CINXE.COM
PEP 638 – Syntactic Macros | peps.python.org
<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> <meta name="color-scheme" content="light dark"> <title>PEP 638 – Syntactic Macros | peps.python.org</title> <link rel="shortcut icon" href="../_static/py.png"> <link rel="canonical" href="https://peps.python.org/pep-0638/"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="../_static/style.css" type="text/css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="../_static/mq.css" type="text/css"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="../_static/pygments.css" type="text/css" media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" id="pyg-light"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="../_static/pygments_dark.css" type="text/css" media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" id="pyg-dark"> <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Latest PEPs" href="https://peps.python.org/peps.rss"> <meta property="og:title" content='PEP 638 – Syntactic Macros | peps.python.org'> <meta property="og:description" content="This PEP adds support for syntactic macros to Python. A macro is a compile-time function that transforms a part of the program to allow functionality that cannot be expressed cleanly in normal library code."> <meta property="og:type" content="website"> <meta property="og:url" content="https://peps.python.org/pep-0638/"> <meta property="og:site_name" content="Python Enhancement Proposals (PEPs)"> <meta property="og:image" content="https://peps.python.org/_static/og-image.png"> <meta property="og:image:alt" content="Python PEPs"> <meta property="og:image:width" content="200"> <meta property="og:image:height" content="200"> <meta name="description" content="This PEP adds support for syntactic macros to Python. A macro is a compile-time function that transforms a part of the program to allow functionality that cannot be expressed cleanly in normal library code."> <meta name="theme-color" content="#3776ab"> </head> <body> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"> <symbol id="svg-sun-half" viewBox="0 0 24 24" pointer-events="all"> <title>Following system colour scheme</title> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"> <circle cx="12" cy="12" r="9"></circle> <path d="M12 3v18m0-12l4.65-4.65M12 14.3l7.37-7.37M12 19.6l8.85-8.85"></path> </svg> </symbol> <symbol id="svg-moon" viewBox="0 0 24 24" pointer-events="all"> <title>Selected dark colour scheme</title> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"> <path stroke="none" d="M0 0h24v24H0z" fill="none"></path> <path d="M12 3c.132 0 .263 0 .393 0a7.5 7.5 0 0 0 7.92 12.446a9 9 0 1 1 -8.313 -12.454z"></path> </svg> </symbol> <symbol id="svg-sun" viewBox="0 0 24 24" pointer-events="all"> <title>Selected light colour scheme</title> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"> <circle cx="12" cy="12" r="5"></circle> <line x1="12" y1="1" x2="12" y2="3"></line> <line x1="12" y1="21" x2="12" y2="23"></line> <line x1="4.22" y1="4.22" x2="5.64" y2="5.64"></line> <line x1="18.36" y1="18.36" x2="19.78" y2="19.78"></line> <line x1="1" y1="12" x2="3" y2="12"></line> <line x1="21" y1="12" x2="23" y2="12"></line> <line x1="4.22" y1="19.78" x2="5.64" y2="18.36"></line> <line x1="18.36" y1="5.64" x2="19.78" y2="4.22"></line> </svg> </symbol> </svg> <script> document.documentElement.dataset.colour_scheme = localStorage.getItem("colour_scheme") || "auto" </script> <section id="pep-page-section"> <header> <h1>Python Enhancement Proposals</h1> <ul class="breadcrumbs"> <li><a href="https://www.python.org/" title="The Python Programming Language">Python</a> » </li> <li><a href="../pep-0000/">PEP Index</a> » </li> <li>PEP 638</li> </ul> <button id="colour-scheme-cycler" onClick="setColourScheme(nextColourScheme())"> <svg aria-hidden="true" class="colour-scheme-icon-when-auto"><use href="#svg-sun-half"></use></svg> <svg aria-hidden="true" class="colour-scheme-icon-when-dark"><use href="#svg-moon"></use></svg> <svg aria-hidden="true" class="colour-scheme-icon-when-light"><use href="#svg-sun"></use></svg> <span class="visually-hidden">Toggle light / dark / auto colour theme</span> </button> </header> <article> <section id="pep-content"> <h1 class="page-title">PEP 638 – Syntactic Macros</h1> <dl class="rfc2822 field-list simple"> <dt class="field-odd">Author<span class="colon">:</span></dt> <dd class="field-odd">Mark Shannon <mark at hotpy.org></dd> <dt class="field-even">Discussions-To<span class="colon">:</span></dt> <dd class="field-even"><a class="reference external" href="https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/U4C4XHNRC4SHS3TPZWCTY4SN4QU3TT6V/">Python-Dev thread</a></dd> <dt class="field-odd">Status<span class="colon">:</span></dt> <dd class="field-odd"><abbr title="Proposal under active discussion and revision">Draft</abbr></dd> <dt class="field-even">Type<span class="colon">:</span></dt> <dd class="field-even"><abbr title="Normative PEP with a new feature for Python, implementation change for CPython or interoperability standard for the ecosystem">Standards Track</abbr></dd> <dt class="field-odd">Created<span class="colon">:</span></dt> <dd class="field-odd">24-Sep-2020</dd> <dt class="field-even">Post-History<span class="colon">:</span></dt> <dd class="field-even">26-Sep-2020</dd> </dl> <hr class="docutils" /> <section id="contents"> <details><summary>Table of Contents</summary><ul