Madonia&amp;rft.aufirst=Molly+Rose&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fscholarship.law.marquette.edu%2Fcgi%2Fviewcontent.cgi%3Farticle%3D1291%26context%3Diplr&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-SupremeCourtPondersCostumes-47"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-SupremeCourtPondersCostumes_47-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-SupremeCourtPondersCostumes_47-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFAFP_Relax_News2016" class="citation web cs1">AFP Relax News (October 31, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/halloween-us-supreme-court-ponders-costumes-123803357.html">"The Supreme Court Ponders Costumes and Copyright on Halloween"</a>. <i>Yahoo</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Yahoo&amp;rft.atitle=The+Supreme+Court+Ponders+Costumes+and+Copyright+on+Halloween&amp;rft.date=2016-10-31&amp;rft.au=AFP+Relax+News&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.yahoo.com%2Flifestyle%2Fhalloween-us-supreme-court-ponders-costumes-123803357.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-Manticore-48"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Manticore_48-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Manticore_48-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-866-tsac-TheRoyalManticoranNavy.pdf">Brief of Royal Manticoran Navy: The Official Honor Harrington Fan Association, Inc. as <i>Amicus Curiae</i></a>, <i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i>, No. 15-866, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-StarAthleticaBrief-49"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-StarAthleticaBrief_49-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-StarAthleticaBrief_49-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/15-866-Pet-Merits-Brief.pdf">Brief for the Petitioner</a>, <i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i>, No. 15-866, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-50"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-50">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFPietzMaxim2017" class="citation web cs1">Pietz, Morgan E.; Maxim, Trevor (April 1, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.gerardfoxlaw.com/news/legal-perspectives/star-athletica-llc-v-varsity-brands-inc/">"Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc"</a>. <i>Gerard Fox Law</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Gerard+Fox+Law&amp;rft.atitle=Star+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc.&amp;rft.date=2017-04-01&amp;rft.aulast=Pietz&amp;rft.aufirst=Morgan+E.&amp;rft.au=Maxim%2C+Trevor&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gerardfoxlaw.com%2Fnews%2Flegal-perspectives%2Fstar-athletica-llc-v-varsity-brands-inc%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-51"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-51">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFBuchanan2016" class="citation web cs1">Buchanan, Leigh (February 22, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.inc.com/magazine/201603/leigh-buchanan/rebel-athletic-custom-cheerleading-uniforms-startup.html">"Meet Rebel Athletic, the $20 Million Custom Cheerleading Uniform Startup Living Up to Its Name"</a>. <i>Inc.com</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Inc.com&amp;rft.atitle=Meet+Rebel+Athletic%2C+the+%2420+Million+Custom+Cheerleading+Uniform+Startup+Living+Up+to+Its+Name&amp;rft.date=2016-02-22&amp;rft.aulast=Buchanan&amp;rft.aufirst=Leigh&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.inc.com%2Fmagazine%2F201603%2Fleigh-buchanan%2Frebel-athletic-custom-cheerleading-uniforms-startup.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-52"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-52">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMasnick2016" class="citation web cs1">Masnick, Mike (July 26, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160723/15225535049/how-supreme-court-case-cheerleader-costumes-copyright-could-impact-prosthetic-hands-much-much-more.shtml">"How A Supreme Court Case On Cheerleader Costumes &amp; Copyright Could Impact Prosthetic Hands And Much, Much More"</a>. <i>Techdirt</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Techdirt&amp;rft.atitle=How+A+Supreme+Court+Case+On+Cheerleader+Costumes+%26+Copyright+Could+Impact+Prosthetic+Hands+And+Much%2C+Much+More&amp;rft.date=2016-07-26&amp;rft.aulast=Masnick&amp;rft.aufirst=Mike&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.techdirt.com%2Farticles%2F20160723%2F15225535049%2Fhow-supreme-court-case-cheerleader-costumes-copyright-could-impact-prosthetic-hands-much-much-more.shtml&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-53"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-53">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFKramer2016" class="citation web cs1">Kramer, Alexis (February 11, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.bna.com/3d-printing-industry-b57982067264/">"3D Printing Industry Wants One Copyright Test, Not 10"</a>. <i>Bloomberg BNA</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 24,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Bloomberg+BNA&amp;rft.atitle=3D+Printing+Industry+Wants+One+Copyright+Test%2C+Not+10&amp;rft.date=2016-02-11&amp;rft.aulast=Kramer&amp;rft.aufirst=Alexis&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bna.com%2F3d-printing-industry-b57982067264%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-TheMakerMovement-54"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-TheMakerMovement_54-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFRimmer2017" class="citation journal cs1">Rimmer, Matthew (February 3, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.law.uwa.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/2986618/Rimmer-5.pdf">"The Maker Movement: Copyright Law, Remix Culture and 3D Printing"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. <i>The University of Western Australia Law Review</i>. Crawley, W. Austl. <a href="/wiki/SSRN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="SSRN (identifier)">SSRN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2910832">2910832</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=The+University+of+Western+Australia+Law+Review&amp;rft.atitle=The+Maker+Movement%3A+Copyright+Law%2C+Remix+Culture+and+3D+Printing&amp;rft.date=2017-02-03&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D2910832%23id-name%3DSSRN&amp;rft.aulast=Rimmer&amp;rft.aufirst=Matthew&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law.uwa.edu.au%2F&#95;_data%2Fassets%2Fpdf_file%2F0004%2F2986618%2FRimmer-5.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-55"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-55">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFPetch2016" class="citation web cs1">Petch, Michael (July 19, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/intellectual-property-3d-printing-changing-landscape-87447/">"Intellectual Property &amp; 3D Printing: A changing landscape"</a>. <i>3D Printing Industry</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 29,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=3D+Printing+Industry&amp;rft.atitle=Intellectual+Property+%26+3D+Printing%3A+A+changing+landscape&amp;rft.date=2016-07-19&amp;rft.aulast=Petch&amp;rft.aufirst=Michael&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2F3dprintingindustry.com%2Fnews%2Fintellectual-property-3d-printing-changing-landscape-87447%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-IntellectualPropertyProfessorsBrief-56"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-IntellectualPropertyProfessorsBrief_56-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-IntellectualPropertyProfessorsBrief_56-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Star-Athletica.pdf">Brief of Intellectual Property Professors as <i>Amicus Curiae</i></a>, <i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i>, No. 15-866, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-FashionLawBrief-57"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-FashionLawBrief_57-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FashionLawBrief_57-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FashionLawBrief_57-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/15-866-respondent-amicus-FLI.pdf">Brief of Fashion Law Institute as <i>Amicus Curiae</i></a>, <i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i>, No. 15-866, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-UnitedStatesBrief-58"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-UnitedStatesBrief_58-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-UnitedStatesBrief_58-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/15-866_amicus_respondent_united_states.pdf">Brief of United States as <i>Amicus Curiae</i></a>, <i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i>, No. 15-866, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-ViewFromTheCourtroom-59"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-ViewFromTheCourtroom_59-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ViewFromTheCourtroom_59-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ViewFromTheCourtroom_59-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFWalsh2016" class="citation web cs1">Walsh, Mark (October 31, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/10/a-view-from-the-courtroom-2/">"A 'view' from the courtroom: Dress for success"</a>. <i>SCOTUSblog</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 16,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=SCOTUSblog&amp;rft.atitle=A+%27view%27+from+the+courtroom%3A+Dress+for+success&amp;rft.date=2016-10-31&amp;rft.aulast=Walsh&amp;rft.aufirst=Mark&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2016%2F10%2Fa-view-from-the-courtroom-2%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-60"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-60">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/15-866.htm"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 1; see also <i>No. 15-866</i> (docket), United States Supreme Court</a> (last visited April 15, 2017) ("Oct 31 2016 Argued. For petitioner: John J. Bursch, Caledonia, Mich. For respondents: William M. Jay, Washington, D. C.; and Eric J. Feigin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)")</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-61"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-61">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2016/15-866">"Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc"</a>. <i>Oyez</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Oyez&amp;rft.atitle=Star+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oyez.org%2Fcases%2F2016%2F15-866&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-NYTOct31-62"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-NYTOct31_62-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-NYTOct31_62-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-NYTOct31_62-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-NYTOct31_62-3"><sup><i><b>d</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-NYTOct31_62-4"><sup><i><b>e</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFLiptak2016" class="citation web cs1">Liptak, Adam (October 31, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/in-a-copyright-case-justices-ponder-the-fashion-industry.html">"In a Copyright Case, Justices Ponder the Meaning of Fashion"</a>. <i>The New York Times</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 15,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=The+New+York+Times&amp;rft.atitle=In+a+Copyright+Case%2C+Justices+Ponder+the+Meaning+of+Fashion&amp;rft.date=2016-10-31&amp;rft.aulast=Liptak&amp;rft.aufirst=Adam&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2016%2F11%2F01%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fin-a-copyright-case-justices-ponder-the-fashion-industry.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-63"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-63">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFBalluck2016" class="citation web cs1">Balluck, Kyle (October 31, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/303599-justice-weigh-cheerleading-uniform-designs/">"Justices weigh cheerleading uniform designs"</a>. <i>TheHill</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 8,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=TheHill&amp;rft.atitle=Justices+weigh+cheerleading+uniform+designs&amp;rft.date=2016-10-31&amp;rft.aulast=Balluck&amp;rft.aufirst=Kyle&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fregulation%2Fcourt-battles%2F303599-justice-weigh-cheerleading-uniform-designs%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-ArgumentAnalysisJusticesWorry-64"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-ArgumentAnalysisJusticesWorry_64-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ArgumentAnalysisJusticesWorry_64-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ArgumentAnalysisJusticesWorry_64-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMann2016" class="citation web cs1">Mann, Ronald (November 1, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/11/argument-analysis-justices-worry-about-killing-knockoffs-with-copyright/">"Argument analysis: Justices worry about 'killing knockoffs with copyright'<span class="cs1-kern-right"></span>"</a>. SCOTUSblog<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 26,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Argument+analysis%3A+Justices+worry+about+%27killing+knockoffs+with+copyright%27&amp;rft.pub=SCOTUSblog&amp;rft.date=2016-11-01&amp;rft.aulast=Mann&amp;rft.aufirst=Ronald&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2016%2F11%2Fargument-analysis-justices-worry-about-killing-knockoffs-with-copyright%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-65"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-65">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 4.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt-66"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-3"><sup><i><b>d</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-4"><sup><i><b>e</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-5"><sup><i><b>f</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-6"><sup><i><b>g</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-7"><sup><i><b>h</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CopyrightsAtTheSupremeCourt_66-8"><sup><i><b>i</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFQuinnBrachmann2017" class="citation web cs1">Quinn, Gene; Brachmann, Steve (March 22, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/03/22/copyrights-supreme-court-star-athletica-v-varsity-brands/id=79767/">"Copyrights at the Supreme Court: Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands"</a>. <i>IPWatchdog</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 24,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=IPWatchdog&amp;rft.atitle=Copyrights+at+the+Supreme+Court%3A+Star+Athletica+v.+Varsity+Brands&amp;rft.date=2017-03-22&amp;rft.aulast=Quinn&amp;rft.aufirst=Gene&amp;rft.au=Brachmann%2C+Steve&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipwatchdog.com%2F2017%2F03%2F22%2Fcopyrights-supreme-court-star-athletica-v-varsity-brands%2Fid%3D79767%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-67"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-67">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 4-6.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-68"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-68">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 8-11.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-slipop11-69"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-slipop11_69-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-slipop11_69-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 11.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-slipop10-70"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-slipop10_70-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-slipop10_70-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 10.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-slipop7-8-71"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-slipop7-8_71-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-slipop7-8_71-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-slipop7-8_71-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 7-8.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-slipop12-15-72"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-slipop12-15_72-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 12-15.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-slipop15-17-73"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-slipop15-17_73-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-slipop15-17_73-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 15-17.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-74"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-74">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 2-3 (Ginsburg, J., concurring in judgment)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-75"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-75">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i>, No. 15-866, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), slip op. at 1 (Ginsburg, J., concurring in judgment)</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-76"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-76">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><a href="/wiki/Title_17_of_the_United_States_Code" title="Title 17 of the United States Code">17 U.S.C.</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/113#a">§&#160;113(a)</a></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-ReferenceA-77"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-ReferenceA_77-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ReferenceA_77-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 2 (Ginsburg, J., concurring in judgment).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-78"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-78">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 4-14 (Ginsburg, J., concurring in judgment).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-breyer1-79"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-breyer1_79-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-breyer1_79-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 1 (Breyer, J., dissenting).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-80"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-80">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 6-7 (Breyer, J., dissenting).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-81"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-81">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 2-4 (Breyer, J., dissenting).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-breyer11-82"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-breyer11_82-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-breyer11_82-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 11 (Breyer, J., dissenting).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-83"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-83">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 4-6 (Breyer, J., dissenting).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-84"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-84">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 7-9 (Breyer, J., dissenting).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-OneYearLater-85"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-OneYearLater_85-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-OneYearLater_85-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFThe_Federalist_Society2018" class="citation audio-visual cs1">The Federalist Society (March 23, 2018). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BP41JX8xU2o"><i>Star Athletica: One Year Later</i></a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.btitle=Star+Athletica%3A+One+Year+Later&amp;rft.date=2018-03-23&amp;rft.au=The+Federalist+Society&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DBP41JX8xU2o&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-86"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-86">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMejia2017" class="citation web cs1">Mejia, Zameena (March 22, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://qz.com/939637/the-supreme-court-ruled-that-varsity-brands-cheerleading-uniform-designs-are-protected-by-copyright-law/">"The Supreme Court says the iconic American cheerleading uniform design is protected by copyright law"</a>. <i>Quartz</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 30,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Quartz&amp;rft.atitle=The+Supreme+Court+says+the+iconic+American+cheerleading+uniform+design+is+protected+by+copyright+law&amp;rft.date=2017-03-22&amp;rft.aulast=Mejia&amp;rft.aufirst=Zameena&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fqz.com%2F939637%2Fthe-supreme-court-ruled-that-varsity-brands-cheerleading-uniform-designs-are-protected-by-copyright-law%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-87"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-87">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6155717/puma-se-v-forever-21-inc/">"Docket for <i>PUMA SE v. Forever 21, Inc.</i>, 2:17-cv-02523"</a>. <i>CourtListener</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 5,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=CourtListener&amp;rft.atitle=Docket+for+PUMA+SE+v.+Forever+21%2C+Inc.