Become a Reviewer:: International Journal of Education, Culture and Society:: Science Publishing Group

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <title>Become a Reviewer:: International Journal of Education, Culture and Society:: Science Publishing Group</title> <meta name="description" content="Read the latest articles of International Journal of Education, Culture and Societyat Science Publishing Group."> <meta name="Keywords" content="International Journal of Education, Culture and Society"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <meta charset="utf-8"> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/font.min.css?v=20241017114704"> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/common.min.css?v=20241017114704"> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/selectJournalForm.min.css?v=20241017114704"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/all.min.css?v=20241017114704"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/problem_feedback.min.css?v=20241017114704"> <script src="/js/jquery-1.11.3.min.js?v=20241017114704"></script> <script src="/js/clipboard/clipboard.min.js?v=20241017114704"></script> <script src="/js/common.min.js?v=20241017114704"></script> <script src="/js/jquery.sticky-sidebar.min.js?v=20241017114704"></script> <script src="/js/customsize-validate.min.js?v=20241017114704"></script> <script src="/ajax/libs/layer/layer.min.js?v=20241017114704"></script> <script src="/ajax/libs/layer/lang/en.js?v=20241017114704"></script> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/journal/css/journal_common.min.css?v=20241017114704"> <script src="/js/layout/decorator_single_journal.min.js?v=20241017114704"></script> </head> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/information/css/for_reviewer.min.css?v=20241017114704"> </head> <body> <div class="header"> <div class="spg_item"> <div class="content clearfix"> <div class="logo left"> <a href="/"><img src="/img/logo.png"></a> </div> <div class="spg_nav left"> <ul> <li class="left"> <a href="/" target="_blank">Home</a> </li> <li class="left"> <a href="/journals/browse-by-subject" target="_blank">Journals</a> </li> <li class="left"> <a href="/proceedings" target="_blank">Proceedings</a> </li> <li class="left"> <a href="/books" target="_blank">Books</a> </li> <li class="left"> <a href="/events" target="_blank">Events</a> </li> <li class="left"> <a href="/information/for-authors" target="_blank">Information</a> </li> <li class="left"> <a href="/contact" target="_blank">Contact</a> </li> </ul> </div>  <div class="single_login_item right"> <div class="single_login_register"> <a href="https://sso.sciencepg.com/login" target="_blank" class="single_login"> Log in </a> <span>|</span> <a href="https://sso.sciencepg.com/register" target="_blank"> Register </a> </div> </div> <div class="single_search left"> <form class="search" action="/search-results" type="get" target="_blank"> <input type="text" placeholder="Search" name="searchWord" min="2" max="512"> <button type="submit" class="single_search_btn"><i class="fas fa-search"></i></button> </form> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="journal_item"> <div class="content position"> <div class="journal_item_box clearfix"> <div class="journal_name_item table"> <h3>International Journal of Education, Culture and Society</h3> </div> <div class="search_item table" style="display: none;"> <form class="example" action="/static"> <input type="text" placeholder="Search title, athors, keyword or doi" name="search"> <button type="submit"><i class="fas fa-search"></i></button> </form> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="journal_nav_item" > <div class="content"> <ul class="clearfix"> <li> <a class="first_nav" href="/journal/214/home">Home</a> </li> <li> <a class="first_nav" href="/journal/214/about">About <img src="/img/tranger.png"></a> <div class="journal_second_menu clearfix"> <div class="col1 left"> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/about">Aims and Scope</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/abstracting-and-indexing">Abstracting and Indexing</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/article-processing-charges">Article Processing Charges</a> </div> </div> <div class="col2 left"> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/submission-guidelines">Submission Guidelines</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/preparing-manuscript">Preparing Your Manuscript</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/supporting-information">Supporting Information</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/editorial-process">Editorial Process</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/manuscript-transfers">Manuscript Transfers</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/promoting-your-publication">Promoting Your Publication</a> </div> </div> <div class="col3 left"> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/peer-review-at-sciencepg">Peer Review at SciencePG</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/open-access">Open Access Policy</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/copyright">Copyright and Licensing</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/publication-ethics">Publication Ethics</a> </div> </div> </div> </li> <li> <a href="/journal/214/archive" class="first_nav">Archive</a> </li> <li> <a href="/journal/214/submit-an-article" class="first_nav">Submission</a> </li> <li> <a href="/journal/214/propose-a-special-issue" class="first_nav">Special Issues <img src="/img/tranger.png"></a> <div class="journal_second_menu clearfix"> <div class="col3 