class="simple"> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#abstract">Abstract</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#motivation">Motivation</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#improving-the-expressiveness-of-libraries-for-specific-domains">Improving the expressiveness of libraries for specific domains</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#trialing-new-language-features">Trialing new language features</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#long-term-stability-for-the-bytecode-interpreter">Long term stability for the bytecode interpreter</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#rationale">Rationale</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#specification">Specification</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#syntax">Syntax</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#lexical-analysis">Lexical analysis</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#statement-form">Statement form</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#expression-form">Expression form</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#resolving-ambiguity">Resolving ambiguity</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#semantics">Semantics</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#compilation">Compilation</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#defining-macro-processors">Defining macro processors</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#ast-extensions">AST extensions</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#hygiene-and-debugging">Hygiene and debugging</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#examples">Examples</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#compile-time-checked-data-structures">Compile-time-checked data structures</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#domain-specific-extensions">Domain-specific extensions</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#compilers">Compilers</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#matching-symbolic-expressions">Matching symbolic expressions</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#zero-cost-markers-and-annotations">Zero-cost markers and annotations</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#prototyping-language-extensions">Prototyping language extensions</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#f-strings">f-strings:</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#try-finally-statement">Try finally statement:</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#with-statement">With statement:</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#macro-definition-macros">Macro definition macros</a></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#backwards-compatibility">Backwards Compatibility</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#performance-implications">Performance Implications</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#implementation">Implementation</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#reference-implementation">Reference Implementation</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#copyright">Copyright</a></li> </ul> </details></section> <section id="abstract"> <h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#abstract" role="doc-backlink">Abstract</a></h2> <p>This PEP adds support for syntactic macros to Python. A macro is a compile-time function that transforms a part of the program to allow functionality that cannot be expressed cleanly in normal library code.</p> <p>The term “syntactic” means that this sort of macro operates on the program’s syntax tree. This reduces the chance of mistranslation that can happen with text-based substitution macros, and allows the implementation of <a class="reference external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hygienic_macro">hygienic macros</a>.</p> <p>Syntactic macros allow libraries to modify the abstract syntax tree during compilation, providing the ability to extend the language for specific domains without adding to complexity to the language as a whole.</p> </section> <section id="motivation"> <h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#motivation" role="doc-backlink">Motivation</a></h2> <p>New language features can be controversial, disruptive and sometimes divisive. Python is now sufficiently powerful and complex, that many proposed additions are a net loss for the language due to the additional complexity.</p> <p>Although a language change may make certain patterns easy to express, it will have a cost. Each new feature makes the language larger, harder to learn and harder to understand. Python was once described as <a class="reference external" href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4731">Python Fits Your Brain</a>, but that becomes less and less true as more and more features are added.</p> <p>Because of the high cost of adding a new feature, it is very difficult or impossible to add a feature that would benefit only some users, regardless of how many users, or how beneficial that feature would be to them.</p> <p>The use of Python in data science and machine learning has grown very rapidly over the last few years. However, most of the core developers of Python do not have a background in data science or machine learning. This makes it extremely difficult for the core developers to determine whether a language extension for machine learning is worthwhile.