CINXE.COM

<!doctype html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8" /> <title>The Beauty of Branes | Scientific American</title> <link rel="canonical" href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-beauty-of-branes/"> <meta name="theme-color" content="#fff"/> <meta name="robots" content="max-image-preview:standard"/> <link rel="image_src" src="https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?w=1200"> <meta property="og:url" content="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-beauty-of-branes/"/> <meta property="og:image" content="https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?w=1200"/> <meta name="twitter:image" content="https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?w=1200"/> <meta name="author" content="Marguerite Holloway"/> <meta name="description" content="Lisa Randall's thinking on higher dimensions, warped space and membranes catalyzed ideas in cosmology and physics. It might even unify all four forces of nature"/> <meta property="og:title" content="The Beauty of Branes"/> <meta property="og:description" content="Lisa Randall's thinking on higher dimensions, warped space and membranes catalyzed ideas in cosmology and physics. It might even unify all four forces of nature"/> <meta property="og:site_name" content="Scientific American"/> <meta property="og:image:alt" content="LISA RANDALL: WARPED THOUGHTS"/> <meta property="og:type" content="article"/> <meta name="twitter:title" content="The Beauty of Branes"/> <meta name="twitter:description" content="Lisa Randall's thinking on higher dimensions, warped space and membranes catalyzed ideas in cosmology and physics. It might even unify all four forces of nature"/> <meta name="twitter:image:alt" content="LISA RANDALL: WARPED THOUGHTS"/> <meta property="og:locale" content="en_US"/> <meta name="twitter:site" content="@sciam"/> <meta name="twitter:domain" content="scientificamerican.com"/> <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image"/> <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-beauty-of-branes/","breadcrumb":{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"The Sciences","item":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/the-sciences/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Beauty of Branes","item":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-beauty-of-branes/"}]}},"headline":"The Beauty of Branes","alternativeHeadline":"The Beauty of Branes","description":"Lisa Randall's thinking on higher dimensions, warped space and membranes catalyzed ideas in cosmology and physics. It might even unify all four forces of nature","url":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-beauty-of-branes/","thumbnailUrl":"https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?w=1200","image":["https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?w=1200","https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?crop=16%3A9%2Csmart&w=1920","https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?crop=4%3A3%2Csmart&w=1200","https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?crop=1%3A1%2Csmart&w=1000"],"datePublished":"2005-10-01T00:00:00-04:00","dateModified":"2024-02-20T14:39:29.640000+00:00","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Marguerite Holloway","url":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/author/marguerite-holloway/"}],"editor":null,"isAccessibleForFree":false,"publisher":{"@id":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/#publisher","name":"Scientific American"},"copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/#publisher","name":"Scientific American"}}</script> <script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsMediaOrganization","@id":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/#publisher","name":"Scientific American","alternateName":"SciAm","legalName":"Scientific American, a Division of Springer Nature America, Inc.","description":"Scientific American is the essential guide to the most awe-inspiring advances in science and technology, explaining how they change our understanding of the world and shape our lives.","foundingDate":"1845-08-28","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/static/sciam.svg"},"url":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/","masthead":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/masthead/","sameAs":["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_American","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q39379","https://www.jstor.org/publisher/sciamerican","https://x.com/sciam","https://www.youtube.com/user/SciAmerican","https://www.tiktok.com/@scientificamerican","https://www.threads.net/@scientific_american","https://www.facebook.com/ScientificAmerican/"],"address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","streetAddress":"1 New York Plaza","addressLocality":"New York","addressRegion":"NY","postalCode":"10004","addressCountry":"US"}}</script> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" /> <link rel="icon shortcut" href="/static/favicon.ico" /> <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS" href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/platform/syndication/rss/" /> <script data-layer="critical">;performance.mark('app-load-start');((d,ael,dcl,unl,cxl,log,onunl)=>{log('[readyState]',d.readyState);d[ael]('readystatechange',()=>log('[readyState]',d.readyState));d[ael](dcl,()=>log(dcl));d[ael](unl,onunl);window.onload=()=>{d.removeEventListener(unl,onunl);log('windowloaded')};})(document,'addEventListener','DOMContentLoaded','beforeunload','cancelled',(...msg)=>console.log('[dev]',...msg),()=>{window[cxl]=true;log(cxl)});((l,pii) => {if (pii.some(p => l.search.includes(p+"="))) {window.initSearch = l.search;const anon = new URLSearchParams(l.search);pii.forEach(p => anon.delete(p));history.replaceState({}, "", l.pathname + "?" + anon);} })(location, ["email", "magic_link", "token", "code", "state"]);</script> <script type="module" crossorigin src="/static/bundle.ccd361ec.js"></script> <link rel="modulepreload" crossorigin href="/static/chunks/preload-helper-4aa0ec7d.js"> <link rel="modulepreload" crossorigin href="/static/chunks/vendor-react-d0986667.js"> <link rel="modulepreload" crossorigin href="/static/chunks/sciam-11dcdbde.js"> <link rel="modulepreload" crossorigin href="/static/chunks/use-piano-auth-sync-4616fe11.js"> <link rel="modulepreload" crossorigin href="/static/chunks/index-49678be1.js"> <link rel="modulepreload" crossorigin href="/static/chunks/datalayer-043ea249.js"> <link rel="modulepreload" crossorigin href="/static/chunks/use-chargebee-76bddde2.js"> <link rel="modulepreload" crossorigin href="/static/chunks/use-plan-6f8b42bf.js"> <link rel="modulepreload" crossorigin href="/static/chunks/use-cart-26044fd3.js"> <link rel="modulepreload" crossorigin href="/static/chunks/useOverlay-f74ac14c.js"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/bundle-aba65ab5.