%2C+2%3A17-cv-02523&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.courtlistener.com%2Fdocket%2F6155717%2Fpuma-se-v-forever-21-inc%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-88"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-88">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.thefashionlaw.com/home/puma-files-design-patent-copyright-trade-dress-suit-against-forever-21-over-rihanna-footwear">"Puma Files Patent, Copyright, Trade Dress Suit Against Forever 21 Over Rihanna Shoes"</a>. <i>The Fashion Law</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 2,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=The+Fashion+Law&amp;rft.atitle=Puma+Files+Patent%2C+Copyright%2C+Trade+Dress+Suit+Against+Forever+21+Over+Rihanna+Shoes&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefashionlaw.com%2Fhome%2Fpuma-files-design-patent-copyright-trade-dress-suit-against-forever-21-over-rihanna-footwear&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-89"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-89">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMorrowHyman2017" class="citation web cs1">Morrow, Loni; Hyman, Jonathan (April 4, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.knobbe.com/news/2017/04/puma-treads-new-territory-hitting-forever-21-copyright-allegations-after-supreme-court">"Puma Treads New Territory Hitting Forever 21 with Copyright Allegations after the Supreme Court's <i>Star Athletica</i> Decision"</a>. <i>Knobbe Martens Intellectual Property Law</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 6,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Knobbe+Martens+Intellectual+Property+Law&amp;rft.atitle=Puma+Treads+New+Territory+Hitting+Forever+21+with+Copyright+Allegations+after+the+Supreme+Court%27s+Star+Athletica+Decision&amp;rft.date=2017-04-04&amp;rft.aulast=Morrow&amp;rft.aufirst=Loni&amp;rft.au=Hyman%2C+Jonathan&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.knobbe.com%2Fnews%2F2017%2F04%2Fpuma-treads-new-territory-hitting-forever-21-copyright-allegations-after-supreme-court&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-90"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-90">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.thefashionlaw.com/home/forever-21-claims-fenty-puma-creeper-design-isnt-new-dates-back-decades">"Forever 21 Claims Fenty Puma Creeper Design Isn't New, "Dates Back Decades"<span class="cs1-kern-right"></span>"</a>. <i>The Fashion Law</i>. October 24, 2018<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">November 8,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=The+Fashion+Law&amp;rft.atitle=Forever+21+Claims+Fenty+Puma+Creeper+Design+Isn%27t+New%2C+%22Dates+Back+Decades%22&amp;rft.date=2018-10-24&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefashionlaw.com%2Fhome%2Fforever-21-claims-fenty-puma-creeper-design-isnt-new-dates-back-decades&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-91"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-91">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.thefashionlaw.com/home/forever-21-puma-settle-lawsuit-over-copied-fenty-footwear">"Forever 21, Puma Settle Lawsuit Over Copied Fenty Footwear"</a>. <i>The Fashion Law</i>. November 8, 2018<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">November 8,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=The+Fashion+Law&amp;rft.atitle=Forever+21%2C+Puma+Settle+Lawsuit+Over+Copied+Fenty+Footwear&amp;rft.date=2018-11-08&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefashionlaw.com%2Fhome%2Fforever-21-puma-settle-lawsuit-over-copied-fenty-footwear&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-92"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-92">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation report cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.copyright.gov/reports/annual/2017/ar2017.pdf">Fiscal 2017 Annual Report</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> (Report). United States Copyright Office. p.&#160;12.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=report&amp;rft.btitle=Fiscal+2017+Annual+Report&amp;rft.pages=12&amp;rft.pub=United+States+Copyright+Office&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Freports%2Fannual%2F2017%2Far2017.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-93"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-93">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation report cs1">"906.8 Functional and Useful Elements". <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/docs/compendium.pdf"><i>Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition</i></a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> (Report). <a href="/wiki/United_States_Copyright_Office" title="United States Copyright Office">United States Copyright Office</a>. September 29, 2017<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=report&amp;rft.btitle=Compendium+of+US+Copyright+Office+Practices%2C+Third+Edition&amp;rft.pub=United+States+Copyright+Office&amp;rft.date=2017-09-29&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Fcomp3%2Fdocs%2Fcompendium.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-94"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-94">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation report cs1">"311.1 Copyrightable Subject Matter". <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/docs/compendium.pdf"><i>Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition</i></a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> (Report). <a href="/wiki/United_States_Copyright_Office" title="United States Copyright Office">United States Copyright Office</a>. September 29, 2017<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=report&amp;rft.btitle=Compendium+of+US+Copyright+Office+Practices%2C+Third+Edition&amp;rft.pub=United+States+Copyright+Office&amp;rft.date=2017-09-29&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Fcomp3%2Fdocs%2Fcompendium.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-95"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-95">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation report cs1">"924&#8211;924.3(D)". <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/docs/compendium-12-22-14.pdf"><i>Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition</i></a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> (Report). <a href="/wiki/United_States_Copyright_Office" title="United States Copyright Office">United States Copyright Office</a>. December 22, 2014<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=report&amp;rft.btitle=Compendium+of+US+Copyright+Office+Practices%2C+Third+Edition&amp;rft.pub=United+States+Copyright+Office&amp;rft.date=2014-12-22&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Fcomp3%2Fdocs%2Fcompendium-12-22-14.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-96"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-96">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation report cs1">"924 Registration Requirements for the Design of a Useful Article". <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/docs/compendium.pdf"><i>Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition</i></a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> (Report). <a href="/wiki/United_States_Copyright_Office" title="United States Copyright Office">United States Copyright Office</a>. September 29, 2017<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=report&amp;rft.btitle=Compendium+of+US+Copyright+Office+Practices%2C+Third+Edition&amp;rft.pub=United+States+Copyright+Office&amp;rft.date=2017-09-29&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Fcomp3%2Fdocs%2Fcompendium.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-97"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-97">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation report cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/draft.html"><i>Public Draft for the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices</i></a> (Report). <a href="/wiki/United_States_Copyright_Office" title="United States Copyright Office">United States Copyright Office</a>. March 15, 2019<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">March 31,</span> 2019</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=report&amp;rft.btitle=Public+Draft+for+the+Compendium+of+U.S.+Copyright+Office+Practices&amp;rft.pub=United+States+Copyright+Office&amp;rft.date=2019-03-15&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Fcomp3%2Fdraft.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-98"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-98">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.copyright.gov/newsnet/2019/753.html">"Copyright Office Releases an Updated Draft of the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition"</a>. <i>www.copyright.gov</i>. March 15, 2019<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">March 31,</span> 2019</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=www.copyright.gov&amp;rft.atitle=Copyright+Office+Releases+an+Updated+Draft+of+the+Compendium+of+U.S.+Copyright+Office+Practices%2C+Third+Edition&amp;rft.date=2019-03-15&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Fnewsnet%2F2019%2F753.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-AnUnsatisfyingEnd-99"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-AnUnsatisfyingEnd_99-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFFreeman2017" class="citation web cs1">Freeman, Helene M. (September 25, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://fashionindustrylaw.com/2017/09/25/star-athletica-an-unsatisfying-end/">"Star Athletica: An Unsatisfying End"</a>. <i>The Fashion Industry Law Blog</i>. Phillips Nizer, LLP<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 15,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=The+Fashion+Industry+Law+Blog&amp;rft.atitle=Star+Athletica%3A+An+Unsatisfying+End&amp;rft.date=2017-09-25&amp;rft.aulast=Freeman&amp;rft.aufirst=Helene+M.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Ffashionindustrylaw.com%2F2017%2F09%2F25%2Fstar-athletica-an-unsatisfying-end%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-100"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-100">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite><i>Varsity Brands, Inc. v. Star Athletica, LLC</i></cite>&#32;(W.D. Tenn.&#32;2017),&#32;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-tnwd-2_10-cv-02508/pdf/USCOURTS-tnwd-2_10-cv-02508-12.pdf">Text</a>.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-101"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-101">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFHannon2017" class="citation web cs1">Hannon, David (March 27, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.b2ipreport.com/swip-report/copyrightability-clarified-for-designs-of-useful-articles/">"Copyrightability Clarified for Designs of "Useful" Articles"</a>. <i>Bejin Bieneman PLC</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Bejin+Bieneman+PLC&amp;rft.atitle=Copyrightability+Clarified+for+Designs+of+%22Useful%22+Articles&amp;rft.date=2017-03-27&amp;rft.aulast=Hannon&amp;rft.aufirst=David&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b2ipreport.com%2Fswip-report%2Fcopyrightability-clarified-for-designs-of-useful-articles%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-102"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-102">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFBuccafuscoLemley2018" class="citation journal cs1">Buccafusco, Christopher; Lemley, Mark A. (2018). "Functionality Screens". <i>Virginia Law Review</i>. <a href="/wiki/SSRN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="SSRN (identifier)">SSRN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2888094">2888094</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=Virginia+Law+Review&amp;rft.atitle=Functionality+Screens&amp;rft.date=2018&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D2888094%23id-name%3DSSRN&amp;rft.aulast=Buccafusco&amp;rft.aufirst=Christopher&amp;rft.au=Lemley%2C+Mark+A.&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-103"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-103">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMenellYablon2017" class="citation journal cs1">Menell, Peter S.; Yablon, Daniel (September 12, 2017). "Star Athletica's Fissure in the Intellectual Property Functionality Landscape". <i>University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online</i> (116). <a href="/wiki/SSRN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="SSRN (identifier)">SSRN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3036254">3036254</a>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=University+of+Pennsylvania+Law+Review+Online&amp;rft.atitle=Star+Athletica%27s+Fissure+in+the+Intellectual+Property+Functionality+Landscape&amp;rft.issue=116&amp;rft.date=2017-09-12&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D3036254%23id-name%3DSSRN&amp;rft.aulast=Menell&amp;rft.aufirst=Peter+S.&amp;rft.au=Yablon%2C+Daniel&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-104"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-104">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFChinlundBolos2017" class="citation web cs1">Chinlund, Gregory J.; Bolos, Michelle (March 28, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.marshallip.com/publications/apart-at-the-seams-copyright-protection-for-apparel-star-athletica-llc-v-varsity-brands-inc/">"Apart at the Seams – Copyright Protection for Apparel: Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc"</a>. <i>Marshall, Gerstein &amp; Borun LLP</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Marshall%2C+Gerstein+%26+Borun+LLP&amp;rft.atitle=Apart+at+the+Seams+%E2%80%93+Copyright+Protection+for+Apparel%3A+Star+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc.&amp;rft.date=2017-03-28&amp;rft.aulast=Chinlund&amp;rft.aufirst=Gregory+J.&amp;rft.au=Bolos%2C+Michelle&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.marshallip.com%2Fpublications%2Fapart-at-the-seams-copyright-protection-for-apparel-star-athletica-llc-v-varsity-brands-inc%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-105"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-105">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFGreenwald2017" class="citation web cs1">Greenwald, Judy (March 28, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20170327/NEWS06/912312586/Supreme-Court-makes-fashion-statement-cheerleader-uniforms-ruling-Varsity-Athlet">"High court fashion statement could lead to more lawsuits"</a>. <i>Business Insurance</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Business+Insurance&amp;rft.atitle=High+court+fashion+statement+could+lead+to+more+lawsuits&amp;rft.date=2017-03-28&amp;rft.aulast=Greenwald&amp;rft.aufirst=Judy&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsurance.com%2Farticle%2F20170327%2FNEWS06%2F912312586%2FSupreme-Court-makes-fashion-statement-cheerleader-uniforms-ruling-Varsity-Athlet&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-106"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-106">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMorran2017" class="citation web cs1">Morran, Chris (March 22, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://consumerist.com/2017/03/22/supreme-courts-ruling-in-cheerleader-uniform-case-could-lead-to-higher-prices-for-clothing-furniture/index.html">"Supreme Court's Ruling In Cheerleader Uniform Case Could Lead To Higher Prices For Clothing, Furniture"</a>. <i>Consumerist</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Consumerist&amp;rft.atitle=Supreme+Court%27s+Ruling+In+Cheerleader+Uniform+Case+Could+Lead+To+Higher+Prices+For+Clothing%2C+Furniture&amp;rft.date=2017-03-22&amp;rft.aulast=Morran&amp;rft.aufirst=Chris&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fconsumerist.com%2F2017%2F03%2F22%2Fsupreme-courts-ruling-in-cheerleader-uniform-case-could-lead-to-higher-prices-for-clothing-furniture%2Findex.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-107"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-107">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFPuglise2016" class="citation web cs1">Puglise, Nicole (July 21, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2016/jul/21/zara-accused-copying-artist-designs-fashion">"Fashion brand Zara accused of copying LA artist's designs"</a>. <i>the Guardian</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 2,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=the+Guardian&amp;rft.atitle=Fashion+brand+Zara+accused+of+copying+LA+artist%27s+designs&amp;rft.date=2016-07-21&amp;rft.aulast=Puglise&amp;rft.aufirst=Nicole&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Ffashion%2F2016%2Fjul%2F21%2Fzara-accused-copying-artist-designs-fashion&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-108"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-108">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMann2017" class="citation web cs1">Mann, Ronald (March 22, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/03/opinion-analysis-court-uses-cheerleader-uniform-case-validate-broad-copyright-industrial-designs/">"Opinion analysis: Court uses cheerleader uniform case to validate broad copyright in industrial designs"</a>. <i>SCOTUSblog</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">July 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=SCOTUSblog&amp;rft.atitle=Opinion+analysis%3A+Court+uses+cheerleader+uniform+case+to+validate+broad+copyright+in+industrial+designs&amp;rft.date=2017-03-22&amp;rft.aulast=Mann&amp;rft.aufirst=Ronald&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2017%2F03%2Fopinion-analysis-court-uses-cheerleader-uniform-case-validate-broad-copyright-industrial-designs%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-109"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-109">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite><i>Silvertop Assocs., Inc. v. Kangaroo Mfg., Inc.</i></cite>,&#32;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://casetext.com/case/silvertop-assocs-inc-v-kangaroo-mfg-inc">319&#32;F. Supp. 3d&#32;754</a>&#32;(D.N.J.&#32;2018)&#32;("These features include: a) the overall length of the costume, b) the overall shape of the design in terms of curvature, c) the length of the shape both above and below the torso of the wearer, d) the shape, size, and jet black color of both ends, e) the location of the head and arm cutouts which dictate how the costume drapes on and protrudes from a wearer (as opposed to the mere existence of the cutout holes), f) the soft, smooth, almost shiny look and feel of the chosen synthetic fabric, g) the parallel lines which mimic the ridges on a banana in three-dimensional form, and h) the bright shade of a golden yellow and uniform color that appears distinct from the more muted and inconsistent tones of a natural banana. The Court finds that, if these features were separated from the costume itself and applied on a painter's canvas, it would qualify as a two-dimensional work of art in a way that would not replicate the costume itself.").</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-110"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-110">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite><i>Silvertop Assocs., Inc. v. Kangaroo Mfg., Inc.</i></cite>,&#32;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://casetext.com/case/silvertop-assocs-inc-v-kangaroo-mfg-inc">&#32;18-2266</a>&#32;(3d Cir.&#32;2019).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-111"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-111">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFJung2019" class="citation web cs1">Jung, Isabelle (February 27, 2019). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.copyright.gov/rulings-filings/review-board/docs/glove-overlay.pdf">"Second Request for Reconsideration for Refusal to Register Overlay for Glove; Correspondence ID: 1-2V1EUOL; SR 1-4260743051"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. <i>copyright.gov</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">March 31,</span> 2019</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=copyright.gov&amp;rft.atitle=Second+Request+for+Reconsideration+for+Refusal+to+Register+Overlay+for+Glove%3B+Correspondence+ID%3A+1-2V1EUOL%3B+SR+1-4260743051&amp;rft.date=2019-02-27&amp;rft.aulast=Jung&amp;rft.aufirst=Isabelle&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Frulings-filings%2Freview-board%2Fdocs%2Fglove-overlay.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-JusticeBreyerFear-112"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-JusticeBreyerFear_112-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-JusticeBreyerFear_112-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFClark2020" class="citation journal cs1">Clark, Dorien (January 1, 2020). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://repository.jmls.edu/ripl/vol19/iss3/3">"The Yeezy Boost 350 Copyright Registrations: Did Kanye West Turn Justice Breyer's Fear Into a Reality?"</a>. <i>The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law</i>. <b>19</b> (3). <a href="/wiki/ISSN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISSN (identifier)">ISSN</a>&#160;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://search.worldcat.org/issn/1930-8140">1930-8140</a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 29,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.jtitle=The+John+Marshall+Review+of+Intellectual+Property+Law&amp;rft.atitle=The+Yeezy+Boost+350+Copyright+Registrations%3A+Did+Kanye+West+Turn+Justice+Breyer%27s+Fear+Into+a+Reality%3F&amp;rft.volume=19&amp;rft.issue=3&amp;rft.date=2020-01-01&amp;rft.issn=1930-8140&amp;rft.aulast=Clark&amp;rft.aufirst=Dorien&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.jmls.edu%2Fripl%2Fvol19%2Fiss3%2F3&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-OtherShoeDrops-113"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-OtherShoeDrops_113-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-OtherShoeDrops_113-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-OtherShoeDrops_113-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFFreeman2019" class="citation web cs1">Freeman, Helene M. (June 4, 2019). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://fashionindustrylaw.com/2019/06/04/the-other-shoe-drops/">"The Other Shoe Drops"</a>. <i>The Fashion Industry Law Blog</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 29,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=The+Fashion+Industry+Law+Blog&amp;rft.atitle=The+Other+Shoe+Drops&amp;rft.date=2019-06-04&amp;rft.aulast=Freeman&amp;rft.aufirst=Helene+M.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Ffashionindustrylaw.com%2F2019%2F06%2F04%2Fthe-other-shoe-drops%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-114"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-114">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFKing2019" class="citation web cs1">King, Ashley (May 17, 2019). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2019/05/16/adidas-copyrights-yeezy-sneaker-design/">"Adidas Secures U.S. Copyright Protection for Yeezy Sneaker Designs"</a>. <i>Digital Music News</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 29,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Digital+Music+News&amp;rft.atitle=Adidas+Secures+U.S.+Copyright+Protection+for+Yeezy+Sneaker+Designs&amp;rft.date=2019-05-17&amp;rft.aulast=King&amp;rft.aufirst=Ashley&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitalmusicnews.com%2F2019%2F05%2F16%2Fadidas-copyrights-yeezy-sneaker-design%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-BoostForCopyright-115"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-BoostForCopyright_115-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-BoostForCopyright_115-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMescher2019" class="citation web cs1">Mescher, Rick (May 28, 2019). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.technologylawsource.com/2019/05/articles/intellectual-property-1/copyright/kanyes-yeezy-sneakers-to-receive-copyright-registrations/">"A "Boost" for copyright protection in the fashion industry: Kanye's Yeezy sneakers to receive copyright registrations"</a>. <i>Technology Law Source</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 29,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Technology+Law+Source&amp;rft.atitle=A+%22Boost%22+for+copyright+protection+in+the+fashion+industry%3A+Kanye%27s+Yeezy+sneakers+to+receive+copyright+registrations&amp;rft.date=2019-05-28&amp;rft.aulast=Mescher&amp;rft.aufirst=Rick&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.technologylawsource.com%2F2019%2F05%2Farticles%2Fintellectual-property-1%2Fcopyright%2Fkanyes-yeezy-sneakers-to-receive-copyright-registrations%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-116"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-116">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 9-11 (Breyer, J., dissenting).</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-117"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-117">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><i>Star Athletica</i>, slip op. at 17.</span> </li> <li id="cite_note-WorkingWithAnAwkwardFit-118"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-WorkingWithAnAwkwardFit_118-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-WorkingWithAnAwkwardFit_118-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFRose2018" class="citation web cs1">Rose, Meredith Filak (August 29, 2018). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/copyright-and-cosplay-working-with-an-awkward-fit/">"Copyright and Cosplay: Working With an Awkward Fit"</a>. <i>Public Knowledge</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">January 5,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Public+Knowledge&amp;rft.atitle=Copyright+and+Cosplay%3A+Working+With+an+Awkward+Fit&amp;rft.date=2018-08-29&amp;rft.aulast=Rose&amp;rft.aufirst=Meredith+Filak&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.publicknowledge.org%2Fblog%2Fcopyright-and-cosplay-working-with-an-awkward-fit%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-119"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-119">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFRose2018" class="citation web cs1">Rose, Meredith Filak (August 29, 2018). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/copyright-props-and-armor-replicas-yer-a-statue-harry/">"Copyright, Props, and Armor Replicas: "Yer a Statue, Harry"<span class="cs1-kern-right"></span>"</a>. <i>Public Knowledge</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">January 5,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Public+Knowledge&amp;rft.atitle=Copyright%2C+Props%2C+and+Armor+Replicas%3A+%22Yer+a+Statue%2C+Harry%22&amp;rft.date=2018-08-29&amp;rft.aulast=Rose&amp;rft.aufirst=Meredith+Filak&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.publicknowledge.org%2Fblog%2Fcopyright-props-and-armor-replicas-yer-a-statue-harry%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-ShapewaysResponse-120"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-ShapewaysResponse_120-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ShapewaysResponse_120-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFWeinberg2017" class="citation web cs1">Weinberg, Michael (March 22, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.shapeways.com/blog/archives/29985-decision-in-the-cheerleader-uniform-case-and-a-new-test-for-copyright.html">"Decision in the Cheerleader Uniform Case and a New Test for Copyright"</a>. <i>www.shapeways.com</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 29,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=www.shapeways.com&amp;rft.atitle=Decision+in+the+Cheerleader+Uniform+Case+and+a+New+Test+for+Copyright&amp;rft.date=2017-03-22&amp;rft.aulast=Weinberg&amp;rft.aufirst=Michael&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.shapeways.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F29985-decision-in-the-cheerleader-uniform-case-and-a-new-test-for-copyright.html&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-MaySpellDisaster-121"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-MaySpellDisaster_121-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-MaySpellDisaster_121-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFMasnick2017" class="citation web cs1">Masnick, Mike (March 23, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170323/00433236983/supreme-court-says-you-can-copyright-elements-useful-articles-which-may-spell-disaster-3d-printing-more.shtml">"Supreme Court Says You Can Copyright Elements Of 'Useful Articles' -- Which May Spell Disaster For 3D Printing &amp; More"</a>. <i>Techdirt</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 29,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Techdirt.&amp;rft.atitle=Supreme+Court+Says+You+Can+Copyright+Elements+Of+%27Useful+Articles%27+--+Which+May+Spell+Disaster+For+3D+Printing+%26+More&amp;rft.date=2017-03-23&amp;rft.aulast=Masnick&amp;rft.aufirst=Mike&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.techdirt.com%2Farticles%2F20170323%2F00433236983%2Fsupreme-court-says-you-can-copyright-elements-useful-articles-which-may-spell-disaster-3d-printing-more.shtml&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-122"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-122">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFJackson2017" class="citation web cs1">Jackson, Beau (March 27, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/supreme-court-rules-cheerleader-uniforms-implications-3d-printing-109227/">"Supreme Court rules over cheerleader uniforms has implications for 3D printing"</a>. <i>3D Printing Industry</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 29,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=3D+Printing+Industry&amp;rft.atitle=Supreme+Court+rules+over+cheerleader+uniforms+has+implications+for+3D+printing&amp;rft.date=2017-03-27&amp;rft.aulast=Jackson&amp;rft.aufirst=Beau&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2F3dprintingindustry.com%2Fnews%2Fsupreme-court-rules-cheerleader-uniforms-implications-3d-printing-109227%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-123"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-123">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFHuddleston2017" class="citation web cs1">Huddleston, Jennifer (August 2, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://readplaintext.com/what-a-supreme-court-decision-on-cheerleading-uniforms-means-for-the-future-of-3d-printing-ad086e6b0469">"What a Supreme Court Decision on Cheerleading Uniforms Means for the Future of 3D Printing"</a>. <i>Plain Text</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 29,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Plain+Text&amp;rft.atitle=What+a+Supreme+Court+Decision+on+Cheerleading+Uniforms+Means+for+the+Future+of+3D+Printing&amp;rft.date=2017-08-02&amp;rft.aulast=Huddleston&amp;rft.aufirst=Jennifer&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Freadplaintext.com%2Fwhat-a-supreme-court-decision-on-cheerleading-uniforms-means-for-the-future-of-3d-printing-ad086e6b0469&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-124"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-124">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFKaufman2017" class="citation web cs1">Kaufman, Roy (June 26, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/26/is-the-us-supreme-court-decision-regarding-uniforms-worth-cheering-for/">"Is the US Supreme Court decision regarding uniforms worth cheering for?"</a>. <i>TechCrunch</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 29,</span> 2020</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=TechCrunch&amp;rft.atitle=Is+the+US+Supreme+Court+decision+regarding+uniforms+worth+cheering+for%3F&amp;rft.date=2017-06-26&amp;rft.aulast=Kaufman&amp;rft.aufirst=Roy&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Ftechcrunch.com%2F2017%2F07%2F26%2Fis-the-us-supreme-court-decision-regarding-uniforms-worth-cheering-for%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-125"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-125">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFKluft2018" class="citation web cs1">Kluft, David (April 24, 2018). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2018/04/star-athletica-and-the-expansion-of-useful-article-protection-copyright-office-permits-registration-of-automotive-floor-liner/">"Star Athletica and the Expansion of Useful Article Protection: Copyright Office Permits Registration of Automotive Floor Liner"</a>. <i>Trademark And Copyright Law</i>. Foley Hoag, LLP<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">May 15,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Trademark+And+Copyright+Law&amp;rft.atitle=Star+Athletica+and+the+Expansion+of+Useful+Article+Protection%3A+Copyright+Office+Permits+Registration+of+Automotive+Floor+Liner&amp;rft.date=2018-04-24&amp;rft.aulast=Kluft&amp;rft.aufirst=David&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2F2018%2F04%2Fstar-athletica-and-the-expansion-of-useful-article-protection-copyright-office-permits-registration-of-automotive-floor-liner%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-MichelinStarAthletica-126"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-MichelinStarAthletica_126-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-MichelinStarAthletica_126-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFFlynn2017" class="citation web cs1">Flynn, James P. (September 19, 2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.ilnipinsider.com/2017/09/will-it-be-known-as-michelin-star-athletica-why-the-us-supreme-court-may-have-given-american-chefs-a-reason-to-cheer/">"Will It Be Known As 'Michelin Star Athletica'?: Why The US Supreme Court May Have Given American Chefs A Reason To Cheer"</a>. <i>ILN IP Insider</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 2,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=ILN+IP+Insider&amp;rft.atitle=Will+It+Be+Known+As+%27Michelin+Star+Athletica%27%3F%3A+Why+The+US+Supreme+Court+May+Have+Given+American+Chefs+A+Reason+To+Cheer&amp;rft.date=2017-09-19&amp;rft.aulast=Flynn&amp;rft.aufirst=James+P.&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ilnipinsider.com%2F2017%2F09%2Fwill-it-be-known-as-michelin-star-athletica-why-the-us-supreme-court-may-have-given-american-chefs-a-reason-to-cheer%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-EatYourArtOut-127"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-EatYourArtOut_127-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-EatYourArtOut_127-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFReed2016" class="citation web cs1">Reed, Natasha (June 21, 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2016/06/eat-your-art-out-intellectual-property-protection-for-food/">"Eat Your Art Out: Intellectual Property Protection for Food"</a>. <i>Trademark And Copyright Law</i>. Foley Hoag, LLP<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 3,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Trademark+And+Copyright+Law&amp;rft.atitle=Eat+Your+Art+Out%3A+Intellectual+Property+Protection+for+Food&amp;rft.date=2016-06-21&amp;rft.aulast=Reed&amp;rft.aufirst=Natasha&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2F2016%2F06%2Feat-your-art-out-intellectual-property-protection-for-food%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-ProtectingFoodCreations-128"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-ProtectingFoodCreations_128-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ProtectingFoodCreations_128-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFHerzfeld" class="citation web cs1">Herzfeld, Oliver. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/oliverherzfeld/2014/03/07/protecting-food-creations/">"Protecting Food Creations"</a>. <i>Forbes</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=Forbes&amp;rft.atitle=Protecting+Food+Creations&amp;rft.aulast=Herzfeld&amp;rft.aufirst=Oliver&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Foliverherzfeld%2F2014%2F03%2F07%2Fprotecting-food-creations%2F&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> <li id="cite_note-129"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-129">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1238218222" /><cite id="CITEREFLewis2006" class="citation web cs1">Lewis, Paul (March 24, 2006). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2006/mar/24/foodanddrink.uk">"Can you copyright a dish?"</a>. <i>the Guardian</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">August 21,</span> 2018</span>.</cite><span title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=unknown&amp;rft.jtitle=the+Guardian&amp;rft.atitle=Can+you+copyright+a+dish%3F&amp;rft.date=2006-03-24&amp;rft.aulast=Lewis&amp;rft.aufirst=Paul&amp;rft_id=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Flifeandstyle%2F2006%2Fmar%2F24%2Ffoodanddrink.uk&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fen.wikipedia.org%3AStar+Athletica%2C+LLC+v.+Varsity+Brands%2C+Inc." class="Z3988"></span></span> </li> </ol></div> <div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="External_links">External links</h2><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=18" title="Edit section: External links"><span>edit</span></a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></div> <ul><li><span class="noviewer" typeof="mw:File"><a href="/wiki/File:Wikisource-logo.svg" class="mw-file-description"><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/15px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png" decoding="async" width="15" height="16" class="mw-file-element" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/23px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/30px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png 2x" data-file-width="410" data-file-height="430" /></a></span> Works related to <a href="https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Special:Search/Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc." class="extiw" title="wikisource:Special:Search/Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.">Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</a> at Wikisource</li> <li>Text of <i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. (section)</i>, 580 U.S. 405 (2017) is available from:&#x20;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/15-866">Cornell</a>&#x20;&#x20;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4377349/star-athletica-l-l-c-v-varsity-brands-inc/">CourtListener</a>&#x20;&#x20;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3822888794493391837">Google&#160;Scholar</a>&#x20;&#x20;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/580/15-866">Justia</a>&#x20;</li> <li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/star-athletica-llc-v-varsity-brands-inc/">SCOTUSblog case page</a></li></ul> <div class="navbox-styles"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1129693374">.mw-parser-output .hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul{margin:0;padding:0}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt,.mw-parser-output .hlist li{margin:0;display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ul{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist .mw-empty-li{display:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dt::after{content:": "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li::after{content:" · ";font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li:last-child::after{content:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:first-child::before{content:" (";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:last-child::after{content:")";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol{counter-reset:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li{counter-increment:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li::before{content:" "counter(listitem)"\a0 "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li ol>li:first-child::before{content:" ("counter(listitem)"\a0 "}</style><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1236075235">.mw-parser-output .navbox{box-sizing:border-box;border:1px solid #a2a9b1;width:100%;clear:both;font-size:88%;text-align:center;padding:1px;margin:1em auto 0}.mw-parser-output .navbox .navbox{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .navbox+.navbox,.mw-parser-output .navbox+.navbox-styles+.navbox{margin-top:-1px}.mw-parser-output .navbox-inner,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup{width:100%}.mw-parser-output .navbox-group,.mw-parser-output .navbox-title,.mw-parser-output .navbox-abovebelow{padding:0.25em 1em;line-height:1.5em;text-align:center}.mw-parser-output .navbox-group{white-space:nowrap;text-align:right}.mw-parser-output .navbox,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup{background-color:#fdfdfd}.mw-parser-output .navbox-list{line-height:1.5em;border-color:#fdfdfd}.mw-parser-output .navbox-list-with-group{text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid}.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-abovebelow,.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-group,.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-image,.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-list{border-top:2px solid #fdfdfd}.mw-parser-output .navbox-title{background-color:#ccf}.mw-parser-output .navbox-abovebelow,.mw-parser-output .navbox-group,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup .navbox-title{background-color:#ddf}.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup .navbox-group,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup .navbox-abovebelow{background-color:#e6e6ff}.mw-parser-output .navbox-even{background-color:#f7f7f7}.mw-parser-output .navbox-odd{background-color:transparent}.mw-parser-output .navbox .hlist td dl,.mw-parser-output .navbox .hlist td ol,.mw-parser-output .navbox .hlist td ul,.mw-parser-output .navbox td.hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .navbox td.hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .navbox td.hlist ul{padding:0.125em 0}.mw-parser-output .navbox .navbar{display:block;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .navbox-title .navbar{float:left;text-align:left;margin-right:0.5em}body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .navbox-image img{max-width:none!important}@media print{body.ns-0 .mw-parser-output .navbox{display:none!important}}</style></div><div role="navigation" class="navbox" aria-labelledby="U.S._Supreme_Court_Article_I_case_law2072" style="padding:3px"><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner" style="border-spacing:0;background:transparent;color:inherit"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1129693374" /><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1239400231">.mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar a>span,.mw-parser-output .navbar a>abbr{text-decoration:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em}html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .navbar li a abbr{color:var(--color-base)!important}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .navbar li a abbr{color:var(--color-base)!important}}@media print{.mw-parser-output .navbar{display:none!important}}</style><div class="navbar plainlinks hlist navbar-mini"><ul><li class="nv-view"><a href="/wiki/Template:USArticleI" title="Template:USArticleI"><abbr title="View this template">v</abbr></a></li><li class="nv-talk"><a href="/wiki/Template_talk:USArticleI" title="Template talk:USArticleI"><abbr title="Discuss this template">t</abbr></a></li><li class="nv-edit"><a href="/wiki/Special:EditPage/Template:USArticleI" title="Special:EditPage/Template:USArticleI"><abbr title="Edit this template">e</abbr></a></li></ul></div><div id="U.S._Supreme_Court_Article_I_case_law2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States" title="Supreme Court of the United States">U.S. Supreme Court</a> <a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Article I</a> case law</div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Enumeration_Clause_of_Section_II2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_3:_Apportionment_of_Representatives_and_taxes" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Enumeration Clause</a> of <a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_2:_House_of_Representatives" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Section II</a></div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Utah_v._Evans" title="Utah v. Evans">Utah v. Evans</a></i> (2002)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Department_of_Commerce_v._New_York" title="Department of Commerce v. New York">Department of Commerce v. New York</a></i> (2019)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Trump_v._New_York" title="Trump v. New York">Trump v. New York</a></i> (2020)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Qualifications_Clauses_of_Sections_II_and_III2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_2:_Qualifications_of_Members" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Qualifications Clauses of Sections II</a> and <a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_3:_Qualifications_of_senators" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">III</a></div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Powell_v._McCormack" title="Powell v. McCormack">Powell v. McCormack</a></i> (1969)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/U.S._Term_Limits,_Inc._v._Thornton" title="U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton">U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton</a></i> (1995)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Cook_v._Gralike" title="Cook v. Gralike">Cook v. Gralike</a></i> (2001)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Elections_Clause_of_Section_IV2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_1:_Time,_place,_and_manner_of_holding" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Elections Clause</a> of <a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_4:_Congressional_elections" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Section IV</a></div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Ex_parte_Siebold" title="Ex parte Siebold">Ex parte Siebold</a></i> (1879)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Smiley_v._Holm" title="Smiley v. Holm">Smiley v. Holm</a></i> (1932)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/U.S._Term_Limits,_Inc._v._Thornton" title="U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton">U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton</a></i> (1995)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Arizona_State_Legislature_v._Arizona_Independent_Redistricting_Commission" title="Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission">Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission</a></i> (2015)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Moore_v._Harper" title="Moore v. Harper">Moore v. Harper</a></i> (2023)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Speech_or_Debate_Clause_of_Section_VI2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Speech_or_Debate_Clause" title="Speech or Debate Clause">Speech or Debate Clause</a> of <a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_6:Compensation,_privileges,_and_restrictions_on_holding_civil_office" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Section VI</a></div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Kilbourn_v._Thompson" title="Kilbourn v. Thompson">Kilbourn v. Thompson</a></i> (1881)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Johnson_(1966)" title="United States v. Johnson (1966)">United States v. Johnson</a></i> (1966)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Gravel_v._United_States" title="Gravel v. United States">Gravel v. United States</a></i> (1972)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Origination_Clause_of_Section_VII2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Origination_Clause" title="Origination Clause">Origination Clause</a> of <a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_7:_Bills" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Section VII</a></div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Flint_v._Stone_Tracy_Co." title="Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.">Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.