</p> <p>By allowing language extensions to be modular and distributable, like libraries, domain-specific extensions can be implemented without negatively impacting users outside of that domain. A web developer is likely to want a very different set of extensions from a data scientist. We need to let the community develop their own extensions.</p> <p>Without some form of user-defined language extensions, there will be a constant battle between those wanting to keep the language compact and fitting their brains, and those wanting a new feature that suits their domain or programming style.</p> <section id="improving-the-expressiveness-of-libraries-for-specific-domains"> <h3><a class="toc-backref" href="#improving-the-expressiveness-of-libraries-for-specific-domains" role="doc-backlink">Improving the expressiveness of libraries for specific domains</a></h3> <p>Many domains see repeated patterns that are difficult or impossible to express as a library. Macros can express those patterns in a more concise and less error-prone way.</p> </section> <section id="trialing-new-language-features"> <h3><a class="toc-backref" href="#trialing-new-language-features" role="doc-backlink">Trialing new language features</a></h3> <p>It is possible to demonstrate potential language extensions using macros. For example, macros would have enabled the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">with</span></code> statement and <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">yield</span> <span class="pre">from</span></code> expression to have been trialed. Doing so might well have lead to a higher quality implementation at first release, by allowing more testing before those features were included in the language.</p> <p>It is nearly impossible to make sure that a new feature is completely reliable before it is released; bugs relating to the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">with</span></code> and <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">yield</span> <span class="pre">from</span></code> features were still being fixed many years after they were released.</p> </section> <section id="long-term-stability-for-the-bytecode-interpreter"> <h3><a class="toc-backref" href="#long-term-stability-for-the-bytecode-interpreter" role="doc-backlink">Long term stability for the bytecode interpreter</a></h3> <p>Historically, new language features have been implemented by naive compilation of the AST into new, complex bytecode instructions. Those bytecodes have often had their own internal flow-control, performing operations that could, and should, have been done in the compiler.</p> <p>For example, until recently flow control within the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">try</span></code>-<code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">finally</span></code> and <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">with</span></code> statements was managed by complicated bytecodes with context-dependent semantics. The control flow within those statements is now implemented in the compiler, making the interpreter simpler and faster.</p> <p>By implementing new features as AST transformations, the existing compiler can generate the bytecode for a feature without having to modify the interpreter.</p> <p>A stable interpreter is necessary if we are to improve the performance and portability of the CPython VM.</p> </section> </section> <section id="rationale"> <h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#rationale" role="doc-backlink">Rationale</a></h2> <p>Python is both expressive and easy to learn; it is widely recognized as the easiest-to-learn, widely used programming language. However, it is not the most flexible. That title belongs to lisp.</p> <p>Because lisp is homoiconic, meaning that lisp programs are lisp data structures, lisp programs can be manipulated by lisp programs. Thus much of the language can be defined in itself.</p> <p>We would like that ability in Python, without the many parentheses that characterize lisp. Fortunately, homoiconicity is not needed for a language to be able to manipulate itself, all that is needed is the ability to manipulate programs after parsing, but before translation to an executable form.</p> <p>Python already has the components needed. The syntax tree of Python is available through the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">ast</span></code> module. All that is needed is a marker to tell the compiler that a macro is present, and the ability for the compiler to callback into user code to manipulate the AST.</p> </section> <section id="specification"> <h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#specification" role="doc-backlink">Specification</a></h2> <section id="syntax"> <h3><a class="toc-backref" href="#syntax" role="doc-backlink">Syntax</a></h3> <section id="lexical-analysis"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#lexical-analysis" role="doc-backlink">Lexical analysis</a></h4> <p>Any sequence of identifier characters followed by an exclamation point (exclamation mark, UK English) will be tokenized as a <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">MACRO_NAME</span></code>.