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/ColumnSignup-b1aa196a.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/SubPromo-b3708065.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/header-04186c49.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/Kicker-9f542fcf.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/ArticleDisplay-3498be04.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/index-1a691954.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/Input-073c1e99.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/Body-e211efbd.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/index-94d9de3f.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/Article-949ca3eb.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/809535ac.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/Article-a01e443c.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/DefaultLayout-2955ad5f.css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/assets/article-92837630.css"> <link rel="modulepreload" href="/static/article.cd3ae419.js" crossorigin fetchpriority="auto"> <link rel="preload" href="https://cdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/otSDKStub.js" as="script" fetchpriority="auto"> <link rel="preload" href="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-5FLM662" as="script" fetchpriority="auto"> <link rel="preload" href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/sciads/sciads.js" as="script" fetchpriority="auto"> <link rel="preload" href="https://cdn.tp.scientificamerican.com/api/tinypass.min.js" as="script" fetchpriority="low"> <link rel="preconnect" href="https://cdn.cxense.com/cx.cce.js" as="script"> </head> <body> <div id="app"><header class="headerContainer-8KxQ5" role="banner"><a href="#main" id="skipToMain" class="skiptocontent sr-only-focusable sr-only">Skip to main content</a><div class="header-1t1JE flex-aYeiI"><div class="left-ajw3c flex-aYeiI"><a href="/" aria-label="Link to homepage" class="logoLink-Wt3sq"><span class="sr-only">Scientific American</span><svg width="1em" height="1em" viewBox="0 0 120.79 128.39" fill="currentColor" role="img" aria-label="Scientific American"><path d="M7.98 58.19c2.3 0 5.24 3.18 14.53 3.18 13.66 0 21.75-8.57 21.75-17.86 0-7.86-3.73-12.94-11.43-17.23l-9.37-5.24c-4.05-2.3-7.46-5.32-7.46-9.92 0-4.92 3.73-7.7 9.69-7.7s11.35 4.21 13.02 13.26h1.98V.95h-1.83c-.16 1.43-.87 2.06-1.75 2.06-2.06 0-4.53-2.94-12.62-2.94C13.85.08 5.12 6.51 5.12 16.35c0 7.3 3.26 11.83 9.77 15.56l9.61 5.48c5.48 3.18 7.7 6.19 7.7 10.72 0 5.64-3.18 9.77-10.64 9.77-9.29 0-13.58-5.08-15.32-16.2H4.1V60.5h1.98c.16-1.67.95-2.3 1.91-2.3Zm65.97 3.26c11.11-.03 19.13-8.81 20.4-20.72l-2.22-.64c-2.54 8.26-7.22 12.46-13.97 12.46-12.23 0-16.04-14.93-16.04-27.87 0-15.56 6.11-21.28 14.13-21.28 5.72 0 11.83 5.72 14.45 16.59h2.06V.95h-1.91c-.16 1.27-.87 2.06-2.14 2.06-1.91 0-5.72-3.02-11.83-3.02-14.85 0-28.66 12.07-28.66 32.39 0 17.39 10.96 29.1 25.72 29.06Zm14.53 42.72L76.49 68.84H56.24v1.75c3.33.16 4.76.95 4.76 5.95v42c0 6.03-1.67 8.1-5.32 8.1-2.54 0-4.53-1.91-6.51-6.91L29.11 68.12h-2.7L6.35 119.89c-2.17 5.72-4.3 6.75-6.35 6.75v1.75h18.02v-1.75c-5.8-.24-8.65-2.7-5.8-10.48l2.05-5.4h17.88l3.45 8.97c2.3 5.72.64 6.91-3.73 6.91v1.75h39.62v-1.75c-4.13 0-6.27-1.19-6.27-8.02l.48-42.08 17.07 51.29h2.14l17.63-51.05v43.9c0 5.48-1.75 5.95-5.08 5.95v1.75h23.34v-1.75c-3.33 0-4.76-.48-4.76-5.95V76.54c0-5.56 1.43-5.95 4.76-5.95v-1.75h-19.85l-12.46 35.33Zm-72.88 3.1 7.56-19.85 7.63 19.85H15.6ZM120.79 2.7V.95h-23.1V2.7c3.33 0 4.84.32 4.84 5.95v44.14c0 5.48-1.51 5.95-4.84 5.95v1.75h23.1v-1.75c-3.33 0-4.76-.48-4.76-5.95V8.65c0-5.64 1.43-5.95 4.76-5.95Z"></path></svg></a></div><div class="center-oMgM8 flex-aYeiI"></div><div class="right-4LP3J flex-aYeiI"><button type="button" id="radix-:Rnl:" aria-haspopup="menu" aria-expanded="false" data-state="closed" class="trigger-8ea-U" aria-label="User Menu"><div class="dropdownIconContainer-hDbEe"><svg width="1em" height="1em" viewBox="0 0 472 472" fill="currentColor" role="img" aria-label="User" class="dropdownIcon-XeKnP profileIconImg-pc8tD"><path d="M403 69a235 235 0 0 0-334 0 235 235 0 0 0 0 334 235 235 0 0 0 334 0 235 235 0 0 0 0-334ZM118 412a122 122 0 0 1 237 0 211 211 0 0 1-237 0Zm41-197a77 77 0 1 1 155 0 77 77 0 0 1-155 0Zm216 181c-14-43-48-77-91-92a101 101 0 1 0-96 0c-43 15-77 49-91 92a212 212 0 1 1 278 0Z"></path></svg><div class="dropdownIcon-XeKnP initials-z1adZ"></div></div></button></div></div></header><main class="main-gNG8x"><article class="article-GDG-h"><div class="article__header-bUswr article__header__reduce_padding_bottom-lno25"><div class="article_date_and_read_time-yLEUt"><p class="article_pub_date-EsKM-">October 1, 2005</p><p class="article_read_time-zEJJG">6 min read</p></div><h1 class="article_hed-9vUZD"><p>The Beauty of Branes</p></h1><div class="article_dek-bmjfm"><p>Lisa Randall's thinking on higher dimensions, warped space and membranes catalyzed ideas in cosmology and physics. It might even unify all four forces of nature</p></div><p class="article_authors-s5nSV">By <a class="article_authors__link--mMFB" href="/author/marguerite-holloway/">Marguerite Holloway</a> </p><div class="article_eyebrows-BqeOV"><div class="eyebrows_container-QeE5W eyebrows_container__margin_top-8RQXq"></div></div></div><div class="body-n28ll prose-Yw0x0 prose-v4bYC article__body-ivA3W"><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">It was the summer of 1998, recalls Harvard University physicist Lisa Randall, when extra dimensions finally pulled her in. Extra dimensions--beyond the four we encounter every day (three of space plus one of time)--have been an ingredient of theoretical physics for decades: mathematician Theodor Kaluza proposed a fifth in 1919, string theory requires 10 of them, M-theory needs 11. But Randall hadn't much use for them, she says, until that summer when she decided they might be helpful to supersymmetry, one of the conundrums she was pondering.