</a></i> (1911)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Munoz-Flores" title="United States v. Munoz-Flores">United States v. Munoz-Flores</a></i> (1990)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Presentment_Clause_of_Section_VII2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Presentment_Clause" title="Presentment Clause">Presentment Clause</a> of Section VII</div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Pocket_Veto_Case" title="Pocket Veto Case">Pocket Veto Case</a> (1929)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Immigration_and_Naturalization_Service_v._Chadha" title="Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha">Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha</a></i> (1983)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Clinton_v._City_of_New_York" title="Clinton v. City of New York">Clinton v. City of New York</a></i> (1998)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Taxing_and_Spending_Clause_of_Section_VIII2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Taxing_and_Spending_Clause" title="Taxing and Spending Clause">Taxing and Spending Clause</a> of <a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_8:_Powers_of_Congress" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Section VIII</a></div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Hylton_v._United_States" title="Hylton v. United States">Hylton v. United States</a></i> (1796)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Collector_v._Day" title="Collector v. Day">Collector v. Day</a></i> (1871)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Springer_v._United_States" title="Springer v. United States">Springer v. United States</a></i> (1881)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Pollock_v._Farmers%27_Loan_%26_Trust_Co." title="Pollock v. Farmers&#39; Loan &amp; Trust Co.">Pollock v. Farmers' Loan &amp; Trust Co.</a></i> (1895)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Brushaber_v._Union_Pacific_Railroad_Co." title="Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.">Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.</a></i> (1916)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bailey_v._Drexel_Furniture_Co." title="Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co.">Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co.</a></i> (1922)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Butler" title="United States v. Butler">United States v. Butler</a></i> (1936)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Helvering_v._Davis" title="Helvering v. Davis">Helvering v. Davis</a></i> (1937)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Dole" title="South Dakota v. Dole">South Dakota v. Dole</a></i> (1987)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Sabri_v._United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Sabri v. United States (page does not exist)">Sabri v. United States</a></i> (2004)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/National_Federation_of_Independent_Business_v._Sebelius" title="National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius">National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius</a></i> (2012)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Commerce_Clause_of_Section_VIII2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Commerce_Clause" title="Commerce Clause">Commerce Clause</a> of Section VIII</div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Dormant_Commerce_Clause" title="Dormant Commerce Clause">Dormant Commerce Clause</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Brown_v._Maryland" title="Brown v. Maryland">Brown v. Maryland</a></i> (1827)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Willson_v._Black-Bird_Creek_Marsh_Co." title="Willson v. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co.">Willson v. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co.</a></i> (1829)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Cooley_v._Board_of_Wardens" title="Cooley v. Board of Wardens">Cooley v. Board of Wardens</a></i> (1852)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Wabash,_St._Louis_%26_Pacific_Railway_Co._v._Illinois" title="Wabash, St. Louis &amp; Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois">Wabash, St. Louis &amp; Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois</a></i> (1886)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Swift_%26_Co._v._United_States" title="Swift &amp; Co. v. United States">Swift &amp; Co. v. United States</a></i> (1905)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/George_W._Bush_%26_Sons_Co._v._Malloy" title="George W. Bush &amp; Sons Co. v. Malloy">George W. Bush &amp; Sons Co. v. Malloy</a></i> (1925)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Baldwin_v._G.A.F._Seelig,_Inc." title="Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc.">Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc.</a></i> (1935)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Edwards_v._California" title="Edwards v. California">Edwards v. California</a></i> (1941)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Southern_Pacific_Co._v._Arizona" title="Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona">Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona</a></i> (1945)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Dean_Milk_Co._v._City_of_Madison" title="Dean Milk Co. v. City of Madison">Dean Milk Co. v. City of Madison</a></i> (1951)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Miller_Bros._Co._v._Maryland" title="Miller Bros. Co. v. Maryland">Miller Bros. Co. v. Maryland</a></i> (1954)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bibb_v._Navajo_Freight_Lines,_Inc." title="Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.">Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.</a></i> (1959)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/National_Bellas_Hess_v._Illinois" title="National Bellas Hess v. Illinois">National Bellas Hess v. Illinois</a></i> (1967)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Pike_v._Bruce_Church,_Inc." title="Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.">Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.</a></i> (1970)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Hughes_v._Alexandria_Scrap_Corp." title="Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.">Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.</a></i> (1976)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Complete_Auto_Transit,_Inc._v._Brady" title="Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady">Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady</a></i> (1977)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Hunt_v._Washington_State_Apple_Advertising_Commission" title="Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission">Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission</a></i> (1977)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/City_of_Philadelphia_v._New_Jersey" title="City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey">City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey</a></i> (1978)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Exxon_Corp._v._Governor_of_Maryland" title="Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland">Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland</a></i> (1978)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Reeves,_Inc._v._Stake" title="Reeves, Inc. v. Stake">Reeves, Inc. v. Stake</a></i> (1980)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Kassel_v._Consolidated_Freightways_Corp." title="Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.">Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.</a></i> (1981)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sporhase_v._Nebraska_ex_rel._Douglas" title="Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rel. Douglas">Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rel. Douglas</a></i> (1982)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=White_v._Mass._Council_of_Construction_Employers&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="White v. Mass. Council of Construction Employers (page does not exist)">White v. Mass. Council of Construction Employers</a></i> (1983)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/South-Central_Timber_Development,_Inc._v._Wunnicke" title="South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke">South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke</a></i> (1984)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Maine_v._Taylor" title="Maine v. Taylor">Maine v. Taylor</a></i> (1986)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Healy_v._Beer_Institute,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Healy v. Beer Institute, Inc. (page does not exist)">Healy v. Beer Institute, Inc.</a></i> (1989)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Quill_Corp._v._North_Dakota" title="Quill Corp. v. North Dakota">Quill Corp. v. North Dakota</a></i> (1992)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Chemical_Waste_Management,_Inc._v._Hunt" title="Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt">Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt</a></i> (1992)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Oregon_Waste_Systems,_Inc._v._Department_of_Environmental_Quality_of_Oregon" title="Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon">Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon</a></i> (1994)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/C%26A_Carbone,_Inc._v._Town_of_Clarkstown" title="C&amp;A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown">C&amp;A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown</a></i> (1994)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/West_Lynn_Creamery,_Inc._v._Healy" title="West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy">West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy</a></i> (1994)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Granholm_v._Heald" title="Granholm v. Heald">Granholm v. Heald</a></i> (2005)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_Haulers_Ass%27n_v._Oneida-Herkimer_Solid_Waste_Management_Authority" title="United Haulers Ass&#39;n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority">United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority</a></i> (2007)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Department_of_Revenue_of_Kentucky_v._Davis" title="Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis">Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis</a></i> (2008)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Comptroller_of_the_Treasury_of_Maryland_v._Wynne" title="Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne">Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne</a></i> (2015)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Wayfair,_Inc." title="South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.">South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.</a></i> (2018)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Tennessee_Wine_and_Spirits_Retailers_Assn._v._Thomas" title="Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. Thomas">Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. Thomas</a></i> (2019)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/National_Pork_Producers_Council_v._Ross" title="National Pork Producers Council v. Ross">National Pork Producers Council v. Ross</a></i> (2023)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Others</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Gibbons_v._Ogden" title="Gibbons v. Ogden">Gibbons v. Ogden</a></i> (1824)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Passenger_Cases" title="Passenger Cases">Passenger Cases</a></i> (1849)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Paul_v._Virginia" title="Paul v. Virginia">Paul v. Virginia</a></i> (1869)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Cooper_Manufacturing_Co._v._Ferguson" title="Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. Ferguson">Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. Ferguson</a></i> (1885)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Kidd_v._Pearson" title="Kidd v. Pearson">Kidd v. Pearson</a></i> (1888)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/In_re_Debs" title="In re Debs">In re Debs</a></i> (1895)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._E._C._Knight_Co." title="United States v. E. C. Knight Co.">United States v. E. C. Knight Co.</a></i> (1895)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Champion_v._Ames" title="Champion v. Ames">Champion v. Ames</a></i> (1903)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Southern_Railway_Co._v._United_States" title="Southern Railway Co. v. United States">Southern Railway Co. v. United States</a></i> (1911)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Hoke_v._United_States" title="Hoke v. United States">Hoke v. United States</a></i> (1913)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Houston_East_%26_West_Texas_Railway_Co._v._United_States" title="Houston East &amp; West Texas Railway Co. v. United States">Houston East &amp; West Texas Railway Co. v. United States</a></i> (1914)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Hammer_v._Dagenhart" title="Hammer v. Dagenhart">Hammer v. Dagenhart</a></i> (1918)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Board_of_Trade_of_City_of_Chicago_v._Olsen" title="Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Olsen">Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Olsen</a></i> (1923)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/A.L.A._Schechter_Poultry_Corp._v._United_States" title="A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States">A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States</a></i> (1935)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Gold_Clause_Cases" title="Gold Clause Cases">Gold Clause Cases</a></i> (1935)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Panama_Refining_Co._v._Ryan" title="Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan">Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan</a></i> (1935)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Carter_v._Carter_Coal_Co." title="Carter v. Carter Coal Co.">Carter v. Carter Coal Co.</a></i> (1936)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/NLRB_v._Jones_%26_Laughlin_Steel_Corp." title="NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp.">NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp.</a></i> (1937)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Carolene_Products_Co." title="United States v. Carolene Products Co.">United States v. Carolene Products Co.</a></i> (1938)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/McGoldrick_v._Berwind-White_Coal_Mining_Co." title="McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.">McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.</a></i> (1940)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Darby_Lumber_Co." title="United States v. Darby Lumber Co.">United States v. Darby Lumber Co.</a></i> (1941)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Wrightwood_Dairy_Co." title="United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.">United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.</a></i> (1942)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn" title="Wickard v. Filburn">Wickard v. Filburn</a></i> (1942)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._South-Eastern_Underwriters_Ass%27n" title="United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass&#39;n">United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n</a></i> (1944)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/North_American_Co._v._SEC" title="North American Co. v. SEC">North American Co. v. SEC</a></i> (1946)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/H.P._Hood_%26_Sons_v._Du_Mond" title="H.P. Hood &amp; Sons v. Du Mond">H.P. Hood &amp; Sons v. Du Mond</a></i> (1949)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Henderson_v._United_States_(1950)" title="Henderson v. United States (1950)">Henderson v. United States</a></i> (1950)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Canton_Railroad_Co._v._Rogan" title="Canton Railroad Co. v. Rogan">Canton Railroad Co. v. Rogan</a></i> (1951)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Boynton_v._Virginia" title="Boynton v. Virginia">Boynton v. Virginia</a></i> (1960)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Heart_of_Atlanta_Motel,_Inc._v._United_States" title="Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States">Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States</a></i> (1964)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Katzenbach_v._McClung" title="Katzenbach v. McClung">Katzenbach v. McClung</a></i> (1964)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Maryland_v._Wirtz&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Maryland v. Wirtz (page does not exist)">Maryland v. Wirtz</a></i> (1968)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/National_League_of_Cities_v._Usery" title="National League of Cities v. Usery">National League of Cities v. Usery</a></i> (1976)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Hodel_v._Virginia_Surface_Mining_%26_Reclamation_Association,_Inc.&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining &amp; Reclamation Association, Inc. (page does not exist)">Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining &amp; Reclamation Association, Inc.</a></i> (1981)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Commonwealth_Edison_Co._v._Montana" title="Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana">Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana</a></i> (1981)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/EEOC_v._Wyoming" title="EEOC v. Wyoming">EEOC v. Wyoming</a></i> (1983)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Garcia_v._San_Antonio_Metropolitan_Transit_Authority" title="Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority">Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority</a></i> (1985)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/New_York_v._United_States" title="New York v. United States">New York v. United States</a></i> (1992)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Lopez" title="United States v. Lopez">United States v. Lopez</a></i> (1995)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Seminole_Tribe_of_Florida_v._Florida" title="Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida">Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida</a></i> (1996)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Reno_v._Condon" title="Reno v. Condon">Reno v. Condon</a></i> (2000)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Locke" title="United States v. Locke">United States v. Locke</a></i> (2000)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Jones_v._United_States_(2000)&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Jones v. United States (2000) (page does not exist)">Jones v. United States</a></i> (2000)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Morrison" title="United States v. Morrison">United States v. Morrison</a></i> (2000)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich" title="Gonzales v. Raich">Gonzales v. Raich</a></i> (2005)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/National_Federation_of_Independent_Business_v._Sebelius" title="National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius">National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius</a></i> (2012)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Taylor_v._United_States_(2016)" title="Taylor v. United States (2016)">Taylor v. United States</a></i> (2016)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Coinage_Clause_of_Section_VIII2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Enumerated_powers" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Coinage Clause</a> of Section VIII</div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th id="Legal_Tender_Cases26" scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><i><a href="/wiki/Legal_Tender_Cases" title="Legal Tender Cases">Legal Tender Cases</a></i></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Knox_v._Lee" title="Knox v. Lee">Knox v. Lee</a></i> (1871)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Juilliard_v._Greenman" title="Juilliard v. Greenman">Juilliard v. Greenman</a></i> (1884)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Copyright_Clause_of_Section_VIII2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Clause" title="Copyright Clause">Copyright Clause</a> of Section VIII</div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1790" title="Copyright Act of 1790">Copyright Act of 1790</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Wheaton_v._Peters" title="Wheaton v. Peters">Wheaton v. Peters</a></i> (1834)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Paige_v._Banks" title="Paige v. Banks">Paige v. Banks</a></i> (1872)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Globe_Newspaper_Co._v._Walker" title="Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker">Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker</a></i> (1908)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/History_of_United_States_patent_law#Patent_Act_of_1793" title="History of United States patent law">Patent Act of 1793</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Tyler_v._Tuel" title="Tyler v. Tuel">Tyler v. Tuel</a></i> (1810)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Evans_v._Eaton_(1818)" title="Evans v. Eaton (1818)">Evans v. Eaton</a></i> (1818)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Evans_v._Eaton_(1822)" title="Evans v. Eaton (1822)">Evans v. Eaton</a></i> (1822)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Evans_v._Hettich" title="Evans v. Hettich">Evans v. Hettich</a></i> (1822)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Patent_infringement_under_United_States_law" title="Patent infringement under United States law">Patent infringement</a> case law</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Evans_v._Jordan" title="Evans v. Jordan">Evans v. Jordan</a></i> (1815)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Hollister_v._Benedict_%26_Burnham_Manufacturing_Co." title="Hollister v. Benedict &amp; Burnham Manufacturing Co.">Hollister v. Benedict &amp; Burnham Manufacturing Co.