</p> </section> <section id="statement-form"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#statement-form" role="doc-backlink">Statement form</a></h4> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span><span class="n">macro_stmt</span> <span class="o">=</span> <span class="n">MACRO_NAME</span> <span class="n">testlist</span> <span class="p">[</span> <span class="s2">"import"</span> <span class="n">NAME</span> <span class="p">]</span> <span class="p">[</span> <span class="s2">"as"</span> <span class="n">NAME</span> <span class="p">]</span> <span class="p">[</span> <span class="s2">":"</span> <span class="n">NEWLINE</span> <span class="n">suite</span> <span class="p">]</span> </pre></div> </div> </section> <section id="expression-form"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#expression-form" role="doc-backlink">Expression form</a></h4> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span><span class="n">macro_expr</span> <span class="o">=</span> <span class="n">MACRO_NAME</span> <span class="s2">"("</span> <span class="n">testlist</span> <span class="s2">")"</span> </pre></div> </div> </section> <section id="resolving-ambiguity"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#resolving-ambiguity" role="doc-backlink">Resolving ambiguity</a></h4> <p>The statement form of a macro takes precedence, so that the code <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">macro_name!(x)</span></code> will be parsed as a macro statement, not as an expression statement containing a macro expression.</p> </section> </section> <section id="semantics"> <h3><a class="toc-backref" href="#semantics" role="doc-backlink">Semantics</a></h3> <section id="compilation"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#compilation" role="doc-backlink">Compilation</a></h4> <p>Upon encountering a <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">macro</span></code> during translation to bytecode, the code generator will look up the macro processor registered for the macro, and pass the AST rooted at the macro to the processor function. The returned AST will then be substituted for the original tree.</p> <p>For macros with multiple names, several trees will be passed to the macro processor, but only one will be returned and substituted, shorting the enclosing block of statements.</p> <p>This process can be repeated, to enable macros to return AST nodes including other macros.</p> <p>The compiler will not look up a macro processor until that macro is reached, so that inner macros do not need to have processors registered. For example, in a <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">switch</span></code> macro, the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">case</span></code> and <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">default</span></code> macros wouldn’t need processors registered as they would be eliminated by the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">switch</span></code> processor.</p> <p>To enable definition of macros to be imported, the macros <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">import!</span></code> and <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">from!</span></code> are predefined. They support the following syntax:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span><span class="s2">"import!"</span> <span class="n">dotted_name</span> <span class="s2">"as"</span> <span class="n">name</span> <span class="s2">"from!"</span> <span class="n">dotted_name</span> <span class="s2">"import"</span> <span class="n">name</span> <span class="p">[</span> <span class="s2">"as"</span> <span class="n">name</span> <span class="p">]</span> </pre></div> </div> <p>The <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">import!</span></code> macro performs a compile-time import of <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">dotted_name</span></code> to find the macro processor, then registers it under <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">name</span></code> for the scope currently being compiled.</p> <p>The <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">from!</span></code> macro performs a compile-time import of <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">dotted_name.name</span></code> to find the macro processor, then registers it under <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">name</span></code> (using the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">name</span></code> following “as”, if present) for the scope currently being compiled.</p> <p>Note that, since <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">import!</span></code> and <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">from!</span></code> only define the macro for the scope in which the import is present, all uses of a macro must be preceded by an explicit <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">import!</span></code> or <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">from!</span></code> to improve clarity.</p> <p>For example, to import the macro “compile” from “my.compiler”:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>from! my.compiler import compile </pre></div> </div> </section> <section id="defining-macro-processors"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#defining-macro-processors" role="doc-backlink">Defining macro processors</a></h4> <p>A macro processor is defined by a four-tuple, consisting of <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">(func,</span> <span class="pre">kind,</span> <span class="pre">version,</span> <span class="pre">additional_names)</span></code>:</p> <ul class="simple"> <li><code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">func</span></code> must be a callable that takes <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">len(additional_names)+1</span></code> arguments, all of which are abstract syntax trees, and returns a single abstract syntax tree.