CINXE.COM
The Layer Refresh Request (LRR) RTCP Feedback Message
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rfc-editor-queue xmlns="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-editor-queue"> <section name="IETF STREAM: WORKING GROUP STANDARDS TRACK"> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtext-lrr"> <draft>draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-07.txt</draft> <date-received>2017-07-07</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9627</auth48-url> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Lennox, D. Hong, J. Uberti, S. Holmer, M. Flodman</authors> <title> The Layer Refresh Request (LRR) RTCP Feedback Message </title> <bytes>31966</bytes> <source>Audio/Video Transport Extensions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-payload-vp9"> <draft>draft-ietf-payload-vp9-16.txt</draft> <date-received>2021-06-10</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9628</auth48-url> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-avtext-lrr</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Uberti, S. Holmer, M. Flodman, D. Hong, J. Lennox</authors> <title> RTP Payload Format for VP9 Video </title> <bytes>57070</bytes> <source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location"> <draft>draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-19.txt</draft> <date-received>2022-03-07</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-planned-changes</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>B. Rosen, R. Marshall, J. Martin</authors> <title> A LoST extension to return complete and similar location info </title> <bytes>39222</bytes> <source>Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm"> <draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-29.txt</draft> <date-received>2022-05-16</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Kim, Ed., J. Jeong, Ed., J. Park, S. Hares, Q. Lin</authors> <title> I2NSF Network Security Function-Facing Interface YANG Data Model </title> <bytes>163771</bytes> <source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model"> <draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-32.txt</draft> <date-received>2022-05-16</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>S. Hares, Ed., J. Jeong, Ed., J. Kim, R. Moskowitz, Q. Lin</authors> <title> I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model </title> <bytes>144719</bytes> <source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model"> <draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-20.txt</draft> <date-received>2022-05-18</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Jeong, P. Lingga, S. Hares, L. Xia, H. Birkholz</authors> <title> I2NSF NSF Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model </title> <bytes>198846</bytes> <source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis"> <draft>draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-16.txt</draft> <date-received>2022-06-21</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>R. Bush, R. Austein</authors> <title> The Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) to Router Protocol, Version 2 </title> <bytes>88464</bytes> <source>SIDR Operations</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm"> <draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-26.txt</draft> <date-received>2023-05-10</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>S. Hyun, Ed., J. Jeong, Ed., T. Roh, S. Wi, J. Park</authors> <title> I2NSF Registration Interface YANG Data Model for NSF Capability Registration </title> <bytes>75991</bytes> <source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http"> <draft>draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http-15.txt</draft> <date-received>2023-05-17</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-teep-protocol</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>D. Thaler</authors> <title> HTTP Transport for Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning: Agent Initiated Communication </title> <bytes>32377</bytes> <source>Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm"> <draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-31.txt</draft> <date-received>2023-06-21</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Jeong, Ed., C. Chung, T. Ahn, R. Kumar, S. Hares</authors> <title> I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model </title> <bytes>148819</bytes> <source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd"> <draft>draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-26.txt</draft> <date-received>2023-07-07</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-rcd</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>C. Wendt, J. Peterson</authors> <title> PASSporT Extension for Rich Call Data </title> <bytes>84186</bytes> <source>Secure Telephone Identity Revisited</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-acme-integrations"> <draft>draft-ietf-acme-integrations-17.txt</draft> <date-received>2023-07-14</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>O. Friel, R. Barnes, R. Shekh-Yusef, M. Richardson</authors> <title> ACME Integrations for Device Certificate Enrollment </title> <bytes>60561</bytes> <source>Automated Certificate Management Environment</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df"> <draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-13.txt</draft> <date-received>2023-10-31</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Rabadan, Ed., S. Sathappan, W. Lin, J. Drake, A. Sajassi</authors> <title> Preference-based EVPN DF Election </title> <bytes>48692</bytes> <source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13"> <draft>draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-04.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-01-09</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>D. Dhody, S. Turner, R. Housley</authors> <title> Updates for PCEPS: TLS Connection Establishment Restrictions </title> <bytes>12769</bytes> <source>Path Computation Element</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netconf-over-tls13"> <draft>draft-ietf-netconf-over-tls13-04.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-01-19</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>S. Turner, R. Housley</authors> <title> Updates to Using the NETCONF Protocol over Transport Layer Security (TLS) with Mutual X.509 Authentication </title> <bytes>12530</bytes> <source>Network Configuration</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang"> <draft>draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-17.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-01-23</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Zhang, D. Dhody, K. Gao, R. Schott, Q. Ma</authors> <title> YANG Data Models for the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Protocol </title> <bytes>162150</bytes> <source>Application-Layer Traffic Optimization</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types"> <draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-18.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-02-23</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>H. Zheng, I. Busi</authors> <title> Common YANG Data Types for Layer 1 Networks </title> <bytes>104702</bytes> <source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease"> <draft>draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-08.