</a></i> (1885)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Rowell_v._Lindsay" title="Rowell v. Lindsay">Rowell v. Lindsay</a></i> (1885)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Schillinger_v._United_States" title="Schillinger v. United States">Schillinger v. United States</a></i> (1894)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bauer_%26_Cie._v._O%27Donnell" title="Bauer &amp; Cie. v. O&#39;Donnell">Bauer &amp; Cie. v. O'Donnell</a></i> (1913)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/General_Talking_Pictures_Corp._v._Western_Electric_Co." title="General Talking Pictures Corp. v. Western Electric Co.">General Talking Pictures Corp. v. Western Electric Co.</a></i> (1938)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Patentability" title="Patentability">Patentability</a> case law</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Pennock_v._Dialogue" title="Pennock v. Dialogue">Pennock v. Dialogue</a></i> (1829)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Hotchkiss_v._Greenwood" title="Hotchkiss v. Greenwood">Hotchkiss v. Greenwood</a></i> (1851)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/O%27Reilly_v._Morse" title="O&#39;Reilly v. Morse">O'Reilly v. Morse</a></i> (1853)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Cochrane_v._Deener" title="Cochrane v. Deener">Cochrane v. Deener</a></i> (1876)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/City_of_Elizabeth_v._American_Nicholson_Pavement_Co." title="City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co.">City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co.</a></i> (1878)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Egbert_v._Lippmann" title="Egbert v. Lippmann">Egbert v. Lippmann</a></i> (1881)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Consolidated_Safety-Valve_Co._v._Crosby_Steam_Gauge_%26_Valve_Co." title="Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge &amp; Valve Co.">Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge &amp; Valve Co.</a></i> (1885)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Voss_v._Fisher" title="Voss v. Fisher">Voss v. Fisher</a></i> (1885)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1831" title="Copyright Act of 1831">Copyright Act of 1831</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Wheaton_v._Peters" title="Wheaton v. Peters">Wheaton v. Peters</a></i> (1834)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Backus_v._Gould" title="Backus v. Gould">Backus v. Gould</a></i> (1849)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Stephens_v._Cady" title="Stephens v. Cady">Stephens v. Cady</a></i> (1853)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Stevens_v._Gladding" title="Stevens v. Gladding">Stevens v. Gladding</a></i> (1854)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Little_v._Hall" title="Little v. Hall">Little v. Hall</a></i> (1856)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Paige_v._Banks" title="Paige v. Banks">Paige v. Banks</a></i> (1872)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Baker_v._Selden" title="Baker v. Selden">Baker v. Selden</a></i> (1879)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Callaghan_v._Myers" title="Callaghan v. Myers">Callaghan v. Myers</a></i> (1888)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Higgins_v._Keuffel" title="Higgins v. Keuffel">Higgins v. Keuffel</a></i> (1891)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Holmes_v._Hurst" title="Holmes v. Hurst">Holmes v. Hurst</a></i> (1899)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Brady_v._Daly" title="Brady v. Daly">Brady v. Daly</a></i> (1899)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bolles_v._Outing_Co." title="Bolles v. Outing Co.">Bolles v. Outing Co.</a></i> (1899)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Mifflin_v._R._H._White_Company" title="Mifflin v. R. H. White Company">Mifflin v. R. H. White Company</a></i> (1903)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Mifflin_v._Dutton" title="Mifflin v. Dutton">Mifflin v. Dutton</a></i> (1903)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1870" title="Copyright Act of 1870">Copyright Act of 1870</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Perris_v._Hexamer" title="Perris v. Hexamer">Perris v. Hexamer</a></i> (1879)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Trade-Mark_Cases" title="Trade-Mark Cases">Trade-Mark Cases</a></i> (1879)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Merrell_v._Tice" title="Merrell v. Tice">Merrell v. Tice</a></i> (1881)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Schreiber_v._Sharpless" title="Schreiber v. Sharpless">Schreiber v. Sharpless</a></i> (1884)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Burrow-Giles_Lithographic_Co._v._Sarony" title="Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony">Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony</a></i> (1884)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Thornton_v._Schreiber" title="Thornton v. Schreiber">Thornton v. Schreiber</a></i> (1888)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Banks_v._Manchester" title="Banks v. Manchester">Banks v. Manchester</a></i> (1888)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Callaghan_v._Myers" title="Callaghan v. Myers">Callaghan v. Myers</a></i> (1888)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Thompson_v._Hubbard" title="Thompson v. Hubbard">Thompson v. Hubbard</a></i> (1889)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Higgins_v._Keuffel" title="Higgins v. Keuffel">Higgins v. Keuffel</a></i> (1891)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Belford_v._Scribner" title="Belford v. Scribner">Belford v. Scribner</a></i> (1892)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Brady_v._Daly" title="Brady v. Daly">Brady v. Daly</a></i> (1899)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bolles_v._Outing_Co." title="Bolles v. Outing Co.">Bolles v. Outing Co.</a></i> (1899)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bleistein_v._Donaldson_Lithographing_Co." title="Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.">Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.</a></i> (1903)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/McLoughlin_v._Raphael_Tuck_%26_Sons_Co." title="McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck &amp; Sons Co.">McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck &amp; Sons Co.</a></i> (1903)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/American_Tobacco_Co._v._Werckmeister" title="American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister">American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister</a></i> (1907)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Werckmeister_v._American_Tobacco_Co." title="Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Co.">Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Co.</a></i> (1907)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_Dictionary_Co._v._G._%26_C._Merriam_Co." title="United Dictionary Co. v. G. &amp; C. Merriam Co.">United Dictionary Co. v. G. &amp; C. Merriam Co.</a></i> (1907)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/White-Smith_Music_Publishing_Co._v._Apollo_Co." title="White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co.">White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co.</a></i> (1908)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Dun_v._Lumbermen%27s_Credit_Ass%27n" title="Dun v. Lumbermen&#39;s Credit Ass&#39;n">Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n</a></i> (1908)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bobbs-Merrill_Co._v._Straus" title="Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus">Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus</a></i> (1908)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Scribner_v._Straus" title="Scribner v. Straus">Scribner v. Straus</a></i> (1908)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bong_v._Campbell_Art_Co." title="Bong v. Campbell Art Co.">Bong v. Campbell Art Co.</a></i> (1909)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Henry_v._A.B._Dick_Co." title="Henry v. A.B. Dick Co.">Henry v. A.B. Dick Co.</a></i> (1912)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Sherman_Antitrust_Act_of_1890" class="mw-redirect" title="Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890">Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Straus_v._American_Publishers_Association" title="Straus v. American Publishers Association">Straus v. American Publishers Association</a></i> (1913)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Interstate_Circuit,_Inc._v._United_States" title="Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States">Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States</a></i> (1939)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Fashion_Originators%27_Guild_of_America_v._FTC" title="Fashion Originators&#39; Guild of America v. FTC">Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC</a></i> (1941)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc." title="United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.">United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.</a></i> (1948)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Broadcast_Music,_Inc._v._CBS_Inc." title="Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS Inc.">Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS Inc.</a></i> (1979)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/International_Copyright_Act_of_1891" title="International Copyright Act of 1891">International Copyright Act of 1891</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Press_Pub._Co._v._Monroe" title="Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe">Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe</a></i> (1896)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/McLoughlin_v._Raphael_Tuck_%26_Sons_Co." title="McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck &amp; Sons Co.">McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck &amp; Sons Co.</a></i> (1903)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/American_Tobacco_Co._v._Werckmeister" title="American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister">American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister</a></i> (1907)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/White-Smith_Music_Publishing_Co._v._Apollo_Co." title="White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co.">White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co.</a></i> (1908)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Globe_Newspaper_Co._v._Walker" title="Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker">Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker</a></i> (1908)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bong_v._Campbell_Art_Co." title="Bong v. Campbell Art Co.">Bong v. Campbell Art Co.</a></i> (1909)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Caliga_v._Inter_Ocean_Newspaper_Co." title="Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.">Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.</a></i> (1909)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Hills_and_Co._v._Hoover" title="Hills and Co. v. Hoover">Hills and Co. v. Hoover</a></i> (1911)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Kalem_Co._v._Harper_Bros." title="Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros.">Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros.</a></i> (1911)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1909" title="Copyright Act of 1909">Copyright Act of 1909</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Hills_and_Co._v._Hoover" title="Hills and Co. v. Hoover">Hills and Co. v. Hoover</a></i> (1911)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/DeJonge_and_Co._v._Breuker_%26_Kessler_Co." class="mw-redirect" title="DeJonge and Co. v. Breuker &amp; Kessler Co.">DeJonge and Co. v. Breuker &amp; Kessler Co.</a></i> (1914)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Herbert_v._Shanley_Co." title="Herbert v. Shanley Co.">Herbert v. Shanley Co.</a></i> (1917)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Manners_v._Morosco" title="Manners v. Morosco">Manners v. Morosco</a></i> (1920)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Fox_Film_Corp._v._Knowles" title="Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles">Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles</a></i> (1923)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Buck_v._Jewell-LaSalle_Realty_Co." title="Buck v. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Co.">Buck v. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Co.</a></i> (1931)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Douglas_v._Cunningham" title="Douglas v. Cunningham">Douglas v. Cunningham</a></i> (1935)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Washingtonian_Pub._Co._v._Pearson" title="Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson">Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson</a></i> (1939)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sheldon_v._Metro-Goldwyn_Pictures_Corp." title="Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.">Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.</a></i> (1940)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Fred_Fisher_Music_Co._v._M._Witmark_%26_Sons" title="Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark &amp; Sons">Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark &amp; Sons</a></i> (1943)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/F._W._Woolworth_Co._v._Contemporary_Arts,_Inc." title="F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.">F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.</a></i> (1952)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Mazer_v._Stein" title="Mazer v. Stein">Mazer v. Stein</a></i> (1954)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/De_Sylva_v._Ballentine" title="De Sylva v. Ballentine">De Sylva v. Ballentine</a></i> (1956)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sears,_Roebuck_%26_Co._v._Stiffel_Co." title="Sears, Roebuck &amp; Co. v. Stiffel Co.">Sears, Roebuck &amp; Co. v. Stiffel Co.</a></i> (1964)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Williams_%26_Wilkins_Co._v._United_States" title="Williams &amp; Wilkins Co. v. United States">Williams &amp; Wilkins Co. v. United States</a></i> (1973)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Patent_misuse" title="Patent misuse">Patent misuse</a> case law</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Motion_Picture_Patents_Co._v._Universal_Film_Manufacturing_Co." title="Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.">Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.</a></i> (1917)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Morton_Salt_Co._v._G.S._Suppiger_Co." title="Morton Salt Co. v. G.S. Suppiger Co.">Morton Salt Co. v. G.S. Suppiger Co.</a></i> (1942)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Clayton_Antitrust_Act_of_1914" title="Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914">Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Fashion_Originators%27_Guild_of_America_v._FTC" title="Fashion Originators&#39; Guild of America v. FTC">Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC</a></i> (1941)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Dowling_v._United_States_(1985)" title="Dowling v. United States (1985)">Dowling v. United States</a></i> (1985)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Lanham_Act" title="Lanham Act">Lanham Act</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Inwood_Laboratories,_Inc._v._Ives_Laboratories,_Inc." title="Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.">Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.</a></i> (1982)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/San_Francisco_Arts_%26_Athletics,_Inc._v._United_States_Olympic_Committee" title="San Francisco Arts &amp; Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee">San Francisco Arts &amp; Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee</a></i> (1987)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Two_Pesos,_Inc._v._Taco_Cabana,_Inc." title="Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.">Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.</a></i> (1992)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Qualitex_Co._v._Jacobson_Products_Co." title="Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.">Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.</a></i> (1995)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/College_Savings_Bank_v._Florida_Prepaid_Postsecondary_Education_Expense_Board" title="College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board">College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board</a></i> (1999)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Cooper_Industries,_Inc._v._Leatherman_Tool_Group,_Inc." title="Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.">Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.</a></i> (2001)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/TrafFix_Devices,_Inc._v._Marketing_Displays,_Inc." title="TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.">TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.</a></i> (2001)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Dastar_Corp._v._Twentieth_Century_Fox_Film_Corp." title="Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.">Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.</a></i> (2003)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Moseley_v._V_Secret_Catalogue,_Inc." title="Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.">Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.</a></i> (2003)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Lexmark_International,_Inc._v._Static_Control_Components,_Inc.#Scope_of_federal_statutory_torts:_2014_ruling_at_the_Supreme_Court" title="Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.">Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.</a></i> (2014)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/POM_Wonderful_LLC_v._Coca-Cola_Co." title="POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.">POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.</a></i> (2014)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Matal_v._Tam" title="Matal v. Tam">Matal v. Tam</a></i> (2017)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Iancu_v._Brunetti" title="Iancu v. Brunetti">Iancu v. Brunetti</a></i> (2019)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Romag_Fasteners,_Inc._v._Fossil,_Inc." title="Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.">Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.</a></i> (2020)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976" title="Copyright Act of 1976">Copyright Act of 1976</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Zacchini_v._Scripps-Howard_Broadcasting_Co." title="Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.">Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.</a></i> (1977)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios,_Inc." title="Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.">Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.</a></i> (1984)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Mills_Music,_Inc._v._Snyder" title="Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder">Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder</a></i> (1985)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Harper_%26_Row_v._Nation_Enterprises" title="Harper &amp; Row v. Nation Enterprises">Harper &amp; Row v. Nation Enterprises</a></i> (1985)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Community_for_Creative_Non-Violence_v._Reid" title="Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid">Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid</a></i> (1989)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Stewart_v._Abend" title="Stewart v. Abend">Stewart v. Abend</a></i> (1990)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Feist_Publications,_Inc.,_v._Rural_Telephone_Service_Co." title="Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.">Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.</a></i> (1991)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Fogerty_v._Fantasy,_Inc." title="Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.">Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.</a></i> (1994)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc." title="Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.">Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.</a></i> (1994)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Lotus_Dev._Corp._v._Borland_Int%27l,_Inc." title="Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int&#39;l, Inc.">Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc.</a></i> (1996)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Quality_King_Distributors_Inc.,_v._L%27anza_Research_International_Inc." title="Quality King Distributors Inc., v. L&#39;anza Research International Inc.">Quality King Distributors Inc., v. L'anza Research International Inc.</a></i> (1998)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Feltner_v._Columbia_Pictures_Television,_Inc." title="Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.">Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.</a></i> (1998)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Tasini" title="New York Times Co. v. Tasini">New York Times Co. v. Tasini</a></i> (2001)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Eldred_v._Ashcroft" title="Eldred v. Ashcroft">Eldred v. Ashcroft</a></i> (2003)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/MGM_Studios,_Inc._v._Grokster,_Ltd." title="MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.">MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.