</li> <li><code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">kind</span></code> must be one of the following:<ul> <li><code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">macros.STMT_MACRO</span></code>: A statement macro where the body of the macro is indented. This is the only form allowed to have additional names.</li> <li><code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">macros.SIBLING_MACRO</span></code>: A statement macro where the body of the macro is the next statement in the same block. The following statement is moved into the macro as its body.</li> <li><code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">macros.EXPR_MACRO</span></code>: An expression macro.</li> </ul> </li> <li><code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">version</span></code> is used to track versions of macros, so that generated bytecodes can be correctly cached. It must be an integer.</li> <li><code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">additional_names</span></code> are the names of the additional parts of the macro, and must be a tuple of strings.</li> </ul> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span># (func, _ast.STMT_MACRO, VERSION, ()) stmt_macro!: multi_statement_body # (func, _ast.SIBLING_MACRO, VERSION, ()) sibling_macro! single_statement_body # (func, _ast.EXPR_MACRO, VERSION, ()) x = expr_macro!(...) # (func, _ast.STMT_MACRO, VERSION, ("subsequent_macro_part",)) multi_part_macro!: multi_statement_body subsequent_macro_part!: multi_statement_body </pre></div> </div> <p>The compiler will check that the syntax used matches the declared kind.</p> <p>For convenience, the decorator <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">macro_processor</span></code> is provided in the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">macros</span></code> module to mark a function as a macro processor:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span><span class="k">def</span> <span class="nf">macro_processor</span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">kind</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="n">version</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="o">*</span><span class="n">additional_names</span><span class="p">):</span> <span class="k">def</span> <span class="nf">deco</span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">func</span><span class="p">):</span> <span class="k">return</span> <span class="n">func</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="n">kind</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="n">version</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="n">additional_names</span> <span class="k">return</span> <span class="n">deco</span> </pre></div> </div> <p>Which can be used to help declare macro processors, for example:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span><span class="nd">@macros</span><span class="o">.</span><span class="n">macro_processor</span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">macros</span><span class="o">.</span><span class="n">STMT_MACRO</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="mi">1_08</span><span class="p">)</span> <span class="k">def</span> <span class="nf">switch</span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">astnode</span><span class="p">):</span> <span class="o">...</span> </pre></div> </div> </section> <section id="ast-extensions"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#ast-extensions" role="doc-backlink">AST extensions</a></h4> <p>Two new AST nodes will be needed to express macros, <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">macro_stmt</span></code> and <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">macro_expr</span></code>.</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span><span class="k">class</span> <span class="nc">macro_stmt</span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">_ast</span><span class="o">.</span><span class="n">stmt</span><span class="p">):</span> <span class="n">_fields</span> <span class="o">=</span> <span class="s2">"name"</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="s2">"args"</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="s2">"importname"</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="s2">"asname"</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="s2">"body"</span> <span class="k">class</span> <span class="nc">macro_expr</span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">_ast</span><span class="o">.</span><span class="n">expr</span><span class="p">):</span> <span class="n">_fields</span> <span class="o">=</span> <span class="s2">"name"</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="s2">"args"</span> </pre></div> </div> <p>In addition, macro processors will need a means to express control flow or side-effecting code, that produces a value. A new AST node called <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">stmt_expr</span></code> will be added, combining a statement and an expression. This new ast node will be a subtype of <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">expr</span></code>, but include a statement to allow side effects. It will be compiled to bytecode by compiling the statement, then compiling the value.</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span><span class="k">class</span> <span class="nc">stmt_expr</span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">_ast</span><span class="o">.