CINXE.COM

{"title":"Studying Efficiency of Digital Technology Facilitated Assessment Techniques in Higher Education","authors":"B. Ferdousi","volume":207,"journal":"International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences","pagesStart":158,"pagesEnd":165,"ISSN":"1307-6892","URL":"https:\/\/publications.waset.org\/pdf\/10013545","abstract":"<p>This study examines the adoption of digital technology in academic assessment or e-assessment in higher education. The main focus of this research is to determine the impact of advanced digital technology on different assessment techniques such as formative assessment and summative assessment. The goal of this study is to critically evaluate the selection of different assessment methods using digital technology to enhance assessment for more effective learning. Given the increasing use of digital technology in the assessment of students' achievement in the learning process, this research is significant. Based on a literature review of different assessment techniques using technology, this study focuses on the formative and summative techniques of e-assessment. The paper offers an in-depth analysis of the innovative and creative use of digital technology in assessment. The findings of this research will enhance knowledge and in-depth understanding of using technology in assessment, especially in active learning environments, in higher academic institutions.<\/p>","references":"[1]\tL. K. Lookadoo, N. E. Bostwick, R. Ralston, F. J. Elizondo, S. Wilson, J. T. Shaw, and L. M. Jensen, \u201cI Forgot I Wasn't Saving the World\": The use of formative and summative assessment in instructional video games for undergraduate biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 26 no. 6, 2017, pp. 597-612.\r\n[2]\tM. Koomen and N. Zoanetti, \u201cStrategic Planning Tools for Large-Scale Technology-Based Assessments,\u201d Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 25, no. 2, Pp. 200-223, 2018. \r\n[3]\tS. S. Huda, Md. Kabir, and T. Siddiq, \u201cE-Assessment in higher education: Students\u2019 perspective,\u201d International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), vol 16 no 2, pp. 250-258, 2020.\r\n[4]\tT. Massinga, N. Schwinningb, M., Strieweb, C., Hancka, and M. Goedickeb, \u201cE-Assessment using variable-content exercises in mathematical statistics,\u201d Journal of Statistics Education, vol 26 no 3, pp.174\u2013189, 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10691898.2018.1518121 \r\n[5]\tW. Bryant, \u201cDeveloping a strategy for using technology-enhanced items in large-scale standardized tests,\u201d Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, vol 22, no 1, 2017.\r\n[6]\tM. Bahar and M. Asil, \u201cAttitude towards e-assessment: influence of gender, computer usage and level of education,\u201d Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance And E-Learning, vol 33, no 3, 2pp. 21\u2013237, 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02680513.2018.1503529\r\n[7]\tM.M. Neumann, J. L. Anthony, N.A. Erazo, and D.L. Neumann, \u201cAssessment and technology: Mapping future directions in the early childhood classroom,\u201d Front. Educ., vol 4, no 116, 2019. DOI: 10.3389\/feduc.2019.00116\r\n[8]\tA. A. Gasmi and A. S. Z. Nadabi, \u201cAn exploratory study of learners\u2019 perceptions about the effectiveness of active learning approaches, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol 14, no 5, pp. 1223-1232, September 2023. ISSN 1798-4769. DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17507\/jltr.1405.10 \u00a9 2023 Academy Publication \r\n[9]\tB. Ferdousi, \u201cThe Effect of computer self-efficacy and attitude on undergraduate students\u2019 intention to use emerging technology in classroom learning,\u201d Journal of Computer Sciences and Applications, vol 7, no 1, pp. 50-55, 2019. DOI: 10.12691\/jcsa-7-1-8.