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-04-04</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9664</auth48-url> <authors>S. Cheshire, T. Lemon</authors> <title> An EDNS(0) option to negotiate Leases on DNS Updates </title> <bytes>28715</bytes> <source>Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dnssd-srp"> <draft>draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-25.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-04-04</date-received> <state>AUTH48*R</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9665</auth48-url> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>T. Lemon, S. Cheshire</authors> <title> Service Registration Protocol for DNS-Based Service Discovery </title> <bytes>104475</bytes> <source>Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang"> <draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang-26.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-04-12</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>Y. Lee, K. Lee, H. Zheng, O. Dios, D. Ceccarelli</authors> <title> A YANG Data Model for L1 Connectivity Service Model (L1CSM) </title> <bytes>34233</bytes> <source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rift-rift"> <draft>draft-ietf-rift-rift-24.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-05-30</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9692</auth48-url> <authors>T. Przygienda, J. Head, A. Sharma, P. Thubert, B. Rijsman, D. Afanasiev</authors> <title> RIFT: Routing in Fat Trees </title> <bytes>443711</bytes> <source>Routing In Fat Trees</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang"> <draft>draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-29.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-06-24</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9731</auth48-url> <authors>Y. Lee, D. Dhody, D. Ceccarelli, I. Bryskin, B. Y. Yoon</authors> <title> A YANG Data Model for Virtual Network (VN) Operations </title> <bytes>105405</bytes> <source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rats-eat"> <draft>draft-ietf-rats-eat-31.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-07-08</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9711</auth48-url> <authors>L. Lundblade, G. Mandyam, J. O'Donoghue, C. Wallace</authors> <title> The Entity Attestation Token (EAT) </title> <bytes>209538</bytes> <source>Remote ATtestation ProcedureS</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>yes</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr"> <draft>draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-22.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-08-13</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9705</auth48-url> <authors>C. Ramachandran, T. Saad, D. Pacella</authors> <title> Refresh-interval Independent FRR Facility Protection </title> <bytes>65021</bytes> <source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rift-yang"> <draft>draft-ietf-rift-yang-17.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-08-19</date-received> <state>AUTH48*R</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9719</auth48-url> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-rift-rift</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>Z. Zhang, Y. Wei, S. Ma, X. Liu, B. Rijsman</authors> <title> YANG Data Model for Routing in Fat Trees (RIFT) </title> <bytes>115761</bytes> <source>Routing In Fat Trees</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-wish-whip"> <draft>draft-ietf-wish-whip-16.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-08-21</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9725</auth48-url> <authors>S. Murillo, A. Gouaillard</authors> <title> WebRTC-HTTP ingestion protocol (WHIP) </title> <bytes>76348</bytes> <source>WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls"> <draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-18.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-09-03</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9761</auth48-url> <authors>T. Reddy.K, D. Wing, B. Anderson</authors> <title> Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) (D)TLS Profiles for IoT Devices </title> <bytes>87975</bytes> <source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-3376bis"> <draft>draft-ietf-pim-3376bis-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-09-03</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9776</auth48-url> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-pim-3228bis</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>B. Haberman</authors> <title> Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 3 </title> <bytes>136718</bytes> <source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-3810bis"> <draft>draft-ietf-pim-3810bis-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-09-03</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9777</auth48-url> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-pim-3228bis</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>B. Haberman</authors> <title> Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6 </title> <bytes>172041</bytes> <source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpbis-compression-dictionary"> <draft>draft-ietf-httpbis-compression-dictionary-19.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-09-06</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>P. Meenan, Y. Weiss</authors> <title> Compression Dictionary Transport </title> <bytes>40758</bytes> <source>HTTP</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis"> <draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-09-13</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>T. Ito, C. Wilson, C. Bonnell, S. Turner</authors> <title> Updates to Lightweight OCSP Profile for High Volume Environments </title> <bytes>78402</bytes> <source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model"> <draft>draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-33.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-09-20</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9742</auth48-url> <authors>J. Clarke, Ed., M. Jethanandani, Ed., C. Wildes, Ed., K. Koushik, Ed.</authors> <title> A YANG Data Model for Syslog Configuration </title> <bytes>95885</bytes> <source>Network Modeling</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>yes</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update"> <draft>draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-14.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-09-30</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9758</auth48-url> <authors>R. Taylor, E. Birrane</authors> <title> Update to the ipn URI scheme </title> <bytes>69353</bytes> <source>Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-nfsv4-delstid"> <draft>draft-ietf-nfsv4-delstid-08.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-04</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9754</auth48-url> <authors>T. Haynes, T. Myklebust</authors> <title> Extending the Opening of Files in NFSv4.2 </title> <bytes>29670</bytes> <source>Network File System Version 4</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile"> <draft>draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-28.