</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">Randall contacted Raman Sundrum, a Boston University postdoctoral student with whom she had previously collaborated, and asked him if he would like to brainstorm about extra dimensions and membranes--"branes," as they are called for short. Branes are domains or swaths of several spatial dimensions within a higher-dimensional space. The everyday world we live in could be a three-brane, for example, and it is anyone's guess as to what dimension brane it might be embedded in. "Raman had already thought about branes and extra dimensions, and he was an obvious person to join forces with," Randall explains.</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">But Sundrum was a little worried. He was on his third postdoc, didn't have a job lined up and was considering leaving physics for finance. But he liked the way Randall thought and decided to set off on what might be his final physics adventure. The fruits of that collaboration, as fueled by caffeine and ice cream as by heady equations, were papers known as RS-1 and RS-2, two of the most cited in physics for the past five years.</p><hr/><h2>On supporting science journalism</h2><p>If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by <a href="/getsciam/">subscribing</a>. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.</p><hr/><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">The papers, which appeared in 1999, offered novel ways to think about gravity, branes and extra dimensions, and they suggested that the universe might have evolved differently in the beginning than it did later. "For me and a lot of people interested in cosmology and particle physics, it meant that there was this whole new set of possibilities of what could be going on in the early universe," says James Cline of McGill University. For Sundrum, now a professor at Johns Hopkins University, it meant seven job offers. "She is somebody with a marvelous instinct," he laughs.</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">This instinct often draws Randall to problems she knows little about. While at the renowned Stuyvesant High School in New York City, Randall decided to work on perfect versions of complex numbers called Gaussian integers for the then Westinghouse science talent search. (In perfect numbers such as 6, the factors--in this case, 1, 2 and 3--add up to the number itself.) "The project was looking for and seeing if there were any patterns. And there aren't very many. Basically, I always do this. I don't know anything and take on a big project," she says. Nevertheless, Randall's musings on these numbers tied for first place--a fitting precedent for her subsequent mathematical forays into a host of arcane physics fields: technicolor, charged parity symmetry violation, flavor structure and baryogenesis, to mention a few.</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">Although they did not intend to, Randall and Sundrum ended up using extra dimensions to offer a solution to what is called the hierarchy problem. It can be framed in several ways, but the problem is essentially this: Why is gravity so puny, so many billion on billions of times weaker compared with the other forces--electromagnetism and the weak and strong nuclear forces? Discrepancy in strength makes it impossible to combine gravity with the other three forces, a unification thought to have existed during the early phase of the big bang.</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">But rather than invoking supersymmetry--a popular solution that argues for the existence of as yet undetected partners to all the known particles--Randall and Sundrum posited that gravity could reside on a different brane than ours, one separated from us by a five-dimensional spacetime in which the extra dimension is 10-31 centimeter wide. In this RS-1 model, all forces and particles stick to our three-brane except gravity, which is concentrated on the other brane and is free to travel between them across spacetime, which is warped in a negative fashion called anti-De Sitter space. By the time it gets to us, gravity is weak; in the other brane it is strong, on a par with the three other forces. [break]</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">String theorists had looked at the idea of confining all forces to a brane and having gravity leak, but they had not worked out the mechanism, says physicist Joseph Lykken of Fermilab in Batavia, Ill. Randall and Sundrum, he remarks, "changed people's thinking about this stuff entirely."</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">As Randall and Sundrum refined their idea, they realized that if the extra dimension of spacetime were warped in anti-De Sitter fashion, it could be infinitely large and what we observe about gravity could still be true. This model came to be known as RS-2. "Working that out was mind-blowing," Sundrum recalls. "We had reason to be dead scared. In each of these cases, there was a distinct fear of making complete fools of ourselves."</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">"It was counterintuitive," notes theorist Michael J. Duff of Imperial College London. "It came as a surprise even to those working in extra dimensions that even though the extra dimension is very large, we wouldn't be aware of it. Newton's law would still be an inverse square law, not an inverse cube law, which is what you might naively expect."