left"> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/special-issue-guidelines">Special Issue Guidelines</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/propose-a-special-issue">Propose a Special Issue</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/conference-special-issue">Conference Special Issue</a> </div> </div> </div> </li> <li> <a href="/journal/214/editorial-board" class="first_nav">Editorial Board <img src="/img/tranger.png"></a> <div class="journal_second_menu clearfix"> <div class="col3 left"> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/editorial-board">Editorial Board</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/join-the-editorial-board">Join the Editorial Board</a> </div> </div> </div> </li> <li> <a href="/journal/214/reviewers" class="first_nav">Reviewers <img src="/img/tranger.png"></a> <div class="journal_second_menu clearfix"> <div class="col3 left"> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/reviewers">Reviewers</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/become-a-reviewer">Become a Reviewer</a> </div> </div> </div> </li> <li class="active"> <a href="/journal/214/join-us" class="first_nav">Join <img src="/img/tranger.png"></a> <div class="journal_second_menu clearfix"> <div class="col3 left"> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/join-the-editorial-board">Join the Editorial Board</a> </div> <div class="journal_menu_link"> <a href="/journal/214/become-a-reviewer">Become a Reviewer</a> </div> </div> </div> </li>  <li> <a href="/journal/214/events" class="first_nav">Events</a> </li> <li> <a href="/journal/214/contact" class="first_nav">Contact</a> </li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="page_nav_track" id="Back_to_top"> <div class="content"> <nav> <ul> <li> <a href="/" class="tohead">Home</a> </li> <li> <span><i class="fas fa-chevron-right"></i></span> <a href="/journals/browse-by-subject" class="tohead">SciencePG Journals</a> </li> <li> <span><i class="fas fa-chevron-right"></i></span> <a href="/journal/214/home" class="tohead">International Journal of Education, Culture and Society</a> </li> <li> <span><i class="fas fa-chevron-right"></i></span> <a href="/journal/214/join-us" class="tohead">Join</a> </li> <li> <span><i class="fas fa-chevron-right"></i></span> <a href="/journal/214/become-a-reviewer" class="tohead">Become a Reviewer</a> </li> </ul> </nav> </div> </div> <div class="container content_position"> <div class="left_nav left" id="nav"> <div class="left_nav_title"> Join Us </div> <ul> <li> <a href="/journal/214/join-the-editorial-board">Join the Editorial Board<i class="fas fa-chevron-right"></i></a> </li> <li class="left_nav_active"> <a href="/journal/214/become-a-reviewer">Become a Reviewer<i class="fas fa-chevron-right"></i></a> </li> </ul> </div> <div class="color_bg" style="padding-top: 0px;"> <div class="right_content"> <div class="page_title"> Become a Reviewer </div> <div class="jump_link"> <p class="">Jump to Section</p> <ul class="jump_ul clearfix"> <li class="left"><a href="#Becoming">Become a Reviewer</a></li> <li class="left"><a href="#Requirements_Responsibilities">Requirements and Responsibilities of Reviewers</a></li> <li class="left"><a href="#Reviewers_Benefits">Benefits for Reviewers</a></li> <li class="left"><a href="#Peer_Review">What is Peer Review?</a></li> <li class="left"><a href="#Types">Types of Peer Review</a></li> <li class="left"><a href="#How">How to Perform Peer Review</a></li> <li class="left"><a href="#Ethics">Peer Review Ethics</a></li> </ul> </div> <div class="height_30" id="Becoming"></div> <div class="intro_normal"> <p class="blokc_p">Who Can Become a Reviewer?</p> <p class="normal_p">The primary requirement for becoming a reviewer is a profound expertise in your respective research field, coupled with the ability to provide thorough, objective, and constructive evaluations of manuscripts. Moreover, we outline distinct qualifications and requirements that potential applicants are anticipated to fulfill.</p> <p class="small_title" style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Our qualifications and requirements for a potential reviewer are as follows:</p> <div class="dot_item"> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> A minimum of 3 years research or professional experience in the relevant field of the applied journal. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> A minimum of 3 publications on the same topic as the applied journal. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Priority will be given to applicants who hold doctoral degrees. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td class="padding0"> Preference will be given to those with relevant reviewing experience. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> <div class="intro_normal"> <p class="blokc_p">How to Become a Reviewer?</p> <p class="normal_p">Engaging in the peer review process not only significantly contributes to the scientific community but also brings considerable benefits for your own research and career development. At SciencePG, we always appreciate and welcome professionals who are interested in becoming part of our dedicated reviewer team.</p> <p class="normal_p">If you are interested, you could join by following the procedures outlined below.</p> <p class="small_title" style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Here are the procedures:</p> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> <p class="normal_p" style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Step 1: If you don't have an English CV, you can download the provided CV template for reference.