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-07</date-received> <state>RFC-EDITOR</state> <authors>D. Arnold, H. Gerstung</authors> <title> Enterprise Profile for the Precision Time Protocol With Mixed Multicast and Unicast messages </title> <bytes>35129</bytes> <source>Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag"> <draft>draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-08</date-received> <state>RFC-EDITOR</state> <authors>L. Colitti, J. Linkova, X. Ma, D. Lamparter</authors> <title> Signaling DHCPv6 Prefix per Client Availability to Hosts </title> <bytes>33262</bytes> <source>IPv6 Maintenance</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix"> <draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-14.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-16</date-received> <state>EDIT*A*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>M. Boucadair, T. Reddy.K</authors> <title> Export of UDP Options Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) </title> <bytes>27758</bytes> <source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata"> <draft>draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-13.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-16</date-received> <state>RFC-EDITOR</state> <authors>M.B. Jones, P. Hunt, A. Parecki</authors> <title> OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata </title> <bytes>70252</bytes> <source>Web Authorization Protocol</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-gnap-resource-servers"> <draft>draft-ietf-gnap-resource-servers-09.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-18</date-received> <state>RFC-EDITOR</state> <authors>J. Richer, F. Imbault</authors> <title> Grant Negotiation and Authorization Protocol Resource Server Connections </title> <bytes>94785</bytes> <source>Grant Negotiation and Authorization Protocol</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification"> <draft>draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification-09.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-18</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>M. Tiloca, F. Palombini, S. Echeverria, G. Lewis</authors> <title> Notification of Revoked Access Tokens in the Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE) Framework </title> <bytes>201141</bytes> <source>Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr"> <draft>draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-17.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-21</date-received> <state>RFC-EDITOR</state> <authors>R. Gandhi, C. Filsfils, D. Voyer, S. Salsano, M. Chen</authors> <title> Performance Measurement for Segment Routing Networks with MPLS Data Plane </title> <bytes>49954</bytes> <source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes"> <draft>draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-08.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-11-13</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>M. Lichvar, A. Malhotra</authors> <title> NTP Interleaved Modes </title> <bytes>36476</bytes> <source>Network Time Protocols</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-jmap-calendars"> <draft>draft-ietf-jmap-calendars-22.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-11-14</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>N. Jenkins, M. Douglass</authors> <title> JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Calendars </title> <bytes>122674</bytes> <source>JSON Mail Access Protocol</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rats-uccs"> <draft>draft-ietf-rats-uccs-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-11-18</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>H. Birkholz, J. O'Donoghue, N. Cam-Winget, C. Bormann</authors> <title> A CBOR Tag for Unprotected CWT Claims Sets </title> <bytes>42618</bytes> <source>Remote ATtestation ProcedureS</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rats-eat-media-type"> <draft>draft-ietf-rats-eat-media-type-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-11-18</date-received> <state>REF*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-rats-uccs</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>L. Lundblade, H. Birkholz, T. Fossati</authors> <title> EAT Media Types </title> <bytes>29835</bytes> <source>Remote ATtestation ProcedureS</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery"> <draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-11-20</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>P. Brissette, A. Sajassi, L. Burdet, J. Drake, J. Rabadan</authors> <title> Fast Recovery for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election </title> <bytes>36018</bytes> <source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang"> <draft>draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-20.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-11-21</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>H. Zheng, I. Busi, X. Liu, S. Belotti, O. Gonzalez de Dios</authors> <title> A YANG Data Model for Optical Transport Network Topology </title> <bytes>189048</bytes> <source>Common Control and Measurement Plane</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bier-php"> <draft>draft-ietf-bier-php-16.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-06</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-bier-idr-extensions</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-bier-lsr-non-mpls-extensions</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-bier-ospfv3-extensions</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>Z. Zhang</authors> <title> BIER Penultimate Hop Popping </title> <bytes>20564</bytes> <source>Bit Indexed Explicit Replication</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa"> <draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-13.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-11</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>P. Brissette, L. Burdet, B. Wen, E. Leyton, J. Rabadan</authors> <title> EVPN Port-Active Redundancy Mode </title> <bytes>29602</bytes> <source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment"> <draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-19.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-11</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>A. Sajassi, P. Brissette, R. Schell, J. Drake, J. Rabadan</authors> <title> EVPN Virtual Ethernet Segment </title> <bytes>56806</bytes> <source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-1stnibble"> <draft>draft-ietf-mpls-1stnibble-13.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-11</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>K. Kompella, S. Bryant, M. Bocci, G. Mirsky, L. Andersson, J. Dong</authors> <title> IANA Registry and Processing Recommendations for the First Nibble Following a Label Stack </title> <bytes>37740</bytes> <source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility"> <draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-21.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-11</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>N. Malhotra, A. Sajassi, A. Pattekar, J. Rabadan, A. Lingala, J. Drake</authors> <title> Extended Mobility Procedures for EVPN-IRB </title> <bytes>64586</bytes> <source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo"> <draft>draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-14.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-11</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9747</auth48-url> <authors>W. Cheng, R. Wang, X. Min, R. Rahman, R. Boddireddy</authors> <title> Unaffiliated Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Echo </title> <bytes>29261</bytes> <source>Bidirectional Forwarding Detection</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-x509-shbs"> <draft>draft-ietf-lamps-x509-shbs-13.