{"title":"Gender Justice and Feminist Self-Management Practices in the Solidarity Economy: A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors that Impact Enterprises Formed by Women in Brazil","authors":"Maria de Nazar\u00e9 Moraes Soares, Silvia Maria Dias Pedro Rebou\u00e7as, Jos\u00e9 Carlos L\u00e1zaro","volume":165,"journal":"International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering","pagesStart":811,"pagesEnd":825,"ISSN":"1307-6892","URL":"https:\/\/publications.waset.org\/pdf\/10011447","abstract":"<p>The Solidarity Economy (SE) acts in the re-articulation of the economic field to the other spheres of social action. The significant participation of women in SE resulted in the formation of a national network of self-managed enterprises in Brazil: The Solidarity and Feminist Economy Network (SFEN). The objective of the research is to identify factors of gender justice and feminist self-management practices that adhere to the reality of women in SE enterprises. The conceptual apparatus related to feminist studies in this research covers Nancy Fraser approaches on gender justice, and Patricia Yancey Martin approaches on feminist management practices, and authors of postcolonial feminism such as Mohanty and Maria Lugones, who lead the discussion to peripheral contexts, a necessary perspective when observing the women&rsquo;s movement in SE. The research has a quantitative nature in the phases of data collection and analysis. The data collection was performed through two data sources: the database mapped in Brazil in 2010-2013 by the National Information System in Solidary Economy and 150 questionnaires with women from 16 enterprises in SFEN, in a state of Brazilian northeast. The data were analyzed using the multivariate statistical technique of Factor Analysis. The results show that the factors that define gender justice and feminist self-management practices in SE are interrelated in several levels, proving statistically the intersectional condition of the issue of women. The evidence from the quantitative analysis allowed us to understand the dimensions of gender justice and feminist management practices intersectionality; in this sense, the non-distribution of domestic work interferes in non-representation of women in public spaces, especially in peripheral contexts. The study contributes with important reflections to the studies of this area and can be complemented in the future with a qualitative research that approaches the perspective of women in the context of the SE self-management paradigm.<\/p>\r\n","references":"[1]\tL. I. Gaiger, Uma outra racionalidade da economia solid\u00e1ria: conclus\u00f5es do primeiro Mapeamento Nacional no Brasil. In: RevistaCr\u00edtica de Ci\u00eancias Sociais, n. 79, p. 57-77, dez, 2007.\r\n[2]\tP. I. Singer, Introdu\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0 Economia Solid\u00e1ria. S\u00e3o Paulo: Editora Funda\u00e7\u00e3o Perseu Abramo, 2008.\r\n[3]\tM. Vieta, \u201cThe stream of self-determination and autogesti\u00f3n: Prefiguring alternative economic realities\u201d. In: Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 2014, 14(4), 779-806.\r\n[4]\tN. Fraser, \u201cPol\u00edticas feministas na era do reconhecimento: uma abordagem bidimensional da justi\u00e7a de g\u00eanero\u201d. In: Bruschini, C. and Unbehaum, S.G. (orgs.). G\u00eanero, democracia e sociedade brasileira. S\u00e3o Paulo: FCC; 2002, Ed. 34, p. 59-78.\r\n[5]\tS. Gherardi, Organizational knowledge: the texture of workplace learning. Organization and strategy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006.\r\n[6]\tP. Y. Martin, \u201cSaid and done\u201d versus \u201csaying and doing\u201d: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. In: Gender & Society, 2003, 17, 342-366.\r\n[7]\tD. Nicolini, Practice theory, work & organization: an introduction. UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.\r\n[8]\tA. G. Ramos, A nova ci\u00eancia das organiza\u00e7\u00f5es: uma reconceitua\u00e7\u00e3o da riqueza das na\u00e7\u00f5es. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da Funda\u00e7\u00e3o Get\u00falio Vargas, 1989.\r\n[9]\tC. T. Mohanty, \u201cUS Empire and the Project of Women\u2019s Studies: Stories of Citizenship, Complicity and Dissent\u201d. In: Gender, Place and Culture, London, 2006, v. 13, n. 1, p. 7-20.\r\n[10]\tL. L. Santos, \u201cDevea economia feminista serp\u00f3s-colonial? Colonialidade econ\u00f3mica, g\u00e9nero e epistemologias do Sul\u201d. In: RevistaCr\u00edtica de Ci\u00eanciasSociais (Online), 114 | 2017, colocado online no dia 20 Dezembro 2017, criado a 23 Dezembro, 2017. URL : http:\/\/journals.openedition.org\/ rccs\/6797 ; DOI : 10.4000\/rccs.6797\r\n[11]\tM. Lugones, \u201cHeterosexualims and the Colonial \/ Modern Gender System.\u201d In: Hypatia, 2007, 22.1: 186-209. Print.