</p> <div class="view_more"><a href="https://download.sciencepg.com/CV.docx" target="_blank">Download CV Template <i class="fas fa-arrow-alt-circle-down"></i></a></div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Step 2: If you haven't registered yet, please create an account by visiting: <a href="https://sso.sciencepg.com/register" target="_blank" class="normal_link"> https://sso.sciencepg.com/register <i class="fas fa-external-link-alt"></i> </a> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Step 3: After registering, log in using your username and password: <a href="https://sso.sciencepg.com/login" target="_blank" class="normal_link"> https://sso.sciencepg.com/login <i class="fas fa-external-link-alt"></i> </a> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td class="padding0"> Step 4: Click on "Become a Reviewer" under the "Join" section. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> </div> <div class="color_bg" id="Requirements_Responsibilities"> <div class="right_content"> <div class="second_title"> Requirements and Responsibilities of Reviewers </div> <p class="normal_p">Reviewers play an indispensable role at SciencePG, as they bear significant responsibility for upholding the integrity of scholarly content. Reviewers are expected to provide a fair, objective, and timely evaluation of manuscripts.</p> <div class="intro_normal"> <p class="small_title">Reviewers for SciencePG should meet the following criteria:</p> <div class="dot_item"> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> No conflicts of interest with any of the authors or the research being reviewed. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Not affiliated with the same institution as the authors. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Have no co-authored publications with the authors within the past three years. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td class="padding0"> Have substantial academic or professional expertise in the field of the submitted paper. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> <div class="intro_normal"> <p class="small_title">Reviewers for SciencePG are expected to:</p> <div class="dot_item"> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Assess the scientific quality of the manuscript with their expert knowledge. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Prepare comprehensive and detailed review reports, and remain responsive throughout the peer review process. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Uphold the highest standards of professionalism and ethics, avoiding personal, financial, or intellectual biases, focusing solely on the research quality and written presentation of the manuscript. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Preserve confidentiality throughout the review process, not disclosing or using any unpublished information or communicating the manuscript content without prior consent from SciencePG. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Refrain from contacting the authors directly without SciencePG's permission. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Suggest citations of the reviewer’s work only when they contribute to the manuscript's academic or technological relevance, not merely to increase citation count or enhance the visibility of the reviewer's work. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Reviewers are asked to maintain their affiliation updated on their reviewer account to allow editors to identify potential conflicts of interest promptly. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td class="padding0"> Complete the review process by providing the review reports within 7-10 days. If unable to adhere to this timeline or an extension is needed, please promptly communicate with the editorial team. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> <p>We understand our reviewers are often engaged in multiple responsibilities, so if you are unable to accept an invitation to review or face any issues after acceptance, please notify us promptly. Recommending an alternative reviewer in such instances is greatly appreciated.</p> </div> </div> <div class="color_bg" id="Reviewers_Benefits"> <div class="right_content"> <div class="second_title"> Benefits for Reviewers <div class="back_to_top"><a href="#Back_to_top"><span class="top_icon"><i class="fas fa-arrow-up"></i></span><span class="back_font">Back to top</span></a></div> </div> <p class="normal_p">Scholars will be entitled to the following benefits when working with SciencePG as reviewers.</p> <div class="intro_normal"> <p class="blokc_p">Benefits for Serving as Reviewers:</p> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Enhance your professional reputation through peer review involvement. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Access cutting-edge research and expand your academic network. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Receive a personalized reviewer certificate for your contribution. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td class="padding0"> Enjoy exclusive offers on Article Processing Charges when publishing with SciencePG. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> </div> <div class="color_bg" id="Peer_Review"> <div class="right_content"> <div class="second_title"> What is Peer Review? <div class="back_to_top"><a href="#Back_to_top"><span class="top_icon"><i class="fas fa-arrow-up"></i></span><span class="back_font">Back to top</span></a></div> </div> <p class="normal_p">Peer review is a fundamental component of scholarly publishing and a process that ensures the validity and quality of scientific literature. It involves the evaluation of research work by experts (peers) in the relevant field, aiming to assess its rigor, coherence, and contribution to existing knowledge.