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-12</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>D. Geest, K. Bashiri, S. Fluhrer, S. Gazdag, S. Kousidis</authors> <title> Use of the HSS and XMSS Hash-Based Signature Algorithms in Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure </title> <bytes>91406</bytes> <source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag"> <draft>draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag-03.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-19</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-snac-simple</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Hui</authors> <title> SNAC Router Flag in ICMPv6 Router Advertisement Messages </title> <bytes>8475</bytes> <source>IPv6 Maintenance</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bier-idr-extensions"> <draft>draft-ietf-bier-idr-extensions-19.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-19</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>X. Xu, M. Chen, K. Patel, I. Wijnands, T. Przygienda, Z. Zhang</authors> <title> BGP Extensions for BIER </title> <bytes>32000</bytes> <source>Bit Indexed Explicit Replication</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pals-ple"> <draft>draft-ietf-pals-ple-15.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-19</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>S. Gringeri, J. Whittaker, N. Leymann, C. Schmutzer, C. Brown</authors> <title> Private Line Emulation over Packet Switched Networks </title> <bytes>82888</bytes> <source>Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-httpapi-api-catalog"> <draft>draft-ietf-httpapi-api-catalog-08.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-20</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>K. Smith</authors> <title> api-catalog: a well-known URI and link relation to help discovery of APIs </title> <bytes>38121</bytes> <source>Building Blocks for HTTP APIs</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-cert-binding-for-multi-auth"> <draft>draft-ietf-lamps-cert-binding-for-multi-auth-06.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-09</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>A. Becker, R. Guthrie, M. Jenkins</authors> <title> Related Certificates for Use in Multiple Authentications within a Protocol </title> <bytes>31899</bytes> <source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection"> <draft>draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection-25.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-09</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>D. Gillmor, B. Hoeneisen, A. Melnikov</authors> <title> Header Protection for Cryptographically Protected E-mail </title> <bytes>684354</bytes> <source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis"> <draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis-10.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-09</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>H. Brockhaus, D. von Oheimb, M. Ounsworth, J. Gray</authors> <title> Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- HTTP Transfer for the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) </title> <bytes>29509</bytes> <source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor"> <draft>draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-13.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-09</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9752</auth48-url> <authors>C. Li, H. Zheng, S. Sivabalan, S. Sidor, Z. Ali</authors> <title> Conveying Vendor-Specific Information in the Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions for Stateful PCE. </title> <bytes>25379</bytes> <source>Path Computation Element</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional"> <draft>draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-13.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-09</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9753</auth48-url> <authors>C. Li, H. Zheng, S. Litkowski</authors> <title> Extension for Stateful PCE to allow Optional Processing of PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Objects </title> <bytes>26918</bytes> <source>Path Computation Element</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl"> <draft>draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-18.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-13</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>G. Brown</authors> <title> Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) mapping for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL) values </title> <bytes>56064</bytes> <source>Registration Protocols Extensions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-cms-sphincs-plus"> <draft>draft-ietf-lamps-cms-sphincs-plus-19.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-13</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>R. Housley, S. Fluhrer, P. Kampanakis, B. Westerbaan</authors> <title> Use of the SLH-DSA Signature Algorithm in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) </title> <bytes>40009</bytes> <source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-acme-onion"> <draft>draft-ietf-acme-onion-07.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-15</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>Q. Misell</authors> <title> Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Extensions for ".onion" Special-Use Domain Names </title> <bytes>44094</bytes> <source>Automated Certificate Management Environment</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher"> <draft>draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-16.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-16</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>T. Werner, M. Richardson</authors> <title> JWS signed Voucher Artifacts for Bootstrapping Protocols </title> <bytes>38945</bytes> <source>Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-cdni-capacity-insights-extensions"> <draft>draft-ietf-cdni-capacity-insights-extensions-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-23</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>A. Ryan, B. Rosenblum, N. Sopher</authors> <title> CDNI Capacity Capability Advertisement Extensions </title> <bytes>32309</bytes> <source>Content Delivery Networks Interconnection</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf"> <draft>draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-51.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-24</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>K. Patel, A. Lindem, S. Zandi, W. Henderickx</authors> <title> BGP Link-State Shortest Path First (SPF) Routing </title> <bytes>99707</bytes> <source>Link State Vector Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang"> <draft>draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-30.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-29</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>D. Dhody, V. Beeram, J. Hardwick, J. Tantsura</authors> <title> A YANG Data Model for Path Computation Element Communications Protocol (PCEP) </title> <bytes>266952</bytes> <source>Path Computation Element</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis"> <draft>draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis-18.