</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">It took a while for many physicists to realize what Randall and Sundrum were suggesting, but the time was right for such thinking. Anti-De Sitter space was popping up in some models, branes were thriving, and in 1998 Nima Arkani-Hamed of Harvard, Georgi Dvali of New York University and Savas Dimopoulos of Stanford University (or ADD, for short) had postulated a three-brane within two large extra dimensions.</p><hr data-block="sciam/raw_html" class=""/><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph"><b><i>Randall and Sundrum offered a new set of options of what went on in the early universe.</i></b></p><hr data-block="sciam/raw_html" class=""/><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">Some of the recent models, be they RS, elaborations of ADD or others, will be put to the test when the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN near Geneva fires up in 2007. "If there is any solution to the hierarchy problem, it should be revealed at the energies the LHC will explore," Randall enthuses. Evidence could include gravitons, supersymmetric partners or evanescent, tiny black holes. "Even if we don't know the answer, it should tell us what the answer is," she adds.</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">In typical fashion, Randall recently took on two things new to her. The first was writing a book about physics, released last month. The second was participating on a task force formed by Harvard president Lawrence Summers after his comments about women in science. She says she is nervous about the reception of the first project and dislikes talking about the second one. "I like to solve simple problems like extra dimensions in space," Randall declares. "Everyone thinks [women in science] is a simpler issue, but it is so much more complicated."</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">She should know: she was the first female captain of her high school math team, and even though Stuyvesant is famous for cultivating science and math whizzes, she did not find it supportive of girls. "There was one teacher who kept saying that Stuyvesant was much better when it was all boys, even though the two best students in his class were girls, and he liked us both. It was this weird cognitive mismatch," she says. Regarding Harvard and the task force, Randall is reticent: "I just want to see a whole bunch more women enter the field so these issues don't have to come up anymore."</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">The 43-year-old Randall is now collaborating with Andreas Karch of the University of Washington, investigating some of the cosmological implications of branes and extra dimensions. According to Randall, we may live in a three-brane, but "there are regions beyond the horizon that look really entirely different. And we haven't fully explored them yet."</p><p class="" data-block="sciam/paragraph">If her ideas don't feel obvious to you, don't fret. You are in good company. "I often don't understand her," Karch confesses. "When she says things, they don't make sense and I first think 'she is crazy.' But I don't say anything, because she is usually right. Lisa just knows the answer."</p></div><footer class="footer-u1I4n"><div class="divide-L7a-x"><div class="rights-Y0o9k"><a target="_blank" href="https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?publisherName=sciam&publication=sciam&title=The+Beauty+of+Branes&publicationDate=2005-10-01&contentID=000EB657-C6C7-1331-841D83414B7FFE9F&orderBeanReset=true&author=Marguerite+Holloway&volume=293&copyright=Copyright+2005+Scientific+American%2C+Inc.+All+rights+reserved">Rights & Permissions</a></div></div><div class="divide-L7a-x"></div><div class="divide-L7a-x"><div class="subdivide-5Zp4J"><div class="bio-LnT3Q"><p><i><a class="bioLink-kqdDv" href="/author/marguerite-holloway/">Marguerite Holloway</a> is a contributing editor for</i> Scientific American.</p></div><a href="/author/marguerite-holloway/">More by <span>Marguerite Holloway</span></a></div></div><div class="divide-L7a-x"><div class="viewIssue-pzfFx"><a class="issueThumb-BLiKJ" href="/issue/sa/2005/10-01/"><img class="thumb-gcwPd" src="https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/E1EF17E4-E452-4C95-B0258882480983D1_source.jpg" alt="Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 4" srcSet="https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/E1EF17E4-E452-4C95-B0258882480983D1_source.jpg?w=300 300w, https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/E1EF17E4-E452-4C95-B0258882480983D1_source.jpg?w=600 600w, https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/E1EF17E4-E452-4C95-B0258882480983D1_source.jpg?w=900 900w" sizes="300px" width="300" loading="lazy"/></a><cite class="issueInfo-xUoIO">This article was originally published with the title “<span>The Beauty of Branes</span>” in <span class="citation-yDArp"><i>Scientific American Magazine</i> Vol. 293 No. 4 (<time dateTime="2005-10-01">October 2005</time>)</span><br/><small class="doi-ggMy7">doi:10.1038/scientificamerican102005-5yT7I7wRfXUpgWyEtOYFx9</small></cite><div class="issueLinks-VGgNn"><a href="/issue/sa/2005/10-01/" class="button-5V-ZC">View This Issue</a></div></div></div></footer><div class="breakoutContainer-8fsaw"><gpt-ad class="ad-G8iDN" unitpath="injector" style="--margin:0.25rem 0 1.25rem" id-format="gpt-unit-{}" sizes-from-0="320x450,300x250,300x50,320x50,fluid" sizes-from-745="320x450,728x90,300x250,fluid" sizes-from-1000="970x350,970x250,970x90,728x90,300x250,fluid" targeting-pos="article-footer"></gpt-ad></div></article></main><footer class="footer-VfsmT"><div class="footerContainer-pfbjC"><h2 class="footerMainText-wQ3og">Expand Your World with Science</h2></div><div class="footerFlexContainer-XKe5g footerContainer-pfbjC"><div class="footerLinks-m1THn"><p class="footerText-PzHcy">Learn and share the most exciting discoveries, innovations and ideas shaping our world today.