</span><span class="n">expr</span><span class="p">):</span> <span class="n">_fields</span> <span class="o">=</span> <span class="s2">"stmt"</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="s2">"value"</span> </pre></div> </div> </section> <section id="hygiene-and-debugging"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#hygiene-and-debugging" role="doc-backlink">Hygiene and debugging</a></h4> <p>Macro processors will often need to create new variables. Those variables need to named in such as way as to avoid contaminating the original code and other macros. No rules for naming will be enforced, but to ensure hygiene and help debugging, the following naming scheme is recommended:</p> <ul class="simple"> <li>All generated variable names should start with a <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">$</span></code></li> <li>Purely artificial variable names should start <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">$$mname</span></code> where <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">mname</span></code> is the name of the macro.</li> <li>Variables derived from real variables should start <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">$vname</span></code> where <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">vname</span></code> is the name of the variable.</li> <li>All variable names should include the line number and the column offset, separated by an underscore.</li> </ul> <p>Examples:</p> <ul class="simple"> <li>Purely generated name: <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">$$macro_17_0</span></code></li> <li>Name derived from a variable for an expression macro: <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">$var_12_5</span></code></li> </ul> </section> </section> <section id="examples"> <h3><a class="toc-backref" href="#examples" role="doc-backlink">Examples</a></h3> <section id="compile-time-checked-data-structures"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#compile-time-checked-data-structures" role="doc-backlink">Compile-time-checked data structures</a></h4> <p>It is common to encode tables of data in Python as large dictionaries. However, these can be hard to maintain and error prone. Macros allow such data to be written in a more readable format. Then, at compile time, the data can be verified and converted to an efficient format.</p> <p>For example, suppose we have a two dictionary literals mapping codes to names, and vice versa. This is error prone, as the dictionaries may have duplicate keys, or one table may not be the inverse of the other. A macro could generate the two mappings from a single table and, at the same time, verify that no duplicates are present.</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span><span class="n">color_to_code</span> <span class="o">=</span> <span class="p">{</span> <span class="s2">"red"</span><span class="p">:</span> <span class="mi">1</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="s2">"blue"</span><span class="p">:</span> <span class="mi">2</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="s2">"green"</span><span class="p">:</span> <span class="mi">3</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="p">}</span> <span class="n">code_to_color</span> <span class="o">=</span> <span class="p">{</span> <span class="mi">1</span><span class="p">:</span> <span class="s2">"red"</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="mi">2</span><span class="p">:</span> <span class="s2">"blue"</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="mi">3</span><span class="p">:</span> <span class="s2">"yellow"</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="c1"># error</span> <span class="p">}</span> </pre></div> </div> <p>would become:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>bijection! color_to_code, code_to_color: "red" = 1 "blue" = 2 "green" = 3 </pre></div> </div> </section> <section id="domain-specific-extensions"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#domain-specific-extensions" role="doc-backlink">Domain-specific extensions</a></h4> <p>Where I see macros having real value is in specific domains, not in general-purpose language features.</p> <p>For example, parsers. Here’s part of a parser definition for Python, using macros:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>choice! single_input: NEWLINE simple_stmt sequence!: compound_stmt NEWLINE </pre></div> </div> </section> <section id="compilers"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#compilers" role="doc-backlink">Compilers</a></h4> <p>Runtime compilers, such as <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">numba</span></code> have to reconstitute the Python source, or attempt to analyze the bytecode. It would be simpler and more reliable for them to get the AST directly:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>from! my.jit.library import jit jit! def func(): ... </pre></div> </div> </section> <section id="matching-symbolic-expressions"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#matching-symbolic-expressions" role="doc-backlink">Matching symbolic expressions</a></h4> <p>When matching something representing syntax, such a Python <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">ast</span></code> node, or a <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">sympy</span></code> expression, it is convenient to match against the actual syntax, not the data structure representing it. For example, a calculator could be implemented using a domain-specific macro for matching syntax:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>from! ast_matcher import match def calculate(node): if isinstance(node, Num): return node.n match! node: case! a + b: return calculate(a) + calculate(b) case! a - b: return calculate(a) - calculate(b) case! a * b: return calculate(a) * calculate(b) case! a / b: return calculate(a) / calculate(b) </pre></div> </div> <p>Which could be converted to:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>def calculate(node): if isinstance(node, Num): return node.n $$match_4_0 = node if isinstance($$match_4_0, _ast.Add): a, b = $$match_4_0.left, $$match_4_0.right return calculate(a) + calculate(b) elif isinstance($$match_4_0, _ast.Sub): a, b = $$match_4_0.left, $$match_4_0.right return calculate(a) - calculate(b) elif isinstance($$match_4_0, _ast.Mul): a, b = $$match_4_0.left, $$match_4_0.right return calculate(a) * calculate(b) elif isinstance($$match_4_0, _ast.Div): a, b = $$match_4_0.left, $$match_4_0.right return calculate(a) / calculate(b) </pre></div> </div> </section> <section id="zero-cost-markers-and-annotations"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#zero-cost-markers-and-annotations" role="doc-backlink">Zero-cost markers and annotations</a></h4> <p>Annotations, either decorators or <a class="pep reference internal" href="../pep-3107/" title="PEP 3107 – Function Annotations">PEP 3107</a> function annotations, have a runtime cost even if they serve only as markers for checkers or as documentation.</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span><span class="nd">@do_nothing_marker</span> <span class="k">def</span> <span class="nf">foo</span><span class="p">(</span><span class="o">...</span><span class="p">):</span> <span class="o">...</span> </pre></div> </div> <p>can be replaced with the zero-cost macro:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>do_nothing_marker!: def foo(...): ... </pre></div> </div> </section> <section id="prototyping-language-extensions"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#prototyping-language-extensions" role="doc-backlink">Prototyping language extensions</a></h4> <p>Although macros would be most valuable for domain-specific extensions, it is possible to demonstrate possible language extensions using macros.</p> <section id="f-strings"> <h5><a class="toc-backref" href="#f-strings" role="doc-backlink">f-strings:</a></h5> <p>The f-string <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">f"..."</span></code> could be implemented as macro as <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">f!("...")</span></code>. Not quite as nice to read, but would still be useful for experimenting with.</p> </section> <section id="try-finally-statement"> <h5><a class="toc-backref" href="#try-finally-statement" role="doc-backlink">Try finally statement:</a></h5> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>try_!: body finally!: closing </pre></div> </div> <p>Would be translated roughly as:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span><span class="k">try</span><span class="p">:</span> <span class="n">body</span> <span class="k">except</span><span class="p">:</span> <span class="n">closing</span> <span class="k">else</span><span class="p">:</span> <span class="n">closing</span> </pre></div> </div> <dl class="simple"> <dt>Note:</dt><dd>Care must be taken to handle returns, breaks and continues correctly. The above code is merely illustrative.</dd> </dl> </section> <section id="with-statement"> <h5><a class="toc-backref" href="#with-statement" role="doc-backlink">With statement:</a></h5> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>with! open(filename) as fd: return fd.read() </pre></div> </div> <p>The above would require handling <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">open</span></code> specially. An alternative that would be more explicit, would be:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>with! open!(filename) as fd: return fd.read() </pre></div> </div> </section> </section> <section id="macro-definition-macros"> <h4><a class="toc-backref" href="#macro-definition-macros" role="doc-backlink">Macro definition macros</a></h4> <p>Languages that have syntactic macros usually provide a macro for defining macros. This PEP intentionally does not do that, as it is not yet clear what a good design would be, and we want to allow the community to define their own macros.</p> <p>One possible form could be:</p> <div class="highlight-default notranslate"><div class="highlight"><pre><span></span>macro_def! name: input: ... # input pattern, defining meta-variables output: ... # output pattern, using meta-variables </pre></div> </div> </section> </section> </section> <section id="backwards-compatibility"> <h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#backwards-compatibility" role="doc-backlink">Backwards Compatibility</a></h2> <p>This PEP is fully backwards compatible.</p> </section> <section id="performance-implications"> <h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#performance-implications" role="doc-backlink">Performance Implications</a></h2> <p>For code that doesn’t use macros, there will be no effect on performance.</p> <p>For code that does use macros and has already been compiled to bytecode, there will be some slight overhead to check that the version of macros used to compile the code match the imported macro processors.</p> <p>For code that has not been compiled, or compiled with different versions of the macro processors, then there would be the usual overhead of bytecode compilation, plus any additional overhead of macro processing.</p> <p>It is worth noting that the speed of source to bytecode compilation is largely irrelevant for Python performance.