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-30</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>H. Brockhaus, D. von Oheimb, M. Ounsworth, J. Gray</authors> <title> Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) </title> <bytes>319299</bytes> <source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue"> <draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-14.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-06</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>M. Boucadair, R. Roberts, S. Barguil Giraldo, O. Gonzalez de Dios</authors> <title> A YANG Data Model for Augmenting VPN Service and Network Models with Attachment Circuits </title> <bytes>68305</bytes> <source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit"> <draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-16.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-06</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>M. Boucadair, R. Roberts, O. Gonzalez de Dios, S. Barguil Giraldo, B. Wu</authors> <title> A Network YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits </title> <bytes>249482</bytes> <source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit"> <draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-20.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-06</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>M. Boucadair, R. Roberts, O. Gonzalez de Dios, S. Barguil Giraldo, B. Wu</authors> <title> YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS) </title> <bytes>335115</bytes> <source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression"> <draft>draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-23.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-06</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>W. Cheng, C. Filsfils, Z. Li, B. Decraene, F. Clad</authors> <title> Compressed SRv6 Segment List Encoding (CSID) </title> <bytes>171295</bytes> <source>Source Packet Routing in Networking</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn"> <draft>draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn-05.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-06</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>V. Smyslov</authors> <title> Renaming Extended Sequence Number (ESN) Transform Type in the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) </title> <bytes>19539</bytes> <source>IP Security Maintenance and Extensions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac"> <draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-15.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-07</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>M. Boucadair, R. Roberts, O. Gonzalez de Dios, S. Barguil Giraldo, B. Wu</authors> <title> A Common YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits </title> <bytes>124731</bytes> <source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi"> <draft>draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-13.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-07</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>S. Previdi, C. Filsfils, K. Talaulikar, P. Mattes, D. Jain</authors> <title> Advertising Segment Routing Policies in BGP </title> <bytes>89953</bytes> <source>Inter-Domain Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-nfsv4-layoutwcc"> <draft>draft-ietf-nfsv4-layoutwcc-07.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-10</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-nfsv4-delstid</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>T. Haynes, T. Myklebust</authors> <title> Add LAYOUT_WCC to NFSv4.2's Flex File Layout Type </title> <bytes>27690</bytes> <source>Network File System Version 4</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2"> <draft>draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-22.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-12</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>V. Smyslov, B. Weis</authors> <title> Group Key Management using IKEv2 </title> <bytes>182048</bytes> <source>IP Security Maintenance and Extensions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap"> <draft>draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-15.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-12</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>R. Marin-Lopez, D. Garcia-Carrillo</authors> <title> EAP-based Authentication Service for CoAP </title> <bytes>97946</bytes> <source>Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con"> <draft>draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-22.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-18</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>S. Hegde, W. Britto A J, R. Shetty, B. Decraene, P. Psenak, T. Li</authors> <title> IGP Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints </title> <bytes>85977</bytes> <source>Link State Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source"> <draft>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source-15.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-18</date-received> <state>EDIT*A</state> <authors>J. Rabadan, J. Kotalwar, S. Sathappan, Z. Zhang, W. Lin</authors> <title> Multicast Source Redundancy in EVPN Networks </title> <bytes>85274</bytes> <source>BGP Enabled ServiceS</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets"> <draft>draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-16.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-18</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>J. Haas, A. Fu</authors> <title> BFD Encapsulated in Large Packets </title> <bytes>32356</bytes> <source>Bidirectional Forwarding Detection</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd"> <draft>draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd-11.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-20</date-received> <state>EDIT*A</state> <authors>G. Mirsky, G. Mishra, D. Eastlake 3rd</authors> <title> Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multipoint Networks over Point-to-Multi-Point MPLS Label Switched Path (LSP) </title> <bytes>29907</bytes> <source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags"> <draft>draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-29.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-21</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>A. Lindem, Ed., P. Psenak, Y. Qu</authors> <title> Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Prefix Administrative Tags </title> <bytes>43571</bytes> <source>Link State Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-suit-manifest"> <draft>draft-ietf-suit-manifest-33.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-25</date-received> <state>MISSREF*A*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-mti</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-report</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-trust-domains</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-update-management</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>B. Moran, H. Tschofenig, H. Birkholz, K. Zandberg, 脴. R酶nningstad</authors> <title> A Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)-based Serialization Format for the Software Updates for Internet of Things (SUIT) Manifest </title> <bytes>224760</bytes> <source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-suit-mud"> <draft>draft-ietf-suit-mud-09.