</p><a class="footerLink-uRzI4" href="/getsciam/">Subscribe</a><a class="footerLink-uRzI4" href="/newsletters/">Sign up for our newsletters</a><a class="footerLink-uRzI4" href="/">See the latest stories</a><a class="footerLink-uRzI4" href="/latest-issue/">Read the latest issue</a><a class="footerLink-uRzI4" href="/getsciam/gift/">Give a Gift Subscription</a><p class="footerSocialMedia-7KIIV">Follow Us:<a href="https://www.instagram.com/scientific_american/?hl=en" target="_blank" alt="Instagram link" title="Instagram"><svg class="footerSocialIcon-UQyIx" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 448 512"><path d="M224.1 141c-63.6 0-114.9 51.3-114.9 114.9s51.3 114.9 114.9 114.9S339 319.5 339 255.9 287.7 141 224.1 141zm0 189.6c-41.1 0-74.7-33.5-74.7-74.7s33.5-74.7 74.7-74.7 74.7 33.5 74.7 74.7-33.6 74.7-74.7 74.7zm146.4-194.3c0 14.9-12 26.8-26.8 26.8-14.9 0-26.8-12-26.8-26.8s12-26.8 26.8-26.8 26.8 12 26.8 26.8zm76.1 27.2c-1.7-35.9-9.9-67.7-36.2-93.9-26.2-26.2-58-34.4-93.9-36.2-37-2.1-147.9-2.1-184.9 0-35.8 1.7-67.6 9.9-93.9 36.1s-34.4 58-36.2 93.9c-2.1 37-2.1 147.9 0 184.9 1.7 35.9 9.9 67.7 36.2 93.9s58 34.4 93.9 36.2c37 2.1 147.9 2.1 184.9 0 35.9-1.7 67.7-9.9 93.9-36.2 26.2-26.2 34.4-58 36.2-93.9 2.1-37 2.1-147.8 0-184.8zM398.8 388c-7.8 19.6-22.9 34.7-42.6 42.6-29.5 11.7-99.5 9-132.1 9s-102.7 2.6-132.1-9c-19.6-7.8-34.7-22.9-42.6-42.6-11.7-29.5-9-99.5-9-132.1s-2.6-102.7 9-132.1c7.8-19.6 22.9-34.7 42.6-42.6 29.5-11.7 99.5-9 132.1-9s102.7-2.6 132.1 9c19.6 7.8 34.7 22.9 42.6 42.6 11.7 29.5 9 99.5 9 132.1s2.7 102.7-9 132.1z"></path></svg></a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/SciAmerican" target="_blank" alt="YouTube link" title="YouTube"><svg class="footerSocialIcon-UQyIx" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 576 512"><path d="M549.655 124.083c-6.281-23.65-24.787-42.276-48.284-48.597C458.781 64 288 64 288 64S117.22 64 74.629 75.486c-23.497 6.322-42.003 24.947-48.284 48.597-11.412 42.867-11.412 132.305-11.412 132.305s0 89.438 11.412 132.305c6.281 23.65 24.787 41.5 48.284 47.821C117.22 448 288 448 288 448s170.78 0 213.371-11.486c23.497-6.321 42.003-24.171 48.284-47.821 11.412-42.867 11.412-132.305 11.412-132.305s0-89.438-11.412-132.305zm-317.51 213.508V175.185l142.739 81.205-142.739 81.201z"></path></svg></a><a href="https://www.threads.net/@scientific_american" target="_blank" alt="Threads link" title="Threads"><svg class="footerSocialIcon-UQyIx" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 448 512"><path d="M331.5 235.7c2.2.9 4.2 1.9 6.3 2.8c29.2 14.1 50.6 35.2 61.8 61.4c15.7 36.5 17.2 95.8-30.3 143.2c-36.2 36.2-80.3 52.5-142.6 53h-.3c-70.2-.5-124.1-24.1-160.4-70.2c-32.3-41-48.9-98.1-49.5-169.6v-.5c.5-71.5 17.1-128.6 49.4-169.6c36.3-46.1 90.3-69.7 160.5-70.2h.3c70.3.5 124.9 24 162.3 69.9c18.4 22.7 32 50 40.6 81.7l-40.4 10.8c-7.1-25.8-17.8-47.8-32.2-65.4c-29.2-35.8-73-54.2-130.5-54.6c-57 .5-100.1 18.8-128.2 54.4C72.1 146.1 58.5 194.3 58 256c.5 61.7 14.1 109.9 40.3 143.3c28 35.6 71.2 53.9 128.2 54.4c51.4-.4 85.4-12.6 113.7-40.9c32.3-32.2 31.7-71.8 21.4-95.9c-6.1-14.2-17.1-26-31.9-34.9c-3.7 26.9-11.8 48.3-24.7 64.8c-17.1 21.8-41.4 33.6-72.7 35.3c-23.6 1.3-46.3-4.4-63.9-16c-20.8-13.8-33-34.8-34.3-59.3c-2.5-48.3 35.7-83 95.2-86.4c21.1-1.2 40.9-.3 59.2 2.8c-2.4-14.8-7.3-26.6-14.6-35.2c-10-11.7-25.6-17.7-46.2-17.8h-.7c-16.6 0-39 4.6-53.3 26.3l-34.4-23.6c19.2-29.1 50.3-45.1 87.8-45.1h.8c62.6.4 99.9 39.5 103.7 107.7l-.2.2zm-156 68.8c1.3 25.1 28.4 36.8 54.6 35.3c25.6-1.4 54.6-11.4 59.5-73.2c-13.2-2.9-27.8-4.4-43.4-4.4c-4.8 0-9.6.1-14.4.4c-42.9 2.4-57.2 23.2-56.2 41.8z"></path></svg></a><a href="https://www.facebook.com/ScientificAmerican" target="_blank" alt="Facebook link" title="Facebook"><svg class="footerSocialIcon-UQyIx" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 320 512"><path d="M279.14 288l14.22-92.66h-88.91v-60.13c0-25.35 12.42-50.06 52.24-50.06h40.42V6.26S260.43 0 225.36 0c-73.22 0-121.08 44.38-121.08 124.72v70.62H22.89V288h81.39v224h100.17V288z"></path></svg></a><a href="/platform/syndication/rss/" target="_blank" alt="RSS feed" title="RSS feed"><svg class="footerSocialIcon-UQyIx" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 448 512"><path d="M0 64C0 46.3 14.3 32 32 32c229.8 0 416 186.2 416 416c0 17.7-14.3 32-32 32s-32-14.3-32-32C384 253.6 226.4 96 32 96C14.3 96 0 81.7 0 64zM0 416a64 64 0 1 1 128 0A64 64 0 1 1 0 416zM32 160c159.1 0 288 128.9 288 288c0 17.7-14.3 32-32 32s-32-14.3-32-32c0-123.7-100.3-224-224-224c-17.7 0-32-14.3-32-32s14.3-32 32-32z"></path></svg></a></p></div><div class="footerImageContainer-omuef"><img class="footerImage-fMFhw" src="/static/assets/footerProductImg-f6732134.png" alt="Scientific American publications in print & digital formats" as="image" loading="lazy"/></div></div><div class="grid-c0--6 footerContainer-pfbjC"><div><ul><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/page/return-refund-policy/">Return & Refund Policy</a></li><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/page/about-scientific-american/">About</a></li><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/pressroom/">Press Room</a></li></ul></div><div><ul class="footer-links"><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/page/frequently-asked-questions/subscriptions-products/">FAQs</a></li><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/page/contact-us/customer-service/">Contact Us</a></li><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/page/international/">International Editions</a></li></ul></div><div><ul class="footer-links"><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/mediakit/">Advertise</a></li><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/accessibility-statement/">Accessibility Statement</a></li><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/page/terms-of-use/">Terms of Use</a></li></ul></div><div><ul class="footer-links"><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/page/privacy-policy/">Privacy Policy</a></li><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="/page/california-consumer-privacy-statement/">California Consumer Privacy Statement</a></li><li><a class="footerSmallLink-tZvCu" href="#">Use of cookies/Do not sell my data</a></li></ul></div></div><div class="footerContainer-pfbjC"><p>Scientific American is part of Springer Nature, which owns or has commercial relations with thousands of scientific publications (many of them can be found at www.springernature.com/us). Scientific American maintains a strict policy of editorial independence in reporting developments in science to our readers.