</p> </section> <section id="implementation"> <h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#implementation" role="doc-backlink">Implementation</a></h2> <p>In order to allow transformation of the AST at compile time by Python code, all AST nodes in the compiler will have to be Python objects.</p> <p>To do that efficiently, will mean making all the nodes in the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">_ast</span></code> module immutable, so as not degrade performance by much. They will need to be immutable to guarantee that the AST remains a <em>tree</em> to avoid having to support cyclic GC. Making them immutable means they will not have a <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">__dict__</span></code> attribute, making them compact.</p> <p>AST nodes in the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">ast</span></code> module will remain mutable.</p> <p>Currently, all AST nodes are allocated using an arena allocator. Changing to use the standard allocator might slow compilation down a little, but has advantages in terms of maintenance, as much code can be deleted.</p> <section id="reference-implementation"> <h3><a class="toc-backref" href="#reference-implementation" role="doc-backlink">Reference Implementation</a></h3> <p>None as yet.</p> </section> </section> <section id="copyright"> <h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#copyright" role="doc-backlink">Copyright</a></h2> <p>This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive.</p> </section> </section> <hr class="docutils" /> <p>Source: <a class="reference external" href="https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0638.rst">https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0638.rst</a></p> <p>Last modified: <a class="reference external" href="https://github.com/python/peps/commits/main/peps/pep-0638.rst">2023-09-09 17:39:29 GMT</a></p> </article> <nav id="pep-sidebar"> <h2>Contents</h2> <ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#abstract">Abstract</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#motivation">Motivation</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#improving-the-expressiveness-of-libraries-for-specific-domains">Improving the expressiveness of libraries for specific domains</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#trialing-new-language-features">Trialing new language features</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#long-term-stability-for-the-bytecode-interpreter">Long term stability for the bytecode interpreter</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#rationale">Rationale</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#specification">Specification</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#syntax">Syntax</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#lexical-analysis">Lexical analysis</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#statement-form">Statement form</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#expression-form">Expression form</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#resolving-ambiguity">Resolving ambiguity</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#semantics">Semantics</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#compilation">Compilation</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#defining-macro-processors">Defining macro processors</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#ast-extensions">AST extensions</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#hygiene-and-debugging">Hygiene and debugging</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#examples">Examples</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#compile-time-checked-data-structures">Compile-time-checked data structures</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#domain-specific-extensions">Domain-specific extensions</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#compilers">Compilers</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#matching-symbolic-expressions">Matching symbolic expressions</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#zero-cost-markers-and-annotations">Zero-cost markers and annotations</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#prototyping-language-extensions">Prototyping language extensions</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#f-strings">f-strings:</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#try-finally-statement">Try finally statement:</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#with-statement">With statement:</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#macro-definition-macros">Macro definition macros</a></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#backwards-compatibility">Backwards Compatibility</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#performance-implications">Performance Implications</a></li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#implementation">Implementation</a><ul> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#reference-implementation">Reference Implementation</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a class="reference internal" href="#copyright">Copyright</a></li> </ul> <br> <a id="source" href="https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0638.rst">Page Source (GitHub)</a> </nav> </section> <script src="../_static/colour_scheme.js"></script> <script src="../_static/wrap_tables.js"></script> <script src="../_static/sticky_banner.js"></script> </body> </html>