\r\n[10]\tJ. S. Deeley, \u201cUsing technology to facilitate effective assessment for learning and feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,\u201d 2017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2017.1356906\r\n[11]\tB. Ferdousi, and J. Bari, \u201cUsing application software, tools, and equipment to facilitate engineering and computer classes online,\u201d International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Advanced Technology, vol 3, no 2, Pp. 1-10, 2022. \r\n[12]\tG. Akcayir, and M. Akcayir, \u201cThe Flipped Classroom: A Review of Its Advantages and Challenges,\u201d Computers & Education, vol 126, pp. 334-345, 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2018.07.021\r\n[13]\tO. Kvashnina, & E. Martynko, \u201cAnalyzing the potential of flipped classroom in ESL teaching, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET),\u201d vol 11, no 3. Pp. 71-73, 2016. DOI:10.3991\/ijet.v11i03.5309\r\n[14]\tJ. Jo, H., Jun, and H. Lim, \u201cA comparative study on gamification of the flipped classroom in engineering education to enhance the effects of learning,\u201d Computer Application Engineering Education, vol 26, pp. 1626\u20131640, 2018. DOI: 10.1002\/cae.21992\r\n[15]\tS. Timmis, P. Broadfoot, R. Sutherland, and A. Oldfield, \u201cRethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks,\u201d British Educational Research Journal, vol 42, no 3, pp. 454\u2013476, 2016.\r\n[16]\tM.A., Khan, V., Vivek, M., Khojah, M.K., Nabi, M., Paul, and S.M. Minhaj, \u201cLearners\u2019 perspective towards e-exams during COVID-19 outbreak: Evidence from higher educational institutions of India and Saudi Arabia,\u201d Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol 18, 6534, 2021. https:\/\/ doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph18126534\r\n[17]\tH. J. Nieminen and L. Tuohilampi, \u201c\u2018Finally studying for myself\u2019 \u2013 examining student agency in summative and formative self-assessment models,\u201d Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol 45, no 7, pp. 1031-1045, 2020. DOI:10.1080\/02602938.2020.1720595\r\n[18]\tZ. Mohamadi, \u201cComparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability,\u201d Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol 59. Pp. 29\u201340, 2018.\r\n[19]\tS.D., Aji, N. M., Hudha, C., Huda, Z., Khoiro, W., Wartono, J. R., Batlolona, S., Alfarisa, A. B. D., Nandiyanto, and A. G. Abdullah, \u201cAdaptive multimedia with android e-assessment to improve assessment efficiency,\u201d 3rd Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference (AASEC 2018). IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 434, 2018. 012294 doi:10.1088\/1757-899X\/434\/1\/012294\r\n[20]\tV. Heyde, and A. Siebrits, \u201cHigher-order e-assessment for physics in the digital age using Sakai,\u201d The Physics Teacher, vol 57, pp. 32\u201334, 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1119\/1.5084925\r\n[21]\tP. K. Rajasekharan and V. A. Prakash, \u201cTechnological leverage in higher education: an evolving pedagogy,\u201d Journal of International Education in Business, 10(2). pp. 130-146, 2017. \u00a9 Emerald Publishing Limited. 2046-469X. DOI 10.1108\/JIEB-09-2016-0034.\r\n[22]\tS. Ketabi, and S. Ketabi, \u201cClassroom and Formative Assessment in Second\/Foreign Language Teaching and Learning,\u201d Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol 4, no 2, pp. 435-440, 2014. doi:10.4304\/tpls.4.2.435-44, ISSN 1799-2591\r\n[23]\tJ. Clarke-Midura and C. Dede, \u201cAssessment, technology, and change,\u201d Journal of Research on Technology in Education (JRTE), vol 42, no 3, pp. 309\u2013328, 2010. | \u00a92010 ISTE | www.iste.org\/jrte\r\n[24]\tY. W. Guo and Z. Yan, \u201cFormative and summative assessment in Hong Kong primary schools: Students\u2019 attitudes matter,\u201d Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol 26, no 6, pp. 675-699, 2019. DOI: 10.1080\/0969594X.2019.1571993\r\n[25]\tM. S. Ismail, R. D. Rahul, I. Patra, and E. Rezvani, \u201cFormative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self\u2011regulation skill,\u201d Language Testing in Asia, vol 12, no 40, 2022. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40468-022-00191-4\r\n[26]\tR., Luckin, W., Clark, K., Avramides, J. Hunter and M. Oliver, \u201cUsing teacher inquiry to support technology-enhanced formative assessment: A review of the literature to inform a new method,\u201d Interactive Learning Environments, vol 25, no 1, pp. 85-97, 2017. DOI: 10.1080\/10494820.2015.1121152\r\n[27]\tN. J. Bacquet, \u201cImplications of Summative and Formative Assessment in Japan - A Review of the Current Literature,\u201d International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 2020. ISSN: 2202-9478. www.ijels.aiac.org.au\r\n[28]\tN. Alahmadi, and M. Alrahaili, \u201cThe impact of the formative assessment in speaking test on Saudi students\u2019 performance,\u201d vol 10, January 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24093\/awej\/vol10no1.22 \r\n[29]\tF. Ahmed, S. Ali, and A. R. Shah, \u201cExploring variation in summative assessment: Language teachers\u2019 knowledge of students\u2019 formative assessment and its effect on their summative assessment,\u201d Bulletin of Education and Research, vol 41, no 2, pp. 109-119, August 2019.