<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <article key="pdf/717" mdate="2007-12-23 00:00:00"> <author>Mahesh Pal</author> <title>Ensemble Learning with Decision Tree for Remote Sensing Classification</title> <pages>3852 - 3854</pages> <year>2007</year> <volume>1</volume> <number>12</number> <journal>International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering</journal> <ee>https://publications.waset.org/pdf/717</ee> <url>https://publications.waset.org/vol/12</url> <publisher>World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology</publisher> <abstract>In recent years, a number of works proposing the combination of multiple classifiers to produce a single classification have been reported in remote sensing literature. The resulting classifier, referred to as an ensemble classifier, is generally found to be more accurate than any of the individual classifiers making up the ensemble. As accuracy is the primary concern, much of the research in the field of land cover classification is focused on improving classification accuracy. This study compares the performance of four ensemble approaches (boosting, bagging, DECORATE and random subspace) with a univariate decision tree as base classifier. Two training datasets, one without ant noise and other with 20 percent noise was used to judge the performance of different ensemble approaches. Results with noise free data set suggest an improvement of about 4 in classification accuracy with all ensemble approaches in comparison to the results provided by univariate decision tree classifier. Highest classification accuracy of 87.43 was achieved by boosted decision tree. A comparison of results with noisy data set suggests that bagging, DECORATE and random subspace approaches works well with this data whereas the performance of boosted decision tree degrades and a classification accuracy of 79.7 is achieved which is even lower than that is achieved (i.e. 80.02) by using unboosted decision tree classifier.</abstract> <index>Open Science Index 12, 2007</index> </article>