</p><p>© 2024 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, A DIVISION OF SPRINGER NATURE AMERICA, INC.<br/>ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.</p></div></footer></div> <script id="__DATA__">window.__DATA__=JSON.parse(`{"initialData":{"article":{"id":1239289,"contentful_id":"5yT7I7wRfXUpgWyEtOYFx9","mura_id":"860F60D3-9C24-4BAA-8FA4120EAD0D5874","mura_contentid":"000EB657-C6C7-1331-841D83414B7FFE9F","title":"The Beauty of Branes","display_title":"<p>The Beauty of Branes</p>","share_title":null,"display_category":"The Sciences","display_category_slug":"the-sciences","display_date":null,"slug":"the-beauty-of-branes","summary":"<p>Lisa Randall's thinking on higher dimensions, warped space and membranes catalyzed ideas in cosmology and physics. It might even unify all four forces of nature</p>","blurb":"<p>It was the summer of 1998, recalls Harvard University physicist Lisa Randall, when extra dimensions finally pulled her in. Extra dimensions--beyond the four we encounter every day (three of space plus one of time)--have been an ingredient of theoretical physics for decades: mathematician Theodor Kaluza proposed a fifth in 1919, string theory requires 10 of them, M-theory needs 11. But Randall hadn't much use for them, she says, until that summer when she decided they might be helpful to supersymmetry, one of the conundrums she was pondering.</p>","why_box":"","content":[{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"It was the summer of 1998, recalls Harvard University physicist Lisa Randall, when extra dimensions finally pulled her in. Extra dimensions--beyond the four we encounter every day (three of space plus one of time)--have been an ingredient of theoretical physics for decades: mathematician Theodor Kaluza proposed a fifth in 1919, string theory requires 10 of them, M-theory needs 11. But Randall hadn't much use for them, she says, until that summer when she decided they might be helpful to supersymmetry, one of the conundrums she was pondering."},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"Randall contacted Raman Sundrum, a Boston University postdoctoral student with whom she had previously collaborated, and asked him if he would like to brainstorm about extra dimensions and membranes--\\"branes,\\" as they are called for short. Branes are domains or swaths of several spatial dimensions within a higher-dimensional space. The everyday world we live in could be a three-brane, for example, and it is anyone's guess as to what dimension brane it might be embedded in. \\"Raman had already thought about branes and extra dimensions, and he was an obvious person to join forces with,\\" Randall explains."},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"But Sundrum was a little worried. He was on his third postdoc, didn't have a job lined up and was considering leaving physics for finance. But he liked the way Randall thought and decided to set off on what might be his final physics adventure. The fruits of that collaboration, as fueled by caffeine and ice cream as by heady equations, were papers known as RS-1 and RS-2, two of the most cited in physics for the past five years."},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"The papers, which appeared in 1999, offered novel ways to think about gravity, branes and extra dimensions, and they suggested that the universe might have evolved differently in the beginning than it did later. \\"For me and a lot of people interested in cosmology and particle physics, it meant that there was this whole new set of possibilities of what could be going on in the early universe,\\" says James Cline of McGill University. For Sundrum, now a professor at Johns Hopkins University, it meant seven job offers. \\"She is somebody with a marvelous instinct,\\" he laughs."},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"This instinct often draws Randall to problems she knows little about. While at the renowned Stuyvesant High School in New York City, Randall decided to work on perfect versions of complex numbers called Gaussian integers for the then Westinghouse science talent search. (In perfect numbers such as 6, the factors--in this case, 1, 2 and 3--add up to the number itself.) \\"The project was looking for and seeing if there were any patterns. And there aren't very many. Basically, I always do this. I don't know anything and take on a big project,\\" she says. Nevertheless, Randall's musings on these numbers tied for first place--a fitting precedent for her subsequent mathematical forays into a host of arcane physics fields: technicolor, charged parity symmetry violation, flavor structure and baryogenesis, to mention a few."},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"Although they did not intend to, Randall and Sundrum ended up using extra dimensions to offer a solution to what is called the hierarchy problem. It can be framed in several ways, but the problem is essentially this: Why is gravity so puny, so many billion on billions of times weaker compared with the other forces--electromagnetism and the weak and strong nuclear forces? Discrepancy in strength makes it impossible to combine gravity with the other three forces, a unification thought to have existed during the early phase of the big bang."},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"But rather than invoking supersymmetry--a popular solution that argues for the existence of as yet undetected partners to all the known particles--Randall and Sundrum posited that gravity could reside on a different brane than ours, one separated from us by a five-dimensional spacetime in which the extra dimension is 10-31 centimeter wide. In this RS-1 model, all forces and particles stick to our three-brane except gravity, which is concentrated on the other brane and is free to travel between them across spacetime, which is warped in a negative fashion called anti-De Sitter space. By the time it gets to us, gravity is weak; in the other brane it is strong, on a par with the three other forces. [break]"},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"String theorists had looked at the idea of confining all forces to a brane and having gravity leak, but they had not worked out the mechanism, says physicist Joseph Lykken of Fermilab in Batavia, Ill. Randall and Sundrum, he remarks, \\"changed people's thinking about this stuff entirely.