\r\n[12]\tN. Fraser, \u201cFrom Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a \u2018Postsocialist\u2019 Age\u201d. In: Fraser, N, Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the \u201cPostsocialist\u201d Condition. New York: Routledge. (Reprinted from New Left Review 212, 1997, 68 \u2013 93.\r\n[13]\tN. Fraser, \u201cMapeando a imagina\u00e7\u00e3o feminista: da redistribui\u00e7\u00e3o ao reconhecimento e \u00e0 representa\u00e7\u00e3o\u201d. In: Revista Estudos Feministas, vol. 15, n. 2, Florian\u00f3polis, 2007, mai-ago, p. 291-308.\r\n[14]\tN. Fraser \u201cDa redistribui\u00e7\u00e3o ao reconhecimento? Dilemas na justi\u00e7ana era p\u00f3s-socialista\u201d. In: Souza, J. (org.). Democraciahoje: novos desafios para a teoria democr\u00e1tica contempor\u00e2nea. Bras\u00edlia: Editora Universidade de Bras\u00edlia, 2001, p. 245-282.\r\n[15]\tP. Y. Martin, Feminist practice in organizations: Implications for management\u201d. In: Fagenson, E. A. (Ed.), Women in management: Trends, issues, and challenges in managerial diversity: 1993, 274\u2013296. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.\r\n[16]\tJ. Collins, R. Hussey, Pesquisa em administra\u00e7\u00e3o: um guia pr\u00e1tico para alunos de gradua\u00e7\u00e3o e p\u00f3s-gradua\u00e7\u00e3o. Trad. Lucia Simonini. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.\r\n[17]\tD. R. Cooper, P. S. Schindler, M\u00e9todos de Pesquisaem Administra\u00e7\u00e3o. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2003.\r\n[18]\tJ. F. Hair, et AL., An\u00e1lise multivariada de dados. 6. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2009. \r\n[19]\tA. G. Ramos, A Redu\u00e7\u00e3o Sociol\u00f3gica: Introdu\u00e7\u00e3oao Estudo da Raz\u00e3o Sociol\u00f3gica. Rio de Janeiro: Edi\u00e7\u00f5es Tempo Brasileiro Ltda, 1996.\r\n[20]\tMinist\u00e9rio do Trabalho (MTb), Secretaria Nacional de Economia Solid\u00e1ria (SENAES). Banco de dados do Sistema de Informa\u00e7\u00f5es da Economia Solid\u00e1ria \u2013 SIES. Bras\u00edlia, 2014. 1CD-Rom: base de dados em planilhas eletr\u00f4nicas.\r\n[21]\tRede de Economia Solid\u00e1ria e Feminista (RESF - SFEN in English) Encontro Nacional da Rede, em Bras\u00edlia, maio de 2013. Dispon\u00edvelem: http:\/\/guayi.org.br\/?page_id=1584. Acessoem: 18 de agosto de 2018.\r\n[22]\tH. Hirata, Nova Divis\u00e3o Sexual doTrabalho? S\u00e3o Paulo: Boitempo, 2002.\r\n[23]\tInstituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat\u00edstica (IBGE), Estat\u00edsticas de G\u00eanero Indicadores sociais das mulheres no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, mar\u00e7o 2018. Recuperadoem 2, mar\u00e7o, 2018, de https:\/\/biblioteca.ibge.gov.br\/index.php\/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101551\r\n[24]\tM. B. M. \u00c0vila, A din\u00e2mica do trabalho produtivo e reprodutivo: uma contradi\u00e7\u00e3o viva no cotidiano das mulheres. In: Venturi, G.; Godinho, T. (Orgs.). Mulheres brasileiras e g\u00eanero nos espa\u00e7os p\u00fablico e privado: umad\u00e9cada de mudan\u00e7as na opini\u00e3o p\u00fablica. S\u00e3o Paulo: Editora Funda\u00e7\u00e3o Perseu Abramo. Edi\u00e7\u00f5es Sesc SP, 2013.\r\n[25]\tJ. Rothschild, J. A. Whitt, \u201cThe collectivist organization: An alternative to rational bureaucratic models\u201d. American Sociological Review, 1979, 44. pp. 509-27.\r\n[26]\tJ. Rothschild, J. A. Whitt, The Cooperative Workplace: Potentials and Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy and Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.\r\n[27]\tP. Y. Martin, \u201cRethinking Feminist Organizations\u201d. In: Gender and Society, Vol. 4 No. 2, June, 1990, 182-206.\r\n[28]\t M. Serva, Racionalidade e organiza\u00e7\u00f5es: o fen\u00f4meno das organiza\u00e7\u00f5es substantivas. Tese (doutorado em administra\u00e7\u00e3o). S\u00e3o Paulo: EAESPIFGV, 1996. 633p.\r\n[29]\tI. Gu\u00e9rin, Asmulheres e a economia solid\u00e1ria. S\u00e3o Paulo: Edi\u00e7\u00f5es Loyola, 2005.\r\n[30]\tM. Arruda, Exchanging visions on a responsible, plural and solidarity-based economy. Rio de Janeiro, ALOE \u2013 Workgroup visions of a responsable, plural y solidarity-based economy. 140p, 2008.\r\n[31]\tD. C.P inheiro, A. P. P. Paula, \u201cA mitologia da inefici\u00eancia nas organiza\u00e7\u00f5es solid\u00e1rias: embusca da ressignifica\u00e7\u00e3o de um conceito\u201d. In: Desenvolvimento em quest\u00e3o, 2014, vol. 12, n. 27, jul-sep, p.42-65.\r\n[32]\tA. Field, Descobrindo a estat\u00edstica usando SPSS. Tradu\u00e7\u00e3o Lor\u00ed Viali. 2 ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2009.\r\n[33]\tM. Lugones, \u201cThe Coloniality of Gender\u201d. In: I, 2 (Spring), 2008, 1-17. Dispon\u00edvelem: https:\/\/globalstudies.trinity.duke.edu\/pcontent\/themes\/cgsh\/materials\/WKO\/v2d2_Lugones.pdf. Acessoem: 12\/12\/2018.","publisher":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology","index":"Open Science Index 165, 2020"}