</a></i> (2005)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Reed_Elsevier,_Inc._v._Muchnick" title="Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick">Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick</a></i> (2010)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Golan_v._Holder" title="Golan v. Holder">Golan v. Holder</a></i> (2012)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Kirtsaeng_v._John_Wiley_%26_Sons,_Inc." title="Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.">Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</a></i> (2013)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Petrella_v._Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer,_Inc." title="Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.">Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.</a></i> (2014)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/American_Broadcasting_Cos.,_Inc._v._Aereo,_Inc." title="American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.">American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.</a></i> (2014)</li> <li><i><a class="mw-selflink selflink">Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</a></i> (2017)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Fourth_Estate_Public_Benefit_Corp._v._Wall-Street.com" title="Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com">Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com</a></i> (2019)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Rimini_Street_Inc._v._Oracle_USA_Inc." title="Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc.">Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc.</a></i> (2019)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Remedy_Clarification_Act" title="Copyright Remedy Clarification Act">Allen v. Cooper</a></i> (2020)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Georgia_v._Public.Resource.Org,_Inc." title="Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.">Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.</a></i> (2020)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Other <a href="/wiki/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_copyright_case_law" title="List of United States Supreme Court copyright case law">copyright cases</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/American_Lithographic_Co._v._Werkmeister" title="American Lithographic Co. v. Werkmeister">American Lithographic Co. v. Werkmeister</a></i> (1911)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Ferris_v._Frohman" title="Ferris v. Frohman">Ferris v. Frohman</a></i> (1912)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Order_of_St._Benedict_of_New_Jersey_v._Steinhauser" title="Order of St. Benedict of New Jersey v. Steinhauser">Order of St. Benedict of New Jersey v. Steinhauser</a></i> (1914)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/International_News_Service_v._Associated_Press" title="International News Service v. Associated Press">International News Service v. Associated Press</a></i> (1918)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/L._A._Westermann_Co._v._Dispatch_Printing_Co." title="L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co.">L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co.</a></i> (1919)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Lumiere_v._Mae_Edna_Wilder,_Inc." title="Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc.">Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc.</a></i> (1923)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Educational_Films_Corp._v._Ward" title="Educational Films Corp. v. Ward">Educational Films Corp. v. Ward</a></i> (1931)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Fox_Film_Corp._v._Doyal" title="Fox Film Corp. v. Doyal">Fox Film Corp. v. Doyal</a></i> (1932)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/George_v._Victor_Talking_Machine_Co." title="George v. Victor Talking Machine Co.">George v. Victor Talking Machine Co.</a></i> (1934)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/KVOS_v._Associated_Press" title="KVOS v. Associated Press">KVOS v. Associated Press</a></i> (1936)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Gibbs_v._Buck" title="Gibbs v. Buck">Gibbs v. Buck</a></i> (1939)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Buck_v._Gallagher" title="Buck v. Gallagher">Buck v. Gallagher</a></i> (1939)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Commissioner_v._Wodehouse" title="Commissioner v. Wodehouse">Commissioner v. Wodehouse</a></i> (1949)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Miller_Music_Corp._v._Charles_N._Daniels,_Inc." title="Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc.">Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc.</a></i> (1960)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Pub._Affairs_Associates,_Inc._v._Rickover" title="Pub. Affairs Associates, Inc. v. Rickover">Pub. Affairs Associates, Inc. v. Rickover</a></i> (1962)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Fortnightly_Corp._v._United_Artists_Television,_Inc." title="Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc.">Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc.</a></i> (1968)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Goldstein_v._California" title="Goldstein v. California">Goldstein v. California</a></i> (1973)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Teleprompter_Corp._v._Columbia_Broadcasting" title="Teleprompter Corp. v. Columbia Broadcasting">Teleprompter Corp. v. Columbia Broadcasting</a></i> (1974)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Twentieth_Century_Music_Corp._v._Aiken" title="Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken">Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken</a></i> (1975)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Other <a href="/wiki/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_patent_case_law" title="List of United States Supreme Court patent case law">patent cases</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Continental_Paper_Bag_Co._v._Eastern_Paper_Bag_Co." title="Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.">Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.</a></i> (1908)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Minerals_Separation,_Ltd._v._Hyde" title="Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde">Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde</a></i> (1916)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._General_Electric_Co." title="United States v. General Electric Co.">United States v. General Electric Co.</a></i> (1926)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Univis_Lens_Co." title="United States v. Univis Lens Co.">United States v. Univis Lens Co.</a></i> (1942)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Altvater_v._Freeman" title="Altvater v. Freeman">Altvater v. Freeman</a></i> (1943)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sinclair_%26_Carroll_Co._v._Interchemical_Corp." title="Sinclair &amp; Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.">Sinclair &amp; Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.</a></i> (1945)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Funk_Bros._Seed_Co._v._Kalo_Inoculant_Co." title="Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.">Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.</a></i> (1948)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Great_Atlantic_%26_Pacific_Tea_Co._v._Supermarket_Equipment_Corp." title="Great Atlantic &amp; Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.">Great Atlantic &amp; Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.</a></i> (1950)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Graver_Tank_%26_Manufacturing_Co._v._Linde_Air_Products_Co." title="Graver Tank &amp; Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.">Graver Tank &amp; Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.</a></i> (1950)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Aro_Manufacturing_Co._v._Convertible_Top_Replacement_Co." title="Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.">Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.</a></i> (1961)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Compco_Corp._v._Day-Brite_Lighting,_Inc." title="Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.">Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.</a></i> (1964)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Wilbur-Ellis_Co._v._Kuther" title="Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther">Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther</a></i> (1964)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Brulotte_v._Thys_Co." title="Brulotte v. Thys Co.">Brulotte v. Thys Co.</a></i> (1964)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Walker_Process_Equipment,_Inc._v._Food_Machinery_%26_Chemical_Corp." title="Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery &amp; Chemical Corp.">Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery &amp; Chemical Corp.</a></i> (1965)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Graham_v._John_Deere_Co." title="Graham v. John Deere Co.">Graham v. John Deere Co.</a></i> (1966)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Adams" title="United States v. Adams">United States v. Adams</a></i> (1966)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Brenner_v._Manson" title="Brenner v. Manson">Brenner v. Manson</a></i> (1966)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Lear,_Inc._v._Adkins" title="Lear, Inc. v. Adkins">Lear, Inc. v. Adkins</a></i> (1969)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Anderson%27s-Black_Rock,_Inc._v._Pavement_Salvage_Co." title="Anderson&#39;s-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.">Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.</a></i> (1969)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Zenith_Radio_Corp._v._Hazeltine_Research,_Inc." title="Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.">Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.</a></i> (1971)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Gottschalk_v._Benson" title="Gottschalk v. Benson">Gottschalk v. Benson</a></i> (1972)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Glaxo_Group_Ltd." title="United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd.">United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd.</a></i> (1973)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Dann_v._Johnston" title="Dann v. Johnston">Dann v. Johnston</a></i> (1976)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sakraida_v._Ag_Pro_Inc." title="Sakraida v. Ag Pro Inc.">Sakraida v. Ag Pro Inc.</a></i> (1976)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Parker_v._Flook" title="Parker v. Flook">Parker v. Flook</a></i> (1978)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Diamond_v._Chakrabarty" title="Diamond v. Chakrabarty">Diamond v. Chakrabarty</a></i> (1980)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Diamond_v._Diehr" title="Diamond v. Diehr">Diamond v. Diehr</a></i> (1981)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bonito_Boats,_Inc._v._Thunder_Craft_Boats,_Inc." title="Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.">Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.</a></i> (1989)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Eli_Lilly_%26_Co._v._Medtronic,_Inc." title="Eli Lilly &amp; Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.">Eli Lilly &amp; Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.</a></i> (1990)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Markman_v._Westview_Instruments,_Inc." title="Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.">Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.</a></i> (1996)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Warner-Jenkinson_Co._v._Hilton_Davis_Chemical_Co." title="Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.">Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.</a></i> (1997)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Pfaff_v._Wells_Electronics,_Inc." title="Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.">Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.</a></i> (1998)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Dickinson_v._Zurko" title="Dickinson v. Zurko">Dickinson v. Zurko</a></i> (1999)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Florida_Prepaid_Postsecondary_Education_Expense_Board_v._College_Savings_Bank" title="Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank">Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank</a></i> (1999)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/J._E._M._Ag_Supply,_Inc._v._Pioneer_Hi-Bred_International,_Inc." title="J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.">J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.</a></i> (2001)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Festo_Corp._v._Shoketsu_Kinzoku_Kogyo_Kabushiki_Co." title="Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.">Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.</a></i> (2002)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Merck_KGaA_v._Integra_Lifesciences_I,_Ltd." title="Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.">Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.</a></i> (2005)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/EBay_Inc._v._MercExchange,_L.L.C." title="EBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C.">eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C.</a></i> (2006)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Illinois_Tool_Works_Inc._v._Independent_Ink,_Inc." title="Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.">Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.</a></i> (2006)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/LabCorp_v._Metabolite,_Inc." title="LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc.">LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc.</a></i> (2006)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/MedImmune,_Inc._v._Genentech,_Inc." title="MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.">MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.</a></i> (2007)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/KSR_International_Co._v._Teleflex_Inc." title="KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.">KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.</a></i> (2007)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._AT%26T_Corp." title="Microsoft Corp. v. AT&amp;T Corp.">Microsoft Corp. v. AT&amp;T Corp.</a></i> (2007)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Quanta_Computer,_Inc._v._LG_Electronics,_Inc." title="Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.">Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.</a></i> (2008)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bilski_v._Kappos" title="Bilski v. Kappos">Bilski v. Kappos</a></i> (2010)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Global-Tech_Appliances,_Inc._v._SEB_S.A." title="Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A.">Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A.</a></i> (2011)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Stanford_University_v._Roche_Molecular_Systems,_Inc." title="Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.">Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.</a></i> (2011)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._i4i_Ltd._Partnership" title="Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership">Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership</a></i> (2011)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Mayo_Collaborative_Services_v._Prometheus_Laboratories,_Inc." title="Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.">Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.</a></i> (2012)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Kappos_v._Hyatt" title="Kappos v. Hyatt">Kappos v. Hyatt</a></i> (2012)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bowman_v._Monsanto_Co." title="Bowman v. Monsanto Co.">Bowman v. Monsanto Co.</a></i> (2013)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Gunn_v._Minton" title="Gunn v. Minton">Gunn v. Minton</a></i> (2013)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Association_for_Molecular_Pathology_v._Myriad_Genetics,_Inc." title="Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.">Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.</a></i> (2013)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/FTC_v._Actavis,_Inc." title="FTC v. Actavis, Inc.">FTC v. Actavis, Inc.</a></i> (2013)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_International" title="Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International">Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International</a></i> (2014)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Akamai_Techs.,_Inc._v._Limelight_Networks,_Inc.#Supreme_Court" title="Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.">Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.</a></i> (2014)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Teva_Pharmaceuticals_USA,_Inc._v._Sandoz,_Inc." title="Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.">Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.</a></i> (2015)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Kimble_v._Marvel_Entertainment,_LLC" title="Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC">Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC</a></i> (2015)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electronics_Co." title="Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.">Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.</a></i> (2016)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/TC_Heartland_LLC_v._Kraft_Foods_Group_Brands_LLC" title="TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC">TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC</a></i> (2017)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Peter_v._NantKwest,_Inc." title="Peter v. NantKwest, Inc.">Peter v. NantKwest, Inc.</a></i> (2019)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Other <a href="/wiki/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_trademark_case_law" title="List of United States Supreme Court trademark case law">trademark cases</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/G._%26_C._Merriam_Co._v._Syndicate_Pub._Co." title="G. &amp; C. Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. Co.">G. &amp; C. Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. Co.</a></i> (1915)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Kellogg_Co._v._National_Biscuit_Co." title="Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.">Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.</a></i> (1938)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Patent_and_Trademark_Office_v._Booking.com_B._V." title="Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V.">Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V.</a></i> (2020)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Necessary_and_Proper_Clause_of_Section_VIII2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Necessary_and_Proper_Clause" title="Necessary and Proper Clause">Necessary and Proper Clause</a> of Section VIII</div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/McCulloch_v._Maryland" title="McCulloch v. Maryland">McCulloch v. Maryland</a></i> (1819)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Lambert_v._Yellowley" title="Lambert v. Yellowley">Lambert v. Yellowley</a></i> (1926)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Sabri_v._United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Sabri v. United States (page does not exist)">Sabri v. United States</a></i> (2004)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich" title="Gonzales v. Raich">Gonzales v. Raich</a></i> (2005)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Comstock" title="United States v. Comstock">United States v. Comstock</a></i> (2010)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/United_States_v._Kebodeaux" title="United States v. Kebodeaux">United States v. Kebodeaux</a></i> (2013)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Habeas_corpus_Suspension_Clause_of_Section_IX2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clauses_2_and_3:_Civil_and_legal_protections" title="Article One of the United States Constitution"><i>Habeas corpus</i> Suspension Clause</a> of <a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_9:_Limits_on_Federal_power" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Section IX</a></div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Ex_parte_Bollman" title="Ex parte Bollman">Ex parte Bollman</a></i> (1807)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Ex_parte_Merryman" title="Ex parte Merryman">Ex parte Merryman</a></i> (1861)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Ex_parte_Endo" title="Ex parte Endo">Ex parte Endo</a></i> (1944)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Immigration_and_Naturalization_Service_v._St._Cyr" title="Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr">Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr</a></i> (2001)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Boumediene_v._Bush" title="Boumediene v. Bush">Boumediene v. Bush</a></i> (2008)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Department_of_Homeland_Security_v._Thuraissigiam" title="Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam">Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam</a></i> (2020)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="No_Bills_of_Attainder_or_Ex_post_facto_Laws_Clause_of_Section_IX2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clauses_2_and_3:_Civil_and_legal_protections" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">No Bills of Attainder or <i>Ex post facto</i> Laws Clause</a> of Section IX</div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Calder_v._Bull" title="Calder v. Bull">Calder v. Bull</a></i> (1798)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sturges_v._Crowninshield" title="Sturges v. Crowninshield">Sturges v. Crowninshield</a></i> (1819)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Ex_parte_Garland" title="Ex parte Garland">Ex parte Garland</a></i> (1866)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Hawker_v._New_York" title="Hawker v. New York">Hawker v. New York</a></i> (1898)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Samuels_v._McCurdy" title="Samuels v. McCurdy">Samuels v. McCurdy</a></i> (1925)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Garner_v._Board_of_Public_Works" title="Garner v. Board of Public Works">Garner v. Board of Public Works</a></i> (1951)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/De_Veau_v._Braisted" title="De Veau v. Braisted">De Veau v. Braisted</a></i> (1960)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Barr_v._City_of_Columbia" title="Barr v. City of Columbia">Barr v. City of Columbia</a></i> (1964)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Teague_v._Lane" title="Teague v. Lane">Teague v. Lane</a></i> (1989)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Kansas_v._Hendricks" title="Kansas v. Hendricks">Kansas v. Hendricks</a></i> (1997)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Smith_v._Doe" title="Smith v. Doe">Smith v. Doe</a></i> (2003)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Contract_Clause_of_Section_X2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Contract_Clause" title="Contract Clause">Contract Clause</a> of <a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_10:_Limits_on_the_States" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Section X</a></div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><i><a href="/wiki/Legal_Tender_Cases" title="Legal Tender Cases">Legal Tender Cases</a></i></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Hepburn_v._Griswold" title="Hepburn v. Griswold">Hepburn v. Griswold</a></i> (1870)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Others</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Fletcher_v._Peck" title="Fletcher v. Peck">Fletcher v. Peck</a></i> (1810)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Dartmouth_College_v._Woodward" title="Dartmouth College v. Woodward">Dartmouth College v. Woodward</a></i> (1819)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sturges_v._Crowninshield" title="Sturges v. Crowninshield">Sturges v. Crowninshield</a></i> (1819)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Ogden_v._Saunders" title="Ogden v. Saunders">Ogden v. Saunders</a></i> (1827)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Charles_River_Bridge_v._Warren_Bridge" title="Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge">Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge</a></i> (1837)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Bronson_v._Kinzie&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Bronson v. Kinzie (page does not exist)">Bronson v. Kinzie</a></i> (1843)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Stone_v._Mississippi&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Stone v. Mississippi (page does not exist)">Stone v. Mississippi</a></i> (1880)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Smyth_v._Ames" title="Smyth v. Ames">Smyth v. Ames</a></i> (1898)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Block_v._Hirsh" title="Block v. Hirsh">Block v. Hirsh</a></i> (1921)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Home_Building_%26_Loan_Ass%27n_v._Blaisdell" title="Home Building &amp; Loan Ass&#39;n v. Blaisdell">Home Building &amp; Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell</a></i> (1934)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=W.B._Worthen_Co._v._Kavanaugh&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="W.B. Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh (page does not exist)">W.B. Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh</a></i> (1935)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=City_of_El_Paso_v._Simmons&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="City of El Paso v. Simmons (page does not exist)">City of El Paso v. Simmons</a></i> (1965)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=U.S._Trust_Co._of_N.Y._v._New_Jersey&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="U.S. Trust Co. of N.Y. v. New Jersey (page does not exist)">U.S. Trust Co. of N.Y. v. New Jersey</a></i> (1977)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Allied_Structural_Steel_Co._v._Spannaus" title="Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus">Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus</a></i> (1978)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Energy_Reserves_Group_v._Kansas_P._%26_L._Co.&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Energy Reserves Group v. Kansas P. &amp; L. Co. (page does not exist)">Energy Reserves Group v. Kansas P. &amp; L. Co.</a></i> (1983)</li> <li><i><a href="/w/index.php?title=Exxon_Corp._v._Eagerton&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton (page does not exist)">Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton</a></i> (1983)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Keystone_Bituminous_Coal_Ass%27n_v._DeBenedictis" title="Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass&#39;n v. DeBenedictis">Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis</a></i> (1987)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sveen_v._Melin" title="Sveen v. Melin">Sveen v. Melin</a></i> (2018)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Import-Export_Clause_of_Section_X2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Import-Export_Clause" title="Import-Export Clause">Import-Export Clause</a> of Section X</div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Brown_v._Maryland" title="Brown v. Maryland">Brown v. Maryland</a></i> (1827)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Canton_Railroad_Co._v._Rogan" title="Canton Railroad Co. v. Rogan">Canton Railroad Co. v. Rogan</a></i> (1951)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible mw-collapsed navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><div id="Compact_Clause_of_Section_X2072" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_3:_Compact_Clause" title="Article One of the United States Constitution">Compact Clause</a> of Section X</div></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Florida_v._Georgia_(1855)" title="Florida v. Georgia (1855)">Florida v. Georgia</a></i> (1855)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Virginia_v._West_Virginia" title="Virginia v. West Virginia">Virginia v. West Virginia</a></i> (1871)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Virginia_v._Tennessee" title="Virginia v. Tennessee">Virginia v. Tennessee</a></i> (1893)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Wharton_v._Wise" title="Wharton v. Wise">Wharton v. Wise</a></i> (1894)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bank_of_New_England#Formation_and_interstate_growth" title="Bank of New England">Northeast Bancorp v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors</a></i> (1985)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/New_Jersey_v._New_York" title="New Jersey v. New York">New Jersey v. New York</a></i> (1998)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Virginia_v._Maryland" title="Virginia v. Maryland">Virginia v. Maryland</a></i> (2003)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Polar_Tankers,_Inc._v._City_of_Valdez" title="Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez">Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez</a></i> (2009)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Texas_v._New_Mexico_and_Colorado" title="Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado">Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado</a></i> (2018)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr></tbody></table></div> <div class="navbox-styles"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1129693374" /><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1236075235" /></div><div role="navigation" class="navbox" aria-labelledby="Copyright_law_of_the_United_States736" style="padding:3px"><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner" style="border-spacing:0;background:transparent;color:inherit"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1129693374" /><link rel="mw-deduplicated-inline-style" href="mw-data:TemplateStyles:r1239400231" /><div class="navbar plainlinks hlist navbar-mini"><ul><li class="nv-view"><a href="/wiki/Template:Copyright_law_in_the_United_States" title="Template:Copyright law in the United States"><abbr title="View this template">v</abbr></a></li><li class="nv-talk"><a href="/wiki/Template_talk:Copyright_law_in_the_United_States" title="Template talk:Copyright law in the United States"><abbr title="Discuss this template">t</abbr></a></li><li class="nv-edit"><a href="/wiki/Special:EditPage/Template:Copyright_law_in_the_United_States" title="Special:EditPage/Template:Copyright law in the United States"><abbr title="Edit this template">e</abbr></a></li></ul></div><div id="Copyright_law_of_the_United_States736" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="/wiki/Copyright_law_of_the_United_States" title="Copyright law of the United States">Copyright law of the United States</a></div></th></tr><tr><td class="navbox-abovebelow hlist" colspan="2"><div> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Title_17_of_the_United_States_Code" title="Title 17 of the United States Code">17 U.S.C.</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Clause" title="Copyright Clause">Copyright Clause</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/United_States_Copyright_Office" title="United States Copyright Office">United States Copyright Office</a> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Compendium_of_U.S._Copyright_Office_Practices" title="Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices">Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices</a></i></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Arbitration_Royalty_Panel" title="Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel">CARP</a>&#160;→&#160;<a href="/wiki/Copyright_Royalty_Board" title="Copyright Royalty Board">CRB</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Catalog" title="Copyright Catalog">Copyright Catalog</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Register_of_Copyrights" title="Register of Copyrights">Register of Copyrights</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Section_108_Study_Group" title="Section 108 Study Group">Section 108 Study Group</a></li></ul></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_status_of_works_by_the_federal_government_of_the_United_States" title="Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States">Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_status_of_works_by_subnational_governments_of_the_United_States" title="Copyright status of works by subnational governments of the United States">Copyright status of works by subnational governments of the United States</a></li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Statutes</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Pre-1976</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1790" title="Copyright Act of 1790">Copyright Act of 1790</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1831" title="Copyright Act of 1831">Copyright Act of 1831</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1870" title="Copyright Act of 1870">Copyright Act of 1870</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/International_Copyright_Act_of_1891" title="International Copyright Act of 1891">International Copyright Act of 1891</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Printing_Act_of_1895" title="Printing Act of 1895">Printing Act of 1895</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1909" title="Copyright Act of 1909">Copyright Act of 1909</a></li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">1970s</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976" title="Copyright Act of 1976">Copyright Act of 1976</a></li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">1980s</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Berne_Convention_Implementation_Act_of_1988" title="Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988">Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988</a></li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">1990s</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Visual_Artists_Rights_Act" title="Visual Artists Rights Act">Visual Artists Rights Act</a> (1990)</li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Remedy_Clarification_Act" title="Copyright Remedy Clarification Act">Copyright Remedy Clarification Act</a> (1990)</li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Renewal_Act_of_1992" title="Copyright Renewal Act of 1992">Copyright Renewal Act of 1992</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Audio_Home_Recording_Act" title="Audio Home Recording Act">Audio Home Recording Act</a> (1992)</li> <li><a href="/wiki/Uruguay_Round_Agreements_Act" title="Uruguay Round Agreements Act">Uruguay Round Agreements Act</a> (1994)</li> <li><a href="/wiki/No_Electronic_Theft_Act" title="No Electronic Theft Act">No Electronic Theft Act</a> (1994)</li> <li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Term_Extension_Act" title="Copyright Term Extension Act">Copyright Term Extension Act</a> (1998)</li> <li><a href="/wiki/Fairness_in_Music_Licensing_Act_of_1998" title="Fairness in Music Licensing Act of 1998">Fairness in Music Licensing Act of 1998</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act" title="Digital Millennium Copyright Act">Digital Millennium Copyright Act</a> (1998) <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act" title="Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act">Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/WIPO_Copyright_and_Performances_and_Phonograms_Treaties_Implementation_Act" title="WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaties Implementation Act">WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaties Implementation Act</a></li></ul></li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">2000s</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Family_Entertainment_and_Copyright_Act" title="Family Entertainment and Copyright Act">Family Entertainment and Copyright Act</a> (2005)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">2010s</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Unlocking_Consumer_Choice_and_Wireless_Competition_Act" title="Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act">Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act</a> (2014)</li> <li><a href="/wiki/Music_Modernization_Act" title="Music Modernization Act">Music Modernization Act</a> (2018)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">2020s</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Copyright_Alternative_in_Small-Claims_Enforcement_Act_of_2020" title="Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2020">CASE Act</a> (2020)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Precedents<br />and rulings</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"></div><table class="nowraplinks navbox-subgroup" style="border-spacing:0"><tbody><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="/wiki/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_copyright_case_law" title="List of United States Supreme Court copyright case law">Supreme Court</a></th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Wheaton_v._Peters" title="Wheaton v. Peters">Wheaton v. Peters</a></i> (1834)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Baker_v._Selden" title="Baker v. Selden">Baker v. Selden</a></i> (1879)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Trade-Mark_Cases" title="Trade-Mark Cases">Trade-Mark Cases</a></i> (1879)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Burrow-Giles_Lithographic_Co._v._Sarony" title="Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony">Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony</a></i> (1884)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Banks_v._Manchester" title="Banks v. Manchester">Banks v. Manchester</a></i> (1888)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Callaghan_v._Myers" title="Callaghan v. Myers">Callaghan v. Myers</a></i> (1888)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bobbs-Merrill_Co._v._Straus" title="Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus">Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus</a></i> (1908)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/White-Smith_Music_Publishing_Co._v._Apollo_Co." title="White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co.">White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co.</a></i> (1908)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Williams_%26_Wilkins_Co._v._United_States" title="Williams &amp; Wilkins Co. v. United States">Williams &amp; Wilkins Co. v. United States</a></i> (1975)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios,_Inc." title="Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.">Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.</a></i> (1984)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Feist_Publications,_Inc.,_v._Rural_Telephone_Service_Co." title="Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.">Feist v. Rural</a></i> (1991)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc." title="Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.">Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.</a></i> (1994)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Quality_King_Distributors_Inc.,_v._L%27anza_Research_International_Inc." title="Quality King Distributors Inc., v. L&#39;anza Research International Inc.">Quality King v. L'anza</a></i> (1998)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Eldred_v._Ashcroft" title="Eldred v. Ashcroft">Eldred v. Ashcroft</a></i> (2003)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/MGM_Studios,_Inc._v._Grokster,_Ltd." title="MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.">MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.</a></i> (2005)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Costco_Wholesale_Corp._v._Omega,_S._A." title="Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A.">Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A.</a></i> (2010)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Golan_v._Holder" title="Golan v. Holder">Golan v. Holder</a></i> (2012)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Kirtsaeng_v._John_Wiley_%26_Sons,_Inc." title="Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.">Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</a></i> (2013)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/American_Broadcasting_Cos.,_Inc._v._Aereo,_Inc." title="American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.">American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.</a></i> (2014)</li> <li><i><a class="mw-selflink selflink">Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands</a></i> (2017)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Fourth_Estate_Public_Benefit_Corp._v._Wall-Street.com" title="Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com">Fourth Estate v. Wall-Street.com</a></i> (2019)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Georgia_v._Public.Resource.Org,_Inc." title="Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.">Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.</a></i> (2020)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Google_LLC_v._Oracle_America,_Inc." title="Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.">Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.</a></i> (2021)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the_Visual_Arts,_Inc._v._Goldsmith" title="Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith">Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith</a></i> (2023)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Appeals courts</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Berlin_v._E.C._Publications,_Inc." title="Berlin v. E.C. Publications, Inc.">Berlin v. E.C. Publications, Inc.</a></i> (2d Cir. 1964)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Roth_Greeting_Cards_v._United_Card_Co." title="Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Co.">Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Co.</a></i> (9th Cir. 1970)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Eltra_Corp._v._Ringer" title="Eltra Corp. v. Ringer">Eltra Corp. v. Ringer</a></i> (4th Cir. 1978)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Walt_Disney_Productions_v._Air_Pirates" title="Walt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates">Walt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates</a></i> (9th Cir. 1978)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Midway_Manufacturing_Co._v._Artic_International,_Inc." title="Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc.">Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc.</a></i> (7th Cir. 1983)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Apple_Computer,_Inc._v._Franklin_Computer_Corp." title="Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp.">Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp.</a></i> (3d Cir. 1983)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Fisher_v._Dees" title="Fisher v. Dees">Fisher v. Dees</a></i> (9th Cir. 1986)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Whelan_v._Jaslow" title="Whelan v. Jaslow">Whelan v. Jaslow</a></i> (3d Cir. 1986)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Vault_Corp._v._Quaid_Software_Ltd." title="Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.">Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.</a></i> (5th Cir. 1988)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Rogers_v._Koons" title="Rogers v. Koons">Rogers v. Koons</a></i> (2nd Cir. 1992)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Computer_Associates_International,_Inc._v._Altai,_Inc." title="Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.">Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.</a></i> (2d Cir. 1992)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/American_Geophysical_Union_v._Texaco,_Inc." title="American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, Inc.">American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, Inc.</a></i> (2nd Cir. 1995)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Dr._Seuss_Enters.,_L.P._v._Penguin_Books_USA,_Inc." title="Dr. Seuss Enters., L.P. v. Penguin Books USA, Inc.">Dr. Seuss Enters., L.P. v. Penguin Books USA, Inc.</a></i>(9th Cir. 1997)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Itar-Tass_Russian_News_Agency_v._Russian_Kurier,_Inc." title="Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.">Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.</a></i> (2d Cir. 1998)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Sony_Computer_Entertainment,_Inc._v._Connectix_Corp." title="Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp.">Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp.</a></i> (9th Cir. 2000)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Nunez_v._Caribbean_Int%27l_News_Corp." title="Nunez v. Caribbean Int&#39;l News Corp.">Nunez v. Caribbean Int'l News Corp.