</p> <div class="intro"> <p class="normal_p">Key aspects of peer review: </p> <div class="li_blcok" style="margin-top: 10px;"> <ul class="clearfix"> <li class="box_shad" style="height:146px;"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Evaluation</p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">Peer review serves as an effective tool for assessing research, facilitating the selection of top-quality articles for publication.</p> </li> <li class="double_box box_shad"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Quality Assurance</p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">Through the process of review and suggested revisions, peer review enhances the overall quality of the published article, providing the author with valuable insights into their research.</p> </li> <li class="box_shad"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Integrity</p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">Peer review supports integrity in research through the rigor of the process itself. If the article is being peer reviewed, it’s being scrutinized in detail, so that readers can trust in the validity and accuracy of the research they're reading.</p> </li> <li class="double_box box_shad"style="height: 174px;"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Networking</p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">The peer review system also fosters a sense of community, enabling fruitful interactions and networking within the research community.</p> </li> </ul> </div> <p>At SciencePG, we consider the peer review process crucial for maintaining the credibility and validity of the research we publish. Despite challenges, peer review remains the widely accepted method for validating research, and we are committed to upholding the highest standards of scholarship. By engaging expert reviewers, we ensure the rigor and trustworthiness of the published work, fostering confidence within the scientific community and beyond.</p> </div> </div> </div> <div class="color_bg" id="Types"> <div class="right_content"> <div class="second_title"> Types of Peer Review <div class="back_to_top"><a href="#Back_to_top"><span class="top_icon"><i class="fas fa-arrow-up"></i></span><span class="back_font">Back to top</span></a></div> </div> <p class="normal_p">The primary peer review models include single-anonymized, double-anonymized, and open peer review. With time, variations such as transparent, collaborative, and post-publication peer reviews have evolved. Suitable new models will be integrated into our process as they emerge. Our goal is to remain at the cutting edge of scholarly publishing by embracing both traditional and innovative peer review models.</p> <p>Here is a simplified guide to the different models of peer review:</p> <div class="intro"> <div class="li_blcok" style="margin-top: 10px;"> <ul class="clearfix"> <li class="box_shad"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Single Anonymized Review</p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">Commonly referred to as "single-blind review", this is where reviewers are aware of the author's identity, but the author does not know the reviewers.</p> </li> <li class="double_box box_shad" style="height:118px;"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Double Anonymized Review</p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">Also known as "double-blind review", the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept secret.</p> </li> <li class="box_shad"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Open Peer Review</p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">The identities of the author and the reviewer are disclosed to all parties, either during or after the review process.</p> </li> <li class="double_box box_shad" style="height:118px;"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Transparent Peer Review</p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">The review report is published along with the final article. The reviewer has the option to disclose their identity.</p> </li> <li class="box_shad"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Collaborative Review </p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">Multiple reviewers collaborate to produce a unified report or the author improves the manuscript under the guidance of one or more reviewers.</p> </li> <li class="double_box box_shad"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Post Publication Review </p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">This involves the review of a published paper, which can be either solicited or unsolicited. It does not exclude other forms of peer review.</p> </li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="color_bg" id="How"> <div class="right_content"> <div class="second_title"> How to Perform Peer Review <div class="back_to_top"><a href="#Back_to_top"><span class="top_icon"><i class="fas fa-arrow-up"></i></span><span class="back_font">Back to top</span></a></div> </div> <div class="intro_normal"> <div class="blokc_p"> Invitation to Review </div> <p class="normal_p">SciencePG is committed to publishing high-quality scientific research. Each manuscript submitted to us undergoes a thorough review process conducted by at least two expert reviewers, who may be volunteer reviewers, members of our reviewer board, or suggested by the authors during the submission. These reviewers are integral in evaluating the manuscript's quality and offering recommendations on its suitability for publication.