\\""},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"As Randall and Sundrum refined their idea, they realized that if the extra dimension of spacetime were warped in anti-De Sitter fashion, it could be infinitely large and what we observe about gravity could still be true. This model came to be known as RS-2. \\"Working that out was mind-blowing,\\" Sundrum recalls. \\"We had reason to be dead scared. In each of these cases, there was a distinct fear of making complete fools of ourselves.\\""},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"\\"It was counterintuitive,\\" notes theorist Michael J. Duff of Imperial College London. \\"It came as a surprise even to those working in extra dimensions that even though the extra dimension is very large, we wouldn't be aware of it. Newton's law would still be an inverse square law, not an inverse cube law, which is what you might naively expect.\\""},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"It took a while for many physicists to realize what Randall and Sundrum were suggesting, but the time was right for such thinking. Anti-De Sitter space was popping up in some models, branes were thriving, and in 1998 Nima Arkani-Hamed of Harvard, Georgi Dvali of New York University and Savas Dimopoulos of Stanford University (or ADD, for short) had postulated a three-brane within two large extra dimensions."},{"tag":"hr","type":"raw_html","attributes":{},"content":""},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"<b><i>Randall and Sundrum offered a new set of options of what went on in the early universe.</i></b>"},{"tag":"hr","type":"raw_html","attributes":{},"content":""},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"Some of the recent models, be they RS, elaborations of ADD or others, will be put to the test when the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN near Geneva fires up in 2007. \\"If there is any solution to the hierarchy problem, it should be revealed at the energies the LHC will explore,\\" Randall enthuses. Evidence could include gravitons, supersymmetric partners or evanescent, tiny black holes. \\"Even if we don't know the answer, it should tell us what the answer is,\\" she adds."},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"In typical fashion, Randall recently took on two things new to her. The first was writing a book about physics, released last month. The second was participating on a task force formed by Harvard president Lawrence Summers after his comments about women in science. She says she is nervous about the reception of the first project and dislikes talking about the second one. \\"I like to solve simple problems like extra dimensions in space,\\" Randall declares. \\"Everyone thinks [women in science] is a simpler issue, but it is so much more complicated.\\""},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"She should know: she was the first female captain of her high school math team, and even though Stuyvesant is famous for cultivating science and math whizzes, she did not find it supportive of girls. \\"There was one teacher who kept saying that Stuyvesant was much better when it was all boys, even though the two best students in his class were girls, and he liked us both. It was this weird cognitive mismatch,\\" she says. Regarding Harvard and the task force, Randall is reticent: \\"I just want to see a whole bunch more women enter the field so these issues don't have to come up anymore.\\""},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"The 43-year-old Randall is now collaborating with Andreas Karch of the University of Washington, investigating some of the cosmological implications of branes and extra dimensions. According to Randall, we may live in a three-brane, but \\"there are regions beyond the horizon that look really entirely different. And we haven't fully explored them yet.\\""},{"tag":"p","type":"paragraph","attributes":{},"content":"If her ideas don't feel obvious to you, don't fret. You are in good company. \\"I often don't understand her,\\" Karch confesses. \\"When she says things, they don't make sense and I first think 'she is crazy.' But I don't say anything, because she is usually right. Lisa just knows the answer.\\""}],"authors":[{"mura_id":"56A0B828-797B-42D1-BB0CB4FBAF372BB0","url":"/author/marguerite-holloway/","contentful_id":"2KcKNZwWlWxuWWe7zKQbty","name":"Marguerite Holloway","slug":"marguerite-holloway","biography":"<p><i>Marguerite Holloway is a contributing editor for</i> Scientific American.</p>","picture_file":null,"category":null,"contacts":[]}],"editors":[],"image_url":"https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg","image_width":200,"image_height":197,"image_alt_text":"LISA RANDALL: WARPED THOUGHTS","image_caption":null,"image_credits":"<p>KATHLEEN DOOHER</p>","image_desktop_url":null,"image_desktop_width":0,"image_desktop_height":0,"image_block_syndication":true,"release_date":"2005-10-01T00:00:00-04:00","date_published":"2005-10-01T00:00:00-04:00","primary_category":"The Sciences","primary_category_slug":"the-sciences","subcategory":"The Sciences","subcategory_slug":"the-sciences","subtype":"news","column":"Insights","digital_column":null,"digital_column_slug":null,"digital_column_url":null,"digital_column_frequency":null,"digital_column_description":null,"digital_column_newsletter_id":null,"digital_column_newsletter_name":null,"digital_column_signup_cta":null,"digital_column_email_subject":null,"collection_slug":null,"collection_name":null,"partner_title":null,"partner_url":null,"partner_end_note":null,"article_doi":"10.1038/scientificamerican102005-5yT7I7wRfXUpgWyEtOYFx9","categories":["Astrophysics","Space & Physics","The