</a></i> (1st Cir. 2000)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/A%26M_Records,_Inc._v._Napster,_Inc." title="A&amp;M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.">A&amp;M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.</a></i> (9th Cir. 2001)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Veeck_v._Southern_Building_Code_Congress_Int%27l" title="Veeck v. Southern Building Code Congress Int&#39;l">Veeck v. Southern Building Code Congress Int'l</a></i> (5th Cir. 2002)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Kelly_v._Arriba_Soft_Corp." title="Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp.">Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp.</a></i> (9th Cir. 2002 / 2003)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/In_re_Aimster_Copyright_Litigation" title="In re Aimster Copyright Litigation">In re Aimster Copyright Litigation</a></i> (7th Cir. 2003)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/NXIVM_Corp._v._Ross_Institute" title="NXIVM Corp. v. Ross Institute">NXIVM Corp. v. Ross Institute</a></i> (2d Cir. 2004)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/BMG_Music_v._Gonzalez" title="BMG Music v. Gonzalez">BMG Music v. Gonzalez</a></i> (7th Cir. 2005)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bill_Graham_Archives_v._Dorling_Kindersley,_Ltd." title="Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley, Ltd.">Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley, Ltd.</a></i> (2nd Cir. 2006)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Blanch_v._Koons" title="Blanch v. Koons">Blanch v. Koons</a></i> (2nd Cir. 2006)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Perfect_10,_Inc._v._Amazon.com,_Inc." title="Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.">Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.</a></i> (9th Cir. 2006)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Cartoon_Network,_LP_v._CSC_Holdings,_Inc." title="Cartoon Network, LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc.">Cartoon Network, LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc.</a></i> (2nd Cir. 2008)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Ahanchian_v._Xenon_Pictures,_Inc." title="Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc.">Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc.</a></i> (9th Cir. 2010)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Penguin_Group_(USA)_Inc._v._American_Buddha" title="Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha">Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha</a></i> (2d Cir. 2011)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Monge_v._Maya_Magazines,_Inc." title="Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc.">Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc.</a></i> (9th Cir. 2012)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Viacom_International_Inc._v._YouTube,_Inc." title="Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.">Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.</a></i> (2d Cir. 2012)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Seltzer_v._Green_Day,_Inc" title="Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc">Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc</a></i> (9th Cir. 2013)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,_Inc." title="Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc.">Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc.</a></i> (2d Cir. 2015)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Lenz_v._Universal_Music_Corp." title="Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.">Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.</a></i> (9th Cir. 2015)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_dispute" title="Monkey selfie copyright dispute">Naruto v. Slater</a></i> (9th Cir. 2018)</li></ul> </div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Lower courts</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em"> <ul><li><i><a href="/wiki/Folsom_v._Marsh" title="Folsom v. Marsh">Folsom v. Marsh</a></i> (C.C.D. Mass. 1841)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Elektra_Records_Co._v._Gem_Electronic_Distributors,_Inc." title="Elektra Records Co. v. Gem Electronic Distributors, Inc.">Elektra Records Co. v. Gem Electronic Distributors, Inc.</a></i> (E.D.N.Y. 1973)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Broderbund_Software_Inc._v._Unison_World,_Inc." title="Broderbund Software Inc. v. Unison World, Inc.">Broderbund Software Inc. v. Unison World, Inc.</a></i> (N.D. Cal. 1986)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Playboy_Enterprises,_Inc._v._Frena" title="Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Frena">Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Frena</a></i> (M.D. Fla. 1993)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp." title="Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.">Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.</a></i> (S.D.N.Y. 1999)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/RealNetworks,_Inc._v._Streambox,_Inc." title="RealNetworks, Inc. v. Streambox, Inc.">RealNetworks, Inc. v. Streambox, Inc.</a></i> (W.D. Wash. 2000)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Mannion_v._Coors_Brewing_Co." title="Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co.">Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co.</a></i> (S.D.N.Y. 2005)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Arista_Records_LLC_v._Lime_Group_LLC" title="Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC">Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC</a></i> (S.D.N.Y. 2010)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Capitol_Records,_LLC_v._ReDigi_Inc." title="Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc.">Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc.</a></i> (S.D.N.Y. 2013)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Equals_Three,_LLC_v._Jukin_Media,_Inc." title="Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc.">Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc.</a></i> (C.D. Cal. 2015)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Hachette_v._Internet_Archive" title="Hachette v. Internet Archive">Hachette v. Internet Archive</a></i> (S.D.N.Y. 2023)</li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Universal_Music_Group_v._Internet_Archive" title="Universal Music Group v. Internet Archive">Universal Music Group v. Internet Archive</a></i> (S.D.N.Y. 2023)</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table><div></div></td></tr><tr><td class="navbox-abovebelow hlist" colspan="2"><div> <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Berne_Convention" title="Berne Convention">Berne Convention</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Uruguay_Round" title="Uruguay Round">Uruguay Round</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Don%27t_Copy_That_Floppy" title="Don&#39;t Copy That Floppy">Don't Copy That Floppy</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Home_Recording_Rights_Coalition" title="Home Recording Rights Coalition">Home Recording Rights Coalition</a></li> <li><i><a href="/wiki/Nimmer_on_Copyright" title="Nimmer on Copyright">Nimmer on Copyright</a></i></li> <li>"<a href="/wiki/You_Wouldn%27t_Steal_a_Car" title="You Wouldn&#39;t Steal a Car">You Wouldn't Steal a Car</a>"</li></ul> </div></td></tr></tbody></table></div> <!-- NewPP limit report Parsed by mw‐web.codfw.main‐657b46f875‐4dwsk Cached time: 20250309002330 Cache expiry: 85006 Reduced expiry: true Complications: [vary‐revision‐sha1, show‐toc] CPU time usage: 1.203 seconds Real time usage: 1.394 seconds Preprocessor visited node count: 14118/1000000 Post‐expand include size: 408882/2097152 bytes Template argument size: 28957/2097152 bytes Highest expansion depth: 16/100 Expensive parser function count: 13/500 Unstrip recursion depth: 1/20 Unstrip post‐expand size: 360580/5000000 bytes Lua time usage: 0.604/10.000 seconds Lua memory usage: 6201862/52428800 bytes Number of Wikibase entities loaded: 0/400 --> <!-- Transclusion expansion time report (%,ms,calls,template) 100.00% 1146.593 1 -total 51.71% 592.877 1 Template:Reflist 29.86% 342.384 58 Template:Cite_web 18.13% 207.901 1 Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case 11.82% 135.499 1 Template:Infobox 9.95% 114.044 1 Template:USArticleI 9.54% 109.342 1 Template:Navbox_with_collapsible_groups 6.66% 76.390 1 Template:Infobox_US_Supreme_Court_case/courts 5.62% 64.432 13 Template:Cite_journal 5.28% 60.555 1 Template:Short_description --> <!-- Saved in parser cache with key enwiki:pcache:53781950:|#|:idhash:canonical and timestamp 20250309002330 and revision id 1252176827. Rendering was triggered because: page-view --> </div><!--esi <esi:include src="/esitest-fa8a495983347898/content" /> --><noscript><img src="https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAutoLogin/start?useformat=desktop&amp;type=1x1&amp;usesul3=0" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="border: none; position: absolute;"></noscript> <div class="printfooter" data-nosnippet="">Retrieved from "<a dir="ltr" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;oldid=1252176827">https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;oldid=1252176827</a>"</div></div> <div id="catlinks" class="catlinks" data-mw="interface"><div id="mw-normal-catlinks" class="mw-normal-catlinks"><a href="/wiki/Help:Category" title="Help:Category">Categories</a>: <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Category:2017_in_United_States_case_law" title="Category:2017 in United States case law">2017 in United States case law</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:United_States_copyright_case_law" title="Category:United States copyright case law">United States copyright case law</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases" title="Category:United States Supreme Court cases">United States Supreme Court cases</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court" title="Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court">United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Cheerleading" title="Category:Cheerleading">Cheerleading</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Fashion_design" title="Category:Fashion design">Fashion design</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Copyrightability_case_law" title="Category:Copyrightability case law">Copyrightability case law</a></li></ul></div><div id="mw-hidden-catlinks" class="mw-hidden-catlinks mw-hidden-cats-hidden">Hidden categories: <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Use_mdy_dates_from_September_2023" title="Category:Use mdy dates from September 2023">Use mdy dates from September 2023</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Articles_with_short_description" title="Category:Articles with short description">Articles with short description</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Short_description_is_different_from_Wikidata" title="Category:Short description is different from Wikidata">Short description is different from Wikidata</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:All_articles_with_specifically_marked_weasel-worded_phrases" title="Category:All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases">All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Articles_with_specifically_marked_weasel-worded_phrases_from_April_2022" title="Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from April 2022">Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from April 2022</a></li></ul></div></div> </div> </main> </div> <div class="mw-footer-container"> <footer id="footer" class="mw-footer" > <ul id="footer-info"> <li id="footer-info-lastmod"> This page was last edited on 20 October 2024, at 05:12<span class="anonymous-show">&#160;(UTC)</span>.</li> <li id="footer-info-copyright">Text is available under the <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_4.0_International_License" title="Wikipedia:Text of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License</a>; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the <a href="https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Terms_of_Use" class="extiw" title="foundation:Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Terms of Use">Terms of Use</a> and <a href="https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Privacy_policy" class="extiw" title="foundation:Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Privacy policy">Privacy Policy</a>. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://wikimediafoundation.org/">Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.</a>, a non-profit organization.</li> </ul> <ul id="footer-places"> <li id="footer-places-privacy"><a href="https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Privacy_policy">Privacy policy</a></li> <li id="footer-places-about"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:About">About Wikipedia</a></li> <li id="footer-places-disclaimers"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer">Disclaimers</a></li> <li id="footer-places-contact"><a href="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us">Contact Wikipedia</a></li> <li id="footer-places-wm-codeofconduct"><a href="https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Universal_Code_of_Conduct">Code of Conduct</a></li> <li id="footer-places-developers"><a href="https://developer.wikimedia.org">Developers</a></li> <li id="footer-places-statslink"><a href="https://stats.wikimedia.org/#/en.wikipedia.org">Statistics</a></li> <li id="footer-places-cookiestatement"><a href="https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Cookie_statement">Cookie statement</a></li> <li id="footer-places-mobileview"><a href="//en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.&amp;mobileaction=toggle_view_mobile" class="noprint stopMobileRedirectToggle">Mobile view</a></li> </ul> <ul id="footer-icons" class="noprint"> <li id="footer-copyrightico"><a href="https://wikimediafoundation.org/" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button--enabled"><picture><source media="(min-width: 500px)" srcset="/static/images/footer/wikimedia-button.svg" width="84" height="29"><img src="/static/images/footer/wikimedia.svg" width="25" height="25" alt="Wikimedia Foundation" lang="en" loading="lazy"></picture></a></li> <li id="footer-poweredbyico"><a href="https://www.mediawiki.org/" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--size-large cdx-button--fake-button--enabled"><picture><source media="(min-width: 500px)" srcset="/w/resources/assets/poweredby_mediawiki.svg" width="88" height="31"><img src="/w/resources/assets/mediawiki_compact.svg" alt="Powered by MediaWiki" lang="en" width="25" height="25" loading="lazy"></picture></a></li> </ul> </footer> </div> </div> </div> <div class="vector-header-container vector-sticky-header-container"> <div id="vector-sticky-header" class="vector-sticky-header"> <div class="vector-sticky-header-start"> <div class="vector-sticky-header-icon-start vector-button-flush-left vector-button-flush-right" aria-hidden="true"> <button class="cdx-button cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only vector-sticky-header-search-toggle" tabindex="-1" data-event-name="ui.vector-sticky-search-form.icon"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-search mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-search"></span> <span>Search</span> </button> </div> <div role="search" class="vector-search-box-vue vector-search-box-show-thumbnail vector-search-box"> <div class="vector-typeahead-search-container"> <div class="cdx-typeahead-search cdx-typeahead-search--show-thumbnail"> <form action="/w/index.php" id="vector-sticky-search-form" class="cdx-search-input cdx-search-input--has-end-button"> <div class="cdx-search-input__input-wrapper" data-search-loc="header-moved"> <div class="cdx-text-input cdx-text-input--has-start-icon"> <input class="cdx-text-input__input" type="search" name="search" placeholder="Search Wikipedia"> <span class="cdx-text-input__icon cdx-text-input__start-icon"></span> </div> <input type="hidden" name="title" value="Special:Search"> </div> <button class="cdx-button cdx-search-input__end-button">Search</button> </form> </div> </div> </div> <div class="vector-sticky-header-context-bar"> <nav aria-label="Contents" class="vector-toc-landmark"> <div id="vector-sticky-header-toc" class="vector-dropdown mw-portlet mw-portlet-sticky-header-toc vector-sticky-header-toc vector-button-flush-left" > <input type="checkbox" id="vector-sticky-header-toc-checkbox" role="button" aria-haspopup="true" data-event-name="ui.dropdown-vector-sticky-header-toc" class="vector-dropdown-checkbox " aria-label="Toggle the table of contents" > <label id="vector-sticky-header-toc-label" for="vector-sticky-header-toc-checkbox" class="vector-dropdown-label cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only " aria-hidden="true" ><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-listBullet mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-listBullet"></span> <span class="vector-dropdown-label-text">Toggle the table of contents</span> </label> <div class="vector-dropdown-content"> <div id="vector-sticky-header-toc-unpinned-container" class="vector-unpinned-container"> </div> </div> </div> </nav> <div class="vector-sticky-header-context-bar-primary" aria-hidden="true" ><i>Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.</i></div> </div> </div> <div class="vector-sticky-header-end" aria-hidden="true"> <div class="vector-sticky-header-icons"> <a href="#" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only" id="ca-talk-sticky-header" tabindex="-1" data-event-name="talk-sticky-header"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-speechBubbles mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-speechBubbles"></span> <span></span> </a> <a href="#" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only" id="ca-subject-sticky-header" tabindex="-1" data-event-name="subject-sticky-header"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-article mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-article"></span> <span></span> </a> <a href="#" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only" id="ca-history-sticky-header" tabindex="-1" data-event-name="history-sticky-header"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-history mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-wikimedia-history"></span> <span></span> </a> <a href="#" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only mw-watchlink" id="ca-watchstar-sticky-header" tabindex="-1" data-event-name="watch-sticky-header"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-star mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-wikimedia-star"></span> <span></span> </a> <a href="#" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only" id="ca-edit-sticky-header" tabindex="-1" data-event-name="wikitext-edit-sticky-header"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-wikiText mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-wikimedia-wikiText"></span> <span></span> </a> <a href="#" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only" id="ca-ve-edit-sticky-header" tabindex="-1" data-event-name="ve-edit-sticky-header"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-edit mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-wikimedia-edit"></span> <span></span> </a> <a href="#" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--icon-only" id="ca-viewsource-sticky-header" tabindex="-1" data-event-name="ve-edit-protected-sticky-header"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-editLock mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-wikimedia-editLock"></span> <span></span> </a> </div> <div class="vector-sticky-header-buttons"> <button class="cdx-button cdx-button--weight-quiet mw-interlanguage-selector" id="p-lang-btn-sticky-header" tabindex="-1" data-event-name="ui.dropdown-p-lang-btn-sticky-header"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-language mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-wikimedia-language"></span> <span>Add languages</span> </button> <a href="#" class="cdx-button cdx-button--fake-button cdx-button--fake-button--enabled cdx-button--weight-quiet cdx-button--action-progressive" id="ca-addsection-sticky-header" tabindex="-1" data-event-name="addsection-sticky-header"><span class="vector-icon mw-ui-icon-speechBubbleAdd-progressive mw-ui-icon-wikimedia-speechBubbleAdd-progressive"></span> <span>Add topic</span> </a> </div> <div class="vector-sticky-header-icon-end"> <div class="vector-user-links"> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="mw-portlet mw-portlet-dock-bottom emptyPortlet" id="p-dock-bottom"> <ul> </ul> </div> <script>(RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgHostname":"mw-web.codfw.main-657b46f875-x7ntk","wgBackendResponseTime":241,"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"1.203","walltime":"1.394","ppvisitednodes":{"value":14118,"limit":1000000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":408882,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":28957,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":16,"limit":100},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":13,"limit":500},"unstrip-depth":{"value":1,"limit":20},"unstrip-size":{"value":360580,"limit":5000000},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 1146.593 1 -total"," 51.71% 592.877 1 Template:Reflist"," 29.86% 342.384 58 Template:Cite_web"," 18.13% 207.901 1 Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case"," 11.82% 135.499 1 Template:Infobox"," 9.95% 114.044 1 Template:USArticleI"," 9.54% 109.342 1 Template:Navbox_with_collapsible_groups"," 6.66% 76.390 1 Template:Infobox_US_Supreme_Court_case/courts"," 5.62% 64.432 13 Template:Cite_journal"," 5.28% 60.555 1 Template:Short_description"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.604","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":6201862,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw-web.codfw.main-657b46f875-4dwsk","timestamp":"20250309002330","ttl":85006,"transientcontent":true}}});});</script> <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"Article","name":"Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.","url":"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Star_Athletica,_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands,_Inc.","sameAs":"http:\/\/www.wikidata.org\/entity\/Q30634832","mainEntity":"http:\/\/www.wikidata.org\/entity\/Q30634832","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Contributors to Wikimedia projects"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/www.wikimedia.org\/static\/images\/wmf-hor-googpub.png"}},"datePublished":"2017-04-15T08:19:17Z","dateModified":"2024-10-20T05:12:11Z","headline":"United States Supreme Court case"}</script> </body> </html>

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10