</p> <div class="intro"> <div class="intro_info"> <p class="small_title">To ensure an efficient and effective review process, we request reviewers to:</p> <div class="dot_item"> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Respond promptly to review invitations, based on their understanding and interest in the manuscript title and abstract. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Suggest alternative reviewers should they need to decline the invitation, ensuring that the manuscript still gets an expert perspective. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Request an extension, if necessary, to ensure a thorough and comprehensive review report. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> </div> <div class="intro"> <div class="intro_info"> <p class="small_title">Before starting a review, there are several factors to consider:</p> <div class="dot_item"> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Timing: Reviews are expected to be completed with 7-10 days. Please communicate immediately with the editor if this deadline cannot be met. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Suitability: If there is any conflict of interest or other reasons that might impede an objective review, please inform the journal's editor. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Confidentiality: The content of the manuscript should not be shared without the editor's permission. If you suspect misconduct, only discuss it with the editor. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Co-reviewing: If you plan to collaborate on a review with a colleague or student, please inform the journal editor beforehand. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="intro_normal"> <div class="blokc_p"> Review Reports </div> <div class="intro"> <div class="number_container"> <span class="number_container_span">1</span> </div> <div class="intro_info"> <p class="small_title">The Elements of Review Reports:</p> <p>Review reports for SciencePG are expected to offer a comprehensive evaluation of the submission, going beyond providing only short or concise remarks. Although SciencePG doesn't prescribe a strict report structure, we recommend the following format:</p> <div class="li_blcok" style="margin-top: 10px;"> <ul class="clearfix"> <li class="box_shad double3"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Brief Summary</p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">Include a short paragraph outlining the aim of the paper, its main contributions, and strengths.</p> </li> <li class="double_box double3 box_shad"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">General Concept Comments</p> <div class="dot_item"> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td style="color: #656565;"> <span class="bold">For Research Articles</span>: Highlight any areas of weakness, such as testability of the hypothesis, methodological inaccuracies, missing controls, etc. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td style="color: #656565;"> <span class="bold">For Review Articles</span>: Comment on the completeness and relevance of the review topic covered, the identified gap in knowledge, and the appropriateness of references. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p class="li_blcok_p2">Remember, these comments should focus on the scientific content of the manuscript and be specific enough for the authors to respond.</p> </li> <li class="box_shad double3"> <p class="li_blcok_p1 blue_font">Specific Comments</p> <p class="li_blcok_p2">Provide specific comments referring to line numbers, tables, or figures that point out inaccuracies within the text or unclear sentences.</p> </li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> <div class="intro"> <div class="number_container"> <span class="number_container_span">2</span> </div> <div class="intro_info"> <p class="small_title">Review Guide for Research Articles:</p> <div class="dot_item"> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Evaluate the clarity, relevance, and structure of the manuscript. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Assess the recency and relevance of the cited references, and look for an excessive number of self-citations. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Review the scientific soundness and the appropriateness of the experimental design. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Evaluate the reproducibility of the results based on the methods section. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Assess the figures/tables for appropriateness and interpretability. Comment on the statistical analysis or specific data. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Ensure the conclusions are consistent with the evidence and arguments presented. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Evaluate the ethics and data availability statements. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> </div> <div class="intro"> <div class="number_container"> <span class="number_container_span">3</span> </div> <div class="intro_info"> <p class="small_title">Review Guide for Review Articles:</p> <div class="dot_item"> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Evaluate the clarity, comprehensiveness, and relevance of the review. Identify any gaps in knowledge. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Check for similar reviews published recently, and assess the current review's relevance and interest to the scientific community. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Review the recency and relevance of the cited references, look for omitted relevant citations, and check for an excessive number of self-citations. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Ensure the statements and conclusions are coherent and supported by the listed citations. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Assess the figures/tables for appropriateness and interpretability. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="intro_normal"> <div class="blokc_p"> Overall Recommendation </div> <p class="normal_p">In addition to review comments, the reviewer will likely be expected to select an overall recommendation to the editor. SciencePG’s most common recommendation types are:</p> <div class="intro"> <div class="number_container"> <span class="number_container_span">1</span> </div> <div class="intro_info"> <p class="small_title">Accept without any changes</p> <p>This decision is reserved for exceptional manuscripts that demonstrate exemplary scholarship. The paper will be published in its original form.</p> </div> </div> <div class="intro"> <div class="number_container"> <span class="number_container_span">2</span> </div> <div class="intro_info"> <p class="small_title">Accept with minor revisions</p> <p>Most accepted papers fall under this category. The manuscript shows promise, but requires minor amendments to enhance clarity, context or polish. Authors are encouraged to address these revisions diligently, using reviewer comments as guidance.</p> </div> </div> <div class="intro"> <div class="number_container"> <span class="number_container_span">3</span> </div> <div class="intro_info"> <p class="small_title">Consider after major revisions</p> <p>This decision indicates that while the paper's central argument or findings are sound, significant revisions are necessary for publication. The author is required to address all the reviewer's comments carefully and provide a detailed response point by point.</p> </div> </div> <div class="intro"> <div class="number_container"> <span class="number_container_span">4</span> </div> <div class="intro_info"> <p class="small_title">Revise and resubmit</p> <p>In cases where a manuscript shows potential but requires substantial changes, this decision will be given. Once the authors have made the requisite changes, the manuscript will be reassessed in another round of review.</p> </div> </div> <div class="intro"> <div class="number_container"> <span class="number_container_span">5</span> </div> <div class="intro_info"> <p class="small_title">Reject the paper</p> <p>For manuscripts with considerable flaws or lack of original contribution, an outright rejection will be advised. Under such circumstances, the manuscript will not be reconsidered for publication, regardless of the revisions made.</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="color_bg" id="Ethics"> <div class="right_content"> <div class="second_title"> Peer Review Ethics <div class="back_to_top"><a href="#Back_to_top"><span class="top_icon"><i class="fas fa-arrow-up"></i></span><span class="back_font">Back to top</span></a></div> </div> <p class="normal_p">Ethical considerations are vital when conducting a review, and it is crucial to be aware of potential issues. Should you encounter any of the following situations, we advise contacting the journal editor immediately.</p> <div class="intro_normal"> <div class="blokc_p"> Potential Conflicts of Interest </div> <p class="normal_p">At SciencePG, we urge reviewers to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and communicate with the journal editorial office if there's uncertainty about what may constitute a conflict. Conflicts of interest might include but are not limited to:</p> <div class="dot_item"> <table class="basic_table_font"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Affiliation: Reviewers working at the same institution as any of the authors. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Academic Connection: Any academic interaction with the authors in the past three years, including co-authoring, collaboration, or joint grant holding. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Personal Relationship: Any close personal relationship, rivalry, or antipathy with any of the authors. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Financial Interest: Potential financial gain or loss from the publication of the manuscript. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <div class="normal_blue_dot"> <span></span> </div> </td> <td> Non-financial Conflicts: Other non-financial conflicts of interest (political, personal, religious, ideological, academic, intellectual, commercial or any other) with any of the authors. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p class="normal_p">Reviewers should openly disclose any conflicts that could be perceived as bias for or against the manuscript or the authors.</p> <p class="normal_p">Please note that having previously reviewed a manuscript for another journal is not considered a conflict of interest. In such a case, reviewers should inform the editorial office about any improvements compared to the previous version of the manuscript.</p> <p>Also, reviewers are encouraged to comment on authors' disclosed conflicts of interest. If there are concerns that authors may not have fully disclosed financial, institutional, commercial, personal, ideological, or academic interests, these should be indicated in the reviewer report.</p> </div> <div class="intro_normal"> <div class="blokc_p"> Declaration of Confidentiality </div> <p class="normal_p">SciencePG operates a rigorous peer review process that requires reviewers to uphold strict confidentiality. Until the manuscript is published, the content, including the abstract, should remain confidential. Reviewers should avoid revealing their identities to the authors, either through their comments or metadata in reports submitted in Microsoft Word or PDF format.