Sciences"],"contains_media":null,"is_partner":false,"is_resalable":true,"is_syndicated":false,"is_opinion":false,"journal_issue_name":"October 2005","keywords":[],"media_url":null,"media_type":null,"podcast_series_name":null,"podcast_series_slug":null,"published_at_date":"2005-10-01","published_at_date_time":"2005-10-01T00:00:00-04:00","published_at_time":"00:00:00","tags":[],"type":"Article","updated_at_date_time":"2024-02-20T14:39:29.640000+00:00","paywall_exempt":false,"page_number":null,"print_title":null,"print_dek":"","canonical_url":null,"url":"/article/the-beauty-of-branes/","footnote":"","content_modeling":null,"content_difficulty":null,"sentiment":null,"durability":null,"newsroom_id":null,"layout":"default"},"issue":{"contentful_id":"5IWmU6mEwzfFs5lWpUYjFh","mura_id":null,"path":"/issue/sa/2005/10-01/","magazine_title":"Scientific American Magazine","issue_title":"October 2005","volume":293,"issue":"4","issue_date":"2005-10-01","pdf_file":"https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/65837F7D-724F-402A-80EEAEE4B2BFA2BE.pdf","image_url":"https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/E1EF17E4-E452-4C95-B0258882480983D1_source.jpg","image_width":440,"image_height":587,"image_alt_text":null,"image_caption":null,"image_credits":null,"cover_credits":null,"image_desktop_url":null,"image_desktop_width":0,"image_desktop_height":0,"image":null},"persistentHeaderTitle":"The Beauty of Branes","dataLayerContent":{"content":{"articleDoi":"10.1038/scientificamerican102005-5yT7I7wRfXUpgWyEtOYFx9","authors":["Marguerite Holloway"],"authorsCategory":[null],"canonicalUrl":"","categories":"Astrophysics,Space & Physics,The Sciences","collectionId":"","collectionName":"","column":"Insights","containsMedia":"","contentfulId":"5yT7I7wRfXUpgWyEtOYFx9","contentId":"000EB657-C6C7-1331-841D83414B7FFE9F","contentDifficulty":"","contentModeling":[],"durability":"","editors":[],"isOpinion":false,"isPartner":false,"isResalable":true,"isSyndicated":false,"journalIssueName":"October 2005","language":"en","partnerName":"","platform":"hopper","paywallExempt":null,"podcastSeries":"","primaryCategory":"The Sciences","printDek":"","printTitle":"","publishedAtDate":"2005-10-01","publishedAtDateTime":"2005-10-01T00:00:00-04:00","publishedAtTime":"00:00:00","readTime":6,"sentiment":"","subCategory":"The Sciences","title":"The Beauty of Branes","type":"news","updatedAtDateTime":"2024-02-20T14:39:29.640000+00:00","wordCount":1357,"advertiser":"","campaign":"","isSponsored":false},"game":{"gameId":"","puzzleType":"","set":"","dek":""}},"meta":{"title":"The Beauty of Branes","canonicalUrl":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-beauty-of-branes/","image":"https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?w=1200","imageWidth":200,"imageBlockSyndication":true,"tags":{"author":"Marguerite Holloway","description":"Lisa Randall's thinking on higher dimensions, warped space and membranes catalyzed ideas in cosmology and physics. It might even unify all four forces of nature","og:title":"The Beauty of Branes","og:description":"Lisa Randall's thinking on higher dimensions, warped space and membranes catalyzed ideas in cosmology and physics. It might even unify all four forces of nature","og:site_name":"Scientific American","og:image":"https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?w=1200","og:image:alt":"LISA RANDALL: WARPED THOUGHTS","og:type":"article","og:url":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-beauty-of-branes/","twitter:title":"The Beauty of Branes","twitter:description":"Lisa Randall's thinking on higher dimensions, warped space and membranes catalyzed ideas in cosmology and physics. It might even unify all four forces of nature","twitter:image":"https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?w=1200","twitter:image:alt":"LISA RANDALL: WARPED THOUGHTS"},"jsonLD":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-beauty-of-branes/","breadcrumb":{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"The Sciences","item":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/the-sciences/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Beauty of Branes","item":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-beauty-of-branes/"}]}},"headline":"The Beauty of Branes","alternativeHeadline":"The Beauty of Branes","description":"Lisa Randall's thinking on higher dimensions, warped space and membranes catalyzed ideas in cosmology and physics. It might even unify all four forces of nature","url":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-beauty-of-branes/","thumbnailUrl":"https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?w=1200","image":["https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?w=1200","https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?crop=16%3A9%2Csmart&w=1920","https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?crop=4%3A3%2Csmart&w=1200","https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/89371556-81E8-44A8-A349659B09896D85_source.jpg?crop=1%3A1%2Csmart&w=1000"],"datePublished":"2005-10-01T00:00:00-04:00","dateModified":"2024-02-20T14:39:29.640000+00:00","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Marguerite Holloway","url":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/author/marguerite-holloway/"}],"isAccessibleForFree":false,"publisher":{"@id":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/#publisher","name":"Scientific American"},"copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https://www.scientificamerican.com/#publisher","name":"Scientific American"}}},"adsConfig":{"unitpath":"/270604982/sciam/article","targeting":{"title":"The Beauty of Branes","id":"5yT7I7wRfXUpgWyEtOYFx9","cat":["Astrophysics","Space & Physics","The Sciences",""],"subject":"The Sciences","authors":["Marguerite Holloway"],"podcast":null,"version":"hopper"}},"podcastSeriesInfo":null,"readTime":6,"wordCount":1357,"isPreview":false,"abTestGroup":"2"},"bundle":"article"}`)</script> <script data-layer="footer">;OptanonWrapper=()=>{};consentQueue=[];tp=[];pdl={requireConsent:'v2'};window.dataLayer=[];;window.__ads=[];_sf_async_config={};_cbq=[]</script> </body> </html>