\r\n[30]\tD.R. Sadler, \u201cFormative assessment and the design of instructional systems,\u201d Instructional Science, vol 18, pp. 145\u2013165, 1989.\r\n[31]\tL. Peculea, and A. Peculea, \u201cPerceptions of future engineering teachers on formative e-assessment using the classroom response system,\u201d Journal Plus Education, XXII,1. pp. 23-32, 2019. ISSN: 1842-077X, E-ISSN (online) 2068-1151. \r\n[32]\tJ. M. Spector, D., Ifenthaler, D., Samspon, L., Yang, E., Mukama, A., Warusavitarana, K., Lokuge Dona, K., Eichhorn, A., Fluck, R., Huang, S., Bridges, J., Lu, Y., Ren, X., Gui, C. C., Deneen, J. San Diego, and D. C. Gibson, \u201cTechnology enhanced formative assessment for 21st century learning,\u201d Educational Technology & Society, vol 19, no 3, pp. 58-71, 2016.\r\n[33]\tB. A., Grosas, R. S., Raju, S. B., Schuett, J., Chuck, and J. T. Millar, \u201cDetermining if active learning through a formative assessment process translates to better performance in summative assessment,\u201d Studies in Higher Education, vol 41, no 9, pp. 1595-1611, 2016. DOI: 10.1080\/03075079.2014.988704. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03075079.2014.988704\r\n[34]\tK. T. Chan, \u201cEmbedding formative assessment in blended learning environment: The case of secondary Chinese language teaching in Singapore,\u201d Education Sciences, vol 11, no 7, 360, 2021.\r\n[35]\tM., Masita and N. Fitri, \u201cThe use of Plickers for formative assessment of vocabular mastery,\u201d Ethical Lingua Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, vol 7, no 2, pp. 311\u2013320, 2020.\r\n[36]\tF. Remmi, and H. Hashim, \u201cPrimary School Teachers\u2019 Usage and Perception of Online Formative Assessment Tools in Language Assessment,\u201d International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, vol 10, no 1, pp. 290\u2013303, 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6007\/IJARPED\/v10-i1\/8846\r\n[37]\tG. Svens\u00e4ter and M. Rohlin, \u201cAssessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy,\u201d European Journal of Dental Education, vol 27, pp. 149-157, 2022. doi:10.1111\/eje.12787\r\n[38]\tB. Sridharan, J. Tai, and D. Boud, \u201cDoes the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement?\u201d Higher Education, vol 77, Pp. 853\u2013870, 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10734-018-0305-7. \r\n[39]\tM. Taras, Assessment - summative and formative - some theoretical reflections, British Journal of Educational Studies, vol 53, no 4, pp 466-478, 2005. DOI:10.1111\/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x\r\n[40]\tI., Elmahdi, A., Al-Hattami, & H. Fawzi, \u201cUsing technology for formative assessment to improve students\u2019 learning,\u201d TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol 7, no 2, Pp. 182-188, 2018.\r\n[41]\tS. K. Kwon, M., Lee, and D. Shin, \u201cEducational assessment in the Republic of Korea: Lights and shadows of high-stake exam-based education system,\u201d Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol 24, 1, pp. 60\u201377, 2017.\r\n[42]\tM. Mimirinis, \u201cQualitative differences in academics\u2019 conceptions of e-assessment,\u201d Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol 44, no 2, pp. 233-248, 2019. DOI:10.1080\/02602938.2018.1493087\r\n[43]\tA., Mahshanian, R., Shoghi, and M.Bahrami, \u201cInvestigating the differential effects of formative and summative assessment on EFL learners\u2019 end-of-term achievement,\u201d Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol 10, no 5, pp. 1055-1066, September 2019. DOI: http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.17507\/jltr.1005.19. ISSN 1798-4769\r\n[44]\tE. McAlpin, Y, Bergner and M. Levine, \u201cSummative assessments of web-based patient simulations of pre-clinical local anaesthesia and non-surgical extraction,\u201d European Journal of Dental Education, vol 25, no 4, Pp. 733-743, 2021. DOI: 10.1111\/eje.12652. Epub 2021 Jan 12. PMID: 33368916.\r\n[45]\tW.J.A.J., Hendriks, N., Bakker, and H. Pluk, \u201cCertainty-based marking in a formative assessment improves student course appreciation but not summative examination scores,\u201d BMC Med Educ, vol 19, no 178, 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12909-019-1610-2","publisher":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology","index":"Open Science Index 207, 2024"}