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-25</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(2G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-suit-manifest</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>B. Moran, H. Tschofenig</authors> <title> Strong Assertions of IoT Network Access Requirements </title> <bytes>24667</bytes> <source>Software Updates for Internet of Things</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa"> <draft>draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-21.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-26</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>A. Bashandy, S. Litkowski, C. Filsfils, P. Francois, B. Decraene, D. Voyer</authors> <title> Topology Independent Fast Reroute using Segment Routing </title> <bytes>65340</bytes> <source>Routing Area Working Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-acme-ari"> <draft>draft-ietf-acme-ari-08.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-27</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>A. Gable</authors> <title> Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Renewal Information (ARI) Extension </title> <bytes>29449</bytes> <source>Automated Certificate Management Environment</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence"> <draft>draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-07.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-27</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>S. Huque, C. Elmerot, O. Gudmundsson</authors> <title> Compact Denial of Existence in DNSSEC </title> <bytes>37384</bytes> <source>Domain Name System Operations</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color"> <draft>draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-03</date-received> <state>MISSREF*A*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>B. Rajagopalan, V. Beeram, S. Peng, M. Koldychev, G. Mishra</authors> <title> Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Extension for Color </title> <bytes>25742</bytes> <source>Path Computation Element</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl"> <draft>draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-20.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-03</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>C. Perkins, S.V.R Anand, S. Anamalamudi, B. Liu</authors> <title> Supporting Asymmetric Links in Low Power Networks: AODV-RPL </title> <bytes>106419</bytes> <source>Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam"> <draft>draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-16.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-04</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>G. Mirsky, S. Boutros, D. Black, S. Pallagatti</authors> <title> Active OAM for use in Geneve </title> <bytes>25841</bytes> <source>Network Virtualization Overlays</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy"> <draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-17.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-06</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>S. Previdi, K. Talaulikar, Ed., J. Dong, H. Gredler, J. Tantsura</authors> <title> Advertisement of Segment Routing Policies using BGP Link-State </title> <bytes>134924</bytes> <source>Inter-Domain Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set"> <draft>draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-18.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-07</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>W. Kumari, K. Sriram, L. Hannachi, J. Haas</authors> <title> Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP </title> <bytes>32575</bytes> <source>Inter-Domain Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-roll-rnfd"> <draft>draft-ietf-roll-rnfd-07.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-11</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>K. Iwanicki</authors> <title> RNFD: Fast border router crash detection in RPL </title> <bytes>65707</bytes> <source>Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection"> <draft>draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-40.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-11</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-raw-architecture</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>P. Thubert, Ed., R. Arvind Jadhav, M. Richardson</authors> <title> Root-initiated Routing State in RPL </title> <bytes>223311</bytes> <source>Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify"> <draft>draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-09.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-17</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>J. Stenstam, P. Thomassen, J. Levine</authors> <title> Generalized DNS Notifications </title> <bytes>45048</bytes> <source>Domain Name System Operations</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options"> <draft>draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-45.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-17</date-received> <state>EDIT*A*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Touch, C. M. Heard, Ed.</authors> <title> Transport Options for UDP </title> <bytes>133936</bytes> <source>Transport and Services Working Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn"> <draft>draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-34.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-17</date-received> <state>EDIT*A</state> <authors>B. Briscoe, M. K眉hlewind, R. Scheffenegger</authors> <title> More Accurate Explicit Congestion Notification (AccECN) Feedback in TCP </title> <bytes>189125</bytes> <source>TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-asdf-sdf"> <draft>draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-23.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-17</date-received> <state>EDIT*A</state> <authors>M. Koster, Ed., C. Bormann, Ed., A. Ker盲nen</authors> <title> Semantic Definition Format (SDF) for Data and Interactions of Things </title> <bytes>214087</bytes> <source>A Semantic Definition Format for Data and Interactions of Things</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting"> <draft>draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-32.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-18</date-received> <state>MISSREF*A*R(2G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>A. Brotman</authors> <title> Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) Aggregate Reporting </title> <bytes>86645</bytes> <source>Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis"> <draft>draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-40.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-18</date-received> <state>MISSREF*A*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>T. Herr, J. Levine</authors> <title> Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) </title> <bytes>203581</bytes> <source>Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis"> <draft>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-42.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-18</date-received> <state>MISSREF*A*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-emailcore-as</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Klensin</authors> <title> Simple Mail Transfer Protocol </title> <bytes>309481</bytes> <source>Revision of core Email specifications</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis"> <draft>draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-18</date-received> <state>EDIT*A</state> <authors>P. Resnick, Ed.