</p> <p class="normal_p">Reviewers may consult with colleagues from their research group given the confidentiality of the manuscript is upheld. If a reviewer wishes to involve a colleague in the review process, they must first inform the SciencePG editorial office.</p> <p class="normal_p">If reviewers wish to disclose their identities, they can choose to do so by signing the review report. However, in all other instances, review reports are deemed confidential and will only be disclosed with the explicit permission of the reviewer.</p> <p>We urge all our reviewers to respect the confidentiality of the review process and treat manuscripts as confidential documents. It is against our policy to disclose any aspect of the review process or the manuscript to anyone who is not directly involved.</p> </div> <div class="intro_normal"> <div class="blokc_p"> Duplicate Publication or Submission </div> <p>If you suspect the manuscript has been previously published or concurrently submitted to another journal, please report this. Authors are obligated to disclose any prior publication or submission of their work for the editor's consideration, and proper attribution should be given if applicable.</p> </div> <div class="intro_normal"> <div class="blokc_p"> Plagiarism </div> <p>SciencePG takes instances of copyright infringement, plagiarism, or any other breaches of publication best practices very seriously. We strive to protect our authors' rights and always investigate claims of plagiarism or misuse of published works. Furthermore, we seek to maintain the reputation of our journals against any form of malpractice.</p> </div> <div class="intro_normal"> <div class="blokc_p"> Ethical Concerns in Research Conduct </div> <p>If you have concerns about the ethics of the research conducted, please raise them. Authors are responsible for declaring any potential conflicts of interest and acknowledging funding bodies that facilitated their research. It's also their responsibility to ensure that they have the necessary permissions for the use of any data or results sourced from others.</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> <script src="/information/js/siber-contente-position.min.js?v=20241017114704"></script> <div class="footer"> <div class="content clearfix"> <div class="foot_item" style="width:458px;"> <p class="foot_p"><a href="/about-sciencepg" target="_blank">About Us</a></p> <p class="foot_about"><a href="/about-sciencepg" target="_blank">Science Publishing Group (SciencePG) is an Open Access publisher, with more than 300 online, peer-reviewed journals covering a wide range of academic disciplines.</a></p> <p class="foot_more_link"><a href="/about-sciencepg" target="_blank" class="foot_about_more">Learn More About SciencePG <i class="fas fa-angle-right"></i></a></p> <div class="foot_logo"> <a href="/" target="_blank"><img src="/img/foot_logo.png"></a> </div> </div> <div class="foot_item"> <p class="foot_p">Products</p> <div class="foot_link"> <ul> <li> <a href="/journals/browse-by-subject" target="_blank">Journals</a> </li> <li> <a href="/special-issues/ongoing" target="_blank">Special Issues</a> </li> <li> <a href="/proceedings" target="_blank">Proceedings</a> </li> <li> <a href="/books" target="_blank">Books</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://www.academicevents.org" target="_blank">AcademicEvents</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://scholarprofiles.com/" target="_blank">ScholarProfiles</a> </li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="foot_item" style="margin-right: 40px;"> <p class="foot_p">Information</p> <div class="foot_link"> <ul> <li> <a href="/information/for-authors" target="_blank">For Authors</a> </li> <li> <a href="/information/for-reviewers" target="_blank">For Reviewers</a> </li> <li> <a href="/information/for-editors" target="_blank">For Editors</a> </li> <li> <a href="/information/for-conference-organizers" target="_blank">For Conference Organizers</a> </li> <li> <a href="/information/for-librarians" target="_blank">For Librarians</a> </li> <li> <a href="/information/article-processing-charges" target="_blank">Article Processing Charges</a> </li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="foot_item" style="margin-top:34px;"> <div class="foot_link"> <ul> <li> <a href="/special-issues/guidelines" target="_blank">Special Issues Guidelines</a> </li> <li> <a href="/information/editorial-process" target="_blank">Editorial Process</a> </li> <li> <a href="/information/peer-review-at-sciencepg" target="_blank">Peer Review at SciencePG</a> </li> <li> <a href="/information/open-access" target="_blank">Open Access</a> </li> <li> <a href="/information/ethical-guidelines" target="_blank">Ethical Guidelines</a> </li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="foot_item double_box"> <p class="foot_p">Important Link</p> <div class="foot_link"> <ul> <li> <a href="/submit-an-article" target="_blank">Manuscript Submission</a> </li> <li> <a href="/special-issues/propose" target="_blank">Propose a Special Issue</a> </li> <li> <a href="/join-the-editorial-board" target="_blank">Join the Editorial Board</a> </li> <li> <a href="/become-a-reviewer" target="_blank">Become a Reviewer</a> </li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="copyright">Copyright © 2012 -- 2024 Science Publishing Group – All rights reserved.</div> </body> </html>

CINXE.COM

Become a Reviewer:: International Journal of Education, Culture and Society:: Science Publishing Group