</authors> <title> Internet Message Format </title> <bytes>133284</bytes> <source>Revision of core Email specifications</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud"> <draft>draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-15.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-20</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>G. Fairhurst, T. Jones</authors> <title> Datagram PLPMTUD for UDP Options </title> <bytes>40560</bytes> <source>Transport and Services Working Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> </section> <section name="IETF STREAM: NON-WORKING GROUP STANDARDS TRACK"> </section> <section name="IETF STREAM: WORKING GROUP INFORMATIONAL/EXPERIMENTAL/BCP"> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability"> <draft>draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability-18.txt</draft> <date-received>2019-12-16</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>J. Jeong, S. Hyun, T. Ahn, S. Hares, D. Lopez</authors> <title> Applicability of Interfaces to Network Security Functions to Network-Based Security Services </title> <bytes>69045</bytes> <source>Interface to Network Security Functions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking"> <draft>draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-03-11</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9626</auth48-url> <authors>M. Zanaty, E. Berger, S. Nandakumar</authors> <title> Video Frame Marking RTP Header Extension </title> <bytes>37126</bytes> <source>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>yes</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance"> <draft>draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-17.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-03-18</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>D. Gillmor, B. Hoeneisen, A. Melnikov</authors> <title> Guidance on End-to-End E-mail Security </title> <bytes>153257</bytes> <source>Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn"> <draft>draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-20.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-06-13</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9732</auth48-url> <authors>J. Dong, S. Bryant, Z. Li, T. Miyasaka, Y. Lee</authors> <title> A Framework for Network Resource Partition (NRP) based Enhanced Virtual Private Networks </title> <bytes>108300</bytes> <source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-rift-applicability"> <draft>draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-06-17</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9696</auth48-url> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-rift-rift</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>Y. Wei, Z. Zhang, D. Afanasiev, P. Thubert, T. Przygienda</authors> <title> RIFT Applicability and Operational Considerations </title> <bytes>89338</bytes> <source>Routing In Fat Trees</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing"> <draft>draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-10.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-08-28</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-teas-yang-te</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>D. King, J. Drake, H. Zheng, A. Farrel</authors> <title> Applicability of Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN) to IETF Network Slicing </title> <bytes>54774</bytes> <source>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mls-architecture"> <draft>draft-ietf-mls-architecture-15.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-08-28</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9750</auth48-url> <authors>B. Beurdouche, E. Rescorla, E. Omara, S. Inguva, A. Duric</authors> <title> The Messaging Layer Security (MLS) Architecture </title> <bytes>122791</bytes> <source>Messaging Layer Security</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-3228bis"> <draft>draft-ietf-pim-3228bis-07.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-09-03</date-received> <state>AUTH48-DONE*R</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9778</auth48-url> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-pim-3376bis</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-pim-3810bis</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>B. Haberman</authors> <title> IANA Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocols </title> <bytes>12960</bytes> <source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases"> <draft>draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases-15.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-09-30</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>T. Saad, K. Makhijani, H. Song, G. Mirsky</authors> <title> Use Cases for MPLS Network Action Indicators and MPLS Ancillary Data </title> <bytes>31887</bytes> <source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations"> <draft>draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-19.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-04</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9726</auth48-url> <authors>M. Richardson, W. Pan</authors> <title> Operational Considerations for Use of DNS in Internet of Things (IoT) Devices </title> <bytes>47880</bytes> <source>Operations and Management Area Working Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-radext-radiusv11"> <draft>draft-ietf-radext-radiusv11-11.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-18</date-received> <state>RFC-EDITOR</state> <authors>A. DeKok</authors> <title> RADIUS/1.1, Leveraging ALPN to remove MD5 </title> <bytes>95764</bytes> <source>RADIUS EXTensions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-madinas-use-cases"> <draft>draft-ietf-madinas-use-cases-19.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-20</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>J. Henry, Y. Lee</authors> <title> Randomized and Changing MAC Address: Context, Network Impacts, and Use Cases </title> <bytes>57388</bytes> <source>MAC Address Device Identification for Network and Application Services</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk"> <draft>draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk-15.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-12-30</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>L. Andersson, S. Bryant, M. Bocci, T. Li</authors> <title> MPLS Network Actions (MNA) Framework </title> <bytes>53253</bytes> <source>Multiprotocol Label Switching</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pquip-pqt-hybrid-terminology"> <draft>draft-ietf-pquip-pqt-hybrid-terminology-06.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-09</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>F. Driscoll, M. Parsons, B. Hale</authors> <title> Terminology for Post-Quantum Traditional Hybrid Schemes </title> <bytes>45066</bytes> <source>Post-Quantum Use In Protocols</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-radext-tls-psk"> <draft>draft-ietf-radext-tls-psk-12.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-22</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>A. DeKok</authors> <title> Operational Considerations for RADIUS and TLS-PSK </title> <bytes>58465</bytes> <source>RADIUS EXTensions</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability"> <draft>draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-22.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-24</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>K. Patel, A. Lindem, S. Zandi, G. Dawra, J. Dong</authors> <title> Usage and Applicability of BGP Link-State Shortest Path Routing (BGP-SPF) in Data Centers </title> <bytes>32276</bytes> <source>Link State Vector Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext"> <draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext-08.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-20</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>K. Talaulikar, C. Filsfils, S. Previdi, P. Mattes, D. Jain</authors> <title> Segment Routing Segment Types Extensions for BGP SR Policy </title> <bytes>37777</bytes> <source>Inter-Domain Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-cpr"> <draft>draft-ietf-idr-cpr-08.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-25</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>H. Wang, J. Dong, K. Talaulikar, h. Talaulikar, R. Chen</authors> <title> BGP Colored Prefix Routing (CPR) for SRv6 based Services </title> <bytes>34373</bytes> <source>Inter-Domain Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct"> <draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-39.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-03</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>K. Vairavakkalai, Ed., N. Venkataraman, Ed.</authors> <title> BGP Classful Transport Planes </title> <bytes>175733</bytes> <source>Inter-Domain Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions-lisp"> <draft>draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions-lisp-09.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-05</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>V. Govindan, S. Venaas</authors> <title> PIM Join/Prune Attributes for LISP Environments using Underlay Multicast </title> <bytes>13525</bytes> <source>Protocols for IP Multicast</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car"> <draft>draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-16.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-03-10</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>D. Rao, Ed., S. Agrawal, Ed.</authors> <title> BGP Color-Aware Routing (CAR) </title> <bytes>203878</bytes> <source>Inter-Domain Routing</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> </section> <section name="IETF STREAM: NON-WORKING GROUP INFORMATIONAL/EXPERIMENTAL/BCP"> <entry xml:id="draft-rivest-sexp"> <draft>draft-rivest-sexp-13.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-13</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>R. Rivest, D. Eastlake 3rd</authors> <title> Simple Public Key Infrastructure (SPKI) S-Expressions </title> <bytes>52293</bytes> <source>IETF - NON WORKING GROUP</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format"> <draft>draft-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format-15.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-10</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>J. Alakuijala, T. Duong, E. Kliuchnikov, Z. Szabadka, L. Vandevenne</authors> <title> Shared Brotli Compressed Data Format </title> <bytes>52777</bytes> <source>IETF - NON WORKING GROUP</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> </section> <section name="IAB STREAM"> </section> <section name="IRTF STREAM"> <entry xml:id="draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-properties"> <draft>draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-properties-09.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-31</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>A. Bozhko</authors> <title> Properties of AEAD Algorithms </title> <bytes>62975</bytes> <source>Crypto Forum Research Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque"> <draft>draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque-18.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-01-14</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>D. Bourdrez, H. Krawczyk, K. Lewi, C. A. Wood</authors> <title> The OPAQUE Augmented PAKE Protocol </title> <bytes>167987</bytes> <source>Crypto Forum Research Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-irtf-coinrg-use-cases"> <draft>draft-irtf-coinrg-use-cases-07.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-21</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>I. Kunze, K. Wehrle, D. Trossen, M.-J. Montpetit, X. de Foy, D. Griffin, M. Rio</authors> <title> Use Cases for In-Network Computing </title> <bytes>120721</bytes> <source>Computing in the Network Research Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-irtf-iccrg-rledbat"> <draft>draft-irtf-iccrg-rledbat-10.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-21</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>M. Bagnulo, A. Garcia-Martinez, G. Montenegro, P. Balasubramanian</authors> <title> rLEDBAT: receiver-driven Low Extra Delay Background Transport for TCP </title> <bytes>49837</bytes> <source>Internet Congestion Control Research Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm-sets"> <draft>draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm-sets-19.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-21</date-received> <state>EDIT*A</state> <authors>S. Fluhrer, Q. Dang</authors> <title> Additional Parameter sets for HSS/LMS Hash-Based Signatures </title> <bytes>57515</bytes> <source>Crypto Forum Research Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve"> <draft>draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve-17.txt</draft> <date-received>2025-02-23</date-received> <state>EDIT</state> <authors>B. Viguier, D. Wong, Ed., G. Assche, Ed., Q. Dang, Ed., J. Daemen, Ed.</authors> <title> KangarooTwelve and TurboSHAKE </title> <bytes>58544</bytes> <source>Crypto Forum Research Group</source> <consensus>yes</consensus> </entry> </section> <section name="INDEPENDENT SUBMISSIONS"> <entry xml:id="draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection"> <draft>draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection-07.txt</draft> <date-received>2022-05-11</date-received> <state>MISSREF*R(1G)</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb</ref-name> <ref-state>NOT-RECEIVED</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>B. Briscoe, Ed., G. White</authors> <title> The DOCSIS(r) Queue Protection Algorithm to Preserve Low Latency </title> <bytes>73799</bytes> <source>INDEPENDENT</source> <consensus>N/A</consensus> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-spinosa-urn-lex"> <draft>draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-05-15</date-received> <state>AUTH48</state> <auth48-url>https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9676</auth48-url> <authors>P. Spinosa, E. Francesconi, C. Lupo</authors> <title> A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Sources of Law (LEX) </title> <bytes>112565</bytes> <source>INDEPENDENT</source> <consensus>N/A</consensus> <awaiting_ad_approval>no</awaiting_ad_approval> </entry> <entry xml:id="draft-tschofenig-rats-psa-token"> <draft>draft-tschofenig-rats-psa-token-24.txt</draft> <date-received>2024-10-31</date-received> <state>EDIT*R</state> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-rats-eat</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <normRef> <ref-name>draft-ietf-rats-eat-media-type</ref-name> <ref-state>IN-QUEUE</ref-state> </normRef> <authors>H. Tschofenig, S. Frost, M. Brossard, A. Shaw, T. Fossati</authors> <title> Arm's Platform Security Architecture (PSA) Attestation Token </title> <bytes>83778</bytes> <source>INDEPENDENT</source> <consensus>N/A</consensus> </entry> </section> </rfc-editor-queue>